Back to Authors

Li, Yan

0000-0002-3966-1610

Mayo Clinic

Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)

Citations 2

A study to assess the efficacy of enasidenib and risk-adapted addition of azacitidine in newly diagnosed IDH2 -mutant AML
Huang, Ying , Lance, Jennie Rachel, Mao, Hsiaoyin, Dunbar, Andrew , McNulty, Samantha N. , Baer, Maria R. , Kovacsovics, Tibor , Blum, William , Schiller, Gary J. , Olin, Rebecca L. , Foran, James M. , Litzow, Mark R. , Patel, Prapti A. , Boyiadzis, Michael , Collins, Robert H. , Chervin, Jordan , Vergilio, Jo‐Anne, Heerema, Nyla A. , Rosenberg, Leonard, Chen, Timothy L. , Yocum, Ashley O. , Druggan, Franchesca , Marcus, Sonja, Stefanos, Mona , Borate, Uma , Burd, Amy , Byrd, John C. , Stein, Eytan M. , Huang, Ying , Cai, Sheng F , Litzow, Mark R. , Lin, Tara L , Druker, Brian J , Mims, Alice S , Byrd, John C , Druley, Todd E. , Li, Yan , Stock, Wendy , Lin, Tara L. , Foster, Matthew C , Shoben, Abigail B. , Levine, Ross L.

Blood Advances | October 23, 2023 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 429-440

10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010563 Get It

Abstract Enasidenib (ENA) is an inhibitor of isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) approved for the treatment of patients with IDH2-mutant relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this phase 2/1b Beat AML substudy, we applied a risk-adapted approach to assess the efficacy of ENA monotherapy for patients aged ≥60 years with newly diagnosed IDH2-mutant AML in whom genomic profiling demonstrated that mutant IDH2 was in the dominant leukemic clone. Patients for whom ENA monotherapy did not induce a complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) enrolled in a phase 1b cohort with the addition of azacitidine. The phase 2 portion assessing the overall response to ENA alone demonstrated efficacy, with a composite complete response (cCR) rate (CR/CRi) of 46% in 60 evaluable patients. Seventeen patients subsequently transitioned to phase 1b combination therapy, with a cCR rate of 41% and 1 dose-limiting toxicity. Correlative studies highlight mechanisms of clonal elimination with differentiation therapy as well as therapeutic resistance. This study demonstrates both efficacy of ENA monotherapy in the upfront setting and feasibility and applicability of a risk-adapted approach to the upfront treatment of IDH2-mutant AML. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03013998.
Genetic Variants Associated with the Risk of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with and without Lung Cancer
Marks, Randolph S., Deschamps, Claude, Scanlon, Paul D., Olswold, Curtis L., Jiang, Ruoxiang , Swensen, Stephen J., Sun, Zhifu , Cunningham, Julie M. , Wampfler, Jason A. , Midthun, David E. , Andrade, Mariza de , Li, Yan , Limper, Andrew H. , Yang, Ping , Sun, Zhifu

Cancer Prevention Research | November 1, 2011 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 365-373

10.1158/1940-6207.capr-11-0243 Get It

Abstract Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a strong risk factor for lung cancer. Published studies about variations of genes encoding glutathione metabolism, DNA repair, and inflammatory response pathways in susceptibility to COPD were inconclusive. We evaluated 470 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) from 56 genes of these three pathways in 620 cases and 893 controls to identify susceptibility markers for COPD risk, using existing resources. We assessed SNP- and gene-level effects adjusting for sex, age, and smoking status. Differential genetic effects on disease risk with and without lung cancer were also assessed; cumulative risk models were established. Twenty-one SNPs were found to be significantly associated with risk of COPD (P < 0.01); gene-based analyses confirmed two genes (GCLC and GSS) and identified three additional genes (GSTO2, ERCC1, and RRM1). Carrying 12 high-risk alleles may increase risk by 2.7-fold; eight SNPs altered COPD risk without lung cancer by 3.1-fold and 4 SNPs altered the risk with lung cancer by 2.3-fold. Our findings indicate that multiple genetic variations in the three selected pathways contribute to COPD risk through GCLC, GSS, GSTO2, ERCC1, and RRM1 genes. Functional studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms of these genes in the development of COPD, lung cancer, or both. Cancer Prev Res; 5(3); 365–73. ©2011 AACR.