AbstractThe initial management of patients with suspected acute biliary infection starts with the measurement of vital signs to assess whether or not the situation is urgent. If the case is judged to be urgent, initial medical treatment should be started immediately including respiratory/circulatory management if required, without waiting for a definitive diagnosis. The patient's medical history is then taken; an abdominal examination is performed; blood tests, urinalysis, and diagnostic imaging are carried out; and a diagnosis is made using the diagnostic criteria for cholangitis/cholecystitis. Once the diagnosis has been confirmed, initial medical treatment should be started immediately, severity should be assessed according to the severity grading criteria for acute cholangitis/cholecystitis, and the patient's general status should be evaluated. For mild acute cholangitis, in most cases initial treatment including antibiotics is sufficient, and most patients do not require biliary drainage. However, biliary drainage should be considered if a patient does not respond to initial treatment. For moderate acute cholangitis, early endoscopic or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage is indicated. If the underlying etiology requires treatment, this should be provided after the patient's general condition has improved; endoscopic sphincterotomy and subsequent choledocholithotomy may be performed together with biliary drainage. For severe acute cholangitis, appropriate respiratory/circulatory management is required. Biliary drainage should be performed as soon as possible after the patient's general condition has been improved by initial treatment and respiratory/circulatory management. Free full articles and mobile app of TG18 are available at: http://www.jshbps.jp/modules/en/index.php?content_id=47. Related clinical questions and references are also included.
Tokyo Guidelines 2018: management strategies for gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis (with videos)
Abstract Since the publication of the Tokyo Guidelines in 2007 and their revision in 2013, appropriate management for acute cholecystitis has been more clearly established. Since the last revision, several manuscripts, especially for alternative endoscopic techniques, have been reported; therefore, additional evaluation and refinement of the 2013 Guidelines is required. We describe a standard drainage method for surgically high‐risk patients with acute cholecystitis and the latest developed endoscopic gallbladder drainage techniques described in the updated Tokyo Guidelines 2018 ( TG 18). Our study confirmed that percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage should be considered the first alternative to surgical intervention in surgically high‐risk patients with acute cholecystitis. Also, endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage or endoscopic ultrasound‐guided gallbladder drainage can be considered in high‐volume institutes by skilled endoscopists. In the endoscopic transpapillary approach, either endoscopic naso‐gallbladder drainage or gallbladder stenting can be considered for gallbladder drainage. We also introduce special techniques and the latest outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided gallbladder drainage studies. Free full articles and mobile app of TG18 are available at: http://www.jshbps.jp/modules/en/index.php?content_id=47 . Related clinical questions and references are also included.
Delphi consensus on bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an evolutionary cul‐de‐sac or the birth pangs of a new technical framework?
Abstract Bile duct injury ( BDI ) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains a serious iatrogenic surgical complication. BDI most often occurs as a result of misidentification of the anatomy; however, clinical evidence on its precise mechanism and surgeons’ perceptions is scarce. Surgeons from Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and the USA, etc. ( n = 614) participated in a questionnaire regarding their BDI experience and near‐misses; and perceptions on landmarks, intraoperative findings, and surgical techniques. Respondents voted for a Delphi process and graded each item on a five‐point scale. The consensus was built when ≥80% of overall responses were 4 or 5. Response rates for the first‐ and second‐round Delphi were 60.6% and 74.9%, respectively. Misidentification of local anatomy accounted for 76.2% of BDI . Final consensus was reached on: (1) Effective retraction of the gallbladder, (2) Always obtaining critical view of safety, and (3) Avoiding excessive use of electrocautery/clipping as vital procedures; and (4) Calot's triangle area and (5) Critical view of safety as important landmarks. For (6) Impacted gallstone and (7) Severe fibrosis/scarring in Calot's triangle, bail‐out procedures may be indicated. A consensus was reached among expert surgeons on relevant landmarks and intraoperative findings and appropriate surgical techniques to avoid BDI .
Silicone Oil–Induced Nasal Polyposis: A Case Report
Abstract Introduction: We and others have shown that pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs) in the tumor-associated stroma of PDAC promote tumor progression and resistance to therapy but the precise mechanisms are unclear. We investigated the role of PSC-derived DKK3, a member of the Dickkopf family of glycoproteins, in PDAC progression, metastasis and response to chemotherapy. Methods: We evaluated expression of DKK3 in human PDAC tissue and cell lines, human PSCs and in a genetically engineered mouse model (GEMM) of PDAC. The paracrine and autocrine effects of DKK3 on PDAC and PSCs were examined by treatment with exogenous DKK3 and gain- and loss of function assays for proliferation, migration, invasion, and gemcitabine-induced apoptosis. The effects of DKK3 on PDAC progression and metastasis were determined by shRNA neutralization and genetic ablation in orthotopic xenograft models and the KPC autochthonous model of PDAC. We developed novel monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against DKK3 and tested their ability to neutralize DKK3 and prolong survival in mouse models of PDAC. Results: DKK3 was expressed at 4.5 times higher levels in human PDAC by Affymetrix profiling compared to normal pancreas and was present in 99% (118/119) of samples on a tissue microarray with moderate to high expression in 59%. In a GEMM of PDAC, DKK3 appeared early with preneoplastic PanIN lesions with increased expression in invasive carcinoma. DKK3 was strongly expressed by PSCs with minimal to no expression in PDAC cells and knockdown by shRNA reduced PSC proliferation and migration by 60% and 84% compared to controls (p<0.001). Treatment of Panc1 and BxPC3 cells with DKK3 stimulated migration and invasion by 100-300% (p<0.001) and proliferation of DKK3-silenced Panc1 cells was decreased by 80% (p<0.001). Overexpression of DKK3 in L3.6pl cells increased colony formation in gemcitabine by >90% (p<0.001) with 65% reduction in apoptosis (p<0.01), indicating that DKK3 contributes to PDAC resistance to chemotherapy. When we ablated DKK3 in KPC mice by breeding with DKK3-knockout mice, tumor growth was inhibited and survival increased by 45% (p=0.0002). In addition, fewer PanIN lesions developed in DKK3-null mice suggesting that DKK3 may contribute to the early developmental stages of PDAC. DKK3 neutralizing mAbs abrogated DKK3-mediated induction of PDAC cell migration, invasion and resistance to gemcitabine in vitro. Furthermore, treatment with DKK3 mAb significantly inhibited primary tumor growth, reduced peritoneal metastases and prolonged survival in an orthotopic model of PDAC by 43% compared to control mAb (p=0.005; HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.01-0.30). Conclusions: These data are the first report, to our knowledge, of a tumor-promoting function of DKK3 and our results suggest that neutralization of DKK3 may be an effective approach as a primary treatment for PDAC and to enhance responsiveness to chemotherapy. Citation Format: Liran Zhou, Hongmei Husted, Todd Moore, Mason Lu, Defeng Deng, Yan Liu, Vijaya Ramachandran, Thiruvengadam Arumugam, Baoan Ji, Huamin Wang, Jeffrey E. Lee, Craig D. Logsdon, Rosa F. Hwang. Targeting stromal-derived Dickkopf-3 (DKK3) for the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2961. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-2961
Polycystic Kidney Disease without an Apparent Family History
The absence of a positive family history (PFH) in 10%–25% of patients poses a diagnostic challenge for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). In the Toronto Genetic Epidemiology Study of Polycystic Kidney Disease, 210 affected probands underwent renal function testing, abdominal imaging, and comprehensive PKD1 and PKD2 mutation screening. From this cohort, we reviewed all patients with and without an apparent family history, examined their parental medical records, and performed renal imaging in all available parents of unknown disease status. Subsequent reclassification of 209 analyzed patients revealed 72.2% (151 of 209) with a PFH, 15.3% (32 of 209) with de novo disease, 10.5% (22 of 209) with an indeterminate family history, and 1.9% (four of 209) with PFH in retrospect. Among the patients with de novo cases, we found two families with germline mosaicism and one family with somatic mosaicism. Additionally, analysis of renal imaging revealed that 16.3% (34 of 209) of patients displayed atypical PKD, most of which followed one of three patterns: asymmetric or focal PKD with PFH and an identified PKD1 or PKD2 mutation (15 of 34), asymmetric and de novo PKD with proven or suspected somatic mosaicism (seven of 34), or focal PKD without any identifiable PKD1 or PKD2 mutation (eight of 34). In conclusion, PKD without an apparent family history may be due to de novo disease, missing parental medical records, germline or somatic mosaicism, or mild disease from hypomorphic PKD1 and PKD2 mutations. Furthermore, mutations of a newly identified gene for ADPKD, GANAB , and somatic mosaicism need to be considered in the mutation-negative patients with focal disease.
BRCA2
Hypomorphic Missense Variants Confer Moderate Risks of Breast Cancer