Citations

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is the most common invasive cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in women. Approximately 20% of breast cancer tumors overexpress human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), which is associated with an aggressive clinical phenotype and with a poorer prognosis. The development of trastuzumab, an immunoglobulin G monoclonal antibody directed against HER2, has changed the treatment paradigm for this disease. However, approximately 15-20% still does not respond to anti-HER2 therapy. Furthermore, despite advances in the management of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, response rate varies greatly, with most patients eventually succumbing to their disease. It is crucial to develop additional therapeutic strategies to improve outcomes for HER2 positive patients, especially those with tumors that do not respond to anti-HER2 therapy. METHODS and RESULTS: Using HER2+ breast cancer cell lines, we found that an USP7 inhibitor, P5091, dramatically sensitized cancer cells to HER2 inhibitor, trastuzumab treatment. To confirm it in vivo, we tested the drug combination in BT474 xenografts and found P5091 and trastuzumab synergistically suppressed tumor growth. Furthermore, using trastuzumab resistant HER2+ breast cancer cell line, we found that USP7 inhibitor, P5091, can dramatically re-sensitize trastuzumab-resistant BT474 cell line to trastuzumab treatment both in vitro and in vivo. More importantly, using patient derived xenograft (PDX) HER2+ models, we confirmed the synergistic combination effect of P5091 and trastuzumab. Mechanistically, USP7 inhibitor, P5091 led to significantly increased degradation of all four HER family members (HER1-4). When we knocked down USP7 by RNA interference or small hairpin RNA (shRNA), we observed similar substantial decrease in HER family member proteins. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated the feasibility of using USP7 inhibitor P5091 to sensitize HER2+ breast cancers to trastuzumab treatment. These results provide a rationale for the use of combination therapy of USP7 inhibitors and HER2 inhibitors to treat HER2+ breast cancer. This combination therapy might also be effective in other cancers with upregulated HER signaling, such as GI cancer, lung cancer or ovarian cancer. Citation Format: Jia Yu, Bo Qin, Judy Boughey, Matthew Goetz, Liewei Wang. The role of USP7 and USP7 inhibitor in HER2+ breast cancer treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2980.

Abstract Background: I-SPY2 is a multicenter, Phase II trial using response-adaptive randomization within biomarker subtypes to evaluate novel agents as neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk at least T2N0 breast cancer. The primary endpoint is pathologic complete response (pCR) at surgery. The goal is to identify regimens that have ≥ 85% Bayesian predictive probability of success in a 300-patient phase 3 neoadjuvant trial defined by hormone-receptor (HR) and HER2 status, and MammaPrint (MP). Regimens may leave the trial for futility (< 10% probability of success), maximum sample size accrual (with probability of success ≥ 10% and < 85%), or as recommended by the independent DSMB. For HER2- subjects the control arm is weekly paclitaxel x12 then doxorubicin & cyclophosphamide (AC) q2-3 weeks x4. For this arm, paclitaxel was omitted and replaced with maximum tolerated dose PARPi talazoparib with synergy dosed irinotecan (25mg/m2). Paclitaxel could be given adjuvantly for these subjects and non-responding subjects could be taken off of experimental therapy. Methods: Women with tumors ≥ 2.5cm were eligible for screening. MP low/HR+ tumors were ineligible. MRI scans (baseline, 3 cycles after start of therapy, prior to AC, and prior to surgery) were used in a longitudinal statistical model to predict pCR for individual patients. Talazoparib was given at 1mg daily with 25mg/m2 irinotecan q2wks. Analysis was intention to treat. Subjects who switched to non-protocol therapy count as non-pCR. Subjects on experimental therapy at time of arm closure are non-evaluable. Talazoparib/irinotecan (TI) was open only to HER2- tumors and eligible for graduation in 3 of 10 pre-defined signatures: HER2-, HR+HER2- and HR-/HER2-. Results: TI did not meet criteria for graduation and was stopped at the recommendation of the DSMB based on expectations of limited activity beyond that seen with standard treatment. Maximum sample size had been reached at the time of this recommendation and subjects currently receiving TI were allowed to continue or change to standard therapy. Exploratory “as treated” analysis for response in gBRCA mutation carriers showed 6/10 gBRCA carriers attained a pCR in the TI arm. Except for 1 patient these gBRCA pCR subjects had >90% tumor reduction by MRI after TI and prior to AC (range: 68-96%). In the TI arm pCR rates were also higher in subjects with a PARPi7-High/MP2 gene expression signature (0.344 vs 0.146). Expected differences in toxicity were seen between arms including g3/4 peripheral neuropathy on control therapy which included paclitaxel (2.6% vs none) and g3/4 neutropenia with TI (30.2% vs 8.2%). Notably gBRCA mutation carriers receiving TI had higher rates of g3/4 neutropenia (60% vs 25.9%). Conclusion: The I-SPY2 study finds the probability that investigational regimens will be successful in a Phase III neoadjuvant trial; TI did not reach the efficacy threshold of 85% probability of success in Phase III in any of the 3 signatures. However by adding talazoparib with synergy dosed irinotecan we were able to omit paclitaxel and observe similar estimated pCR rates. This informs current work to evolve the I-SPY2 trial design to reduce toxicity without compromising outcomes and develop successful combinations targeted to biology, including DNA repair deficiency. Citation Format: Richard Schwab, Amy S. Clark, Christina Yau, Nola Hylton, Wen Li, Denise Wolfe, A Jo Chien, Anne M. Wallace, Andres Forero-Torres, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Rita Nanda, Nora Jaskowiak, Judy Boughey, Tufia Haddad, Heather S. Han, Catherine Lee, Kathy Albain, Claudine Isaacs, Anthony D. Elias, Erin D. Ellis, Payal Shah, Julie E. Lang, Janice Lu, Debasish Tripathy, Kathleen Kemmer, Douglas Yee, Barbara Haley, Melanie Majure, Erin Roesch, Christos Vaklavas, Cheryl Ewing, Teresa Helsten, W Fraser Symmans, Jane Perlmutter, Hope S. Rugo, Michelle Melisko, Amy Wilson, Ruby Singhrao, Laura van 't Veer, Angela DeMichele, Smita Asare, Don Berry, Laura J. Esserman. Evaluation of talazoparib in combination with irinotecan in early stage, high-risk HER2 negative breast cancer: Results from the I-SPY 2 TRIAL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT136.

6526 Background: Most patients diagnosed with breast cancer turn to the Internet to learn about their diagnosis; however, information online is often generic, challenging to navigate, and not expert-curated. To facilitate patient education and engagement in our breast clinic, we piloted the implementation of pre-visit education via brief microlearning videos organized within an online platform. Methods: Seventeen videos of 2-4 minute duration were developed by multidisciplinary content experts. Videos covered a variety of educational topics relevant to breast cancer, including treatment options. Patients received a link via email to create an account, which provided access to the platform. Aggregate viewing data and optional patient surveys (online after viewing 3 videos and at the clinical appointment) were used to assess opt-in rates, engagement, and satisfaction. Results: Between September 2018 and January 2019, 57.4% (240/418) of women with biopsy proven breast cancer who were sent an email invitation registered on the platform. On average, patients watched 11 of the 17 videos, with 93.7% of users (225/240) viewing at least one. Overall, 85% (168/198) of women recommend the microlearning format for patient education. The most-viewed video topics included types of breast cancer, breast abnormality and biopsy, understanding biopsy results, tumor markers, and staging. Seventy-eight percent (154/198) of women reported that they planned to share the videos with family or caregivers, and 67% (133/198) felt that the educational content increased their satisfaction with their overall experience. Barriers to video access were emails marked as junk, not having an email address, and difficulties with videos loading. Conclusions: The majority of patients participating in this pilot registered on the platform and watched pre-visit microlearning educational videos. These expert-curated videos contributed to high levels of satisfaction and engagement. Strategies to overcome barriers to access will be developed to expand the reach of this new valuable component of breast cancer care.

TPS4162 Background: 4-10% of PDAC patients harbor pathogenic germline variants in cancer susceptibility genes, including APC, ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDKN2A, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PALB2, PMS2, STK11, and TP53. For families with such pathogenic variants, the greatest potential impact of germline testing is to identify relatives with the same pathogenic variant (cascade testing), thereby providing the opportunity for early detection and cancer interception of PDAC and other associated malignancies. Numerous factors limit cascade testing in real-world practice, including family dynamics, widespread geographic distribution of relatives, access to genetic services, and misconceptions about the importance of germline testing, such that the preventive benefits of cascade testing are often not fully realized. The primary aim of this study is to analyze two alternative strategies for cascade testing in families with inherited PDAC susceptibility. Methods: 1000 individuals (from approximately 200 families) with a confirmed pathogenic germline variant in any of the above genes in a 1st/2nd degree relative and a 1st/2nd degree relative with PDAC will be remotely enrolled through the study website (www.generatestudy.org) and randomized between two different methods of cascade testing (individuals with prior genetic testing will be ineligible): Arm 1 will undergo pre-test genetic education with a pre-recorded video and live interactive session with a genetic counselor via a web-based telemedicine platform (Doxy.me), followed by germline testing through Color Genomics; Arm 2 will undergo germline testing through Color Genomics without dedicated pre-test genetic education. Color Genomics will disclose results to study personnel and directly to participants in both arms. Participants in both arms will have the option of pursuing additional telephone-based genetic counseling through Color Genomics. The primary outcome will be uptake of cascade testing. Secondary outcomes will include participant self-reported genetic knowledge, cancer worry, distress, decisional preparedness, familial communication, and screening uptake, which will be measured via longitudinal surveys. Enrollment will begin February, 2019. Clinical trial information: NCT03762590.

1527 Background: Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing (PROMPT) is an online registry for individuals who have had multiplex panel testing for cancer susceptibility. The main objective of this registry is to ascertain families to allow penetrance calculations for mutations in less well characterized genes. Methods: Since September 2014, health care providers and commercial laboratories have given PROMPT information with the test results to eligible individuals. Participants with pathogenic mutations or variants of unknown significance in cancer susceptibility genes have self-enrolled in PROMPT. We have sent annual follow-up surveys to participants to capture updated personal and family histories, additional genetic testing in the family, and changes in cancer screening patterns. Results: To date, 5800 participants have enrolled in PROMPT and 2321 follow-up surveys are completed. Of those eligible for follow-up, 1980 (44%) have completed at least one survey. 134 (5.8%) reported a new cancer diagnosis since baseline. Breast cancer (37, 27.6%) and non-Melanoma skin cancer (35, 26.2%) were the most commonly reported new diagnoses. 5.7% of participants with an ATM variant, 5.2% of those with a BRCA2 variant, and 4.3% of those with a CHEK2 variant and at least one follow-up survey have reported a new primary cancer diagnosis (excluding non-Melanoma skin cancer). In addition, 70 (3%) participants reported a cancer recurrence since time of last follow-up. Bone (9, 12.9%) and liver (8, 11.4%) were the most common recurrence sites. 12.7% of those with a TP53 variant, 7.1% of those with a BARD1 variant, and 3.3% of those with an ATM variant and at least one follow-up survey have reported a recurrence. 59 (2.5%) participants had additional clinical genetic testing, and 555 (24%) participants reported clinical genetic testing of family members. Conclusions: PROMPT collects updated health information from participants to achieve the primary goal of determining cancer incidence among carriers of different mutations. Moreover, PROMPT has increased participant contacts through use of annual follow-up surveys and gene-specific surveys with subsets of participants. Ongoing efforts include obtaining pathology reports of new and recurrent cancer diagnoses on study.