Citations

Abstract Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), accounting for approximately 30% of all NHL cases. DLBCL diagnosis relies on histologic examination, immunophenotyping, molecular and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis to differentiate it from similar NHL subtypes with overlapping morphological features, including more high-grade lymphomas like double-hit lymphoma. Because FISH is performed in a panel of single- or dual-target test format and analyzed through microscopy and manual image analysis, assessment of multiple target biomarkers can be cumbersome and expensive. As additional biomarkers for diagnosis, subtyping, prognosis, and therapeutic decision-making become available, target panels will become larger, posing additional challenges to clinical laboratories. Patients and Methods In this study, Hi-C sequencing of FFPE samples was performed to identify all genomic rearrangements by a single sequencing analysis for an unselected DLBCL case series of 159 patients, and the results were compared to FISH for the detection of clinically important variants. Results Hi-C sequencing showed superior performance compared to FISH: standard FISH for DLBCL includes testing for MYC, BCL2, and BCL6. Between FISH and Hi-C, these biomarkers were detected 105 times, of which, FISH detected 80/105 (76%) and Hi-C detected 102/105 (97%). The cohort included 4 double-hit lymphomas by FISH but Hi-C sequencing detected five. Besides DLBCL diagnostic biomarkers (MYC, BCL2, BCL6), many additional biomarkers were detected by Hi-C sequencing including variants not tested by FISH because the clinical suspicion was ambiguous and the relevant FISH probes were not used, and those not tested because the biomarkers were not thought to be common and, hence, left out of the FISH panel. In total, Hi-C sequencing detected additional biomarkers in 42 (26%) cases, including (1) variants targeted by FISH (i.e. MYC, BCL2, BCL6) but negative, (2) classification biomarkers for other lymphomas (CCND1, MALT, IRF4), and (3) those not tested because the biomarkers are not common and not included in the FISH panel. These additional biomarkers were supportive of suspected diagnosis of DLBCL versus double-hit lymphoma (24 cases), prompted reconsideration of a different diagnosis that may have led to different treatments (6 cases, e.g. mantle cell lymphoma), or biomarkers such as PDL1, ALK, and ATM which have implications for targeted therapies and/or inclusion in clinical trials (5 cases). Conclusion The Hi-C FFPE sequencing technology has the potential to improve the workflow of pathology labs for detection of a wide range of structural variants informing precision diagnosis and treatment for lymphomas.

Abstract Introduction: Idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD) is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by systemic inflammation of unknown etiology. Clinically, iMCD is classified into idiopathic plasmacytic lymphadenopathy (IPL), thrombocytopenia, anasarca, fever, renal dysfunction/reticulin fibrosis, and organomegaly (TAFRO), and not otherwise specified (NOS) subtypes. Among these, TAFRO and a subset of NOS cases share overlapping clinicopathological features and often follow a fatal clinical course. However, the pathogenesis remains largely undefined. This study combines a comprehensive transcriptomic analysis with histological assessment, focusing on vascular proliferation to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of the TAFRO subtype. Methods: We conducted a pathological analysis of nine IPL, nine TAFRO, and eight NOS cases, and performed transcriptome analysis from frozen lymph node specimens from 12, two, and four IPL, TAFRO, and NOS cases, respectively. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and KEGG pathway analysis were performed to identify significant pathways in TAFRO and NOS, with IPL cases as controls. Results: Histologically, TAFRO and NOS exhibited a significantly higher degree of vascularization than IPL (IPL vs TAFRO: p < 0.001, IPL vs NOS: p = 0.002). In addition, “whirlpool vessels” in GCs were seen in most cases in TAFRO and NOS (TAFRO: 9/9, 100%, NOS: 6/8, 75%), but not in IPL (IPL vs TAFRO: p < 0.001, IPL vs NOS: p = 0.007). Immunostaining for Ets-related gene revealed that the number of endothelial cells of TAFRO and NOS was significantly larger than that in IPL (TAFRO vs IPL: p < 0.001, NOS vs IPL: p = 0.002). KEGG pathway analysis revealed the PI3K–Akt signaling pathway was significantly enriched in the TAFRO/NOS groups. Immunohistochemistry of phosphorylated Akt and phosphorylated p38, both upstream and downstream effectors of the PI3K–Akt signaling pathway, were positive in vascular endothelial cells of TAFRO and NOS. Discussion: TAFRO and NOS exhibit marked angiogenesis and are histologically distinct from IPL. Furthermore, this angiogenesis is thought to be driven by upregulation of the PI3K–Akt signaling pathway, which may also contribute to extravascular fluid leakage, potentially leading to pleural and ascitic effusion or systemic edema observed in the TAFRO subtype. Conclusion: The present results suggest the crucial role of PI3K–Akt signaling pathway in TAFRO pathogenesis from transcriptomic and histopathological findings. This mechanistic insight may help elucidate the distinct pathogenesis of iMCD subtypes.

Abstract Background Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a very rare histiocytic/dendritic cell neoplasm driven by mutations in genes of the MAPK pathway, such as BRAFV600E. Its clinical presentation is highly heterogeneous, and data on its natural history and prognosis in large cohorts are limited. Here, we investigated the clinical features and outcomes of a very large international cohort of patients with ECD. Methods We included patients diagnosed with ECD between 1990 and 2024, followed at 13 referral centers in Europe and the Americas, who had available clinical and follow-up data (with a minimal follow-up duration of 6 months). We analyzed the clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes, and sought to identify predictors of survival. The study was conceived and conducted within the ECD Global Alliance network. Results A total of 1044 patients with ECD were included. The median age at diagnosis was 57 years (IQR 46-66), and the male-to-female ratio was 2.2. The median age at the first ECD manifestation was 55 years (IQR 43-65). Bone pain (20%), kidney and urinary manifestations (18%), and diabetes insipidus (11%) were the most frequently reported initial features. The median number of involved sites was 4 (IQR 3-6), most frequently including the long bones (n=768, 74%), the retroperitoneum, (n=605, 58%), the periaortic space (n=449, 43%), the CNS (n=368, 35%), the facial/orbit area (n=347, 33%), and the heart (n=334, 32%). Among 955 tested patients, 572 (60%) harbored the BRAFV600E mutation, and 86 (9%) a MAP2K1 mutation. Clinical and/or pathology overlap with Langerhans cell histiocytosis and Rosai-Dorfman-Destombes disease was observed in 115 (11%) and 42 (4%) patients, respectively. Clonal hematopoiesis was identified in 217 of 556 tested patients (39%), and a history of second cancer was reported in 272 patients (26%), including both solid (14%) and hematologic (12%) neoplasms. First-line treatment mostly included interferon-alpha (n=342, 33%) and BRAFi/MEKi (n=314, 30%), while second- and third-line treatments mostly consisted of BRAFi/MEKi (55% and 63%, respectively). After a median follow-up of 51 months (IQR 20-89), 222 (21%) patients died; causes of death were related to ECD in almost half of the patients (n=101). A multivariate Cox regression model identified the following factors as significantly associated with increased mortality: older age (HR 1.058, 95%CI 1.033-1.083; p<0.001), pseudo-neurodegenerative lesions (HR 2.280, 95%CI 1.337-3.891; p=0.022), elevated CRP at diagnosis (HR 2.574, 95%CI 1.024-6.467; p=0.044), and second hematologic cancer (HR 2.639, 95%CI 1.602-4.348; p<0.001). Conclusions Despite advances in treatments over the last decade, ECD remains associated with substantial mortality. Age, neurodegenerative lesions, elevated CRP levels, and the presence of a second hematologic cancer are the main predictors of poor survival.

Abstract Introduction: The CARTITUDE-4 (NCT04181827) trial compared cilta-cel, a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell treatment (tx) targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), with 2 standard-of-care regimens in patients (pts) with RRMM and 1–3 prior lines of therapy (LOT). Cilta-cel significantly improved overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55) and progression-free survival (PFS; HR 0.29). The DREAMM-7 (NCT04246047) and DREAMM-8 (NCT04484623) trials evaluated belamaf, an anti-BCMA antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone (BVd) and with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (BPd), respectively. Both trials demonstrated improved survival and response rates with belamaf in pts with ≥1 prior LOT. International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) guidance for RRMM tx recommends using anti-BCMA T-cell redirecting therapy (TCRT), such as CAR-T (eg, cilta-cel), before anti-BCMA ADCs (eg, belamaf). As cilta-cel and belamaf have not been compared head to head, we conducted unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) to estimate relative efficacies using CARTITUDE-4 study individual patient data (IPD) and published data from DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8. Methods: Unanchored MAICs were performed using IPD from apheresed pts in the CARTITUDE-4 cilta-cel arm. Eligibility criteriafrom DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8 were applied to the cilta-cel cohort. Further adjustments were made by weighting cilta-cel IPDto match reported baseline characteristics (including refractory status [for DREAMM-8], cytogenetic risk, International Staging System stage, and presence of extramedullary disease) from DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8. Outcomes were compared using weighted IPD for cilta-cel and reported response rates and simulated IPD based on published Kaplan–Meier PFS curves for BVd and BPd. For each matched population, we compared PFS, ORR, and very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) and complete response or better (≥CR) rates. A weighted Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate PFS HRs and 95% CIs. A weighted logistic regression analysis was used to derive relative response ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs to compare relative tx effects. Results: The MAICs included 208 apheresed pts from CARTITUDE-4 (cilta-cel), 243 pts from DREAMM-7 (BVd), and 155 pts from DREAMM-8 (BPd). To form comparable cohorts, we excluded cilta-cel pts who would not have been eligible for DREAMM-7 (n=87) or DREAMM-8 (n=55). Cilta-cel pts were most commonly excluded from the DREAMM-7 MAIC due to bortezomib refractoriness or anti-CD38 refractoriness (n=55 and n=50, respectively), and from the DREAMM-8 MAIC due to bortezomib refractoriness (n=55). After exclusions, 121 and 153 cilta-cel pts remained in the MAICs with BVd and BPd, respectively. After adjustment, cilta-cel was associated with significantly lower risk of progression or death compared with BVd (HR 0.46 [95% CI 0.28–0.75]; P=0.0020) and BPd (HR 0.61 [95% CI 0.39–0.96]; P=0.0320). ORR was significantly higher with cilta-cel vs BVd (92.9% vs 82.7%; RR 1.12 [95% CI 1.03–1.22]; P=0.0087) and vs BPd (89.3% vs 77.4%; RR 1.15 [95% CI 1.04–1.29]; P=0.0100). Rates of ≥VGPR and ≥CR were also higher with cilta-cel vs BVd (≥VGPR: 89.7% vs 65.8%; RR 1.36 [95% CI 1.21–1.53]; ≥CR: 86.0% vs 34.6%; RR 2.49 [95% CI 2.04–3.03]; both P<0.0001) and vs BPd (≥VGPR: 86.6% vs 63.9%; RR 1.36 [95% CI 1.18–1.56]; ≥CR: 81.8% vs 40.0%; RR 2.05 [95% CI 1.65–2.53]; both P<0.0001). Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the adjusted comparisons and showed statistically significant PFS and tx response benefits with cilta-cel vs BVd and BPd. Conclusions: These MAICs demonstrated superior PFS and response rates with cilta-cel compared with 2 belamaf-containing regimens (BVd and BPd). Results should be interpreted with caution as there were substantial differences in the pt populations of CARTITUDE-4 vs DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8. However, adjusted cilta-cel cohort sizes remained large enough for robust comparisons that showed statistically significant differences across efficacy outcomes. Another limitation is the remaining potential unmeasured residual confounding differences. Nonetheless, these findings support IMWG guidance recommending anti-BCMA TCRTs prior to ADCs and provide valuable comparative evidence in the absence of head-to-head trials.

Abstract Introduction: Indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM) is a clonal mast cell disease driven by the KIT D816V mutation in ~95% of cases and is associated with symptoms of mast cell activation and tissue infiltration. It can cause chronic, debilitating symptoms − including life-threatening anaphylaxis and impaired bone health. While historically most patients have relied on symptom-directed best supportive care (BSC) therapies, avapritinib is used as a new standard of care targeting KIT D816V, the primary driver for SM. Avapritinib is an oral, potent, selective KIT D816V inhibitor, and the first and only approved targeted therapy for adult patients with ISM in the USA and the EU. Approval was based on results from the phase 2 PIONEER trial. Here, we present the findings from ~3.5-year long-term follow-up. Methods: Adults with centrally confirmed ISM and uncontrolled moderate-to-severe symptoms who completed the randomized dose-finding (Part 1), or randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (Part 2) portions of PIONEER (NCT03731260) rolled over to the open-label, long-term extension (Part 3). This cumulative analysis includes patients who initiated avapritinib at the recommended dose of 25 mg once daily (QD) in either Parts 1, 2, or 3. All patients received BSC. Per investigator discretion and based on disease burden, dose titration up to 50 mg QD of avapritinib was permitted in Part 3. Long-term efficacy was assessed by measuring changes in symptoms and QoL, using the ISM-Symptom Assessment Form (ISM-SAF; ©2018 Blueprint Medicines, a Sanofi Company) and the Mastocytosis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (MC-QoL). Safety was also assessed. Results: Overall, 226 patients initiated avapritinib 25mg QD across Parts 1, 2, and 3. This longer-term analysis is inclusive of 65 patients who dose titrated from 25 mg to 50 mg QD in Part 3. Median (range) treatment duration was 40.0 months (0.7‒67.2) as of February 21, 2025. Longer-term efficacy data with ~3.5 years of follow-up demonstrated sustained disease-related symptom improvements. The mean change (standard deviation [SD]) in total symptom score (TSS, per ISM-SAF), was −19.80 (19.81) at Week 144 (Month 33) and −20.43 (20.57) at Week 168 (Month 39) from a baseline of 48.08 (19.47). Additionally, avapritinib-treated patients demonstrated durable improvement in their most severe symptoms (mean change [SD] from baseline of −3.35 [3.02] at Month 33 and −3.47 [3.19] at Month 39) per ISM-SAF. Sustained responses were observed across all individual symptom domains (0–30) with mean changes (SD) at Month 33 and Month 39 of −3.77 (5.52) and −3.84 (6.05) for the gastrointestinal domain, −8.21 (7.70) and −8.20 (7.85) for the skin domain, and −4.66 (6.24) and −4.87 (6.51) for the neurocognitive domain. The mean percent change (SD) in MC-QoL was −34.67 (40.16) at Month 33 and −40.72 (33.24) at Month 39 from a baseline of 54.24 (18.32). Treatment with avapritinib was well tolerated, and its safety profile was similar to the previously reported placebo-controlled portion. Most treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were Grades 1–2, and 7% of patients experienced Grade ≥3 TRAEs of which diarrhea, neutrophil count decrease, and weight increase occurred in >1 patient. No Grade ≥3 TRAEs of increase in transaminases were observed. Edema (peripheral and periorbital), the most frequently reported TRAE, was mostly Grade 1 and occurred most frequently during the first 3–4 months of treatment. Three patients (1%) experienced serious adverse events assessed as treatment related. However, none led to treatment discontinuation and no trends were observed. After approximately 3.5 years of follow-up, low rates of treatment discontinuations (n=7, 3%) due to TRAEs were observed. Conclusion: Longer follow-up of patients with ISM treated on the PIONEER trial, including some on avapritinib for up to 5 years, demonstrates that prolonged avapritinib therapy continues to be effective and well tolerated. Additional prospective analyses will be needed to determine effects of selective KIT D816V-inhibition on anaphylaxis. These data support a favorable benefit-risk profile of avapritinib as a chronic treatment for adult patients with ISM.

Abstract Introduction: Standardized reporting of clinical trials results for MDS is essential to improve clinical interpretation and cross-study comparison. However, reporting of patient characteristics, response criteria, and endpoints in publications is often inconsistent; there is no systemic analysis of MDS trial reporting available. We conducted a systematic review of published MDS trial manuscripts on behalf of the international consortium for MDS (icMDS) to assess variability in reporting practices. Methods We searched ClinicalTrials.gov to identify all clinical trials registered for adults (≥18 years) with MDS that reported results between 2015-2024. Clinical trials that included acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) were included if they enrolled ≥5 MDS patients. We excluded trials without an MDS cohort; non-therapeutic trials; trials focused on transplant interventions; or those which enrolled solid malignancies or other hematologic malignancies (chronic myeloid leukemia or lymphoid diseases). Finally, trials were required to have a manuscript available on Larvol, PubMed, or Google Scholar. Trials were categorized by disease risk (lower-risk [LR] vs. higher-risk [HR]) and trial phase (early phase [EP] vs. late phase [LP]). Results We identified 502 MDS trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, of which 351 did not meet inclusion criteria and 79 lacked a manuscript. A total of 72 trials (32 EP, 40 LP) with 80 publications (34 EP, 46 LP) were analyzed. Frequently reported baseline characteristics included age (100% EP, 100% LP), disease risk (74% EP, 74% LP), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (85% EP, 72% LP), prior treatments (71% EP, 67% LP), and RBC transfusion dependency (32% EP, 70% LP). Less frequently reported characteristics included blood counts (hemoglobin [Hb; 38% EP, 54% LP], platelet count [38% EP, 54% LP], neutrophil count [24% EP and LP]) and bone marrow blasts (29% EP, 43% LP). Although disease risk was widely reported, definitions varied: IPSS and IPSS-R were each reported in 54% of manuscripts, while IPSS-M appeared in only 3%. Cytogenetic risk was separately reported in 39% of manuscripts (38% EP, 39% LP), and mutational data in 45% (47% EP, 43% LP). Responses per IWG 2006 criteria were reported in 84% of manuscripts. The primary endpoint involved safety/tolerability in 85% of EP manuscripts, though definitions were variable; recommended phase 2 dose was the most common (26% of EP manuscripts). In LP trials, primary endpoints were risk-specific: transfusion independence (TI) in 77% of LR, overall response rate (ORR) in 28% of HR, and complete remission (CR) or overall survival (OS) in 22% of HR. In HR manuscripts, CR was reported in 100%, ORR in 73%, hematologic improvement (HI) in 48%, RBC-TI in 23%, and OS in 80%. However, seven different definitions were used for ORR: CR + marrow CR + partial remission + HI per IWG 2006 was most common (35%). Event-free survival was reported in 25%; progression-free survival and relapse-free survival in 13%; and leukemia-free survival in 5%. Early mortality rate was reported in 35% (18% EP, 56% LP) and transplant rate in 58% (50% EP, 67% LP). Only 47% of HR and 90% of LR manuscripts identified HI-eligible patients. In LR-MDS, RBC-TI was reported in 72% of manuscripts but used six definitions. The most common were RBC-TI ≥8 weeks at any time during treatment (24%), ≥8 weeks within 28 weeks of treatment (13%), ≥8 weeks with Hb increase ≥1.0 (4%), ≥12 weeks with Hb increase ≥1.5 (4%), and ≥16 weeks within 24 weeks of treatment (12%). The remainder did not report RBC-TI, did not define it, or used a custom definition not used in another trial. HI was reported in 80% of LR papers with most of those reporting HI using IWG 2006 criteria (90%). Conclusion Reporting of baseline characteristics, response criteria, and outcomes is inconsistent in MDS clinical trials, with wide variability in response definitions, including ORR and TI. This heterogeneity limits interpretability, hampers historical comparisons and may obscure efficacy signals. Our findings highlight the need for standardized reporting guidelines to ensure clarity and consistency in MDS trial publications. As a next phase of this effort, we will conduct a formal Delphi process among icMDS experts to establish consensus recommendations for minimal and optimal MDS clinical trial reporting in manuscripts by disease risk (LR/HR) and trial phase (EP/LP).

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second-most common hematological malignancy in the United States. Myeloma tumors have significant genetic heterogeneity that impacts disease progression and promotes resistance to treatment. RAS is a key oncogenic driver that activates the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathways..Mutations in genes that code for RAS isozymes, KRAS, HRAS, or NRAS, lead to increased levels of activated GTP-RAS and are associated with the most aggressive forms of cancer. Mutations in the RAS family of genes are most common (40-50%) in myeloma. We and others have reported that RAS mutations may not be disease-initiating but rather arise during disease progression and relapse or as subclonal events that impart selective growth advantage and emerging drug resistance. In addition, non-mutant RAS can also be hyperactivated from upstream signaling (like receptor tyrosine kinases) or loss-of-function mutations in GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs). Given the importance of RAS mutations, allele-specific RAS inhibitors have long been considered an attractive strategy for myeloma treatment. However, multiple studies have reported various mechanisms of resistance to allele-specific RAS inhibitors as well as isoform-specific pan-RAS inhibitors, including newly acquired activating RAS mutations, RAS amplification, unchecked activation of co-expressed wild-type RAS (WT-RAS) isozymes, or acquired bypass mechanisms like new oncogenic fusions. Since MM remains incurable, we sought to improve upon currently available treatments by developing small-molecule inhibitors that preferentially inhibit myeloma cells with activated RAS isozymes. We have created NRasQ61X and KRasG12X mutations by CRISPR-Cas directed edits in a single endogenous RAS allele in human myeloma cell lines (HMCLs) that initially had two wild-type alleles. We found that these mutant-NRAS and mutant-KRAS edited cells have increased proliferation compared to cells with WT-RAS, as well as acquired resistance to several commonly used therapeutics. In this study, we used a triangulation method that combines our drug combination candidate prediction algorithm called ‘secDrug’ and the ‘Direct to Drug’ screening platform that evaluated 84 FDA-approved oncology drugs and emerging therapeutics in these RAS mutant myeloma lines. We identified BIRC5 as a potential target for RAS-mutant myeloma. BIRC5 expression is a key mechanism for the evasion of apoptosis. Notably, oncogenic RAS has been shown to promote MYC stabilization via upregulation of BIRC5. Earlier studies suggested that BIRC5 inhibitors are potent in targeting drug-resistant subclones in hematological malignancies. We performed in vitro cytotoxicity studies and cell-based assays using an in-house panel of HMCLs (n>50) representing WT- and mutant-RAS, as well as innate and acquired response/resistance to the standard of care drugs, proteasome inhibitors (PIs) and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), to confirm the potency of novel selective BIRC5 inhibitors, as single agent (IC50 range 0.22-15.30 nM; Mean 4.431±1.041 nM) and in combination with PIs and IMiDs (Chou-Talalay's Combination Index or CI <0.3, indicating strong synergism). Further, we used bulk and single-cell whole-transcriptomics, siRNA-mediated gene knockdown studies, and functional validation to characterize the treatment-induced genes and molecular pathways underpinning the mechanism of action and drug synergy at the subclone level. Finally, we compared the efficacy of these BIRC5 inhibitors against several RAS inhibitors, including cyclorasin B4-27, a bicyclic peptidyl pan-RAS inhibitor, RMC-6236, a multi-selective noncovalent RAS(on) inhibitor, and ADT-007, a novel, highly potent, and selective pan-RAS inhibitor that we have synthesized, and observed comparable effects on cell death and apoptosis. Ex vivo analysis in bone marrow-derived CD138+ cells from myeloma patients using high-throughput Mass Cytometry (CyTOF or Cytometry by Time-Of-Flight) confirmed the dose-dependent reduction of MCL1, Ki-67, CCND1, c-KIT, and MYC. We will present these results that demonstrate the clinical potential of BIRC5 inhibitors as novel candidates in curbing progression and drug resistance in RAS-mutant myeloma.

Abstract Introduction: Cilta-cel is approved in the US and the EU for the treatment of patients (pts) with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma (MM) after ≥1 prior line of therapy (pLOT), including a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory agent based on the CARTITUDE-1 (CART-1, NCT03548207) and CARTITUDE-4 (CART-4, NCT04181827) studies. Cilta-cel led to deep and durable responses and significant survival benefit in pts with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) after ≥3 pLOT in CART-1. In CART-4, cilta-cel led to a significant overall survival benefit with a higher proportion of pts achieving deep, sustained minimal residual disease negativity vs standard of care in pts with lenalidomide-refractory MM after 1–3 pLOT. We investigated the mechanism of action of cilta-cel by correlating biomarkers from peripheral blood and the bone marrow TME with progression-free survival (PFS) and number of pLOT in pts with RRMM from CART-1 and CART-4. Methods: Biomarker analyses were performed using peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirates (BMAs) collected in both CART-1 and CART-4 studies. Immunophenotyping by flow cytometry was performed using peripheral blood at baseline/time of apheresis in samples from both studies. Immune fitness at baseline was assessed in pts by pLOT and in association with PFS. Gene set enrichment scores were derived from RNA sequencing data of the TME using BMAs. Mixed-effects models were used to identify signatures/pathways modulated over time (day [D] 28 and at 6 months [mo] post infusion vs screening) and in association with PFS and pLOT. Results: In total, 176 CART-4 and 97 CART-1 pts received cilta-cel as study treatment. Immunophenotyping data were available from 248 peripheral blood samples (1 pLOT, n=56; 2 pLOT, n=61; ≥3 pLOT, n=131). At apheresis, CD4+ naïve T cells (%) were higher in pts with 1 or 2 pLOT, compared with those with ≥3 pLOT, while no difference was found in pts with ≥3 pLOT with further breakdown (i.e., 3–4 vs 5–6 vs ≥7 pLOT). Further, higher baseline levels of CD4+ naïve T cells were associated with longer PFS. These data suggest that the negative impact on peripheral immune fitness with the addition of LOT may plateau when pts have received ≥3 pLOT. TME gene expression data were available from 148 BMA samples (screening, n=50; D28, n=50; 6 mo, n=48) from CART-4. Analyses of gene expression signatures suggest depletion of B cells and antibodies at D28 post cilta-cel infusion, with partial recovery at 6 mo. This was corroborated in parallel by flow cytometry and immunoglobulin quantification. Further, elevated expression of genes associated with myeloid cells, including tumor-associated macrophages (TAM, likely M1), and of genes associated with cytotoxic T cells were also observed at D28. Elevated expression of genes associated with B-cell receptors, T-cell differentiation and activation, and cytokine signaling pathways were found at both D28 and 6 mo. Pts with longer PFS (>18 mo) had higher levels of M1 TAM at D28, while those with shorter PFS had higher levels of regulatory T cells and more suppressed interferon pathway genes at 6 mo, suggesting that relapse may be associated with a more suppressive immune response. In pts with fewer pLOT, more profound B-cell depletion on D28, better recovery at 6 mo, and elevated B-cell receptor signaling were inferred from gene expression data. Pts with 1 pLOT also demonstrated higher elevation of M1 TAM expression on D28 from screening as compared with pts with 3 pLOT, similar to what was observed in pts with longer PFS. Conclusions: Correlative biomarker data suggest that longer PFS is associated with better immune fitness at baseline and stronger immune responses post cilta-cel infusion, as observed in peripheral blood and within the TME of pts with RRMM in CART-1 and CART-4. The peripheral immune fitness was more pronounced in pts with 1 and 2 pLOT vs 3 pLOT and beyond, where deterioration plateaued. This suggests the impact of T-cell immune fitness on PFS may be limited beyond the third LOT. Importantly, other covariates, including factors within the immune TME and tumor burden, may play a significant role in balancing this compromised intrinsic T-cell immune fitness at apheresis, thereby contributing to PFS durability after 3 pLOT. Overall, these results support increased benefits in treating pts with MM with cilta-cel in earlier LOTs.

Abstract Background: Systemic mastocytosis (SM) comprises a spectrum of subtypes characterized by neoplastic mast cell (MC) infiltration of tissues and release of MC mediators. Non-advanced SM (NonAdvSM), including indolent SM (ISM), smoldering SM (SSM), and bone marrow mastocytosis (BMM) subtypes, is the most prevalent form of SM. NonAdvSM can be associated with debilitating symptomology which can significantly impair quality of life. The gain-of-function somatic KIT c.2447 C>T (p.D816V) mutation is found in up to 95% of patients with SM. Bezuclastinib (CGT9486) is an oral, potent, and selective type 1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity against KIT D816V. Results from Summit (NCT05186753) Part 1 informed the recommended phase 2 dose (100 mg QD bezuclastinib) for Part 2. We report topline results from the 24-week assessment of Summit Part 2. Methods: Summit is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled Phase 2 trial of bezuclastinib in patients with NonAdvSM who had inadequate symptom control despite best supportive care (BSC) medications. The primary endpoint was 24-week mean change from baseline in Mastocytosis Symptom Severity Daily Diary (MS2D2) total symptom score (TSS) (range 0–110), which is a fit-for-purpose patient-reported outcome measure of NonAdvSM symptom severity. Key secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients with ≥50% reduction in serum tryptase, KIT p.D816V variant allele frequency (VAF), bone marrow (BM) MC burden, and MS2D2 TSS, ≥30% TSS reduction. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive 100mg QD bezuclastinib + BSC or PBO + BSC. Results: As of May 22, 2025, 179 patients were enrolled in Part 2: 119 were randomized to receive bezuclastinib and 60 to placebo. Patients enrolled were representative of the NonAdvSM population with moderate to severe symptoms. Median age (range) was 51 (23-78) years; 65.9% female; mean (SD) baseline MS2D2 TSS 55.6 (19.8); 82% of patients had ISM, 11% had BMM, and 7% had smoldering SSM. At baseline, median (range) KIT p.D816V VAF in whole blood, BM MC burden, and serum tryptase was 0.25% (0-34%), 10% (1-75%), and 40 (6-692) ng/mL, respectively. Bezuclastinib demonstrated statistically significant superiority to placebo on all primary and key secondary endpoints. At Week 24, bezuclastinib led to significantly greater symptom improvement vs placebo (LS mean [95% CI] MS2D2 TSS change: –24.3 [–27.6 to –21.1] vs –15.4 [–19.6 to –11.2]; placebo-adjusted difference: –8.9 points; P=0.0002). A ≥50% reduction in serum tryptase was achieved in 87.4% of bezuclastinib-treated patients vs 0% on placebo (P<0.0001). Significantly more patients receiving bezuclastinib achieved ≥50% reductions in KIT D816V VAF, serum tryptase, BM MCs (P<0.0001), MS2D2 TSS (P=0.01), and ≥30% reduction in MS2D2 TSS (P=0.0004). Most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were low grade (gr; 70% Gr 1) and reversible. The most common TEAEs (≥10%) in any treatment group and occurring in greater frequency in the bezuclastinib arm were hair color changes (69.5% vs 5.0%), altered taste (23.7% vs 0%), nausea (22.0% vs 13.3%), increased ALT/AST (22.0% vs 6.6%), headache (17.8% vs 11.7%), alopecia (11.9% vs 3.3%), and increased ALP (10.2% vs 3.3%). TEAEs (≥10%) that occurred more often in the placebo group were diarrhea (13% vs 18%), dizziness (10% vs 12%), fatigue (7% vs 12%), and arthralgia (6% vs 15%). ALT/AST elevations ≥Gr 3 were experienced by 5.9% of patients. The only hepatic adverse events (AEs) reported were transient lab abnormalities; none required hospitalization. Treatment-related AEs requiring dose reductions occurred in 11% of patients receiving bezuclastinib. All discontinuations (5.9%) due to treatment-related AEs were due to transaminase elevations; all fully resolved. Conclusions: At 24-weeks, bezuclastinib 100 mg QD demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvements in symptom burden and biomarkers of disease vs placebo in patients with NonAdvSM. The treatment was generally well-tolerated and effective across a population that is representative of the real-world NonAdvSM population, including SSM. These results support the use of bezuclastinib to reduce SM burden and symptoms in pts with NonAdvSM, and a potentially disease-modifying impact.

Abstract Consumption of a Western diet and high body mass index (BMI) are risk factors for progression from premalignant phenotypes to multiple myeloma, a hematologic cancer. In the NUTRIVENTION trial (NCT04920084), we administered a high-fiber, plant-based diet (HFPBD; meals for 12 weeks, coaching for 24 weeks) to 23 participants with myeloma precursor states and elevated BMI. The intervention was feasible and improved quality of life and modifiable risk factors: metabolic (BMI, insulin resistance), microbiome (diversity, composition), and immune (inflammation, monocyte subsets). Disease progression trajectory improved (n = 2) or was stable. Findings were translated to Vk*MYC mice modeling the myeloma precursor state, in which a high-fiber diet (HFD) delayed disease progression through improved metabolism and microbiome composition, leading to increased short-chain fatty acid production that reinvigorated antitumor immunity and inhibited tumor growth. These effects from fiber consumption were independent of calorie restriction and weight loss. A HFD is a low-risk intervention that may delay progression to myeloma. Significance: A HFPBD in participants with precursor plasma cell disorders and an elevated BMI improved metabolic, microbiome, and immune biomarkers of disease. In a subset, it may delay progression to myeloma. In mouse models, a HFD delayed progression to myeloma independent of calorie restriction. See related commentary by Fairfield and Reagan, p. 623