Citations

Abstract Description Background Castration-resistant prostate cancers (CRPC) do not respond to immunotherapy.1,2 Prostate cancer-derived immune factors (IF) like sPD-L1 drive immunosuppression and resistance.3 Circulating tumor-reactive T cells (TTR; CD8+CD11ahigh) and other immune subsets predict progression-free survival in oligometastatic CRPC after radiotherapy.4 A better understanding of the levels and changes in IF in CRPC—a tumor immune “circulome”—may lead to better immunotherapeutic approaches. Methods 79 men with oligometastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer were treated with radiation and blood was collected before and after treatment (NCT02816983). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were subjected to immunophenotyping, and plasma was subjected to the Olink Explore panel assay measuring levels of 5,416 IFs using a proximity extension assay technology. Results High baseline soluble levels of PD-L1, PD-L2, TIM-3, and other selected immunotherapy-related IFs predicted inferior outcomes, including overall survival. Conversely, high soluble CTLA-4 levels strongly predicted superior outcomes (p < 0.0001). These results additionally correlated with changes in circulating tumor-reactive (TTR) T cells in these patients. Discussion IF influence systemic immunity in CRPC. These results suggest a multifactorial mechanism by which prostate cancers drive systemic immunosuppression and resistance to immunotherapy. Ongoing efforts to address IFs may help overcome CRPC immunotherapy resistance.5 Funding Sources Department of Defense HT9425-24-1-0622, An Atlas of the Tumor Immune Circulome (PI: Orme) Prostate Cancer Foundation Young Investigator Award (PI: Orme) National Cancer Institute K12 CA90628-23 (PI: Orme) Topic Categories Tumor Immunology: Checkpoints, Prevention, and Treatment (TIPT)

ABSTRACT We present the case of a 28‐year‐old right‐handed woman with medically refractory focal epilepsy. Her seizure semiology and electroencephalography (EEG) indicated a seizure onset zone in the right central‐parietal area. However, both MRI and PET scans were unremarkable, showing no focal lesions or areas of altered metabolism. Intracranial monitoring, with extensive evaluation of both hemispheres, confirmed the seizure onset zone in the right central‐parietal region. This area not only served as the site of seizure onset but also encompassed the primary sensory cortex.

Abstract Background The RefleXion X1 is a novel PET/CT‐guided ring gantry linac that introduces unique geometry and workflow compared to conventional systems. Existing QA guidelines (AAPM TG‐142, 148, 306) cover standard linacs and tomotherapy but do not address this platform's needs. Therefore, an automated daily QA solution is required to ensure accurate output, imaging guidance, and couch positioning, which motivated the development and evaluation of the workflow presented in this study. Purpose To develop and evaluate an automated, efficient, and comprehensive daily quality assurance (QA) workflow for a novel PET/CT‐guided ring gantry linear accelerator (RefleXion X1), incorporating tests for dosimetry, imaging guidance, and couch positioning accuracy. Methods An IMRT QA plan was designed following the CT scan of the TomoDose 2D diode detector array (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, FL) within the RefleXion treatment planning system (TPS). Several spherical targets of varying sizes were contoured to conform the dose distribution to these targets and evaluate beam output, laser localization, profile constancy, and CT‐MV isocenter coincidence. Linear models correlating spatial location of dose peak with intentional shifts in different directions were developed and integrated into an in‐house analysis software, iQA, written in C#. The software was validated for robustness and successfully implemented in clinical practice. Results Validation with 42 intentional shifts showed submillimeter accuracy, with mean deviations of 0.2 mm (X), 0.1 mm (Y), and 0.79 mm (Z), and R 2 values ≥ 0.98. Over 1 year, daily QA data showed stable output constancy (1.006 ± 0.016), left/right target dose constancy (1.007 ± 0.005 and 0.996 ± 0.004), and consistent CT‐MV isocenter offsets (–0.335 ± 0.23 mm in X, 0.19 ± 0.19 mm in Y, and –0.544 ± 0.36 mm in Z). The software also detected a gradual output drift in between, prompting a timely linac adjustment. Conclusion This fully automated, single‐delivery QA workflow enables efficient and robust evaluation of multiple IGRT performance parameters. It improves standardization, reduces human error, and reliably monitors long‐term machine stability. The tools and methodology may be adopted by other clinics seeking a practical and automated daily QA solution. Future developments will focus on incorporating PET QA and rotational couch validations to further enhance the system's comprehensiveness and adaptability.

Abstract Objectives Pivotal trials have established the effectiveness of the Responsive Neurostimulation System (RNS® System) in treating focal epilepsy. In clinical trials, depth leads were primarily used to treat mesial temporal seizure onsets while cortical strip leads were used to treat neocortical seizure onsets. Here, we systematically analyze the safety and efficacy of stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG)‐guided depth leads to provide responsive stimulation to neocortical gray matter. Methods Patients were stratified as strong responders (>median cohort seizure reduction %), weak responders (>0% and ≤median cohort seizure reduction %), and anti‐responders (≤0%) based on percent seizure reduction at 1 year post‐implant (1‐Y). Pre‐operative T1‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging and post‐operative computed tomography images were merged, and the Euclidean distance between the sEEG epileptic focus (sEEG‐EF) and the nearest RNS System depth lead contacts was calculated. Results A total of 87 depth leads were implanted in 55 patients across neocortical brain regions. The median reduction in clinical seizures improved from 66.7% at 1‐Y to 77.5% at long‐term follow‐up (LTFU: 2.35 ± 0.95 years), with 10 patients (18.2%) achieving complete seizure freedom. Seven patients (12.7%) experienced six serious adverse events. At 1‐Y, shorter Euclidean distance between the sEEG‐EF and RNS System depth leads predicted improved seizure outcome in strong responders ( β = −0.84, p = 0.008) but not in weak responders ( β = 0.21, p = 0.9) or anti‐responders ( β = −20.34, p = 0.11). At LTFU, there was no significant relationship between Euclidean distance and seizure reduction in strong responders ( β = 0.77, p = 0.18), weak responders ( β = 2.05, p = 0.54), or anti‐responders ( β = 0.24, p = 0.99). Exploratory analyses at 1‐Y showed nominal associations between older age ( ρ = 0.32), longer epilepsy duration ( ρ = 0.27), and non‐mesial temporal sEEG‐EFs and greater seizure reduction; however, none survived Bonferroni correction (adjusted α = 0.0027; all post‐correction p > 0.0027), and no associations were observed at LTFU. Significance In this series, neocortical depth leads for RNS therapy had favorable safety and efficacy and proximity to the sEEG‐EF drove initial outcomes for strong responders to RNS therapy. Plain Language Summary In this multi‐center study, patients with difficult‐to‐treat seizures received brain‐responsive stimulation using a device called responsive neurostimulation (RNS), which delivers small electrical pulses to reduce seizures. We focused on patients treated with electrodes placed in the brain's outer regions (the neocortex) and guided by a mapping procedure called sEEG. On average, patients had their seizures cut by two‐thirds after one year and by more than three‐quarters with longer follow‐up, with about one in five becoming seizure‐free. The treatment was safe, and closer electrode placement to the seizure source helped explain early—but not long‐term—improvements.

Abstract The brain avidly consumes glucose to fuel neurophysiology. Cancers of the brain, such as glioblastoma (GBM), relinquish physiological integrity and gain the ability to proliferate and invade healthy tissue. How brain cancers rewire glucose utilization to drive aggressive growth remains elusive. Here, we infused 13C-labeled glucose into patients and mice with brain cancer, coupled with quantitative metabolic flux analysis, to map the fates of glucose-derived carbon in tumor vs. cortex. Through the first direct and comprehensive measurements of carbon and nitrogen labeling in both cortex and glioma tissues, we uncover profound metabolic transformations. In human cortex, glucose carbons fuel essential physiologic processes including TCA cycle oxidation and neurotransmitter synthesis. Conversely, gliomas downregulate these processes and scavenge alternative carbon sources such as amino acids from the environment, repurposing glucose-derived carbons to generate molecules needed for proliferation and invasion. Targeting this metabolic rewiring in mice through dietary amino acid modulation selectively alters GBM metabolism, slows tumor growth, and augments the efficacy of standard-of-care treatments. These findings illuminate how aggressive brain tumors exploit glucose to suppress normal physiological activity in favor of malignant expansion and offer potential therapeutic strategies to enhance treatment outcomes.

Abstract There are no approved treatments for relapsed/refractory (R/R) PCNSL. We show promising efficacy in the salvage setting using emavusertib in combination with ibrutinib, which targets the BCR and TLR pathways. These 2 major pathways are associated with activation of NF-κB. Updated safety and efficacy data of this combination in R/R PCNSL from the ongoing Phase 1/2 TakeAim Lymphoma trial (NCT03328078) will be presented. As of 01 May 2025, 33 patients with R/R PCNSL were treated with emavusertib in combination with ibrutinib. Eligible patients receive emavusertib in combination with ibrutinib until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. Median age was 63 years (range 43-81); 16 patients were male. Median prior anti-cancer therapy was 2 (range 1-5); 26 (78.8%) patients had prior BTKi exposure. Median duration of emavusertib/ibrutinib treatment was 51 days (range 5-798). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 11 (33.3%) patients; neutropenia in 5 (15.2%) patients, amylase increased, lipase increased, and leukopenia in 2 (6.1%) patients each. The majority of Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs were reversible and manageable. Among the 19 BTKi-experienced patients treated for ≥ 28 days, there were 5 CRs and 2 PRs, with an ORR of 36.8%. Three patients with CR were on treatment for 10+ mos, with 1 CR patient ongoing with DOT of 26.2+ mos. Among the 5 BTKi-naïve patients treated for ≥ 28 days, 1 achieved CR and 3 had PR, with ORR of 80%; the CR patient is ongoing with DOT of 18.1+ mos. The ORR in the combined population was 45.8% (6 CRs; 5 PRs). The combination of emavusertib and ibrutinib demonstrates promising clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile in patients with R/R PCNSL. This regimen appears capable of overcoming resistance to prior BTKi therapy. Patient enrollment in this trial continues.

The treatment landscape of invasive early-stage and metastatic breast cancer is evolving constantly. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent updates included in the most recent version (version 5.2025) of the NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer specific to workup, locoregional therapy, surveillance, and systemic neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy recommendations for invasive, nonmetastatic breast cancer.

The NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer provide a framework on which to base decisions for patients with prostate cancer across the disease spectrum. The Guidelines sections included in this article focus on metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and metastatic CRPC (mCRPC). For patients with mCSPC, disease characteristics, such as whether metastases arose synchronously or metachronously and the degree of metastatic burden, impact therapy decisions, including how much treatment intensification is appropriate and when prostate-directed and/or metastasis-directed therapy should be considered. In the mCRPC setting, androgen deprivation therapy is continued with the sequential or concurrent addition of certain androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, chemotherapies, immunotherapies, radiopharmaceuticals, and/or targeted therapies. The NCCN Prostate Cancer Panel emphasizes a shared decision-making approach in all disease settings based on patient preferences, prior treatment exposures, biomarkers, the extent and location of metastases, symptoms, and potential side effects.