Citations

Background: Tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) organization fundamentally shapes cancer progression and immunotherapy outcomes. Traditional 2D spatial molecular approaches inadequately capture the complex three-dimensional architecture and cellular interactions within TIME. We developed an AI-driven platform integrating multiple spatial molecular datasets, enabling comprehensive 3D visualization for therapeutic discovery and patient selection. Methods: Our platform combines holotomography imaging, providing 3D refractive index maps, with diverse spatial molecular data: in situ molecular imaging, spatial proteomics, multiplex immunohistochemistry, and spatial transcriptomics. AI algorithms align datasets within a unified 3D coordinate system, while Poisson implicit surface reconstruction generates subcellular-resolution models. Platform validation used clinical samples from immunotherapy-treated patients. Results: The platform integrated multimodal spatial data into high-resolution 3D TIME representations, revealing novel relationships between protein expression, transcriptional patterns, and cellular architecture. 3D surface protein analysis with subcellular morphology identified patients with target protein expression outside tight junctions, indicating higher risk for adverse effects from antibody-drug conjugates and cellular therapies. This insight, unavailable through 2D analysis, enabled precise patient selection. Conclusions: This platform provides detailed subcellular-resolution TIME architecture analysis, offering actionable insights for therapeutic targeting, biomarker discovery, and patient selection. AI-driven 3D spatial multimodal TIME analysis advances precision medicine across multiple therapeutic approaches, including immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and drug delivery optimization. AI Disclosure: Original abstract content was written by the authors. Claude was used for editorial assistance and formatting without altering the scientific content or context of the work. Citation Format: Inyeop Jang, Yoonho Choi, Minji Kim, Jeonghwan Park, Jiyeon Sung, Byungsoo Ann, Clemenceau R. Jean, TaeHyun Hwang. AI-enabled 3D multimodal integration platform reveals subcellular architecture of tumor immune microenvironment for therapeutic target and biomarker discovery and patient selection [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 3648.

Abstract Background: Understanding the spatiotemporal dynamics of the tumor microenvironment (TME) during treatment is crucial for improving outcomes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study presents a pre-planned spatiotemporal analysis from a phase II trial evaluating neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX in resectable PDAC, aimed at elucidating treatment resistance mechanisms and identifying predictive biomarkers. Methods: This multi-institutional, single-arm phase II trial enrolled treatment-naïve patients with histologically confirmed resectable PDAC (NCT05066802) who underwent six cycles of neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was the R0 resection rate. Matched pre-treatment tumor biopsies and post-treatment surgical specimens were analyzed from selected responders (R) and non-responders (NR) using high-resolution spatial transcriptomics (10X Genomics Visium). This approach enabled comprehensive mapping of TME evolution and treatment-induced changes. Results: Between May 2020 and February 2022, 27 patients were enrolled. Of these, 24 patients underwent surgery after neoadjuvant treatment (resection rate: 88.9%), and 23 achieved R0 resection (85.2%), meeting the primary endpoint. However, 20 resected patients (83.3%) recurred. Spatiotemporal analysis was performed on matched samples from four R and four NR. In pre-treatment samples from NR group, clusters dominated by fibroblasts (enriched for ECM, EMT, and CAF phenotypes) and B cell subtypes were distinct compared to R group, which exhibited elevated antibody responses and robust T cell and macrophage activity. NR samples showed increased IgM expression but lacked corresponding Fc receptors, suggesting limited immune effector function. Post-treatment NR surgical specimens displayed elevated expression of MUC5AC and CEACAM6 in malignant ductal cells, alongside genes promoting tumor growth. Neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX increased fibroblast, while reducing immune cell components. NR tumors formed distinct "resistance niches" after chemotherapy, marked by ECM production, CAF activation, and RTK signaling. Conversely, R tumors showed enhanced epithelial organization with increased type-I hemidesmosome complexes facilitating epithelial adhesion to the basement membrane. Conclusion: Three months of neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX was feasible and tolerable for resectable PDAC but associated with high recurrence rate, emphasizing the need for better patient selection. Spatiotemporal analysis revealed critical differences in TME dynamics according to treatment response, including the emergence of resistance niches and distinct pre-treatment spatial signatures. These findings support the integration of spatial biology into future pancreatic cancer trials to improve stratification and therapy. Citation Format: Choong-kun Lee, Changjin Hong, Ho Kyoung Hwang, Min Hwan Kim, Jean Rene Clemenceau, Seock-Jin Chung, Isabel Barnfather, Sumanth Reddy Nakkireddy, Jeong Hwan Park, Ji-Youn Sung, Minji Kim, Yooho Choi, Inyeop Jang, Sunho Park, Sung Hyun Kim, Chang Moo Kang, Hye Jin Choi, Tae Hyun Hwang. Spatiotemporal evolution of the tumor microenvironment predicts treatment response in phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 771.

PURPOSE To investigate the clinical behavior of breast cancer in young BRCA carriers according to the specific BRCA gene ( BRCA1 v BRCA2 ) and the association of the timing of genetic testing (before v at diagnosis) with prognosis. METHODS This was an international, multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective cohort study that included 4,752 patients harboring germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1 or BRCA2 , who were diagnosed with stage I-III invasive breast cancer at 40 years or younger between January 2000 and December 2020 in 78 centers worldwide (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03673306 ). RESULTS Compared with BRCA2 carriers (n = 1,683), BRCA1 carriers (n = 3,069) had more frequently hormone receptor–negative (74.4% v 15.5%) and high-grade (77.5% v 49.1%) tumors. Similar outcomes were observed in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers but with a different pattern and risk of disease-free survival events over time. Compared with patients tested for BRCA at diagnosis (ie, between 2 months before and up to 6 months after diagnosis; n = 1,671), those tested before diagnosis (ie, any time up to 2 months before diagnosis; n = 411) had smaller tumors (T1: 61.3% v 32.4%), less nodal involvement (N0: 65.9% v 50.8%), less frequently received chemotherapy (84.4% v 92.9%), and axillary dissection (37.5% v 47.4%). Patients tested before diagnosis had better overall survival (OS; unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.61 [95% CI, 0.40 to 0.92]); however, this result lost statistical significance after adjustment for potential confounders including tumor stage (adjusted HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.47 to 1.15]). CONCLUSION This global study provides evidence on the different clinical behavior of breast cancer in young BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Identifying a BRCA PV in healthy individuals was associated with earlier-stage breast cancer diagnosis and lower treatment burden, as well as better unadjusted OS.

Abstract Background: DNMT3A and TET2 are epigenetic regulator genes commonly mutated in age-related clonal hematopoiesis (CH). Despite having opposed epigenetic functions, these mutations are associated with increased all-cause mortality and a low risk for hematological neoplasms. In this study, we make use of a natural inflammatory response occurring during COVID-19 to define the impact of these mutations on inflammation and outcomes. Methods: A cohort of 243 community-based patients (Olmsted County, MN) with COVID-19 were identified. CH status was determined on PBMC using error corrected sequencing (lower detection limit 0.5% VAF). In a subset of patients, we use multi-omics interrogation of the genome, transcriptome, and epigenome at single cell (sc) resolution along with DNA methylation, in PBMC, from patients with COVID-19 and CH. Results: We detected 97 CH mutations in 72 (29.6%) of 243 patients with COVID-19. The most frequent being DNMT3A (n=30, 30%) and TET2 (n=26, 28%). The presence of CH negatively impacted overall survival when restricted to TET2 and DNMT3A mutations. However, only DNMT3Amt CH retained age and comorbidity independent prognostication (HR 2.84, p = 0.022). We then assessed for changes in DNA methylation using Illumina MethylationEPIC array on patients with COVID-19 and DNMT3A (n=3) or TET2mt (n=4) CH. Site specific DNA methylation changes revealed significant loss of methylation in DNMT3Amt CH in comparison to TET2mt patients, with 10,944 hypomethylated and 1,160 hypermethylated sites. We found that actively transcribed states (Tx, TxWk) were more commonly hypomethylated in DNMT3Amt CH while enhancers (Enh) and promoters (TssA, TssAFlnk) were more commonly hypomethylated in TET2mt CH. We then conducted scDNA-seq in DNMT3Amt (n=3) and TET2mt (n=1) CH in COVID-19 and observed that while in TET2mt CH, mutations were largely restricted to classical and intermediate monocytes, in DNMT3Amt CH, mutations were seen in myeloid and lymphoid lineage cells. We performed scRNA-seq on patients with COVID-19 and DNMT3A (n=3) or TET2mt (n=6) CH. Differential gene expression analysis identified 1,569 upregulated genes in DNMT3Amt patients and 205 downregulated. Pathway analysis demonstrated an upregulation of genes involved in T cell survival, function, and inflammation in DNMT3Amt patients compared to TET2mt patients with a significant overexpression of GIMAP1, GIMAP4, IRF2, IL32 in multiple cell types. We correlated transcriptomic changes with chromatin accessibility using the 10X Genomics Multiome platform to profile both gene expression and open chromatin from the same samples. Analysis of global distribution of cut sites and differentially accessible peaks showed increased chromatin accessibility in DNMT3Amt CH, especially CD4+ T lymphocytes and NK cells. Conclusion: We demonstrate an age, sex, and comorbidity-independent adverse impact on mortality associated with DNMT3Amt CH in the context of COVID-19 and highlight transcriptomic and epigenetic differences between DNMT3A and TET2mt CH, with single cell resolution. Citation Format: Jenna A Fernandez, Wazim Mohammed Ismail, Moritz Binder, Terra Lasho, Susan M. Geyer, Amelia Mazzone, Christy M. Finke, Abhishek Mangaonkar, Jeong-Heon Lee, Liguo Wang, Vernadette A. Simon, Fariborz Rakhshan Rohakthar, Amik Munankarmy, Jonathan J. Harrington, Melissa R. Snyder, Keith D. Robertson, Alexandre Gaspar-Maia, Mrinal Patnaik. Divergent impacts of DNMT3A and TET2 mutant clonal hematopoiesis on COVID-19 related outcomes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: DNA Methylation, Clonal Hematopoiesis, and Cancer; 2025 Feb 1-4; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(3 Suppl):Abstract nr A012.

PURPOSE In patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), brentuximab vedotin (BV) as monotherapy or combined with either lenalidomide (Len) or rituximab (R) has demonstrated efficacy with acceptable safety. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of BV + Len + R versus placebo + Len + R in patients with R/R DLBCL. METHODS ECHELON-3 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 trial comparing BV + Len + R with placebo + Len + R in patients with R/R DLBCL. Patients received BV or placebo once every 3 weeks, Len once daily, and R once every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and secondary end points included investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). A prespecified interim analysis was performed after 134 OS events, with two-sided P = .0232 as the efficacy boundary. RESULTS Patients (N = 230) were randomly assigned to receive BV + Len + R (n = 112) or placebo + Len + R (n = 118). Two patients in the placebo arm did not receive treatment. With a median follow-up of 16.4 months, the median OS was 13.8 months with BV + Len + R versus 8.5 months with placebo + Len + R (hazard ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.89]; two-sided P = .009). The median PFS was 4.2 months with BV + Len + R versus 2.6 months with placebo + Len + R (hazard ratio, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.73]; two-sided P < .001). The ORR was 64% ([95% CI, 55 to 73]; two-sided P < .001) with BV + Len + R and 42% (95% CI, 33 to 51) with placebo + Len + R; complete response rates were 40% and 19%, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 97% of patients in both arms. In both arms, the most common treatment-emergent AEs were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, and anemia. CONCLUSION BV + Len + R demonstrated a statistically significant survival benefit with a manageable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with R/R DLBCL.

Introduction Age correlates with survival in patients (pts) with DLBCL, which has a median age at diagnosis of 67 y. Recent therapeutic advances, including bispecifics and cell therapy, have promising efficacy, but safety and accessibility continue to be limited for older pts. The randomized, global, phase 3 ECHELON-3 study (NCT04404283) demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate (ORR) with brentuximab vedotin (BV) + lenalidomide (Len) + rituximab (R; BV+Len+R) vs placebo+Len+R in pts with R/R DLBCL after ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies who were ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplant and/or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Here, we present safety and efficacy in pts aged ≥65 y. Methods In ECHELON-3, pts were randomized 1:1 to receive BV (1.2 mg/kg) or placebo every 3 weeks (q3w), in combination with R (375 mg/m2) q3w and Len (20 mg) once daily. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was required in all cycles. Efficacy was assessed by investigators per Lugano 2014 classification. The primary endpoint was OS, with key secondary endpoints of PFS and ORR. Other secondary endpoints included detailed safety and tolerability. This subgroup analysis comprises pts aged ≥65 y. P values are descriptive. Results A total of 155 pts aged ≥65 y were enrolled from April 2021 to November 2023 and randomized to BV+Len+R (n=79) or placebo+Len+R (n=76). The median age was 75 y (range, 65-89 y); 54% of pts were male, 59% were White, and 19% were Asian. Twenty-three percent and 54% had Ann Arbor stage III and IV disease, respectively, and 64% had high-intermediate or high International Prognostic Index scores (3-5) at enrollment. The most common DLBCL subtype was DLBCL not otherwise specified (58%). Twenty-nine percent of pts had transformed DLBCL. Approximately half (49%) of pts had primary refractory disease, and 81% had disease refractory to their most recent prior line of therapy. Seventy percent of pts had &lt;1% CD30 expression via IHC; 48% of cases had germinal center B-cell origin. Prior CAR-T was reported in 21.9% of pts. At a median follow-up of 16.8 mo (95% CI, 14.3-19.5 mo), median OS was 15.9 mo (95% CI, 11.7 mo-not estimable [NE]) with BV+Len+R vs 8.5 mo (95% CI, 5.5-11.5 mo) with placebo+Len+R (hazard ratio [HR], 0.540; 95% CI, 0.351-0.830; P=.0043). Median PFS was 5.7 mo (95% CI, 4.1-12.7 mo) with BV+Len+R vs 2.8 mo (95% CI, 1.9-4.1 mo) with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.478; 95% CI, 0.318-0.718; P=.0003). ORR was 70.9% (95% CI, 59.6%-80.6%) with BV+Len+R vs 46.1% (95% CI, 34.5%-57.9%) with placebo+Len+R (P=.0020); complete response (CR) rate was 45.6% vs 19.7%, respectively. Median time to CR was 1.61 mo with both BV+Len+R and placebo+Len+R (range, 1.2-7.3 vs 0.7-4.6 mo, respectively). Median duration of CR was 18.9 mo (95% CI, 12.4 mo-NE) with BV+Len+R vs 5.4 mo (95% CI, 2.8 mo-NE) with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.416; 95% CI, 0.139-1.250). In total, 154 pts were evaluable for safety analysis (75 pts in placebo+Len+R group). The median number of cycles was 5 (range, 1-34) vs 3 (range, 1-31) in the BV+Len+R and placebo+Len+R groups, respectively. The percentage of pts with any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was similar between groups (97% with BV+Len+R and 99% with placebo+Len+R); grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 89% of pts in the BV+Len+R group and 76% in the placebo+Len+R group. Serious TEAEs and TEAEs leading to death were reported more frequently in the BV+Len+R group (62% and 13%, respectively) than the placebo+Len+R group (47% and 8%, respectively). More pts discontinued study treatment due to TEAEs in the BV+Len+R group than the placebo+Len+R group (20% vs 8%). In total, 39% of pts on BV+Len+R had a peripheral neuropathy event vs 27% of pts on placebo+Len+R; however, the majority of cases were grade 1 (22% and 17%, respectively). Additional information on older pts will be presented. Conclusions BV+Len+R demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement in all key efficacy outcomes in pts aged ≥65 y, which is consistent with the overall ECHELON-3 population (median age 74 y; 70.5% of pts aged ≥65 y in BV+Len+R group). Differences in some safety endpoints are likely attributable to longer duration of treatment in the BV+Len+R group. No clinically meaningful safety trends in pts aged ≥65 y were identified. These results suggest that BV+Len+R may be an effective treatment option in older pts with R/R DLBCL.

Introduction Patients (pts) with progressive disease after ≥2 prior lines of systemic therapy are unlikely to derive additional benefit from current salvage immunochemotherapies, and survival declines significantly with each subsequent treatment. Pts with refractory disease following second-line therapy have worse outcomes, with reported overall response rates (ORRs) of 1% to 14% and overall survival (OS) of 5 months (Blood. 2017;130[16]:1800-1808). While chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has become a preferred strategy in the second- and third-line settings, pts with R/R disease following CAR-T experience dismal survival, with progression-free survival (PFS) and OS as low as 3 and 5 months, respectively, and no agreed standard of care post CAR-T (Blood. 2022;140[24]:2527-2529). The randomized, global, phase 3 ECHELON-3 study (NCT04404283) was conducted in pts with R/R DLBCL after ≥2 prior therapies who were ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplant and/or CAR-T. Here, we present subgroup analyses in pts with 2 prior lines of therapy, refractory disease, or prior CAR-T. Methods In these subgroup analyses of ECHELON-3, eligible pts had 2 prior lines of systemic therapy, disease refractory to the last prior therapy, or prior exposure to CAR-T. Pts could qualify for ≥1 subgroup and were analyzed separately. Refractory disease was defined as stable or progressive disease as best overall response to last line of treatment or relapse ≤6 months from the end of treatment. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive brentuximab vedotin (BV; 1.2 mg/kg) or placebo every 3 weeks (q3w), in combination with rituximab (R; 375 mg/m2) q3w and lenalidomide (Len; 20 mg) once daily. Efficacy was assessed by investigators per Lugano 2014 classification. The primary endpoint was OS, with key secondary endpoints of PFS and ORR. P values are descriptive. Results In total, 230 pts were enrolled in ECHELON-3 from April 2021 to November 2023, with a median follow-up of 16.4 months (range, 0.1-31.5 months). Overall, 94 pts with 2 prior lines of systemic therapy were enrolled and randomized to BV+Len+R (n=48) or placebo+Len+R (n=46). Median OS was 16.3 months (95% CI, 12.6 months-not estimable) with BV+Len+R vs 8.5 months (95% CI, 4.1-15.8 months) with placebo+Len+R (hazard ratio [HR], 0.557; 95% CI, 0.317-0.977; P=.0388). Median PFS was 7.1 months (95% CI, 3.6-12.6 months) with BV+Len+R vs 2.7 months (95% CI, 1.4-4.0 months) with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.462; 95% CI, 0.279-0.764; P=.0020). ORR was 68.8% (95% CI, 53.7%-81.3%) with BV+Len+R vs 43.5% with placebo+Len+R (95% CI, 28.9%-58.9%; P=.0216); complete response (CR) rate was 52.1% vs 13.0%, respectively. Additional data for pts by lines of therapy received will be presented. In total, 194 pts with disease refractory to the most recent systemic therapy were enrolled and randomized to BV+Len+R (n=98) and placebo+Len+R (n=96). Median OS was 11.7 months (95% CI, 8.8-16.3 months) with BV+Len+R vs 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.7-8.5 months) with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.566; 95% CI, 0.396-0.808; P=.0015). Median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.8-5.4 months) with BV+Len+R vs 1.5 months (95% CI, 1.4-2.6 months) with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.508; 95% CI, 0.363-0.712; P&lt;.0001). ORR was 59.2% (95% CI, 48.8%-69.0%) with BV+Len+R vs 29.2% (95% CI, 20.3%-39.3%) with placebo+Len+R (P&lt;.0001); CR rate was 34.7% vs 11.5%, respectively. Overall, 67 pts who received prior CAR-T were enrolled and randomized to BV+Len+R (n=32) and placebo+Len+R (n=35). Median OS was 15.6 months with BV+Len+R vs 4.4 months with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.2-0.75). Median PFS was 3.0 months with BV+Len+R vs 1.4 months with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.76). ORR was 65.6% (95% CI, 46.8%-81.4%) with BV+Len+R vs 25.7% (95% CI, 12.5%-43.3%) with placebo+Len+R (P=.0014); CR rate was 37.5% vs 11.4%, respectively. Conclusions BV+Len+R demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement in all key efficacy outcomes, including CR and OS, in pts with 2 prior lines of therapy, disease refractory to prior treatment, or prior CAR-T. This treatment benefit was generally consistent with that observed in the overall ECHELON-3 study population. Therefore, BV+Len+R has the potential to address an unmet need for effective and tolerable therapy in heavily pretreated pts, as described above.

Introduction Relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is very aggressive, with a historically low complete response (CR) rate (Blood. 2017; 130[16]:1800-1808). Recent research has focused on achieving complete and durable responses in this population, which translate to improvements in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results from the randomized, global, phase 3 ECHELON-3 study (NCT04404283) demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in OS, PFS, and objective response rate with brentuximab vedotin (BV) combined with lenalidomide (Len) and rituximab (R; BV+Len+R) vs placebo+Len+R in patients (pts) with R/R DLBCL after ≥2 prior systemic therapies. Here, we present subgroup analyses in pts with a best overall response (BOR) of CR (n=67). Methods Pts in the study were randomized (1:1) to receive BV (1.2 mg/kg) or placebo every 3 weeks, in combination with R (375 mg/m2) and Len (20 mg) once daily. In these subgroup analyses, eligible pts had a BOR of CR and some ended study treatment and received any subsequent anticancer therapy. BOR was assessed by investigators according to the Lugano 2014 classification. Duration of response was defined as the time from the start of the first documented CR to the first documented tumor progression per Lugano 2014 or death. Pts who initiated a subsequent nonpalliative anticancer therapy were censored at the most recent prior response assessment. Subsequent nonpalliative anticancer therapies were defined as any systemic therapy received after the end of study treatment. P values are descriptive. Results Of the 112 pts in the BV+Len+R group, 45 (40.2%) had a BOR of CR. Of the 118 pts in the placebo+Len+R group, 22 (18.6%) had a BOR of CR. The median duration of CR was 18.9 months (95% CI, 11.1 months-not estimable [NE]) with BV+Len+R vs not reached (NR) with placebo+Len+R (hazard ratio [HR], 0.527; 95% CI, 0.200-1.389; P=.1891). The median time to CR was 1.58 months (range, 1.2-7.3 months) with BV+Len+R and 1.61 months (range, 0.7-4.6 months) with placebo+Len+R. With a median follow-up of 14.3 months, the median OS in pts with a BOR of CR was 31.5 months (95% CI, 20.3 months-NE) in the BV+Len+R group vs NR in the placebo+Len+R group (HR, 1.044; 95% CI, 0.331-3.298; P=.9407). Median PFS in pts with a BOR of CR was 21.5 months (95% CI, 12.6 months-NE) in the BV+Len+R group vs NR (95% CI, 5.4 months-NE) in the placebo+Len+R group (HR, 0.6333; 95% CI, 0.256-1.567; P=.3198). Results of NR in the placebo+Len+R group are likely attributable to limited follow-up and small sample size. Additional data on baseline characteristics of pts who had CR will be presented. Of the 45 pts with CR in the BV+Len+R group, 42 (93.3%) received no subsequent anticancer therapy. Of the 22 pts with CR in the placebo+Len+R group, 17 (77.3%) received no subsequent anticancer therapy. Conclusions BV doubled the CR rate in pts with R/R DLBCL compared with placebo, and outcomes in pts with CR were durable, with only 6.7% of pts treated with BV+Len+R receiving subsequent systemic anticancer therapy, compared with 22.7% of pts treated with placebo+Len+R receiving subsequent therapy. Overall, BV+Len+R demonstrated a survival benefit in the ECHELON-3 study and is a promising option to achieve complete and durable responses in third- or later-line therapy for pts with R/R DLBCL.

Abstract Aims Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a critical manifestation of severe cardiac dysfunction, necessitating precise evaluation of left ventricular (LV) function by transthoracic echocardiography. The prognostic value of global longitudinal strain (GLS) has not been examined in patients with CS. Therefore, we aimed to assess the prognostic significance of GLS in patients with CS. Methods and results This was a retrospective study of patients with CS from 2007 to 2018 who had a transthoracic echocardiography performed within 24 h of admission. GLS was measured, and conventional parameters were obtained. LV dysfunction was categorized by GLS: &gt; 9.7% (Quartile 1), 7.0% &lt; GLS ≤ 9.7% (Quartile 2), 5.0% &lt; GLS ≤ 7.0% (Quartile 3), and ≤5.0% (Quartile 4). Outcomes included in-hospital and 1-year all-cause mortality. Among 623 patients with CS with the median LVEF of 31% [inter-quartile range (IQR): 24–41%] and the median GLS of 7.0% (IQR: 5.0–9.7%), in-hospital mortality was 29%. Mortality increased across GLS quartiles: Quartile 1: 17%; Quartile 2: 22%; Quartile 3: 35%; and Quartile 4: 42%. GLS remained the only independent echocardiographic predictor of in-hospital mortality after adjusting for clinical covariates (adjusted odds ratio: 1.23 per 1% decrease, 95% confidence interval: 1.04–1.46, P = 0.015). GLS independently predicted 1-year all-cause mortality (P &lt; 0.001). The prognostic value of GLS was superior in cases with acute coronary syndrome. A classification and regression tree analysis identified GLS as the most important echocardiographic variable for predicting in-hospital mortality. Conclusion GLS independently predicted short- and long-term mortality in patients with CS, surpassing conventional echocardiographic parameters in prognostic value, supporting its potential role in risk stratification in this population.