Citations

Abstract Pre-eclampsia (PE) affects 5–8% of pregnancies and has detrimental effects on maternal–fetal health. PE is characterized by de novo hypertension after 20 wk of gestation and end-organ damage. Systemic inflammatory imbalance has been associated with PE, but its contribution to the pathology is poorly understood. Our objective was to investigate maternal systemic immune changes in early-onset PE (EOPE) and late-onset PE (LOPE) versus uncomplicated pregnancies (control [CTRL]), and their contribution to endothelial activation, hallmark of hypertension. Blood samples were analyzed by flow cytometry, multiplex assay, intracellular cytokine staining, and single-cell RNA sequencing. We performed cocultures between circulating immune cells and HUVECs to assess endothelial activation. We found that EOPE had decreased regulatory T cells (4.64±0.33, p < 0.05) and monocytes (33.92±3.08, p < 0.01), whereas LOPE had decreased regulatory T cells (4.60±0.30, p < 0.05) and Th2 cells (7.50±0.62, p < 0.01) versus CTRL. Compared to CTRL, elevated cytokines/chemokines, and growth factors were observed in LOPE, whereas EOPE primarily showed decreased levels. Using intracellular cytokine staining, we observed more monocytes producing IL-12, TNF-α, and IL-1β (all p < 0.05) in LOPE versus CTRL. At the transcriptomic level, we found differentially expressed genes between EOPE and CTRL, predominantly related to upregulation of immune activation pathways. Lastly, EOPE PBMCs induced heightened endothelial activation in vitro observed by increased ICAM-1 and ET-1 (p < 0.05), whereas LOPE PBMCs required LPS stimulation. Although significant proteomic changes are observed in the LOPE group, the EOPE displayed changes mostly at the transcriptomic levels and could induce endothelial activation in vitro.

ABSTRACTProblemPreeclampsia (PE) and fetal growth restriction (FGR) are often associated with maternal inflammation and an increased risk of cardiovascular and metabolic disease in the affected mothers. The mechanism responsible for this increased risk of subsequent disease may involve reprogramming of innate immune cells, characterized by epigenetic modifications.Method of StudyCirculating monocytes from women with PE, FGR, or uncomplicated pregnancies (control) were isolated before labor. Cytokine release from monocytes following exposure to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and the presence of lysine 4‐trimethylated histone 3 (H3K4me3) within TNF promoter sequences were evaluated. Single‐cell transcriptomic profiles of circulating monocytes from women with PE or uncomplicated pregnancies were assessed.ResultsMonocytes from women with PE or FGR exhibited increased IL‐10 secretion and decreased IL‐1β and GM‐CSF secretion in response to LPS. While TNFα secretion was not significantly different in cultures of control monocytes versus those from complicated pregnancies with or without LPS exposure, monocytes from complicated pregnancies had significantly decreased levels of H3K4me3 associated with TNF promoter sequences. Cluster quantification and pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes revealed an increased proportion of anti‐inflammatory myeloid cells and a lower proportion of inflammatory non‐classical monocytes among the circulating monocyte population in women with PE.ConclusionsMonocytes from women with PE and FGR exhibit an immune tolerance phenotype before initiation of labor. Further investigation is required to determine whether this tolerogenic phenotype persists after the affected pregnancy and contributes to increased risk of subsequent disease.

AbstractProblemThe COVID‐19 pandemic has been shown to have a detrimental impact on the mental health of pregnant individuals, and chronic stress can alter the immune profile. However, the effects of the COVID‐19 pandemic on the immune system in pregnancy are still poorly understood. We aimed to evaluate the impact of pandemic exposure on the maternal immune profile in uncomplicated pregnancies.Method of studyWe collected blood and placenta samples from pregnant individuals exposed and unexposed to the pandemic to compare their immune and inflammatory profiles. We performed co‐culture with circulating maternal immune cells and endothelial cells to assess endothelial activation. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired t‐test, Mann‐Whitney, or Fisher's exact test as appropriate.ResultsIn exposed individuals, we observed a decreased proportion of Th2 cells (p < .0001) and Treg/Th17 ratio (p < .05), as well as an increased Th1/Th2 ratio (p < .0001). Levels of IL‐1β (p < .01) and IL‐18 (p < .01) were increased in the circulation of exposed participants, whilst other mediators were significantly decreased (IFNγ, IL‐8, MCP‐1, amongst others). Furthermore, we observed increased production of ICAM, hallmark of endothelial activation, when we co‐cultured endothelial cells with immune cells from exposed individuals. Vaccination status impacted the cellular profile with increased proportions of Th1 and B cells in vaccinated participants.ConclusionOverall, we observed a pro‐inflammatory bias in the circulation of pregnant individuals exposed to the COVID‐19 pandemic, with otherwise uncomplicated pregnancies. Our work also supports an association between the increased risk of endothelial activation/hypertension and SARS‐CoV2 infection, which might be driven in part by exposure to the pandemic and associated stressors.

Major advances in prostate cancer diagnosis, staging, and management have occurred over the past decade, largely due to our improved understanding of the technical aspects and clinical applications of advanced imaging, specifically magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and prostate-cancer-specific positron emission tomography (PET). Herein, we review the established utility of these important and exciting technologies, as well as areas of controversy and uncertainty that remain important areas for future study. There is strong evidence supporting the utility of MRI in guiding initial biopsy and assessing local disease. There is debate, however, regarding how to best use the imaging modality in risk stratification, treatment planning, and assessment of biochemical failure. Prostate-cancer-specific PET is a relatively new technology that provides great value to the evaluation of newly diagnosed, treated, and recurrent prostate cancer. However, its ideal use in treatment decision making, staging, recurrence detection, and surveillance necessitates further research. Continued study of both imaging modalities will allow for an improved understanding of their best utilization in improving cancer care.

AbstractAimThis study aims to assess the association of obesity and CRP concentrations in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and its influence on measures of disease activity.MethodsA comprehensive search was performed using Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, from the time of their inception to November 2021. Observational studies that evaluated the association between CRP concentrations and obesity or overweight in patients with RA were considered eligible. Correlation coefficients were pooled using the inverse variance method, while effect sizes were pre‐calculated for adjusted standardized regression coefficients (β).ResultsA total of 10 studies, which comprised 4024 patients, were included in this systematic review. Individually, most studies report a significant association between CRP concentrations and a higher body mass index or other adiposity measures, but the statistical significance was not sustained when pooling their data together. Through the estimates provided in the present review, it is noted that CRP tends to be more elevated in female patients with RA that have a higher BMI. However, this association is not present in men.ConclusionCRP tends to be elevated in female patients with RA that have a higher BMI. Further research is required to assess this possible sex‐related difference and to aid shared decision‐making in order to avoid over‐treatment and increased burden in patients with obesity and RA.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022314580.

ImportancePatients should have an active role in decisions about pursuing or forgoing specific therapies in treatment de-escalation trials.ObjectiveTo evaluate longitudinal patient-reported outcomes (PROs) encompassing decisional comfort and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among patients who elected to enroll in a clinical trial evaluating radiotherapy alone, without breast surgery, for invasive breast cancers with exceptional response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST).Design, Setting, and ParticipantsProspective, single-group, phase 2 clinical trial at 7 US medical centers. Women aged 40 years or older with invasive cT1-2 N0-1 M0 triple-negative or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2)–positive breast cancer with no pathologic evidence of residual disease following standard NST enrolled from March 6, 2017, to November 9, 2021. Validated PRO measures were administered at baseline and 6, 12, and 36 months post-radiotherapy. Data were analyzed from January to February 2023.InterventionsPRO measures included the Decision Regret Scale (DRS), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Lymphedema (FACT-B+4), and Breast Cancer Treatment Outcomes Scale (BCTOS).Main Outcomes and MeasuresChanges in PRO measure scores and subscores over time.ResultsAmong 31 patients, the median (IQR) age was 61 (56-66) years, 26 (84%) were White, and 26 (84%) were non-Hispanic. A total of 15 (48%) had triple-negative disease and 16 (52%) had ERBB2-positive disease. Decisional comfort was high at baseline (median [IQR] DRS score 10 [0-25] on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating higher decisional regret) and significantly increased over time (median [IQR] DRS score at 36 months, 0 [0-20]; P &amp;lt; .001). HRQOL was relatively high at baseline (median [IQR] FACT-B composite score 121 [111-134] on a 0-148 scale, with higher scores indicating higher HRQOL) and significantly increased over time (median [IQR] FACT-B score at 36 months, 128 [116-137]; P = .04). Perceived differences between the affected breast and contralateral breast were minimal at baseline (median [IQR] BCTOS score 1.05 [1.00-1.23] on a 1-4 scale, with higher scores indicating greater differences) and increased significantly over time (median [IQR] BCTOS score at 36 months, 1.36 [1.18-1.64]; P &amp;lt; .001). At 36 months postradiotherapy, the cosmetic subscore was 0.45 points higher than baseline (95% CI, 0.16-0.74; P = .001), whereas function, pain, and edema subscores were not significantly different than baseline.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this nonrandomized phase 2 clinical trial, analysis of PROs demonstrated an overall positive experience for trial participants, with longitudinal improvements in decisional comfort and overall HRQOL over time and minimal lasting adverse effects of therapy.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02945579

ObjectiveApproximately one third of individuals worldwide have not received a COVID‐19 vaccine. Although studies have investigated risk factors linked to severe COVID‐19 among unvaccinated people with rheumatic diseases (RDs), we know less about whether these factors changed as the pandemic progressed. We aimed to identify risk factors associated with severe COVID‐19 in unvaccinated individuals in different pandemic epochs corresponding to major variants of concern.MethodsPatients with RDs and COVID‐19 were entered into the COVID‐19 Global Rheumatology Alliance Registry between March 2020 and June 2022. An ordinal logistic regression model (not hospitalized, hospitalized, and death) was used with date of COVID‐19 diagnosis, age, sex, race and/or ethnicity, comorbidities, RD activity, medications, and the human development index (HDI) as covariates. The main analysis included all unvaccinated patients across COVID‐19 pandemic epochs; subanalyses stratified patients according to RD types.ResultsAmong 19,256 unvaccinated people with RDs and COVID‐19, those who were older, male, had more comorbidities, used glucocorticoids, had higher disease activity, or lived in lower HDI regions had worse outcomes across epochs. For those with rheumatoid arthritis, sulfasalazine and B‐cell–depleting therapy were associated with worse outcomes, and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors were associated with improved outcomes. In those with connective tissue disease or vasculitis, B‐cell–depleting therapy was associated with worse outcomes.ConclusionRisk factors for severe COVID‐19 outcomes were similar throughout pandemic epochs in unvaccinated people with RDs. Ongoing efforts, including vaccination, are needed to reduce COVID‐19 severity in this population, particularly in those with medical and social vulnerabilities identified in this study.