Citations

Abstract Background Most oncology therapeutics have limited distribution into the brain, and developing strategies to overcome this limitation would be clinically impactful. While therapeutic radiation is often cited as a strategy to accomplish this, there are no published studies demonstrating the effect of radiation on drug distribution into the brain or brain tumors. Methods Mice were treated with brain radiation (6 Gy × 5, 4 Gy × 10; 40 Gy × 1) and dosed with drugs (levetiracetam, cefazolin, nedisertib, brigimadlin, apitolisib, or GNE-317) at times ranging from just prior to months after radiation. Plasma and tissue drug concentrations were measured by LC-MS/MS. Results Radiation did not significantly enhance drug delivery into brain tissue for levetiracetam, cefazolin, GNE-317, apitolisib, or nedisertib at any time post-radiation. Even a single, supra-therapeutic dose of radiation (40 Gy) did not significantly affect brain distribution of GNE-317 or apitolisib (P ≥ .07) from 16 to 160 hours post-radiation. For brigimadlin, radiation (6 Gy × 5) was associated with a modest but significant increase in drug accumulation only at 72 hours post-radiation (brain-to-plasma ratio 0.014 ± 0.006 vs. 0.025 ± 0.010, respectively; P = .04), but not at any other timepoint (24 hours, 15, 28, 94, 133, 183 days; P > .05). Similarly, radiation (6 Gy × 5) of orthotopic tumors did not increase levels of brigimadlin in GBM10 or GBM108 or nedisertib in GBM108 (P > .05). Conclusions Radiation had no meaningful impact on drug delivery into brain or brain tumors for the drugs tested.

Objectives Black/African American (B/AA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients have worse clinical outcomes than White patients and are underrepresented in genomic databases. We aimed to expand our understanding of the PDAC somatic landscape from a diverse cohort. Materials and Methods Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens from 24 surgically resected PDAC cases were collected, with self-reported race/ethnicity. Whole exome sequencing was performed on malignant and benign tissue. Bioinformatics analysis included deduction of genetic ancestry and somatic mutational analysis, with comparisons to public datasets. Results Out of 24 cases, 17 identified as B/AA race; genetic ancestry analysis confirmed proportions of Sub-Saharan African ancestry greater than 47%. The most commonly mutated genes included KRAS , TP53 , SMAD4 , and CDKN2A . Comparison of mutations in our cohort versus publicly available, predominantly White datasets showed higher mutation frequencies of ATM, RREB1, BRCA1/2, KDM6A, ARID1A, BRAF, and MYC ( P < 0.04). When cohorts were combined and analyzed by race, no mutation frequencies differences were observed, including KRAS . Conclusions Genomic analysis of PDAC tumors from B/AA and White patients demonstrate similarities in mutation frequencies. Larger studies are needed to further understand molecular characterizations across continental subpopulations. This study provides further rationale for equitable representation of diverse patients in genomic databases and clinical trials.

ASCO Guidelines provide recommendations with comprehensive review and analyses of the relevant literature for each recommendation, following the guideline development process as outlined in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual . ASCO Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy for Clinical Practice Guidelines . Clinical Practice Guidelines and other guidance (“Guidance”) provided by ASCO is not a comprehensive or definitive guide to treatment options. It is intended for voluntary use by clinicians and should be used in conjunction with independent professional judgement. Guidance may not be applicable to all patients, interventions, diseases or stages of diseases. Guidance is based on review and analysis of relevant literature and is not intended as a statement of the standard-of-care. ASCO does not endorse third-party drugs, devices, services, or therapies and assumes no responsibility for any harm arising from or related to the use of this information. See complete disclaimer in Appendix 1 and 2 (online only). PURPOSE To provide evidence-based guidance for clinicians who treat patients with stage I-III anal cancer. METHODS A systematic review of the literature conducted by the Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center provided the evidence base for this guideline. An ASCO Expert Panel reviewed this evidence and came to consensus on a set of evidence-based recommendations. RESULTS The systematic review contained three randomized controlled trials and three nonrandomized studies of interventions that were relevant to the guideline topic and informed the recommendations. RECOMMENDATIONS Mitomycin-C (MMC) with a fluoropyrimidine (fluorouracil [FU] or capecitabine) is recommended as the radiosensitizing component of chemoradiation (CRT) for anal cancer; the Expert Panel recognizes that capecitabine is often used as an orally administered alternative to FU and is currently being used in ongoing clinical trials. Cisplatin with FU is an additional chemotherapy combination that may be recommended as radiosensitizing chemotherapy. Because of the myelosuppression associated with MMC, the preferable regimen for patients with immunosuppression is cisplatin and FU. Cisplatin is not recommended for patients with renal dysfunction, significant neuropathy, or hearing loss, and there is no evidence to recommend substituting carboplatin for cisplatin. Dose and schedule options for recommended chemotherapy agents are included within the full text of the guideline. Routine induction chemotherapy before CRT and additional chemotherapy after CRT are not recommended for patients with localized anal cancer. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines .

Importance Neoadjuvant therapy (NT) is an increasingly used treatment strategy for patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Little research has been conducted on cancer care delivery during NT, and the standards for optimal delivery of NT have not been defined. Objective To develop consensus best practices for delivering NT to patients with localized PDAC. Design, Setting, and Participants This study used a modified Delphi approach consisting of 2 rounds of voting, and a series of virtual conferences (from October to December 2023) to reach expert consensus on candidate best practice statements generated from a systematic review of the literature and expert opinion. An interdisciplinary panel was formed including 47 North American experts from surgical, medical, and radiation oncology, radiology, pathology, gastroenterology, integrative oncology, anesthesia, pharmacy, nursing, cancer care delivery research, and nutrition as well as patient and caregiver stakeholders. Main Outcome and Measures Statements that reached 75% agreement or greater were included in final consensus statements. Results Of the 47 participating panel members, 27 (57.64%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 47.6 (8.2) years. Physicians reported completing training a mean (SD) 14.6 (8.6) years prior and seeing a mean (SD) 110.6 (38.4) patients with PDAC annually; 35 (77.7%) were in academic practice. Final consensus was reached on 82 best practices for delivering NT. Of these, 38 statements focused on pre-NT practices, including diagnosis and staging (n = 15), evaluation and optimization (n = 20), and decision-making (n = 3); 29 statements defined best practices during NT, including initiation (n = 3), delivery of therapy (n = 8), restaging practices (n = 12), and management of complications during NT (n = 6); and 15 best practices were identified to guide treatment post-NT, focusing on surgery (n = 7), pathology (n = 4), and follow-up (n = 3). Conclusions Using a modified Delphi consensus technique, best practice guidelines were developed focusing on the optimal standards for delivering NT to patients with localized PDAC. Given the prognostic importance of completing multimodality therapy, efforts to standardize and optimize the delivery of NT represent an immediate opportunity to decrease care variation and improve outcomes for patients with PDAC. Future research should focus on validating and implementing best practice standards into clinical practice.

Abstract BACKGROUND Liquid biopsy in glioblastoma (GBM) is hindered by insufficient requisite circulating-tumor (ct) and cell-free (cf) DNA in blood due to blood-brain barrier (BBB). This limits the identification of blood-based tumor biomarkers along with biomarker-driven systemic therapies. Real-time image-guided low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) plus IV microbubble oscillators, leads to non-invasive BBB disruption. METHODS LIBERATE is an ongoing, prospective, multi-center, self-controlled, pivotal trial investigating safety and technical efficacy of LIFU-based BBB disruption for increasing blood ctDNA and cfDNA levels in adult GBM patients (aged 18-80 years). Patients with suspected GBM planned for biopsy/resection at ten US centers are being enrolled. Patients with multifocal tumors or tumors arising from deep midline, thalamus, cerebellum, or brainstem are excluded. Patients are administered IV microbubbles for enhanced sonication effects, after which MR-guided BBB disruption using 220kHz LIFU device is performed with real-time acoustic-feedback-control for effective microbubble activation. Pre- and post-LIFU, phlebotomy and MRI brain are performed. Primary study endpoint is defined, per subject, as ratio between their blood cfDNA level 1-hour post-LIFU procedure compared to blood cfDNA pre-procedure. Primary study hypothesis is that BBB disruption leads to ≥2-fold rise in blood cfDNA. Secondary hypothesis is that there exists ≥75% agreement between biomarker pattern in blood cfDNA sample obtained 1-hour post-LIFU and biomarker pattern in tumor tissue obtained later. Trial is powered to evaluate both primary and secondary hypotheses. Based on assumed true agreement rate of 91% and one-sided alpha=0.025, an exact test for binomial proportions provides N=50 with 84% power for secondary hypothesis. Exploratory endpoints include (1) sensitivity of detection of specific somatic mutations in ctDNA from blood collected pre- and post-LIFU, (2) ctDNA estimation in samples collected at 30-minutes, 1-hour, 2-hour, and 3-hour post-LIFU to determine time of greatest yield, (3) correlation of MRI parameters related to grading of BBB disruption and ctDNA-based biomarkers from post-LIFU blood samples. Patient enrollment commenced in 2022 and remains ongoing (NCT05383872).

Abstract BACKGROUND The prognostic factors impacting the survival of grade 4 IDH-mutant astrocytoma treated with standard radiation/temozolomide are not well-described. METHODS A retrospective cohort was generated of all patients diagnosed at Mayo Clinic with grade 4 IDH-mutant astrocytoma (2021 WHO Classification) on initial diagnosis between 2002-2023, and who received standard radiation/temozolomide. The impact of patient, tumor and molecular variables on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated using survival analyses and Cox regression models. RESULTS Fifty-eight patients were identified. The median age was 36 years, 64% were male and 93% were white. The median follow up was 3.3 years. The median OS and PFS were 6.9 years and 2.4 years, respectively. CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion significantly reduced both OS (2.5 years vs NR, HR=3.9, p=0.0168) and PFS (1.4 vs 4.5 years, HR=4.2, p=0.0005). Midline involvement (brainstem, basal ganglia, thalamus, cerebellum or corpus callosum) also significantly reduced both OS (2.4 vs 12.8 years, HR=7.0, p=0.0014) and PFS (1.4 vs 4.5 years, HR=4.8, p=0.0002). MGMT promoter hypermethylation showed a trend toward significance for PFS (p=0.082) but did not impact OS. Age, sex, tumor size, ATRX immunohistochemistry and tumor-treating field therapy did not impact survival outcomes. Multivariable analyses revealed that PFS remained significantly impacted by both CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion (HR=3.5, p=0.0051) and midline involvement (HR=3.1, p=0.0125). A significant association between CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion and midline involvement was unexpectedly observed (53% if midline, 24% if non-midline; χ2=4.3, p=0.037). Exploratory analyses revealed that 15/15 (100%) of patients with midline involvement demonstrated aberration in RB1 signaling (CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion, n=8; CDKN2A/B hemizygous deletion or loss of heterozygosity, n=6; CDK4 amplification, n=1). CONCLUSION CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion and midline involvement independently impact PFS in patients with grade 4 IDH-mutant astrocytoma treated with standard radiation/temozolomide. Furthermore, midline involvement may be associated with aberrant RB1 signaling.

Importance Outcomes for patients with unresectable stage III non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with chemoradiation therapy (CRT) have improved with adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors, with a reported 5-year overall survival benefit of approximately 10% for adjuvant durvalumab vs placebo after completion of CRT without progression and with preserved performance status. Starting atezolizumab prior to CRT may allow more patients to benefit from immunotherapy. Objective To evaluate clinical outcomes of patients treated with atezolizumab before and after CRT for unresectable stage III NSCLC. Design, Setting, and Participants This single-cohort, phase II, nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted at 11 US sites. Patients with pathologically confirmed, unresectable stage III NSCLC who were treatment naive and had good performance status were enrolled between January 3, 2018, and July 24, 2019. Data were locked on March 21, 2023. Interventions Patients received four 21-day cycles of atezolizumab, 1200 mg intravenously, with therapy administered on day 1 of each cycle. Patients not experiencing tumor progression continued to CRT (60 Gy to involved fields) concurrent with weekly carboplatin area under the curve of 2 and paclitaxel, 50 mg/m 2 , followed by planned consolidation carboplatin area under the curve of 6 and paclitaxel, 200 mg/m 2 , for two 21-day cycles. Patients not experiencing progression continued atezolizumab, 1200 mg, every 21 days to complete 1 year of therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the disease control rate at 12 weeks. Secondary end points were progression-free survival, overall survival, overall response rate, safety, and translational science end points. Results A total of 62 patients (median [range] age, 63.9 [38.1-86.5] years; 32 female [51.6%]) were enrolled and received at least 1 dose of atezolizumab. The disease control rate at 12 weeks was 74.2% (80% CI, 65.7%-81.4%). Median progression-free survival was 30.0 months (95% CI, 15.8 to not evaluable), and the median overall survival was not reached. The overall survival rate at 24 months was 73.7% (95% CI, 63.4%-85.7%), and the overall response rate was 66.2%. Seventeen patients (27.4%) experienced grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events, including 1 with grade 5 pneumonitis and 1 with grade 4 Guillain-Barré syndrome. Thirty patients (48.4%) experienced grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events. Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that neoadjuvant atezolizumab merits further study based on safety and encouraging outcomes. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03102242

Abstract BACKGROUND Accurate molecular diagnosis of infiltrating brainstem tumors, including diffuse midline gliomas and IDH mutant astrocytomas, is essential for prognostication and optimal therapy. Surgical biopsy of the brainstem carries risk of permanent neurological deficits and may yield insufficient or non-diagnostic tissue. We hypothesized that minimally invasive “liquid biopsy” analyzing circulating tumor cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) could represent an alternative molecular diagnostic modality. METHODS We performed MSK-IMPACT, a New York State Department of Health authorized hybridization capture-based next-generation panel DNA sequencing clinical assay on 44 CSF samples from 37 unique patients with brainstem tumors. Ages at time of CSF collection ranged from 1–47 years (median: 29 years). For samples in which diagnostic alterations could not be detected, we performed a series of secondary analyses for known hotspot mutations such as H3F3A, IDH1/2, and BRAF, including manual review for mutant reads below the official clinical reporting threshold, as well as droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). RESULTS Among 44 samples included in this study, 10/44 (23%) samples had mutations detected by MSK-IMPACT using standard clinical calling criteria and 14 of the remaining 34 samples (41%) had supporting evidence of a diagnostically relevant mutation based on manual review. Testing by ddPCR was performed on 11 samples (based on DNA availability), uncovering 4 additional mutations. Overall positive diagnostic yield was 64% (28/44). In biopsied patients, CSF confirmed disease-defining mutations in 80% (16/20) of CSF samples, including H3F3A K28M (9/10; 90%) and IDH1/2 (5/6; 83%). Among 24 unbiopsied patients, a disease-defining mutation was identified in 60% (15/25) of CSF samples. CONCLUSIONS Analysis of CSF cfDNA in patients with brainstem tumors has a high diagnostic yield and obviates the need for tissue biopsy in a majority of patients. A tiered testing approach using next-generation sequencing and ddPCR assays helps maximize diagnostic information and sensitivity.