Citations

Developmental/epileptic encephalopathy with spike-wave activation in sleep (DEE-SWAS) is newly proposed nomenclature put forth by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) to replace the problematic electrographic and/or clinical phenotypes of electrical status epilepticus of sleep (ESES) and continuous spike-wave in sleep (CSWS). The nomenclature update represents a noble effort to minimize the confusion of how to define and appropriately utilize this alphabet soup of acronyms, thereby aiding in future clinical and research efforts. The name change fails to capture greater challenges within the field, which still plague diagnosis and treatment and stagnates substantive research advancements. Through a directed literature review of DEE-SWAS with emphasis on the new ILAE nomenclature and the RESCUE-ESES trial, we will highlight major persistent quandaries in the field. These include inadequate or insufficient diagnostic biomarkers (ie, the spike wave index), the highly variable clinical manifestations, ranging from dubious associations to profound developmental regression, presumptively caused by spike-wave activation in sleep, and variable and often ineffective treatment paradigms. We will also review the broader diagnostic evaluation of DEE-SWAS. By doing so, we aim to shed light on crucial research and clinical questions that could advance our understanding of diagnosing and treating children with DEE-SWAS, as well as addressing the uncertainty surrounding the neurological effects of sleep-activated epileptiform discharges.

Background Low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg once daily) reduces the risk of major cardiovascular events in coronary disease, but its mechanism of action is not yet fully understood. We investigated whether low-dose colchicine is associated with changes in pericoronary inflammation and plaque composition in patients with chronic coronary disease. Methods We performed a cross-sectional, nationwide, subanalysis of the Low-Dose Colchicine 2 Trial (LoDoCo2, n=5522). CT angiography studies were performed in 151 participants randomised to colchicine or placebo after a median treatment duration of 28.2 months. Pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) attenuation measurements around proximal coronary artery segments and quantitative plaque analysis for the entire coronary tree were performed using artificial intelligence-enabled plaque analysis software. Results Median PCAT attenuation was not significantly different between the two groups (−79.5 Hounsfield units (HU) for colchicine versus −78.7 HU for placebo, p=0.236). Participants assigned to colchicine had a higher volume (169.6 mm 3 vs 113.1 mm 3 , p=0.041) and burden (9.6% vs 7.0%, p=0.035) of calcified plaque, and higher volume of dense calcified plaque (192.8 mm 3 vs 144.3 mm 3 , p=0.048) compared with placebo, independent of statin therapy. Colchicine treatment was associated with a lower burden of low-attenuation plaque in participants on a low-intensity statin, but not in those on a high-intensity statin (p interaction =0.037). Conclusions Pericoronary inflammation did not differ among participants who received low-dose colchicine compared with placebo. Low-dose colchicine was associated with a higher volume of calcified plaque, particularly dense calcified plaque, which is considered a feature of plaque stability.

Importance High-quality evidence regarding suppressive valacyclovir treatment in herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) is necessary to guide care. Objective To determine whether suppressive valacyclovir compared with placebo delays the occurrence of new or worsening stromal keratitis (SK), endothelial keratitis (EK), iritis, or dendriform epithelial keratitis (DEK) during 12 months of treatment and if treatment benefit persisted at 18 months (secondary end point). Design, Setting, and Participants The Zoster Eye Disease Study (ZEDS) was a randomized clinical trial conducted in 95 sites from November 2017 to June 2024. Immunocompetent, nonpregnant adults with a history of an HZO rash, documented active keratitis or iritis within 1 year, and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 or greater were eligible. After determined to be eligible, participants were randomized in 4 strata: age at onset (<60 years vs ≥60 years) and disease duration (<6 months vs ≥6 months). Interventions A total of 12 months of double-masked daily valacyclovir, 1000 mg, or placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was time to first occurrence within 12 months of new or worsening SK, EK, iritis, or DEK. Results A total of 527 participants (median [IQR] age, 60 [50-68] years; 266 female [50.5%]; 266 in the valacyclovir group; 261 in the placebo group) were randomized in 4 strata; 481 completed 12 months, and 460 completed 18 months. Data were analyzed by intention to treat. At 12 months, primary end points occurred in 86 participants (33%) assigned to placebo and 74 (28%) assigned to valacyclovir, and at 18 months in 104 participants (40%) assigned to placebo and 86 (32%) assigned to valacyclovir. The hazard ratio (HR) of the primary end point at 12 months was 0.77 for participants taking valacyclovir vs placebo (HR, 0.77; adjusted 95% CI, 0.56-1.05; P = .09) and 0.73 at the secondary end point at 18 months (HR, 0.73; adjusted 95% CI, 0.55-0.97; P = .03). There was a reduction of multiple other secondary end points at 12 months (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.95; P = .02) and 18 months (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55-0.95; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance Although the primary outcome did not show a benefit of suppressive valacyclovir treatment, secondary study outcomes showed treatment superiority at the 18-month end point and reduced number of multiple episodes of keratitis or iritis at both 12 and 18 months. These results support consideration of 1 year of suppressive valacyclovir treatment for HZO. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03134196

Importance Evidence regarding suppressive valacyclovir treatment on postherpetic neuralgia is necessary to guide care. Objective To test the hypothesis that suppressive treatment with 1000 mg/d of oral valacyclovir for 12 months reduces the prevalence, severity, and duration of postherpetic neuralgia compared with placebo at 12 and 18 months in participants with herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO). Design, Setting, and Participants Multicenter, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial including 527 immunocompetent, nonpregnant adults with history of HZO rash, documented keratitis, or iritis within 1 year and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 or greater. The study was conducted at 95 participating sites (in Canada, New Zealand, and the US) from November 2017 to June 2024 and participant visits occurred every 3 months. Intervention Treatment with 1000 mg/d of valacyclovir or placebo for 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures Prevalence of postherpetic neuralgia, severity as determined by pain score (a score of ≥3 on a scale of 1-10), pain duration (≥3 months after HZO onset), and total daily dose of pain medication. Results Of the 527 participants (490 completed 12 months of treatment and 460 completed 18 months), 73 (14%) had postherpetic neuralgia and were analyzed by age at HZO onset (<60 years or ≥60 years) and disease duration (recent [<6 months] or chronic [≥6 months]). Of the 73 participants with postherpetic neuralgia (34 in the valacyclovir group and 39 in the placebo group), the mean age was 62.4 years (SD, 13.6 years), 59% were female, 5% were Black or African American, and 10% were Hispanic. The prevalence of postherpetic neuralgia at 12 months was not reduced by valacyclovir (12/32 [38%]) compared with placebo (14/35 [40%]) (between-group difference, 2.5% [95% CI, −20.8% to 25.8%]; P >.99). The participants who were younger than 60 years at HZO onset and had a chronic disease duration had lower pain scores in the valacyclovir group (mean score, 0.3 [SD, 0.9]) vs the placebo group (mean score, 0.8 [SD, 1.9]) at 12 months ( P = .045) and at 18 months (mean score, 0.2 [SD, 0.9] vs 1.0 [SD, 2.3], respectively; P = .02). There was a decrease in pain duration in the valacyclovir group at 18 months (mean, 13.6 [SD, 11.4] months) vs the placebo group (mean, 18.7 [SD, 29.5] months) (linear mixed-effects model between-group difference, −3.39 months [95% CI, −6.73 to −0.04 months]; P = .046). The total daily dose of neuropathic pain medication was lower in the valacyclovir group (mean, 271.4 [SD, 593.8] mg/d) vs the placebo group (mean, 363.4 [SD, 592.2] mg/d) at 12 months (linear mixed-effects model P = .006) and at 18 months (mean, 209.0 [SD, 412.8] mg/d vs 286.2 [SD, 577.9] mg/d, respectively; linear mixed-effects model P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance One year of suppressive treatment with valacyclovir was associated with a lower dosage of neuropathic pain medication. Participants in the valacyclovir group, who were younger at HZO onset and had a chronic disease duration, had lower pain scores. These secondary outcomes support consideration of 1 year of suppressive treatment with valacyclovir to reduce dosage of pain medications and pain due to HZO. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03134196

INTRODUCTION: To assess strategies for optimizing participation of underserved minorities in a blood-based early colorectal cancer detection test study (PREEMPT CRC; NCT04369053) at a hospital serving primarily Black individuals. METHODS: Culturally sensitive, racially congruent research staff approached individuals undergoing average-risk screening colonoscopy. Consent/study procedures were synchronized with clinical appointments. Enrolled and not-enrolled patient characteristics were compared. Recruitment was compared with other study sites. RESULTS: In total, 247 of 509 eligible individuals were enrolled; most were identified as Black (88.7%). No baseline characteristics were associated with participation. Recruitment was high compared with other sites (11th centile). DISCUSSION: Recruitment barriers for Black individuals can be overcome when easy, culturally sensitive access is facilitated.

Importance Molecular techniques, including next-generation sequencing, genomic copy number profiling, fusion transcript detection, and genomic DNA methylation arrays, are now indispensable tools for the workup of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Yet there remains a great deal of heterogeneity in using such biomarker testing across institutions and hospital systems. This is in large part because there is a persistent reluctance among third-party payers to cover molecular testing. The objective of this Review is to describe why comprehensive molecular biomarker testing is now required for the accurate diagnosis and grading and prognostication of CNS tumors and, in so doing, to justify more widespread use by clinicians and coverage by third-party payers. Observations The 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system for CNS tumors incorporates specific molecular signatures into the essential diagnostic criteria for most tumor entities. Many CNS tumor types cannot be reliably diagnosed according to current WHO guidelines without molecular testing. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network also incorporates molecular testing into their guidelines for CNS tumors. Both sets of guidelines are maximally effective if they are implemented routinely for all patients with CNS tumors. Moreover, the cost of these tests is less than 5% of the overall average cost of caring for patients with CNS tumors and consistently improves management. This includes more accurate diagnosis and prognostication, clinical trial eligibility, and prediction of response to specific treatments. Each major group of CNS tumors in the WHO classification is evaluated and how molecular diagnostics enhances patient care is described. Conclusions and Relevance Routine advanced multidimensional molecular profiling is now required to provide optimal standard of care for patients with CNS tumors.

Abstract BACKGROUND Patients with meningiomas that have progressed after surgery and/or radiation have limited treatments. Loss of NF2 and CDKN2A/B are common in higher-grade meningiomas and promote meningioma progression. We evaluated the efficacy of abemaciclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor, as part of Alliance A071401, a genomically-driven phase II trial in recurrent or progressive meningiomas. METHODS Eligible patients (pts) with grade 2/3 tumors and NF2 mutations or CDK pathway alterations were treated with abemaciclib 200 mg orally twice daily. Two co-primary endpoints were used: progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6) and response rate (RR); the trial would be declared positive if either endpoint was met. Twenty-four evaluable pts provided ≥85% power to detect a PFS6 ≥41.5% (vs. null 15%; alpha=0.02), and ≥89% power to detect RR ≥20% (vs. null 2.5%; alpha=0.021). RESULTS Of 83 pts screened while the abemaciclib arm was open between September 15, 2021 and October 3, 2022, 36 eligible pts received abemaciclib. The observed PFS6 rate in the first 24 evaluable pts was 54% (95% CI 33-75%), thus the study met PFS6 endpoint. Of all 35 evaluable pts, median PFS was 7.6 months (95% CI 3.6-17.1 months), estimated 6-month PFS was 55% (95% CI 40-75%) and estimated 6-month OS was 88% (95% CI 77-100%). No objective responses were observed. Of the 36 pts who started treatment, two had a grade 4 adverse event at least possibly related to treatment which included ALT elevation(1), AST elevation(1) and vomiting(1). Patients with NF2 alterations (n=24) had favorable PFS6 outcomes (58%, 95% CI 37-78%) compared to those with CDK (n=4, 25%, 95% CI 1-81%) and CDK+NF2 alterations (n=7, 29% 95% CI 4-71%), (Fisher’s Exact p=0.036). CONCLUSIONS Abemaciclib was well-tolerated and resulted in improved PFS6, meeting the trial’s co-primary endpoint. Abemaciclib warrants further investigation for the treatment of patients with progressive meningiomas.

Abstract BACKGROUND Patients with meningiomas who have progressed after multimodal treatments face a significant shortage of viable therapeutic options. Recent advancements in the molecular understanding of meningiomas have identified the FAK and RAF/MEK signaling pathways as potential promising targets for progressive meningiomas. METHODS In vitro, we tested two human meningioma cell lines, IOMM-Lee (NF2 wild-type and CDKN2A loss) and CH157-MN (NF2 mutant). The cells were plated in Matrigel-coated wells, treated with defactinib (FAK inhibitor), VS-6766 (RAF/MEK inhibitor, avutometinib) and the combination over a 7-day period and assessed for cell viability using the CellTiter-Glo 3D assay. In vivo, we tested the efficacy of the FAK inhibitor VS-4718 (possessing favorable pharmacokinetic properties in mice) and RAF/MEK inhibitor VS-6766, both given daily via oral gavage, in athymic nude mice bearing IOMM-Lee or CH157-MN tumors. RESULTS In the matrigel assay, VS-6766 suppressed IOMM-Lee and CH157-MN cells in a dose dependent manner. The drug combination was mostly additive in IOMM-Lee cells. However, CH157-MN cells showed a strong synergistic response across all drug concentrations tested. In the IOMM-Lee flank tumor model, VS-4718 alone had no effect, while VS-6766 alone or in combination significantly reduced tumor growth and extended median survival from 25 days to 47 days (p < 0.05). In the CH157 flank tumor model, VS-4718 monotherapy did not affect tumor growth or survival, but VS-6766 monotherapy slowed tumor growth and increased median survival from 10 days to 31 days (p < 0.001). Combining both drugs further reduced tumor growth and extended median survival to 42 days (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Treatment with FAK and RAF/MEK inhibitors showed synergistic or combination effects in the NF2 mutant CH157-MN model in vitro and in vivo. RAF/MEK inhibitor monotherapy was effective for the IOMM-Lee model (NF2 wild-type), without clear benefit of combining with the FAK inhibitor. Investigations in intracranial tumor models are underway.

Abstract Meningiomas are the most frequent primary intracranial tumors. Hence, they constitute a major share of diagnostic specimens in neuropathology practice. The 2021 WHO Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors (“CNS5”) has introduced the first molecular grading parameters for meningioma with oncogenic variants in the TERT promoter and homozygous deletion of CDKN2A/B as markers for CNS WHO grade 3. However, after the publication of the new classification volume, clarifications were requested, not only on novel but also on long-standing questions in meningioma grading that were beyond the scope of the WHO “blue book.” In addition, more recent research into possible new molecular grading parameters could not yet be implemented in the 2021 classification but constitutes a compelling body of literature. Hence, the consortium to inform molecular and practical approaches to CNS tumor taxonomy-not official WHO (cIMPACT-NOW) Steering Committee convened a working group to provide such clarification and assess the evidence of possible novel molecular criteria. As a result, this cIMPACT-NOW update provides guidance for more standardized morphological evaluation and interpretation, most prominently pertaining to brain invasion, identifies scenarios in which advanced molecular testing is recommended, proposes to assign CNS WHO grade 2 for cases with CNS WHO grade 1 morphology but chromosomal arm 1p deletion in combination with 22q deletion and/or NF2 oncogenic variants, and discusses areas in which the current evidence is not yet sufficient to result in new recommendations.