Citations

AbstractBackgroundCardiac tamponade or pericardial tamponade (PT) can be a complication following invasive cardiac procedures.MethodsPatients who underwent various procedures in the cardiac catheterization lab (viz. coronary interventions) were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Edition, Clinical Modification (International classification of diseases [ICD]‐9‐Clinical modification [CM] and ICD‐10‐CM, respectively) from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Patient demographics, presence of comorbidities, PT‐related events, and in‐hospital death were also abstracted from the NIS database.ResultsThe frequency of PT‐related events in the patients undergoing CI from 2010 to 2017 ranged from 3.3% to 8.4%. Combined in‐hospital mortality/morbidity of PT‐related events were higher with increasing age (odds ratio [OR] [95% CI]: chronic total occlusion (CTO) = 1.19 [1.10‐1.29]; acute coronary syndrome (ACS) = 1.21 [1.11‐1.33], both p < 0.0001) and female sex (OR [95%CI]: CTO = 1.70 [1.45‐2.00]; ACS = 1.72 [1.44‐2.06], both p < 0.0001). In‐hospital mortality related to PT‐related events was found to be 8.5% for coronary procedures. In‐hospital mortality was highest amongst the patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) for ACS (ACS vs. non‐CTO PTCA vs. CTO PTCA: 15.7% vs. 10.4% and 14.4%, p < 0.0001 and ACS vs. non‐CTO PTCA vs. CTO PTCA: 12.1% vs. 8.1% and 5.6%, p = 0.0001, respectively).ConclusionsIn the real‐world setting, PT‐related events in CI were found to be 3.3%−8.4%, with in‐hospital mortality of 8.5%. The patients undergoing PTCA for ACS were found to have highest mortality. Older patients undergoing CTO PTCA independently predicted higher mortality.

Aim: AI research, development, and implementation are expanding at an exponential pace across healthcare. This paradigm shift in healthcare research has led to increased demands for clinical outcomes, all at the expense of a significant gap in AI literacy within the healthcare field. This has further translated to a lack of tools in creating a framework for literature in the AI in medicine domain. We propose HUMANE (Harmonious Understanding of Machine Learning Analytics Network), a checklist for establishing an international consensus for authors and reviewers involved in research focused on artificial intelligence (AI) or machine learning (ML) in medicine. Methods: This study was conducted using the Delphi method by devising a survey using the Google Forms platform. The survey was developed as a checklist containing 8 sections and 56 questions with a 5-point Likert scale. Results: A total of 33 survey respondents were part of the initial Delphi process with the majority (45%) in the 36–45 years age group. The respondents were located across the USA (61%), UK (24%), and Australia (9%) as the top 3 countries, with a pre-dominant healthcare background (42%) as early-career professionals (3–10 years’ experience) (42%). Feedback showed an overall agreeable consensus (mean ranges 4.1–4.8, out of 5) as cumulative scores throughout all sections. The majority of the consensus was agreeable with the Discussion (Other) section of the checklist (median 4.8 (interquartile range (IQR) 4.8-4.8)), whereas the least agreed section was the Ground Truth (Expert(s) review) section (median 4.1 (IQR 3.9–4.2)) and the Methods (Outcomes) section (median 4.1 (IQR 4.1–4.1)) of the checklist. The final checklist after consensus and revision included a total of 8 sections and 50 questions. Conclusions: The HUMANE international consensus has reflected on further research on the potential of this checklist as an established consensus in improving the reliability and quality of research in this field.

Introduction: Epsilon wave, one of the major criteria for the diagnosis of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM), is present in only 30% of ACM patients. Fontaine Leads have been shown to facilitate the visualization of Epsilon waves. Hypothesis: Modified Fontaine leads may help in better visualization of Epsilon waves in ACM patients than standard Fontaine leads. Methods: We prospectively enrolled ACM patients under our follow-up. Fontaine and the modified Fontaine EKGs were recorded ( Figure 1A ). The duration and amplitude of Epsilon waves, when present, were measured. Duration-amplitude product (DAP) was computed and compared. Results: EKGs of seventeen patients were available for analysis. Four patients (24%) had an Epsilon wave on a 12 lead EKG. Thirteen patients (76%) had Epsilon waves either on 12 lead EKG or Fontaine modification leads. These 13 patients (10 males and 3 females; mean age: 40.5 ±13 years) were included in the analysis. ( Table 1 ) Epsilon waves were seen in 10 (77%) patients in Standard Fontaine Leads. In the rest of the modifications, Epsilon waves were seen in 85% (11), 77% (10), 80% (8), and 80% (8) in Right, Left, Right-Left, and Left-Right Fontaine leads, respectively. ( Table 1 ) In only one patient (8%), the Standard Fontaine Epsilon wave had maximum DAP. Right, Left, Right-Left, and Left-Right Fontaine leads had maximum DAP in 5 (39%), 3 (23%), 2 (20%), and 3 (30%) patients, respectively. Conclusions: A modified Fontaine lead position may facilitate the Epsilon wave visualization in patients suffering from ACM when standard EKG and Fontaine lead EKGs fail to do so. A well-designed randomized study may be needed to evaluate the utility of modified Fontaine Leads in ACM.

Introduction: The treatment options for high and extreme-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis have changed significantly over the past decade because of advances in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However new permanent pacemaker implant (PPI) remains an impending concern after TAVR. Hypothesis: We sought to determine the frequency, predictors and outcomes of patients requiring PPI after TAVR. Methods: We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database using the ICD-9-CM procedure code of 35.05 for transfemoral/transaortic and 35.06 for transapical replacement of aortic valve .We identified TAVR procedures associated with new permanent pacemaker implants using appropriate validated ICD-9-CM codes. Using multivariate analysis we further identified predictors of PPM implants Results: An estimated 8828 TAVR procedures were performed in United States between 2011-2012. 773 (8.7%) TAVR procedures were associated with PPIs. PPI were higher in older (age>80 years), White race, diabetics, left bundle branch block (LBBB), right bundle branch block (RBBB), transfemoral approach. The inhospital mortality ( 5.2% vs.4.6% ) , mean length of stay ( 9.8 vs. 8.3 days ) disposition to short term nursing facility was higher (38.2% vs. 32.1%) and mean total costs (82217$ vs. 52283$) was higher in TAVR + PPI group . On multivariate analysis, Age in 5 year increment [Odds ratio (OR) 1.11; Confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.17, p<0.001], diabetes [OR 1.26; CI 1.07-1.49, p<0.001], LBBB [OR 1.99; CI 1.55-2.56, p<0.001], RBBB [OR 5.36; CI 3.80-7.55, p<0.001] were independent predictors of PPI. Transfemoral approach was associated with more PPI implants [OR 1.41; CI 1.12 -1.78, p<0.001] Conclusion: Age, baseline conduction system disturbances, diabetes, transfemoral approach emerged as independent predictors of PPI after TAVR. This study provides useful tools to identify high-risk patients for PPI after TAVR.

Introduction: The impact of COVID-19 was felt across cardiology as resources were redirected to critical care, delaying elective cardiology procedures. Hypothesis: To evaluate differences in outcomes of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures in 2020 (height of COVID) vs. 2016-2019 (pre-COVID). Methods: Adults >= 18 years undergoing CIED procedures were identified from National Inpatient Sample Databases (NIS) 2016-2020. Complications and mortality were assessed based on the type of device: Permanent Pacemaker (PPM); Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD); Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with Pacemaker (CRT-P) or defibrillator (CRT-D): Leadless PPM; Generator explant (GE), and Lead extraction (LE). Results: A 13.8% drop in CIED admissions was recorded between 2019 and 2020 (p<0.01). Fewer procedures involving PPM, ICD, CRT-P, CRT-D, LE, and GE were observed between 2019 and 2020. Leadless PPM utilization rose consistently between 2016-2020 (47.6% increase during 2020 vs 2019)(Figure). In 2020, a higher proportion of patients were classified with a Charlson Comorbidity Index score of ≥3 (severe) (47.4% in 2020 vs. 42.9% in 2016-2019, p<0.01). The table shows significantly higher complications during CIED implants with no changes in mortality related to procedures. Conclusions: Patients admitted for CIED implants in 2020 had more severe comorbidities and expressed considerable differences in complications than pre-COVID era (2016-2019), but mortality remained unchanged. Leadless PPM use increased during pandemic, as against a decrease in the use of other CIEDs.

Introduction: While Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) primarily affects the respiratory system but can impact the cardiovascular system can triggering various complications. Hypothesis: To investigate the trend in age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) in patients with atrial fibrillation(AF) among COVID-19-positive patients (CPP) by race and sex. Methods: Trends in AAMRs (per 100,000) from all-cause in patients with AF between April to December 2016-2020 were evaluated via the National Inpatient Sample and the US Census Bureau. The AAMRs among CPP with AF in 2020 was also evaluated between racial and sex cohorts. Results: A gradual rise in AAMR(all causes) in patients with AF was observed between 2016-2019, with a 49.4% overall rise between 2019(271 per 100,000) and 2020(405 per 100,000) ( Table 1a and Figure ). Around 250475 COVID-19-positive patients had AF, and 24.2% of cases did not survive their hospitalization (vs. 10.9% in those without AF, p<0.01, aOR 1.457, 95% CI 1.438-1.477). Among CPP males and females with AF that died, White females and males were the oldest, while Black males and females reported the highest mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score ( Table 1b ).Furthermore, among the CPP with AF in 2020, Hispanics reported a higher AAMR (119.6 per 100,000) than Whites(111.1 per 100,000) and Blacks(101.9 per 100,000). AAMRs in males were higher in Hispanic males (144.8 per 100,000), followed by White males (129.7 per 100,000), and Black males (110 per 100,000). However, the AAMRs in females were highest in Black females (91.3 per 100,000), followed by White females (88.3 per 100,000) and Hispanic females (87.0 per 100,000). ( Table 1c ) Conclusions: AAMRs in patients with AF are on the rise and a sharp growth was seen during the first year of the pandemic. AAMRs among CPP patients with AF were highest among Black females and Hispanic males, while White males and females were oldest and Black males and females reported the highest CCI scores.

Introduction: Incident cardiac arrhythmias are common in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, but the impact of a second incident cardiac arrhythmia during hospitalization on clinical outcomes remain unclear. Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to assess the frequency and prognostic implications of a second incident arrhythmia in hospitalized COVID-19 patients over the pandemic course till vaccine availability. Methods: The multicenter COVID-RHYTHM Registry enrolled hospitalized COVID-19 patients from 3/8/2020 to 1/24/2021. Cardiac arrhythmia included documented atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter (AFL), ventricular tachycardia (VT), severe sinus bradycardia (<40 bpm) or AV block. Outcomes were compared between patients with single vs. more than one incident arrhythmias adjusting for baseline variables. Results: Of 6299 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, 4398 had an had an incident cardiac arrhythmia during hospitalization, of which 822 (19%) had a second incident arrhythmia. Those with >1 incident arrhythmia had a higher baseline prevalence of heart failure, chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease and sleep apnea (Table). Those with >1 incident arrhythmia had higher in-hospital mortality, need for ICU admission and need for rehab upon discharge. Length of stay was similar between the groups. Conclusions: In hospitalized COVID-19 patients with incident cardiac arrhythmias, a second incident arrhythmia during hospitalization was seen in 19%. Having >1 incident arrhythmia was associated with increased need for ICU admission and reduced survival.

AbstractBackgroundCardiac tamponade (CT) can be a complication following invasive cardiac procedures. We assessed CT following common cardiac electrophysiology (EP) procedures to facilitate risk prediction of associated morbidity and in‐hospital mortality.MethodsPatients who underwent various EP procedures in the cardiac catheterization lab (ablations and device implantations) were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD‐9‐CM and ICD‐10‐CM, respectively) from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Patient demographics, presence of comorbidities, CT‐related events, and in‐hospital death were also abstracted from the NIS database.ResultsThe frequency of CT‐related events in patients with EP intervention from 2010 to 2017 ranged from 3.4% to 7.0%. In‐hospital mortality related to CT‐related events was found to be 2.2%. Increasing age was the only predictor of higher mortality in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) groups (OR [95% CI]: AF ablation = 11.15 [1.70–73.34], p = .01; CRT = 1.41 [1.05–1.90], p = .02).ConclusionsIn the real‐world setting, CT‐related events in EP procedures were found to be 3.4%–7.0% with in‐hospital mortality of 2.2%. Older patients undergoing AF ablation were found to have higher mortality.