Introduction: Resistant and uncontrolled hypertension pose persistent clinical and public health challenges. Renal denervation, a catheter-based procedure targeting renal sympathetic nerves, has emerged as a promising approach to lower blood pressure by reducing sympathetic overactivity. Hypothesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of sham-controlled trials investigated whether renal denervation results in sustained blood pressure reduction across short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science through March 2025. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251015937). Randomized, sham-controlled trials of renal denervation in resistant/uncontrolled hypertension were included. Primary outcomes were ambulatory blood pressure (daytime, nighttime, and 24-hour); secondary outcomes included office and home blood pressure measurements. Follow-up durations were categorized into three groups: less than 6 months, 6–12 months, and greater than 12 months. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB-2. Results: Twenty trials (25 reports) with 2,167 RDN patients and 1,744 sham controls were included. Most trials had a low risk of bias. RDN significantly reduced 24-hour SBP (–3.29 mmHg, 95% CI: –5.91 to –0.67) and DBP (–1.42 mmHg, 95% CI: –2.29 to –0.55), despite high heterogeneity (I2 > 90%). Daytime DBP showed a significant reduction (–2.90 mmHg, 95% CI: –4.39 to –1.41), while other BP measures were less consistent. Home SBP was significantly reduced (–5.04 mmHg, 95% CI: –8.50 to –1.58). At 6–12 months, 24-hour SBP reduction persisted (–3.36 mmHg, 95% CI: –5.71 to –1.01), but DBP effects were nonsignificant. Long-term follow-up revealed nonsignificant changes in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure. Conclusions: Renal denervation modestly lowers BP in the short term (<6 months). Mid-term SBP reduction persists, but diastolic and long-term effects are inconsistent. These findings highlight the need for refined patient selection, optimized techniques, and longer follow-up trials.
Use of Protamine for Heparin Reversal in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
AbstractBackgroundCardiac tamponade or pericardial tamponade (PT) can be a complication following invasive cardiac procedures.MethodsPatients who underwent various procedures in the cardiac catheterization lab (viz. coronary interventions) were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Edition, Clinical Modification (International classification of diseases [ICD]‐9‐Clinical modification [CM] and ICD‐10‐CM, respectively) from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Patient demographics, presence of comorbidities, PT‐related events, and in‐hospital death were also abstracted from the NIS database.ResultsThe frequency of PT‐related events in the patients undergoing CI from 2010 to 2017 ranged from 3.3% to 8.4%. Combined in‐hospital mortality/morbidity of PT‐related events were higher with increasing age (odds ratio [OR] [95% CI]: chronic total occlusion (CTO) = 1.19 [1.10‐1.29]; acute coronary syndrome (ACS) = 1.21 [1.11‐1.33], both p < 0.0001) and female sex (OR [95%CI]: CTO = 1.70 [1.45‐2.00]; ACS = 1.72 [1.44‐2.06], both p < 0.0001). In‐hospital mortality related to PT‐related events was found to be 8.5% for coronary procedures. In‐hospital mortality was highest amongst the patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) for ACS (ACS vs. non‐CTO PTCA vs. CTO PTCA: 15.7% vs. 10.4% and 14.4%, p < 0.0001 and ACS vs. non‐CTO PTCA vs. CTO PTCA: 12.1% vs. 8.1% and 5.6%, p = 0.0001, respectively).ConclusionsIn the real‐world setting, PT‐related events in CI were found to be 3.3%−8.4%, with in‐hospital mortality of 8.5%. The patients undergoing PTCA for ACS were found to have highest mortality. Older patients undergoing CTO PTCA independently predicted higher mortality.