Desai, Maheshkumar

Introduction: The treatment options for high and extreme-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis have changed significantly over the past decade because of advances in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However new permanent pacemaker implant (PPI) remains an impending concern after TAVR. Hypothesis: We sought to determine the frequency, predictors and outcomes of patients requiring PPI after TAVR. Methods: We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database using the ICD-9-CM procedure code of 35.05 for transfemoral/transaortic and 35.06 for transapical replacement of aortic valve .We identified TAVR procedures associated with new permanent pacemaker implants using appropriate validated ICD-9-CM codes. Using multivariate analysis we further identified predictors of PPM implants Results: An estimated 8828 TAVR procedures were performed in United States between 2011-2012. 773 (8.7%) TAVR procedures were associated with PPIs. PPI were higher in older (age>80 years), White race, diabetics, left bundle branch block (LBBB), right bundle branch block (RBBB), transfemoral approach. The inhospital mortality ( 5.2% vs.4.6% ) , mean length of stay ( 9.8 vs. 8.3 days ) disposition to short term nursing facility was higher (38.2% vs. 32.1%) and mean total costs (82217$ vs. 52283$) was higher in TAVR + PPI group . On multivariate analysis, Age in 5 year increment [Odds ratio (OR) 1.11; Confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.17, p<0.001], diabetes [OR 1.26; CI 1.07-1.49, p<0.001], LBBB [OR 1.99; CI 1.55-2.56, p<0.001], RBBB [OR 5.36; CI 3.80-7.55, p<0.001] were independent predictors of PPI. Transfemoral approach was associated with more PPI implants [OR 1.41; CI 1.12 -1.78, p<0.001] Conclusion: Age, baseline conduction system disturbances, diabetes, transfemoral approach emerged as independent predictors of PPI after TAVR. This study provides useful tools to identify high-risk patients for PPI after TAVR.

Introduction: Short-term use of Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS) has the potential to benefit the patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) who may be high-risk or suffer complications. The present study was conducted to address the contemporary use of MCS in TAVR procedures. Methods: The study included a total of 1794 TAVR procedures in the years 2011-2012 from Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Use of MCS was identified using ICD-9-CM codes. The patients were divided based on use of MCS devices. The primary outcome of the study was in-hospital mortality and the secondary outcomes were complications, length of stay (LOS) and cost. Multi-variate simple logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors of the outcomes. Results: Out of total 1794 TAVR procedures, 190 (10.6 %) utilized a MCS device (MCS group) and 1,604 (89.4%) did not (non-MCS group). The use of MCS devices with TAVR was associated with increase in the in-hospital mortality (14.9% vs. 3.5%, p<0.01) with same results obtained in multi-variate models. The rates of complications were significantly higher in MCS group so as the mean length of stay (11.8±0.8 vs. 8.1±0.2 days, p<0.01) and cost ($68,997±3,656 vs. $55,878±653, p=0.03). Conclusion: Use of MCS in TAVR predicts increase in-hospital mortality, complications, LOS and cost of care.