Citations

ABSTRACT Many real‐world patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) are excluded by TOPAZ‐1 criteria; this study assessed cisplatin and gemcitabine plus durvalumab (CGD) efficacy and safety in these patients. Data from 1358 patients with advanced BTC treated with first‐line CGD across 55 international centers were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified as TOPAZ‐1‐in (meeting all inclusion criteria) or TOPAZ‐1‐out (meeting ≥ 1 exclusion criterion). Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Furthermore, OS and PFS of the TOPAZ‐1‐out cohort were compared with reconstructed survival data from the phase III trial. 912 (67.1%) patients were classified as TOPAZ‐1‐in , and 446 (32.9%) as TOPAZ‐1‐out . After a median follow‐up of 14.5 months (95% CI: 13.7–36.5), OS was 16.1 months in TOPAZ‐1‐in and 12.5 months in TOPAZ‐1‐out (HR 0.69, 95% CI: 14.6–16.5, p = 0.0001); PFS was 8.2 versus 6.5 months (HR 0.73, 95% CI: 7.1–8.1, p < 0.0001). Median OS in the TOPAZ‐1‐out cohort (12.5 months) was nearly identical to the phase III trial experimental arm (12.9 months; HR 1.15, p = 0.13); for PFS the HR was 1.12 (95% CI 0.93–1.42; p = 0.09). Among TOPAZ‐1‐out patients, active infection, elevated bilirubin, and ECOG PS > 1 were linked to poorer OS, while no detrimental impact emerged for ALT/AST abnormalities, corticosteroid use, renal or hematologic parameters, or prior surgery within 6 months, suggesting treatment effectiveness was broadly maintained across clinical subgroups. Furthermore, TOPAZ‐1‐out patients experienced no significant increase in adverse events compared with the TOPAZ‐1‐in group. Real‐world data suggest CGD may be effective in TOPAZ‐1‐out patients, with no evident increase in toxicity, supporting the potential expanded use of the regimen in clinical practice.

Introduction Out‐of‐hospital community births account for 1.6% to 2% of births in the United States and are associated with fewer obstetric interventions but increased neonatal risk. Little is known about how maternity care providers’ characteristics, values, and prior exposure to community birth influence attitudes toward community birth. Methods We conducted an observational cross‐sectional survey using a 40 to 43 item Research Electronic Data Capture questionnaire distributed October 2 to 30, 2024. Eligible participants (“providers”) included in‐hospital physicians, midwives, community birth providers, and registered nurses. The survey assessed demographics, practice characteristics, provider values, prior community birth experience, and attitudes toward community birth. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize characteristics. Group comparisons between in‐hospital and community birth providers were conducted using analysis of variance and χ 2 or Fisher exact tests. Associations between attitudes and provider values were evaluated using linear models with Bonferroni correction. Results Sixty‐seven providers completed the survey (51 in hospital, 16 community based). Most respondents were female (89.6%) and White (77.6%), with a median of 7 years in practice (IQR, 3‐14.5). Attitudes significantly differed by role ( P = .007) and credentials ( P = .002). In‐hospital providers reported safety concerns about community birth and perceived antenatal counseling to be inadequate. Perceived patient distrust during transfer was common among both in‐hospital and community‐based providers (69% and 81%, respectively). After adjustment for provider role and multiple comparisons, no significant differences in personal values were noted by attitude group; however, providers with positive attitudes toward community birth were more likely to believe that patients value compassion (β = 2.3, P = .004). Discussion Provider attitudes toward community birth appear to be shaped more by professional role and clinical experience than by differences in underlying value systems. High levels of perceived patient distrust during transfer highlight the need for interventions that strengthen compassion across maternity care settings.

Abstract The liver is organized into tightly regulated zones with distinct metabolic functions but zonation erodes with age. Cellular senescence contributes to aging and liver diseases, however, its impact on aging biology is ill-defined. As part of The Cellular Senescence Network Consortium, we used multiple spatial transcriptomics approaches (GeoMx, Visium, CosMx) with snRNA-seq to profile senescence signatures, zonation markers, and metabolic pathways in livers from wild-type (WT) mice of multiple ages. We observed a loss of canonical zone signatures in aged mouse livers characterized by “expansion” of midlobular (zone 2) marker gene expression, accompanied by diminished expression of zone 3 marker genes by middle-age (18 months), indicative of loss of cell identity. Multiple analytic approaches identified distinct age-, zone- and sex-specific senescence signatures, which were significantly associated with zonation markers changes. This was recapitulated in Ercc1 mutant models of accelerated senescence, supporting a causal role of senescent cells in liver aging. A “no-zone” hepatocyte-like cluster expanded with age and with the strongest Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype (SASP) profile. Gene expression profiles from senescent hepatocytes implicate decreased WNT signaling and increased BMP as contributing to age-related loss of zonation. Together, these data elucidate the role of senescent cells in driving aging biology in non-diseased liver through disruption of cell:cell signaling and the loss of metabolic and cell identity gene expression necessary for hepatocyte function.

Background : Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a major cause of cancer-related mortality. Optimal treatment decisions are challenging, and existing treatment allocation frameworks may not fully reflect the evolving therapeutic landscape or contemporary clinical practices in North America. Methods : Using a modified Delphi process, a multidisciplinary panel of 20 North American experts in hepatology, medical oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology developed a consensus-based treatment framework for HCC, termed the BEACON-HCC system. The framework was informed by current evidence and expert opinion through iterative discussion and voting. In a pilot study using 29 real-world patient cases, we assessed concordance between external expert recommendations and BEACON-HCC recommendations and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) 2025 treatment recommendations. Results : The BEACON-HCC treatment allocation framework diverges from prior frameworks by incorporating nuanced clinical features such as degree of intrahepatic tumor burden and vascular invasion, and adverse tumor prognostic markers, to align treatment allocation with tumor biology and therapeutic potential. Key innovations include the incorporation of emerging modalities such as external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), transarterial radioembolization (TARE), and systemic-locoregional combination therapies. In the pilot exercise, expert treatment decisions showed 96.6% concordance with BEACON-HCC recommendations and 72.4% concordance with BCLC recommendations. Conclusions : BEACON-HCC is a consensus-based framework for treatment allocation that incorporates the expanding range of therapeutic options available to patients in the North American HCC population. Expert treatment decisions showed a high concordance with the BEACON-HCC system; further validation using empiric clinical data is planned through the HCC-Live Consortium.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women, causing more than 600,000 deaths every year. The human microbiome is increasingly recognized as a key regulator of cancer initiation, progression, and therapeutic response. Postbiotics—defined as non-viable microbial cells and/or their structural components and metabolites that confer health benefits—are emerging as promising and safer alternatives to live probiotics in oncology. This review provides a comprehensive mechanistic overview of the potential role of postbiotics against cancer, with a specific focus on breast cancer. Preclinical evidence demonstrates that selected postbiotics exert dose- and time-dependent anticancer effects against multiple breast cancer subtypes by modulating key oncogenic pathways (such as PI3K/AKT and NF-κB) and inducing epigenetic regulation through histone deacetylase inhibition. Beyond direct effects on tumor cell proliferation and apoptosis, postbiotics influence the breast cancer microenvironment by reshaping cytokine networks, suppressing pro-metastatic inflammation, and enhancing antitumor immune responses through the activation of NK cells and T cells. We also provide emerging links between microbiome composition, estrobolome activity, and breast cancer subtype-specific biology. Despite these encouraging findings, the clinical translation of postbiotics in oncology remains limited. Currently, only one registered clinical trial investigates postbiotics in the oncology setting (melanoma), and no clinical trials have specifically evaluated postbiotics in breast cancer patients. This highlights a substantial translational gap between preclinical evidence and clinical application. Accordingly, well-designed, tumor-specific clinical trials are urgently needed to validate the safety, efficacy, and therapeutic potential of postbiotics as novel strategies in personalized breast cancer management.

Abstract Background Complications such as intermittent pouchitis (IP) and chronic inflammatory disorders of the pouch (CP) are common after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), particularly among patients with both ulcerative colitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). There are no standardized approaches for prophylaxis against these complications for patients with PSC undergoing IPAA. We compared outcomes among patients with PSC and IPAA who received antibiotic or immunosuppressive therapies to those who did not. Methods We designed a retrospective cohort study that included patients with ulcerative colitis and PSC from 7 tertiary care centers that underwent IPAA between 1994 and 2023. Patients were categorized on whether they received medications following IPAA that may provide primary prophylactic benefit, such as antibiotics, probiotics, immunomodulators, or biologic medications; and the proportion of patients developing IP and CP was evaluated. Results A total of 172 patients were included in the cohort, and 13 (7.6%) patients received antibiotics or immunosuppressant medications. Antibiotics and probiotics were the most common therapy (5 patients, 2.9%), followed by biologics, small-molecule inhibitors, immunomodulators, or mesalamine (all 1 patient, 0.6%). Compared to patients not receiving antibiotics or immunosuppression, patients receiving antibiotics or immunosuppression were significantly less likely to develop IP (69.2% vs 91.2%; P = .03; odds ratio 0.22; 95% CI, 0.06-0.80) and CP (23.1% vs 56.0%, P = 0.04; OR 0.24, 95% CI, 0.06-0.89). Conclusions In this retrospective cohort of patients with ulcerative colitis and PSC undergoing IPAA, usage of concomitant antibiotics or immunosuppression was low. However, use of concomitant antibiotics or immunosuppression may decrease the burden of inflammatory conditions of the pouch in these high-risk patients.

Abstract Germinal center (GC)-derived lymphomas arise within a specialized immune ecosystem, yet whether malignant cells direct its remodeling remains unclear. Integrating genomic, transcriptomic, spatial, and functional analyses across follicular lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, we define a developmental framework linking malignant B-cell differentiation state to tumor microenvironment (TME) organization. Rather than segregating by histology, lymphomas align along a shared differentiation continuum in which proliferative dark zone (DZ) states associate with immune-depleted TMEs, whereas post-GC/memory B-cell (MBC) states drive inflamed but immunosuppressed TMEs. Spatial profiling reveals collapse of GC architecture and emergence of suppressive myeloid niches along this trajectory. Single-cell lineage reconstruction uncovers a DZ-to-MBC developmental axis underlying lymphoma evolution. Genetic reprogramming in vivo demonstrates that malignant differentiation state is sufficient to instruct TME remodeling. Collectively, these findings establish malignant differentiation state as a causal determinant of immune architecture across GC-derived lymphomas and identify lineage-directed immune reprogramming as a potential therapeutic strategy.

Abstract Invasive lobular breast carcinoma (ILC) is the most common special histological subtype of breast cancer, which accounts for 10-15% of all cases. To study the phenotype characteristics, metastatic growth kinetic and immune microenvironment of ILC, we developed an orthotopically transplantable cell line model from the spontaneous mammary fat pad tumor of CDH1-PTEN dual knockout C57BL/6 mouse with Cre-loxP system, designated CPT6. CPT6 recapitulates single-file growth pattern of human ILC, with pleomorphic features and a high mitotic index. RNA sequencing together with whole exome sequencing reveals a luminal A subtype with targetable driver mutations such as Kras G12C. As a novel orthotopically transplantable ILC model in immune competent mice, CPT6 shows robust in vivo growth and metastatic rate, and has moderate immunogenicity which appears to be T-cell independent. We also profiled the immune microenvironment of CPT6, revealing a myeloid-rich environment with dominant M2-macrophage population, which is concordant with human ILC. In summary, this model recapitulates human ILC phenotype and represents a valuable preclinical platform for evaluating immunotherapy and other therapeutic strategies for invasive lobular breast carcinoma.

Abstract Treatment resistance and metastases occur in 10–20% of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), the most common special histological subtype of breast cancer. ILC metastasizes to the ovary more frequently than no special type (NST) tumors, also known as invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). To characterize the genomic landscape of breast cancer ovarian metastases, we analyzed 15,613 local breast cancers, 22,010 non-ovarian metastases, and 246 ovarian metastases sequenced using FoundationOne®CDx or FoundationOne® assays. Ovarian metastases had enriched CDH1 , PIK3CA , and TBX3 mutations and depleted TP53 and MYC alterations relative to local breast cancers, with additional depletion of ESR1 mutations compared to non-ovarian metastases. CDH1 mutations were less frequent in ovarian metastases (47%) than local ILC (81.3%), with reduced 16q loss (64% vs 84%), indicating that ovarian metastases also arise from non-ILC tumors. We extended these findings to a UPMC cohort of 27 ovarian metastases (13 ILC, 8 IDC, 6 mixed ductal-lobular carcinoma) with patient-matched primary tumors in most cases. In both cohorts, patients with ovarian metastases were significantly younger than those with other metastatic sites. In the UPMC cohort, the most frequent mutations were in PIK3CA , CDH1 , KMT2C , FOXA1 , and RUNX1 . Transcriptomic analysis identified upregulated G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) pathways, including metabotropic glutamate receptor signaling. Functional studies showed that calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR), a GPCR overexpressed in ovarian metastases, drives MEK/ERK-dependent migration and F-actin reorganization in ILC cell lines, enhanced by estrogen and blocked by calcilytic, MEK, or anti- estrogen treatment. Our findings inform future therapeutic targeting of ovarian metastasis.