Finn, Richard S.

Background : Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a major cause of cancer-related mortality. Optimal treatment decisions are challenging, and existing treatment allocation frameworks may not fully reflect the evolving therapeutic landscape or contemporary clinical practices in North America. Methods : Using a modified Delphi process, a multidisciplinary panel of 20 North American experts in hepatology, medical oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology developed a consensus-based treatment framework for HCC, termed the BEACON-HCC system. The framework was informed by current evidence and expert opinion through iterative discussion and voting. In a pilot study using 29 real-world patient cases, we assessed concordance between external expert recommendations and BEACON-HCC recommendations and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) 2025 treatment recommendations. Results : The BEACON-HCC treatment allocation framework diverges from prior frameworks by incorporating nuanced clinical features such as degree of intrahepatic tumor burden and vascular invasion, and adverse tumor prognostic markers, to align treatment allocation with tumor biology and therapeutic potential. Key innovations include the incorporation of emerging modalities such as external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), transarterial radioembolization (TARE), and systemic-locoregional combination therapies. In the pilot exercise, expert treatment decisions showed 96.6% concordance with BEACON-HCC recommendations and 72.4% concordance with BCLC recommendations. Conclusions : BEACON-HCC is a consensus-based framework for treatment allocation that incorporates the expanding range of therapeutic options available to patients in the North American HCC population. Expert treatment decisions showed a high concordance with the BEACON-HCC system; further validation using empiric clinical data is planned through the HCC-Live Consortium.

4100 Background: Checkpoint inhibition with anti-PD1 is able to elicit objective response rates (ORR) of ̃ 20% in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) but molecular biomarkers predicting response remain unknown. Here, we define biomarkers of response and primary resistance to anti-PD1 in aHCC by analyzing molecular features prior to systemic therapy. Methods: Through an international consortium of 13 referral centers, we gathered 111 fresh and archived tumor samples from patients with advanced HCC treated with single agent anti- PD1 therapy. Genomic analysis was performed with whole genome expression arrays, CTNNB1 exon 3 mutation assessment and histological evaluation. Results: Overall, we performed transcriptomic analysis in 83 patients, 28 of which were treated in first-line (ORR: 42.9%) while the remaining 55 patients were treated either in 2nd (41 patients, ORR 29.3%) or 3rd line (14 patients, ORR 7.1%) after prior therapy with tyrosine- kinase inhibitors (TKI) sorafenib or lenvatinib. In patients treated in frontline, response was associated with a significant upregulation in Interferon-γ signaling (IFNγ) and genesets relatedto the antigen presentation machinery (FDR < 0.05). Through differential expression analysis we defined an 11-gene signature that was significantly associated with both major pathways (FDR < 0.01) and was capable of predicting OR as well as progression-free- (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with aHCC. The signature was validated in three independent cohorts of melanoma, lung cancer, and head and neck squamous cell cancer patients were high expression was associated with a significant increase in ORR and longer PFS. In HCC, high expression of the signature was associated with a distinct profile in the immune infiltrate, where an increase in M1 macrophages (p = 0.003), CD4 memory T cell (p < 0.01) and CD4 naïve T cell-infiltration (p = 0.026) was observed. Conversely, low expression of the signature was associated with a marked upregulation of regulatory T cells (p < 0.001). No association was found, however, between either the overall immune infiltrate or CTNNB1 mutations and response. In patients that were treated with TKIs in frontline before receiving subsequent anti-PD1 therapy, the signature was no longer able to predict either OR or PFS/OS, suggesting that TKIs may reshape the microenvironment in a way that renders previously inflamed tumors no longer amenable to anti-PD1. Conclusions: Here, we define an 11-gene signature of response to anti-PD1 in first line aHCC. The signature was validated in patients with other solid cancer types, where it retained its predictive ability. Of note, the signature was not able to identify responders among HCC patients that were treated with TKIs prior to anti-PD1 therapy. The molecular changes induced by different treatment lines would, thus, require fresh biopsies prior to anti-PD1to enable biomarker-driven treatment.

Abstract Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has emerged as a major cause of cancer deaths globally. The landscape of systemic therapy has recently changed, with six additional systemic agents either approved or awaiting approval for advanced stage HCC. While these agents have the potential to improve outcomes, a survival increase of 2–5 months remains poor and falls short of what has been achieved in many other solid tumor types. The roles of genomics, underlying cirrhosis, and optimal use of treatment strategies that include radiation, liver transplantation, and surgery remain unanswered. Here, we discuss new treatment opportunities, controversies, and future directions in managing HCC.

Purpose No standard treatment exists for patients with cholangiocarcinoma for whom first-line gemcitabine-based therapy fails. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 ( FGFR2) fusions/translocations are present in 13% to 17% of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. BGJ398, an orally bioavailable, selective pan-FGFR kinase inhibitor, has shown preliminary clinical activity against tumors with FGFR alterations. Methods A multicenter, open-label, phase II study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02150967) evaluated BGJ398 antitumor activity in patients age ≥ 18 years with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma containing FGFR2 fusions or other FGFR alterations whose disease had progressed while receiving prior therapy. Patients received BGJ398 125 mg once daily for 21 days, then 7 days off (28-day cycles). The primary end point was investigator-assessed overall response rate. Results Sixty-one patients (35 women; median age, 57 years) with FGFR2 fusion (n = 48), mutation (n = 8), or amplification (n = 3) participated. At the prespecified data cutoff (June 30, 2016), 50 patients had discontinued treatment. All responsive tumors contained FGFR2 fusions. The overall response rate was 14.8% (18.8% FGFR2 fusions only), disease control rate was 75.4% (83.3% FGFR2 fusions only), and estimated median progression-free survival was 5.8 months (95% CI, 4.3 to 7.6 months). Adverse events included hyperphosphatemia (72.1% all grade), fatigue (36.1%), stomatitis (29.5%), and alopecia (26.2%). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 25 patients (41%) and included hyperphosphatemia (16.4%), stomatitis (6.6%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (4.9%). Conclusion BGJ398 is a first-in-class FGFR kinase inhibitor with manageable toxicities that shows meaningful clinical activity against chemotherapy-refractory cholangiocarcinoma containing FGFR2 fusions. This promising antitumor activity supports continued development of BGJ398 in this highly selected patient population.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a complex disease most commonly arising in the background of chronic liver disease. In the past two decades, there has been a significant increase in our understanding of both the clinical and molecular heterogeneity of HCC. There has been a robust increase in clinical trial activity in patients with poor prognostic factors, such as macrovascular invasion and extrahepatic spread (EHS). We aimed to synthesize the evidence for the treatment of patients with advanced HCC based on these baseline characteristics, including patients with both Child‐Pugh (CP) scores of A and B. A comprehensive search of several databases from each database inception to February 15, 2016 any language was conducted. We included 14 studies (three randomized controlled studies [RCTs] and 11 observational studies). We included studies that compared sorafenib, transarterial bland embolization/transarterial chemoembolization, yttrium‐90/radiation therapy, ablation (or combination), and no therapy. Two RCTs comparing sorafenib to best supportive care demonstrated a consistent improvement in overall survival (OS) for patients with advanced HCC and metastatic vascular invasion (MVI) and/or EHS and CP A liver disease (hazard ratio, 0.66 [95% confidence interval, 0.51‐0.87]; I 2 = 0%). Several observational studies evaluated locoregional therapies alone or in combination with other treatments and were limited by very‐low‐quality of evidence. This was true for both patients with EHS and MVI. Conclusion : In patients with advanced HCC and CP A liver function, sorafenib is the only treatment that has been shown to improve OS in randomized studies. High‐quality data supporting the use of other treatment modalities in this setting, or in the setting of patients with less compensated (CP B) liver disease, are lacking. (H epatology 2018;67:422‐435)

Abstract The recent identification of activating fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) mutations in endometrial cancer has generated an opportunity for a novel target-based therapy. Here, we explore the therapeutic potential of 2 FGFR inhibitors, the multikinase inhibitor dovitinib (TKI258) and the more selective FGFR inhibitor NVP-BGJ398 for the treatment of endometrial cancer. We examined the effects of both inhibitors on tumor cell growth, FGFR2 signaling, cell cycle, and apoptosis using a panel of 20 molecularly characterized human endometrial cancer cell lines. Anchorage-independent growth was studied using soft agar assays. In vivo studies were conducted using endometrial cancer xenograft models. Cell lines with activating FGFR2 mutations (S252W, N550K) were more sensitive to dovitinib or NVP-BGJ398 when compared with their FGFR2 wild-type counterparts (P = 0.073 and P = 0.021, respectively). Both agents inhibited FGFR2 signaling, induced cell-cycle arrest, and significantly increased apoptosis in FGFR2-mutant lines. In vitro, dovitinib and NVP-BGJ398 were both potent at inhibiting cell growth of FGFR2-mutant endometrial cancer cells, but the activity of dovitinib was less restricted to FGFR2-mutant lines when compared with NVP-BGJ398. In vivo, dovitinib and NVP-BGJ398 significantly inhibited the growth of FGFR2-mutated endometrial cancer xenograft models. In addition, dovitinib showed significant antitumor activity in FGFR2 wild-type endometrial cancer xenograft models including complete tumor regressions in a long-term in vivo study. Dovitinib and NVP-BGJ398 warrant further clinical evaluation in patients with FGFR2-mutated endometrial cancer. Dovitinib may have antitumor activity in endometrial cancer beyond FGFR2-mutated cases and may permit greater flexibility in patient selection. Mol Cancer Ther; 12(5); 632–42. ©2013 AACR.

Abstract Background: Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecological malignancy in the western world. Activating mutations of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) have been described in 12-16% of endometrial cancers. Moreover, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and their receptors are involved in the neovascularization, invasiveness, and metastatic potential of endometrial cancer. Therefore, suppression of FGFR/VEGFR/PDGFR signaling by TKI258 may represent a novel approach for treatment of endometrial cancer. Experimental Design: The aims of this study were 1.) to assess the effect of TKI258 on tumor cell growth in two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) culture assays using a panel of 20 human endometrial cancer cell lines, 2.) to identify candidate molecular markers predicting sensitivity using baseline gene expression profiling and mutational analyses, and 3.) to determine the in vivo antineoplastic activity of TKI258 in endometrial cancer xenograft models. In addition, we screened 200 fresh frozen endometrial cancer specimens to comprehensively assess the distribution pattern of PI3K, PTEN, and FGFR mutations in endometrial cancer. Results: Concentration-dependent anti-proliferative effects of TKI285 using 2D assays were seen in all endometrial cancer cell lines tested, but varied significantly between individual cell lines (IC50 range: 0.42µM – 3.06 µM). The three most sensitive endometrial cancer cell lines demonstrated activating FGFR2 mutations (MFE296: N549K, IC50 0.42µM; AN3CA: N549K and K310R, IC50 0.50µM; MFE280: S252W, IC50 0.66µM). Assessment of TKI258 responses in 3D assays demonstrated similar results to those observed in 2D culture assays in that the 3 cell lines harboring FGFR2 mutations were the most sensitive to TKI258 achieving 100% growth inhibition at a concentration of 1µM. AN3CA and MFE296 endometrial cancer cells formed xenografts in nude mice and antitumor activity was studied in both models. Inhibition of p-FGFR, p-PDGFR, p-VEGFR-2, pAKT and p-ERK1/2 were observed. Comprehensive data on the pattern of PI3K, PTEN and FGFR mutations in endometrial cancer will be provided. Conclusion: TKI258 demonstrates significant antitumor activity in endometrial cancer cells with FGFR2 mutations. This study provides a strong rationale for the clinical evaluation of TKI258 in patients with endometrial cancer, specifically in those harboring FGFR2 mutations. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3589. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-3589