Back to Authors

Rabiee, Atoosa

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3535-2706

Mayo Clinic

Washington DC VA Medical Center

Citations 4

Long-term clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19 and chronic liver disease: US multicenter COLD study
Aby, Elizabeth S. , Moafa, Ghady, Sultan, Mohammad T., Cacioppo, Paula A., Kumar, Sonal , Chung, Raymond , Bloom, Patricia P. , Gustafson, Jenna , Daidone, Michael , Reinus, Zoe, Debes, José D. , Sandhu, Sunny , Khalid, Sameeha , Roytman, Marina , Catana, Andreea M. , Wegermann, Kara , Carr, Rotonya M. , Saiman, Yedidya , Kassab, Ihab , Chen, Vincent , Rabiee, Atoosa , Rosenberg, C. E., Nguyen, Veronica , Gainey, Christina S. , Chavin, Kenneth D. , Chascsa, David M. , Varelas, Lee , Moghe, Akshata , Dhanasekaran, Renumathy , Latt, Nyan , Bloom, Patricia P , Debes, Jose D , Sandhu, Sunny , Sohal, Aalam , Khalid, Sameeha , Roytman, Marina , Catana, Andreea Maria , Wegermann, Kara , Carr, Rotonya M , Chen, V L , Rabiee, Atoosa , Nguyen, Veronica , Gainey, Christina , Zhou, Kali , Chavin, Kenneth , Lizaola-Mayo, Blanca , Chascsa, David M , Varelas, Lee , Dhanasekaran, Renumathy , Lizaola‐Mayo, Blanca

Hepatology Communications | January 24, 2023 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1 | Pages: e8874-e8874

10.1097/01.hc9.0000897224.68874.de Get It

Background: COVID-19 is associated with higher morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic liver diseases (CLDs). However, our understanding of the long-term outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with CLD is limited. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, observational cohort study of adult patients with CLD who were diagnosed with COVID-19 before May 30, 2020, to determine long-term clinical outcomes. We used a control group of patients with CLD confirmed negative for COVID-19. Results: We followed 666 patients with CLD (median age 58 years, 52.8% male) for a median of 384 (interquartile range: 31–462) days. The long-term mortality was 8.1%; with 3.6% experiencing delayed COVID-19-related mortality. Compared to a propensity-matched control group of patients with CLD without COVID-19 (n=1332), patients with CLD with COVID-19 had worse long-term survival [p<0.001; hazards ratio (HR): 1.69; 95% CI: 1.19–2.41] and higher rate of hospitalization (p<0.001, HR: 2.00, 1.62–2.48) over a 1-year follow-up period. Overall, 29.9% of patients reported symptoms of long-COVID-19. On multivariable analysis, female sex (p=0.05, HR: 2.45, 1.01–2.11), Hispanic ethnicity (p=0.003, HR: 1.94, 1.26–2.99), and severe COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation (p=0.028, HR: 1.74, 1.06–2.86) predicted long-COVID-19. In survivors, liver-related laboratory parameters showed significant improvement after COVID-19 resolution. COVID-19 vaccine status was available for 72% (n=470) of patients with CLD and history of COVID-19, of whom, 70% (n=326) had received the COVID-19 vaccine. Conclusions: Our large, longitudinal, multicenter study demonstrates a high burden of long-term mortality and morbidity in patients with CLD and COVID-19. Symptoms consistent with long-COVID-19 were present in 30% of patients with CLD. These results illustrate the prolonged implications of COVID-19 both for recovering patients and for health care systems.
S1304 Impact of an Online Gastroenterology Journal Club: An Effectiveness Survey
Ali, Ijlal Akbar , Rabiee, Atoosa , Mahmood, Sultan , Kahn, Allon , Amin, Sunil

American Journal of Gastroenterology | October 24, 2021 | Volume: 116 | Issue: 1 | Pages: S601-S602

10.14309/01.ajg.0000778748.24860.b4 Get It

Impact of exposure to patients with COVID-19 on residents and fellows: an international survey of 1420 trainees
Cravero, Anne , Kim, Nicole J. , Feld, Lauren D. , Rabiee, Atoosa , Bazarbashi, Najdat , Bassin, Sandhya R. , Lee, Tzu-Hao, Moon, Andrew M. , Liang, Peter S. , Aby, Elizabeth S. , Khan, Mohammad Qasim , Young, Kristen , Kobeissy, Abdallah, Hashim, Almoutaz, Houser, Allysia, Ioannou, George N. , Cravero, Anne L , Young, Kristen J , Liang, Peter S , Moon, Andrew M , Berry, Kristin , Qi, Xiaolong , Patel, Arpan , Wijarnpreecha, Karn , Khan, Mohammad Qasim

Postgraduate Medical Journal | October 21, 2020 | Volume: 97 | Issue: 1153 | Pages: 706-715

10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-138789 Get It

ABSTRACTObjectivesTo determine how self-reported level of exposure to patients with novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) affected the perceived safety, training and well-being of residents and fellows.MethodsWe administered an anonymous, voluntary, web-based survey to a convenience sample of trainees worldwide. The survey was distributed by email and social media posts from April 20th to May 11th, 2020. Respondents were asked to estimate the number of patients with COVID-19 they cared for in March and April 2020 (0, 1–30, 31–60, &gt;60). Survey questions addressed (1) safety and access to personal protective equipment (PPE), (2) training and professional development and (3) well-being and burnout.ResultsSurveys were completed by 1420 trainees (73% residents, 27% fellows), most commonly from the USA (n=670), China (n=150), Saudi Arabia (n=76) and Taiwan (n=75). Trainees who cared for a greater number of patients with COVID-19 were more likely to report limited access to PPE and COVID-19 testing and more likely to test positive for COVID-19. Compared with trainees who did not take care of patients with COVID-19 , those who took care of 1–30 patients (adjusted OR [AOR] 1.80, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.51), 31–60 patients (AOR 3.30, 95% CI 1.86 to 5.88) and &gt;60 patients (AOR 4.03, 95% CI 2.12 to 7.63) were increasingly more likely to report burnout. Trainees were very concerned about the negative effects on training opportunities and professional development irrespective of the number of patients with COVID-19 they cared for.ConclusionExposure to patients with COVID-19 is significantly associated with higher burnout rates in physician trainees.
Recent Developments and Therapeutic Strategies against Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Yarchoan, Mark , Agarwal, Parul , Rao, Shuyun , Dawson, Laura A. , Llovet, Josep M. , Groopman, John D. , El‐Serag, Hashem B. , Monga, Satdarshan P. , Wang, Xin Wei , Roberts, Lewis R. , Gunaratne, Preethi H. , Tsung, Allan , Brown, Kimberly , Lawrence, Theodore S. , Kim, Amy K. , Rabiee, Atoosa , Resar, Linda , Meyer, Jeffrey , He, Aiwu Ruth , Ghoshal, Kalpana , Ryan, Patrick , Jaffee, Elizabeth M. , Guha, Chandan , Mishra, Lopa , Coleman, C. Norman, Ahmed, Mansoor M. , Groopman, John D , El-Serag, Hashem B , Roberts, Lewis R , Wei Wang, Xin , Lawrence, Theodore S , Yarchoan, Mark , Monga, Satdarshan , Villanueva, Augusto , Karasic, Thomas Benjamin , Finn, Richard S. , Karin, Michael , Schwartz, Robert E. , Tanabe, Kenneth K. , Salem, Riad , Singal, Amit G. , Hoshida, Yujin

Cancer Research | September 3, 2019 | Volume: 79 | Issue: 17 | Pages: 4326-4330

10.1158/0008-5472.can-19-0803 Get It

Abstract Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has emerged as a major cause of cancer deaths globally. The landscape of systemic therapy has recently changed, with six additional systemic agents either approved or awaiting approval for advanced stage HCC. While these agents have the potential to improve outcomes, a survival increase of 2–5 months remains poor and falls short of what has been achieved in many other solid tumor types. The roles of genomics, underlying cirrhosis, and optimal use of treatment strategies that include radiation, liver transplantation, and surgery remain unanswered. Here, we discuss new treatment opportunities, controversies, and future directions in managing HCC.