Wei Wang, Xin

Abstract Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has emerged as a major cause of cancer deaths globally. The landscape of systemic therapy has recently changed, with six additional systemic agents either approved or awaiting approval for advanced stage HCC. While these agents have the potential to improve outcomes, a survival increase of 2–5 months remains poor and falls short of what has been achieved in many other solid tumor types. The roles of genomics, underlying cirrhosis, and optimal use of treatment strategies that include radiation, liver transplantation, and surgery remain unanswered. Here, we discuss new treatment opportunities, controversies, and future directions in managing HCC.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) has over the last 10‐20 years become the focus of increasing concern, largely due to its rising incidence and high mortality rates worldwide. The significant increase in mortality rates from this primary hepatobiliary cancer, particularly over the past decade, has coincided with a rapidly growing interest among clinicians, investigators, and patient advocates to seek greater mechanistic insights and more effective biomarker‐driven targeted approaches for managing and/or preventing this challenging liver cancer. In addition to discussing challenges posed by this aggressive cancer, this review will emphasize recent epidemiological, basic, and translational research findings for iCCA. In particular, we will highlight emerging demographic changes and evolving risk factors, the critical role of the tumor microenvironment, extracellular vesicle biomarkers and therapeutics, intertumoral and intratumoral heterogeneity, and current and emerging targeted therapies regarding iCCA. Specifically, recent evidence linking non–bile duct medical conditions, such as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonspecific cirrhosis, to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinogenesis together with geographic and ethnic variation will be assessed. Recent developments concerning the roles played by transforming growth factor‐β and platelet‐derived growth factor D in driving the recruitment and expansion of cancer‐associated myofibroblasts within cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) stroma as well as their therapeutic implications will also be discussed. In addition, the potential significance of extracellular vesicles as bile and serum biomarkers and therapeutic delivery systems for iCCA will be described. An integrated systems approach to classifying heterogeneous iCCA subtypes will be further highlighted, and recent clinical trials and emerging targeted therapies will be reviewed, along with recommendations for future translational research opportunities. Established international CCA networks are now facilitating collaborations aimed at advancing iCCA translational and clinical research.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma remains a highly heterogeneous malignancy that has eluded effective patient stratification to date. The extent to which such heterogeneity can be influenced by individual driver mutations remains to be evaluated. Here, we analyzed genomic (whole‐exome sequencing, targeted exome sequencing) and epigenomic data from 496 patients and used the three most recurrently mutated genes to stratify patients ( IDH , KRAS , TP53 , “undetermined”). Using this molecular dissection approach, each subgroup was determined to possess unique mutational signature preferences, comutation profiles, and enriched pathways. High‐throughput drug repositioning in seven patient‐matched cell lines, chosen to reflect the genetic alterations specific for each patient group, confirmed in silico predictions of subgroup‐specific vulnerabilities linked to enriched pathways. Intriguingly, patients lacking all three mutations (“undetermined”) harbored the most extensive structural alterations, while isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant tumors displayed the most extensive DNA methylome dysregulation, consistent with previous findings. Conclusion : Stratification of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients based on occurrence of mutations in three classifier genes ( IDH , KRAS , TP53 ) revealed unique oncogenic programs (mutational, structural, epimutational) that influence pharmacologic response in drug repositioning protocols; this genome dissection approach highlights the potential of individual mutations to induce extensive molecular heterogeneity and could facilitate advancement of therapeutic response in this dismal disease. (H epatology 2018).