Geldmaker, Laura

Introduction Out‐of‐hospital community births account for 1.6% to 2% of births in the United States and are associated with fewer obstetric interventions but increased neonatal risk. Little is known about how maternity care providers’ characteristics, values, and prior exposure to community birth influence attitudes toward community birth. Methods We conducted an observational cross‐sectional survey using a 40 to 43 item Research Electronic Data Capture questionnaire distributed October 2 to 30, 2024. Eligible participants (“providers”) included in‐hospital physicians, midwives, community birth providers, and registered nurses. The survey assessed demographics, practice characteristics, provider values, prior community birth experience, and attitudes toward community birth. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize characteristics. Group comparisons between in‐hospital and community birth providers were conducted using analysis of variance and χ 2 or Fisher exact tests. Associations between attitudes and provider values were evaluated using linear models with Bonferroni correction. Results Sixty‐seven providers completed the survey (51 in hospital, 16 community based). Most respondents were female (89.6%) and White (77.6%), with a median of 7 years in practice (IQR, 3‐14.5). Attitudes significantly differed by role ( P = .007) and credentials ( P = .002). In‐hospital providers reported safety concerns about community birth and perceived antenatal counseling to be inadequate. Perceived patient distrust during transfer was common among both in‐hospital and community‐based providers (69% and 81%, respectively). After adjustment for provider role and multiple comparisons, no significant differences in personal values were noted by attitude group; however, providers with positive attitudes toward community birth were more likely to believe that patients value compassion (β = 2.3, P = .004). Discussion Provider attitudes toward community birth appear to be shaped more by professional role and clinical experience than by differences in underlying value systems. High levels of perceived patient distrust during transfer highlight the need for interventions that strengthen compassion across maternity care settings.

Objective: To evaluate factors associated with the conversion of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) to open partial nephrectomy (OPN) and radical nephrectomy (RN). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 775 consecutive RAPNs from a single surgeon. Perioperative factors were evaluated for association with RAPN conversion such as Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score, length of stay (LOS), and operative time (OT). A logistic regression model was utilized to evaluate factors associated with conversion and reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. Continuous and categorical variables were analyzed through the Wilcoxon rank-sum and chi-square tests. Results: Thirty-two (4.1%) patients had a conversion including 19 (2.5%) to OPN and 13 (1.7%) to RN. OPN conversions were related to bleeding ( n = 7), inability to dissect perinephric fat ( n = 4), liver retraction ( n = 1), and failure to secure renal hilum/progress ( n = 7). In contrast, conversions to RN were due to tumor involvement of the renal vein ( n = 3) or ureter ( n = 5) and inability to achieve negative margins ( n = 5). Patients in the conversion cohort were more likely to have larger tumor size (3.7 vs 2.8 cm; p < 0.001) and higher MAP score (3.0 vs 2.0; p = 0.04). Median LOS was higher in the conversion group (3.0 vs 2.0 days; p = 0.003). Conversions were associated with postoperative complications (28.1% vs 13.7%; p = 0.023). After adjusting tumor size in our regression model, longer OT and dissection time were statistically higher in the conversion group (OR = 2.19 [1.50–3.21]; p < 0.001 and OR = 2.67 [1.82–3.94]; p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Larger tumor size and higher MAP score were associated with conversions during RAPN. Conversions were associated with higher LOS, longer OT, and postoperative complications.