Citations

Although continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) provide an augmentation in systemic perfusion, there is a scarcity of in vivo data regarding systemic pulsatility on support. Patients supported on CF-LVAD therapy (n = 71) who underwent combined left/right catheterization ramp study were included. Aortic pulsatility was defined by the pulsatile power index (PPI), which was also calculated in a cohort of high-output heart failure (HOHF, n = 66) and standard HF cohort (n = 44). PPI was drastically lower in CF-LVAD–supported patients with median PPI of 0.006 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.002–0.012) compared with PPI in the HF population at 0.09 (IQR, 0.06–0.17) or HOHF population at 0.25 (IQR, 0.13–0.37; p < 0.0001 among groups). With speed augmentation during ramp, PPI values fell quickly in patients with higher PPI at baseline. PPI correlated poorly with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in all groups. In CF-LVAD patients, there was a stronger correlation with LV dP/dt (r = 0.41; p = 0.001) than LVEF (r = 0.21; p = 0.08; p int < 0.001). CF-LVAD support is associated with a dramatic reduction in arterial pulsatility as measured by PPI relative to HOHF and HF cohorts and decreases with speed. Further work is needed to determine the applicability to the next generation of device therapy.

Study Design: Prospective randomized Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial. Objective: The purpose of the present study is to report the 1-year clinical and radiographic outcomes and safety profile of patients who underwent lumbar facet arthroplasty through implantation of the Total Posterior Spine System (TOPS) device. Summary of Background Data: Lumbar facet arthroplasty is one proposed method of dynamic stabilization to treat grade-1 spondylolisthesis with stenosis; however, there are currently no Food and Drug Administration-approved devices for facet arthroplasty. Methods: Standard demographic information was collected for each patient. Radiographic parameters and patient-reported outcome measures were assessed preoperatively and at regular postoperative intervals. Complication and reoperation data were also collected for each patient. Results: At the time of this study, 153 patients had undergone implantation of the TOPS device. The mean surgical time was 187.8 minutes and the mean estimated blood loss was 205.7cc. The mean length of hospital stay was 3.0 days. Mean Oswestry Disability Index, Visual Analog Score leg and back, and Zurich Claudication Questionnaire scores improved significantly at all postoperative time points (P>0.001). There were no clinically significant changes in radiographic parameters, and all operative segments remained mobile at 1-year follow-up. Postoperative complications occurred in 11 patients out of the 153 patients (7.2%) who underwent implantation of the TOPS device. Nine patients (5.9%) underwent a total of 13 reoperations, 1 (0.6%) of which was for device-related failure owing to bilateral L5 pedicle screw loosening. Conclusions: Lumbar facet arthroplasty with the TOPS device demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in all patient-reported outcome measures and the ability to maintain motion at the index level while limiting sagittal translation with a low complication rate.

AbstractPulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive pulmonary vascular disease that negatively impacts health‐related quality of life (HRQOL). The PAH‐symptoms and impact (PAH‐SYMPACT) questionnaire is a validated disease‐specific patient‐reported outcome (PRO) instrument that assesses a patient's symptoms and the impact of PAH and its treatment on well‐being. We performed a single‐center prospective cohort study of patients with PAH to determine the feasibility of assessing PROs in clinical practice and to determine the association between PAH‐SYMPACT domains and clinical characteristics and outcomes. One hundred and ten patients completed the 1‐day version of the PAH‐SYMPACT questionnaire which consists of 22 Likert‐scale questions that assess HRQOL across four domains: cardiopulmonary (CP) symptoms, cardiovascular (CV) symptoms, physical impact (PI), and cognitive and emotional (CE) impact. Higher scores indicate worse HRQOL. Patients were predominantly female (n = 86, 78%) with a mean age of 57.8 ± 16.2 years. While several patient characteristics were associated with CP and PI domains, few were associated with CV and CE domains. PI and CE impact scores were associated with recent hospitalizations and mortality and CE impact score was independently associated with an increased risk of death after adjustment for disease severity (hazard ratio: 3.29, 95% confidence interval: 1.56–6.91, p = 0.002). In conclusion, the assessment of PROs in clinical practice using the PAH‐SYMPACT questionnaire is both feasible and valuable. PAH‐SYMPACT scores have independent prognostic value and are not adequately reflected by traditional measures of disease severity. These findings underscore the importance of assessing HRQOL in clinical practice.

AbstractAimsAn artificial intelligence algorithm detecting age from 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) has been suggested to reflect ‘physiological age’. An increased physiological age has been associated with a higher risk of cardiac mortality in the non-transplant population. We aimed to investigate the utility of this algorithm in patients who underwent heart transplantation (HTx).Methods and resultsA total of 540 patients were studied. The average ECG ages within 1 year before and after HTx were used to represent pre- and post-HTx ECG ages. Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) was defined as any coronary revascularization, heart failure hospitalization, re-transplantation, and mortality. Recipient pre-transplant ECG age (mean 63 ± 11 years) correlated significantly with recipient chronological age (mean 49 ± 14 years, R = 0.63, P &lt; 0.0001), while post-transplant ECG age (mean 54 ± 10 years) correlated with both the donor (mean 32 ± 13 years, R = 0.45, P &lt; 0.0001) and the recipient ages (R = 0.38, P &lt; 0.0001). During a median follow-up of 8.8 years, 307 patients experienced MACE. Patients with an increase in ECG age post-transplant showed an increased risk of MACE [hazard ratio (HR): 1.58, 95% confidence interval (CI): (1.24, 2.01), P = 0.0002], even after adjusting for potential confounders [HR: 1.58, 95% CI: (1.19, 2.10), P = 0.002].ConclusionElectrocardiogram age-derived cardiac ageing after transplantation is associated with a higher risk of MACE. This study suggests that physiological age change of the heart might be an important determinant of MACE risk post-HTx.

Background: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is a new therapy for advanced heart failure (HF). The number of HF patients eligible for LVAD and the cardiology providers’ comfort level with referral for LVAD remains unclear. Objective: To assess provider perception of LVAD candidacy and LVAD referral patterns in consecutive HF patients. Methods: Providers completed a survey for each HF patient seen between March 1, 2013 and April 26, 2013. The survey listed standard LVAD candidacy criteria and asked 1) if a patient was an LVAD candidate (yes, no, unsure); 2) reasons patients were not LVAD candidates (check list, table); and 3) whether the patient had been referred for LVAD evaluation (yes, no, unsure). Results: Patients (n=522) were seen in a tertiary HF outpatient clinic (n=357; 68%), a tertiary HF inpatient service (n=36; 7%), a tertiary general cardiology service (n=45; 9%) or a community based outpatient cardiac clinic (n=84; 16%) Median age of patients was 73 years and 65% were male. Provider assessment of LVAD candidacy was “no” in 443 (85%), “yes” in 35 (7%) and “unsure” in 43 (8%) with ineligibility for LVAD attributed to multiple concerns (Table). Ninety percent of patients considered “too old” for LVAD were over 78 years of age. Provider designation of LVAD candidacy as yes or unsure varied across practice setting: tertiary HF outpatient clinic, 12%; tertiary HF inpatient service, 42%; tertiary general cardiology service, 22%; and community based outpatient cardiac clinic, 13%. In patients with a provider designation of LVAD candidacy as yes or unsure (n=78), only 21 (27%) patients had been referred for LVAD evaluation. Conclusion: When provided with LVAD candidacy criteria, providers indicated 15% of HF patients were (7%) or were possibly (8%) LVAD candidates but indicated that few patients had undergone a formal LVAD evaluation. These data suggest that measures to improve evaluation of HF patients for LVAD are needed.

Background: While implantation of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) improves survival and quality of life in patients with advanced heart failure, very little is known about healthcare resource utilization, including hospital readmissions, post-LVAD. Methods: Administrative claims data from a large, national US health plan were used to identify privately insured and Medicare Advantage patients that received an LVAD (ICD-9-CM code 37.66) and survived to hospital discharge from January 1, 2006 through 31 August 31, 2013, and had at least six months coverage pre-LVAD. The individuals covered by this health plan, about 88 million in years 2003 to 2013, are geographically dispersed across the United States, with greatest representation in the South and Midwest census regions. Reasons for subsequent readmissions were categorized according to the AHRQ Clinical Classifications Software and risk factors for readmission analyzed using multiple failure Cox regression analysis. Patients were censored at the time of heart transplantation or end of coverage through November 30, 2013. Results: In total, 857 patients received an LVAD, of whom 693 (81%) survived to hospital discharge without undergoing heart transplantation (mean age 56 years, 77% male). After a median follow-up of 0.69 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.31, 1.50) years, 1,659 readmissions occurred among 509 patients. Over this period, patients spent a median of 10.5 days (IQR: 0 -40 days) per followup year hospitalized. The number of readmissions per patient varied widely (0 to 20 per person), with 184 (26.6%) patients experiencing no readmissions, while 112 (16.2%) had 5 or more readmissions during follow-up. The most common reasons for readmission were device complications (291 readmissions in 155 patients), heart failure (246 readmissions in 135 patients), gastrointestinal bleeding (90 readmissions in 52 patients), and arrhythmia (88 readmissions in 55 patients). Readmission risk was higher in patients who had longer initial length of stay and more comorbid conditions. Discussion: There is tremendous variability in the readmission burden experienced post-LVAD, with some patients experiencing no readmissions while others are repeatedly hospitalized. LVAD therapy introduces a unique set of problems that often prompt readmission including device complications and gastrointestinal bleeding.

Introduction: The number of patients with sarcoidosis requiring heart transplantation (HT) is on the rise. Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of isolated HT in patients with sarcoid cardiomyopathy. Methods: Adult HT recipients were identified in the UNOS Registry between 1990 and 2020. Patients were grouped according to diagnosis. The cumulative incidences for the all-cause mortality and rejection were compared using Fine and Gray model analysis, accounting for re-transplantation as a competing risk. Moreover, we reviewed characteristics and outcomes of all HT recipients with previous diagnosis of sarcoid cardiomyopathy from a single-center. Results: A total of 30,874 HT recipients were included in the present study (n=240 sarcoidosis, n=1,431 non-ischemic restrictive cardiomyopathy, and n=29,203 non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy). During a total of 196,985 patient-years, all-cause mortality at the latest follow-up was not significantly different when comparing sarcoidosis to non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (adjusted subhazard ratio [aSHR] 1.4, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.88-2.3, p=0.15) or restrictive cardiomyopathy (aSHR 1.12, 95% CI: 0.65-1.95, p=0.67). Accordingly, multivariable analysis suggested that 1-year mortality was not significantly different between sarcoidosis and non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (aSHR 1.56, 95% CI: 0.9-2.7, p=0.12) or restrictive (aSHR 1.15, 95% CI: 0.61-2.18, p=0.66) cardiomyopathy. Additionally, no differences were observed regarding 30-day mortality after HT. Data from the single-center case review showed excellent long-term outcomes with sirolimus-based immunosuppression. Conclusions: Short- and long-term outcomes after isolated HT do not seem to be inferior in sarcoid cardiomyopathy when compared to common types of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Abstract Background The number of patients with sarcoidosis requiring heart transplantation (HT) is increasing. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of isolated HT in patients with sarcoid cardiomyopathy and compare them to recipients with non-ischaemic restrictive or dilated cardiomyopathy. Methods and results Adult HT recipients were identified in the UNOS Registry between 1990 and 2020. Patients were grouped according to diagnosis. The cumulative incidences for the all-cause mortality and rejection were compared using Fine and Gray model analysis, accounting for re-transplantation as a competing risk. Rejection was evaluated using logistic regression analysis. We also reviewed characteristics and outcomes of all HT recipients with previous diagnosis of sarcoid cardiomyopathy from a single centre. A total of 30 160 HT recipients were included in the present study (n = 239 sarcoidosis, n = 1411 non-ischaemic restrictive cardiomyopathy, and n = 28 510 non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy). During a total of 194 733 patient-years, all-cause mortality at the latest follow-up was not significantly different when comparing sarcoidosis to non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy [adjusted subhazard ratio (aSHR) 1.46, 95% confidence intervals (CIs): 0.9–2.4, P = 0.12] or restrictive cardiomyopathy (aSHR 1.12, 95% CI: 0.65–1.95, P = 0.67). Accordingly, multivariable analysis suggested that 1 year mortality was not significantly different between sarcoidosis and non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (aSHR 1.56, 95% CI: 0.9–2.7, P = 0.12) or restrictive cardiomyopathy (aSHR 1.15, 95% CI: 0.61–2.18, P = 0.66). No differences were observed regarding 30 day mortality, treated and hospitalized acute rejection, and 30 day death from graft failure after HT. Thirty-day mortality did not improve significantly in more recent HT eras whereas there was a trend towards improved 1 year mortality in the latest HT era (P = 0.06). Data from the single-centre case review showed excellent long-term outcomes with sirolimus-based immunosuppression. Conclusions Short-term and long-term post HT outcomes among patients with sarcoid cardiomyopathy are similar to those with common types of non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors have been shown to reduce proliferation of lymphoid cells; thus, their use for immunosuppression after heart transplantation (HT) may reduce post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) risk. This study sought to investigate whether the sirolimus (SRL)-based immunosuppression regimen is associated with a decreased risk of PTLD compared with the calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based regimen in HT recipients. We retrospectively analyzed 590 patients who received HTs at two large institutions between 1 June 1988 and 31 December 2014. Cox proportional-hazard modeling was used to examine the association between type of primary immunosuppression and PTLD after adjustment for potential confounders, including Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) status, type of induction therapy, and rejection. Conversion from CNI to SRL as primary immunosuppression occurred in 249 patients (42.2%). During a median follow-up of 6.3 years, 30 patients developed PTLD (5.1%). In a univariate analysis, EBV mismatch was strongly associated with increased risk of PTLD (HR 10.0, 95% CI: 3.8–26.6; p < 0.001), and conversion to SRL was found to be protective against development of PTLD (HR 0.19, 95% CI: 0.04–0.80; p = 0.02). In a multivariable model and after adjusting for EBV mismatch, conversion to SRL remained protective against risk of PTLD compared with continued CNI use (HR 0.12, 95% CI: 0.03–0.55; p = 0.006). In conclusion, SRL-based immunosuppression is associated with lower incidence of PTLD after HT. These findings provide evidence of a benefit from conversion to SRL as maintenance therapy for mitigating the risk of PTLD, particularly among patients at high PTLD risk.