Citations

AbstractIntroductionParathyroid scintigraphy (PS) may be used to localize hyperactive parathyroid glands preoperatively. Performance of PS in the setting of secondary and tertiary hyperparathyroidism (HPT) is not well quantified. The performance of PS in secondary/tertiary HPT versus primary HPT may reflect physiologic as well as radiopharmaceutical kinetic differences between multigland hyperplasia versus adenoma. The aim of this study was to review the performance of PS in secondary/tertiary HPT with a comparison to that for primary HPT. Moreover, we evaluated (1) the sensitivity of PS in detecting enlarged glands, and (2) PS detectability as a function of gland weight.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of the Mayo Clinic database from 2000 to 2004. We identified 40 patients with secondary or tertiary HPT as well as a matched control group of 40 patients with primary HPT who had had preoperative PS and underwent parathyroid surgery.ResultsParathyroid scintigraphy correctly localized all enlarged glands in 88% of patients in the primary HPT group. PS correctly identified both the number and locations of all hyperplastic glands in only 28% of the secondary/tertiary HPT patients. PS failed to identify one enlarged gland in 23% of the patients and two or more enlarged glands in 40% of the patients. PS correctly detects the largest gland in 88% of the patients with secondary and tertiary HPT. The mean gland weight detectable by PS was 612 ± 120 mg for primary HPT. In secondary/tertiary HPT, glands detected by PS had a mean weight of 950 ± 109 mg, whereas the mean weight was 276 ± 34 mg for undetected glands (P < 0.002).ConclusionsParathyroid scintigraphy is a sensitive study for localizing parathyroid glands preoperatively in primary HPT patients. Its sensitivity is low in secondary and tertiary HPT patients. Thus PS has limited value as a preoperative localization study in secondary/tertiary HPT patients.

Purpose To determine the dose-limiting toxicities, maximum-tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetics of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol (NSC 649890) when administered as a 1-hour infusion over 3 consecutive days to children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors. Patients and Methods Flavopiridol was administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion daily for 3 consecutive days every 21 days, or when hematologic toxicity or any grade 2 or greater nonhematologic toxicity resolved. The starting dose was 37.5 mg/m2/d. Dose escalation was in cohorts of three patients in a standard fashion until dose-limiting toxicity and the maximum-tolerated dose were determined. Flavopiridol levels were measured on days 1, 2, and 3. Results Twenty-five children received flavopiridol at doses of 37.5 to 80 mg/m2/day over 3 consecutive days. The maximum-tolerated dose was 62.5 mg/m2/d. The primary dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia and diarrhea. No antitumor effect was observed in this population. Mean peak plasma concentrations of 3.71 and 9.11 μmol/L were achieved at the end of the 1-hour infusion, following dose escalation from 37.5 mg/m2 to 80 mg/m2, respectively. The median flavopiridol plasma clearance was 8.0 L/h/m2 (range, 2.6 to 17.1 L/h/m2). Conclusion The maximum-tolerated dose of flavopiridol in children, and the recommended phase II dose for pediatric studies, was 62.5 mg/m2/day when administered as a 1-hour infusion for 3 consecutive days. Dose-limiting toxicities of neutropenia and diarrhea were similar to those in adult studies.

Purpose The objective of this study was to determine prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs). Patients and Methods This study focused on the 107 adult solid organ transplantation patients who were diagnosed with PTLDs at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) between December 1970 and May 2003. Results The median age at the time of diagnosis was 48 years (range, 15 to 75 years). Extranodal disease including grafted organ involvement was present in 85 patients (80%). The graft organ was involved in 30 patients (28%). At the time of these analyses, 62 patients (58%) had died. The median survival for the entire cohort was 31.5 months (95% CI, 10.7 to 72.5 months). The median follow-up of living patients was 51.8 months (range, 5.6 to 202.6 months). In univariate analyses for overall survival from the time of PTLD diagnosis, the following poor prognostic factors were identified: poor performance status with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group levels 3 and 4 (P < .0001), grafted organ involvement (P = .0005), the presence of one or more extranodal sites (P = .005), both nodal and extranodal disease (P = .002), high International Prognostic Index (P = .006), advanced stage (P = .001), and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (P = .03). A final multivariable model for survival was constructed using three factors: poor performance status (3 to 4), monomorphic disease, and graft organ involvement. Conclusion A prognostic model has been developed for PTLD patients using one center's 30 years of experience. We propose additional confirmation and validation of these prognostic factors in larger prospective studies.

AbstractCholangiocarcinomas are usually fatal neoplasms originating from bile duct epithelia. Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a promising agent for cancer therapy, including cholangiocarcinoma. However, many cholangiocarcinoma cells are resistant to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis. Thus, our aim was to examine the intracellular mechanisms responsible for TRAIL resistance in human cholangiocarcinoma cell lines. Three TRAIL-resistant human cholangiocarcinoma cell lines were identified. All of the cell lines expressed TRAIL receptor 1/death receptor 4 (TRAIL-R1/DR4) and TRAIL-R2/DR5. Expression of TRAIL decoy receptors and the antiapoptotic cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (cFLIP) was inconsistent across the cell lines. Of the antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family of proteins profiled (Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Mcl-1), Mcl-1 was uniquely overexpressed by the cell lines. When small-interfering-RNA (siRNA) technology was used to knock down expression of Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Mcl-1, only the Mcl-1-siRNA sensitized the cells to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis. In a cell line stably transfected with Mcl-1-small-hairpin-RNA (Mcl-1-shRNA), Mcl-1 depletion sensitized cells to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis despite Bcl-2 expression. TRAIL-mediated apoptosis in the stably transfected cells was associated with mitochondrial depolarization, Bax activation, cytochrome c release from mitochondria, and caspase activation. Finally, flavopiridol, an anticancer drug that rapidly down-regulates Mcl-1, also sensitized cells to TRAIL cytotoxicity. In conclusion, these studies not only demonstrate that Mcl-1 mediates TRAIL resistance in cholangiocarcinoma cells by blocking the mitochondrial pathway of cell death but also identify two strategies for circumventing this resistance.