Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

329 citation(s) found for "Völp, Kirsten".

Chronic Recreational Physical Inactivity and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Risk: Evidence from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium
Cannioto, Rikki , LaMonte, Michael J. , Sucheston‐Campbell, Lara, Eng, Kevin H., Szender, J. Brian, Chang‐Claude, Jenny, Schmalfeldt, Barbara , Klapdor, R, Gower, Emily, Minlikeeva, Albina N. , Zirpoli, Gary , Edwards, Robert P., Goode, Ellen L. , Goodman, Marc T. , Høgdall, Estrid , Hosono, Satoyo , Jensen, Allan , Jordan, Susan J. , Group, on behalf of The Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Matsuo, Keitaro , Ness, Roberta B., Olsen, Catherine M. , Olson, Sara H. , Pearce, Celeste Leigh , Pike, Malcolm C. , Rossing, Mary Anne, Szamreta, Elizabeth A. , Thompson, Pamela J., Tseng, Chiu-Chen , Vierkant, Robert A. , Webb, Penelope M. , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Wicklund, Kristine G. , Winham, Stacey J. , Wu, Anna H. , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Terry, Kathryn L. , Kelemen, Linda E. , Moysich, Kirsten B. , Risch, Harvey A. , Hong, Chi‐Chen , Bandera, Elisa V. , Berchuck, Andrew , Cramer, Daniel W. , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Fridley, Brooke L. , Group, on behalf of The Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Kjær, Susanne K. , Modugno, Francesmary , Winham, Stacey J , Webb, Penelope M , Jensen, Allan , Vierkant, Robert A , Moysich, Kirsten , Matsuo, Keitaro , Høgdall, Estrid , Zirpoli, Gary , Goodman, Marc T

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | May 7, 2016 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1114-1124

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-1330 | PMID 27197285 Get It

Abstract Background: Despite a large body of literature evaluating the association between recreational physical activity and epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk, the extant evidence is inconclusive, and little is known about the independent association between recreational physical inactivity and EOC risk. We conducted a pooled analysis of nine studies from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium to investigate the association between chronic recreational physical inactivity and EOC risk. Methods: In accordance with the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, women reporting no regular, weekly recreational physical activity were classified as inactive. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to estimate the ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between inactivity and EOC risk overall and by subgroups based upon histotype, menopausal status, race, and body mass index. Results: The current analysis included data from 8,309 EOC patients and 12,612 controls. We observed a significant positive association between inactivity and EOC risk (OR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.14–1.57), and similar associations were observed for each histotype. Conclusions: In this large pooled analysis examining the association between recreational physical inactivity and EOC risk, we observed consistent evidence of an association between chronic inactivity and all EOC histotypes. Impact: These data add to the growing body of evidence suggesting that inactivity is an independent risk factor for cancer. If the apparent association between inactivity and EOC risk is substantiated, additional work via targeted interventions should be pursued to characterize the dose of activity required to mitigate the risk of this highly fatal disease. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(7); 1114–24. ©2016 AACR.
Assessment of Multifactor Gene–Environment Interactions and Ovarian Cancer Risk: Candidate Genes, Obesity, and Hormone-Related Risk Factors
Usset, Joseph , McGuire, Valerie , Sieh, Weiva , Webb, Penelope M. , Chang‐Claude, Jenny, Brinton, Louise A. , Cunningham, Julie M. , DeFazio, Anna , Edwards, Robert P., Gayther, Simon A. , Goodman, Marc T. , Høgdall, Estrid , Jensen, Allan , Johnatty, Sharon E., Lurie, Galina, Massuger, Leon F.A.G. , Menon, Usha , Moysich, Kirsten B. , Ness, Roberta B., Pike, Malcolm C. , Ramus, Susan J. , Rossing, Mary Anne, Rothstein, Joseph H. , Song, Honglin , Thompson, Pamela J., Berg, David J. Van Den, Vierkant, Robert A. , Wang‐Gohrke, Shan , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Whittemore, Alice S. , Wu, Anna H. , Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Goode, Ellen L. , Fazio, Anna de , Raghavan, Rama , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , Rudolph, Anja , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Berchuck, Andrew , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra , Kiemeney, Lambertus A. , Kjær, Susanne K. , Larson, Melissa C. , Modugno, Francesmary , Wilkens, Lynne R. , Yang, Hannah , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Fridley, Brooke L. , Ramus, Susan J , Webb, Penelope M , Jensen, Allan , Vierkant, Robert A , Menon, Usha , Moysich, Kirsten , Sieh, Weiva , Høgdall, Estrid , Goodman, Marc T

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | March 14, 2016 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 780-790

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-1039 | PMID 26976855 Get It

Abstract Background: Many epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk factors relate to hormone exposure and elevated estrogen levels are associated with obesity in postmenopausal women. Therefore, we hypothesized that gene–environment interactions related to hormone-related risk factors could differ between obese and non-obese women. Methods: We considered interactions between 11,441 SNPs within 80 candidate genes related to hormone biosynthesis and metabolism and insulin-like growth factors with six hormone-related factors (oral contraceptive use, parity, endometriosis, tubal ligation, hormone replacement therapy, and estrogen use) and assessed whether these interactions differed between obese and non-obese women. Interactions were assessed using logistic regression models and data from 14 case–control studies (6,247 cases; 10,379 controls). Histotype-specific analyses were also completed. Results: SNPs in the following candidate genes showed notable interaction: IGF1R (rs41497346, estrogen plus progesterone hormone therapy, histology = all, P = 4.9 × 10−6) and ESR1 (rs12661437, endometriosis, histology = all, P = 1.5 × 10−5). The most notable obesity–gene–hormone risk factor interaction was within INSR (rs113759408, parity, histology = endometrioid, P = 8.8 × 10−6). Conclusions: We have demonstrated the feasibility of assessing multifactor interactions in large genetic epidemiology studies. Follow-up studies are necessary to assess the robustness of our findings for ESR1, CYP11A1, IGF1R, CYP11B1, INSR, and IGFBP2. Future work is needed to develop powerful statistical methods able to detect these complex interactions. Impact: Assessment of multifactor interaction is feasible, and, here, suggests that the relationship between genetic variants within candidate genes and hormone-related risk factors may vary EOC susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(5); 780–90. ©2016 AACR.
A targeted genetic association study of epithelial ovarian cancer susceptibility
Earp, Madalene A. , Winham, Stacey J. , Sicotte, Hugues , Chien, Jeremy , Goodman, Marc T. , Levine, Douglas A. , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Ness, Roberta B., Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Rossing, Mary Anne, Tworoger, Shelley S. , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Bisogna, Maria, Brinton, Louise A. , Brooks‐Wilson, Angela , Carney, Michael E. , Cunningham, Julie M. , Edwards, Robert P., Fogarty, Zachary C. , Iversen, Edwin S., Kraft, Peter , Le, Nhu D. , Lin, Hui‐Yi , Lissowska, Jolanta , Moysich, Kirsten B. , Olson, Sara H. , Pike, Malcolm C. , Rider, David N., Terry, Kathryn L. , Thompson, Pamela J., Vierkant, Robert A. , Vitonis, Allison F., Wu, Anna H. , Phelan, Catherine M., Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Chen, Y. Ann , Sellers, Thomas A. , Goode, Ellen L. , Earp, Madalene, Larson, Nicholas, Larson, Nicholas B. , Permuth, Jennifer B. , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Bandera, Elisa V. , Berchuck, Andrew , Cook, Linda S. , Cramer, Daniel W. , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Larson, Melissa C. , Modugno, Francesmary , Poole, Elizabeth M. , Berg, David Van Den , Wilkens, Lynne R. , Yang, Hannah , Ziogas, Argyrios , Fridley, Brooke L. , Winham, Stacey J , Tworoger, Shelley S , Vierkant, Robert A , Chien, Jeremey , Monteiro, Alvaro N , Moysich, Kirsten , Lissowska, Jolanta , Brooks-Wilson, Angela R , Lin, Hui-Yi , Fogarty, Zachary C , Kraft, Peter , Goodman, Marc T

Oncotarget | February 2, 2016 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 7381-7389

10.18632/oncotarget.7121 | PMID 26848776 Get It

Investigation of Exomic Variants Associated with Overall Survival in Ovarian Cancer
Winham, Stacey J. , Pirie, Ailith, Chen, Y. Ann , Fogarty, Zachary C. , Earp, Madalene A. , Goodman, Marc T. , Levine, Douglas A. , Menon, Usha , Ness, Roberta B., Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Rossing, Mary Anne, Wentzensen, Nicolas , Bean, Yukie T., Bisogna, Maria, Brinton, Louise A. , Carney, Michael E. , Cunningham, Julie M. , DeFazio, Anna , Dicks, Ed , Edwards, Robert P., Gayther, Simon A. , Gore, Martin, Iversen, Edwin S., Jensen, Allan , Johnatty, Sharon E., Lester, Jenny, Lin, Hui‐Yi , Lissowska, Jolanta , Lubiński, Jan , Menkiszak, Janusz , Moysich, Kirsten B. , Pike, Malcolm C. , Ramus, Susan J. , Song, Honglin , Terry, Kathryn L. , Thompson, Pamela J., Berg, David J. van den , Vierkant, Robert A. , Vitonis, Allison F., Walsh, Christine M. , Wu, Anna H. , Group, Georgia Chenevix-Trench on behalf of Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Permuth‐Wey, Jennifer, Phelan, Catherine M., Sellers, Thomas A. , Goode, Ellen L. , Webb, Penelope M. , Whiteman, David C. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Bowtell, David D.L. , Ewing, Ailith , Fazio, Anna de , Larson, Melissa C. , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Bandera, Elisa V. , Cramer, Daniel W. , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Gronwald, Jacek , Karlan, Beth Y. , Kjær, Susanne K. , Pejovic, Tanja B. , Cybulski, Cezary , Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra , Modugno, Francesmary , Orlow, Irene , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , Wilkens, Lynne R. , Yang, Hannah , Ziogas, Argyrios , Berchuck, Andrew , Group, Georgia Chenevix-Trench on behalf of Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Fridley, Brooke L. , Winham, Stacey J , Ramus, Susan J , Webb, Penelope M , Jensen, Allan , Vierkant, Robert A , Menon, Usha , Moysich, Kirsten , Lissowska, Jolanta , Menkiszak, Janusz , Lin, Hui-Yi , Fogarty, Zachary C , Ewing, Ailith , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Whiteman, David C , Bowtell, David D , Lubinski, Jan , Goodman, Marc T

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | January 8, 2016 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 446-454

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-0240 | PMID 26747452 Get It

Abstract Background: While numerous susceptibility loci for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have been identified, few associations have been reported with overall survival. In the absence of common prognostic genetic markers, we hypothesize that rare coding variants may be associated with overall EOC survival and assessed their contribution in two exome-based genotyping projects of the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC). Methods: The primary patient set (Set 1) included 14 independent EOC studies (4,293 patients) and 227,892 variants, and a secondary patient set (Set 2) included six additional EOC studies (1,744 patients) and 114,620 variants. Because power to detect rare variants individually is reduced, gene-level tests were conducted. Sets were analyzed separately at individual variants and by gene, and then combined with meta-analyses (73,203 variants and 13,163 genes overlapped). Results: No individual variant reached genome-wide statistical significance. A SNP previously implicated to be associated with EOC risk and, to a lesser extent, survival, rs8170, showed the strongest evidence of association with survival and similar effect size estimates across sets (Pmeta = 1.1E−6, HRSet1 = 1.17, HRSet2 = 1.14). Rare variants in ATG2B, an autophagy gene important for apoptosis, were significantly associated with survival after multiple testing correction (Pmeta = 1.1E−6; Pcorrected = 0.01). Conclusions: Common variant rs8170 and rare variants in ATG2B may be associated with EOC overall survival, although further study is needed. Impact: This study represents the first exome-wide association study of EOC survival to include rare variant analyses, and suggests that complementary single variant and gene-level analyses in large studies are needed to identify rare variants that warrant follow-up study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(3); 446–54. ©2016 AACR.
The Texting Rhythm: A Novel EEG Waveform Using Smartphones
Tatum, William O. , DiCiaccio, Benedetto, Kipta, Joseph A., Yelvington, Kirsten , Stein, Michael A.

Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology | January 8, 2016 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 359-366

10.1097/wnp.0000000000000250 | PMID 26744835 Get It

Introduction:We report a unique EEG phenomenon in patients with paroxysmal neurological events undergoing video EEG monitoring.Methods:Two epilepsy centers analyzed the interictal scalp EEG in patients using personal electronic devices during epilepsy monitoring. The texting rhythm (TR) was defined as a reproducible, stimulus-evoked, generalized frontocentral monomorphic burst of 5–6 Hz theta consistently induced by active text messaging. An independent prospective and retrospective cohort was analyzed and compared from two sites in Florida and Illinois. We assessed age, gender, diagnosis, epilepsy classification, MRI, and EEG to compare patients with a TR. Analysis was performed with statistical significance set atP< 0.05.Results:We identified 24 of 98 evaluable patients with a TR in a prospective arm at one center and 7 of 31 patients in a retrospective arm at another totaling 31/129 (24.0%). The waveform prevalence was similar at both centers independent of location. TR was highly specific to active texting. A similar waveform during independent cognitive, speech or language, motor activation and audio cellular telephone use was absent (P< 0.0001). It appeared to be increased in patients with epilepsy in one cohort (P= 0.03) and generalized seizures in the other (P= 0.025). Age, gender, epilepsy type, MRI results, and EEG lateralization in patients with focal epileptic seizures did not bear a relationship to the presence of a TR in either arm of the study (P= NS).Conclusions:The TR is a novel waveform time-locked to text messaging and associated with active use of smartphones. Electroencephalographers should be aware of the TR to separate it from an abnormality in patients undergoing video EEG monitoring. Larger sample sizes and additional research may help define the significance of this unique cognitive-visual-cognitive-motor network that is technology-related and task-specific with implications in communication research and transportation safety.
Arthroscopic Repair of a Posterior Bony Bankart Lesion
Poehling-Monaghan, Kirsten L., Krych, Aaron J. , Dahm, Diane L., Krych, Aaron J

Arthroscopy Techniques | November 9, 2015 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.eats.2015.07.009 | PMID 26870644 Get It

Abstract Posterior bony defects of the glenoid rim, particularly those associated with instability, are often a frustrating challenge for arthroscopists because of the defects' inaccessibility from standard portals. This challenge is enhanced when the lesion is chronic and fibrous malunion of the fragment makes mobilization difficult. We present our technique for arthroscopic repair of the relatively uncommon chronic posterior bony Bankart lesion. By use of lateral positioning and a standard anterior viewing portal and posterior working portal, as well as a strategically placed posterolateral accessory portal, the lesion is first freed from its malreduced position and ultimately repaired using suture anchor fixation of the bony fragment along with its associated labrum directly to the remaining glenoid rim. This technique, facilitated by precise portal placement, results in satisfactory fragment reduction, appropriate capsular tension, and restoration of anatomy. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.
Epithelial‐Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) Gene Variants and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC) Risk
Amankwah, Ernest K. , Lin, Hui‐Yi , Lawrenson, Kate , Chornokur, Ganna , Aben, Katja K.H. , Antonenkova, Natalia, Bruinsma, Fiona , Bean, Yukie T., Beckmann, Matthias W. , Bisogna, Maria, Bogdanova, Natalia , Brinton, Louise A. , Campbell, Ian , Chen, Zhihua , Chen, Y. Ann , Chang‐Claude, Jenny, Cunningham, Julie M. , Dansonka‐Mieszkowska, Agnieszka , Despierre, Evelyn, Dicks, Ed , Dörk, Thilo , Easton, Douglas F. , Eccles, Diana M., Edwards, Robert P., Ekici, Arif B. , Fasching, Peter A. , Gao, Yu‐Tang , Giles, Graham G. , Glasspool, Rosalind , Goodman, Marc T. , Harrington, Patricia, Harter, Philipp , Hasmad, Hanis Nazihah, Hein, Alexander , Heitz, Florian , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T., Hillemanns, Peter , Høgdall, Claus , Høgdall, Estrid , Hosono, Satoyo , Iversen, Edwin S., Jakubowska, Anna , Jensen, Allan , Ji, Bu‐Tian , Kellar, Melissa, Kiemeney, Lambertus A. , Krakstad, Camilla , Kupryjańczyk, Jolanta , Lambrechts, Diether , Lambrechts, Sandrina, Le, Nhu D. , Lee, Alice W. , Lele, Shashi, Leminen, Arto, Lester, Jenny, Levine, Douglas A. , Liang, Dong , Lim, Boon Kiong , Lissowska, Jolanta , Lu, Karen, Lubiński, Jan , Lundvall, Lene, Massuger, Leon F.A.G. , Matsuo, Keitaro , McGuire, Valerie , McLaughlin, John R., McNeish, Iain A. , Menon, Usha , Moysich, Kirsten B., Ness, Roberta B., Eilber, Ursula, Odunsi, Kunle , Olson, Sara H. , Orlow, Irene , Oršulić, Sandra , Weber, Rachel Palmieri , Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Pelttari, Liisa M. , Permuth‐Wey, Jennifer, Pike, Malcolm C., Rossing, Mary Anne, Rothstein, Joseph H. , Runnebaum, Ingo B. , Rzepecka, Iwona K. , Salvesen, Helga B., Schernhammer, Eva , Schwaab, Ira, Shu, Xiao‐Ou, Shvetsov, Yurii B. , Sieh, Weiva , Song, Honglin , Southey, Melissa C. , Śpiewankiewicz, Beata, Sucheston‐Campbell, Lara, Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Terry, Kathryn L. , Thompson, Pamela J., Tangen, Ingvild L. , Tworoger, Shelley S. , Altena, Anne M. van , Vierkant, Robert A. , Vergote, Ignace , Walsh, Christine , Wang‐Gohrke, Shan , Wentzensen, Nicolas, Whittemore, Alice S. , Wicklund, Kristine G. , Wu, Anna H. , Wu, Xifeng , Woo, Yin Ling , Zheng, Wei , Kelemen, Linda E. , group, Georgia Chenevix‐Trench on behalf of the AOCS management, Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Ramus, Susan J. , Goode, Ellen L. , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Gayther, Simon A. , Narod, Steven A., Sellers, Thomas A. , Phelan, Catherine M., Lu, Karen H. , Eccles, Diana , Lambrechts, Diether , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , Dennis, Joe , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Bandera, Elisa V. , Bjørge, Line , Brooks‐Wilson, Angela , Bunker, Clareann H. , Bützow, Ralf C. , Carty, Karen , Cook, Linda S. , Cramer, Daniel W. , Cybulski, Cezary , Bois, Andreas du , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Dürst, Matthias , Eccles, Diana M., Fridley, Brooke L. , Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra , Gronwald, Jacek , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T. , Karlan, Beth Y. , Jim, Heather , Kjær, Susanne K. , Lu, Karen, McLaughlin, John R., Milne, Roger L. , Modugno, Francesmary , Nevanlinna, Heli , Paul, James , Pejovic, Tanja B. , Poole, Elizabeth M. , Risch, Harvey A. , Rosen, Barry P. , Rudolph, Anja , Siddiqui, Nadeem , Thomsen, Lotte Nedergaard , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Wilkens, Lynne R. , Yang, Hannah , Ziogas, Argyrios , Berchuck, Andrew , group, Georgia Chenevix‐Trench on behalf of the AOCS management, Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Pelttari, L M , Dörk, Thilo , Lambrechts, Diether , Giles, Graham G , Kiemeney, Lambertus A , McNeish, Iain A , Ramus, Susan J , Teo, Soo H , Tworoger, Shelley S , Hein, Alexander , Hillemanns, Peter , Jensen, Allan , Vierkant, Robert A , Eccles, Diana , Menon, Usha , Lawrenson, Kate , Monteiro, Alvaro N , Moysich, Kirsten , Orlow, Irene , Lissowska, Jolanta , Campbell, Ian G , Southey, Melissa C , Glasspool, Rosalind , Lin, Hui-Yi , Matsuo, Keitaro , Heitz, Florian , Jakubowska, Anna , Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta , Lambrechts, Diether , Sieh, Weiva , Ekici, Arif B , Bogdanova, Natalia V , Zheng, Wei , Høgdall, Estrid , Høgdall, Claus K , Lubinski, Jan , Goodman, Marc T

Genetic Epidemiology | September 24, 2015 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 689-697

10.1002/gepi.21921 | PMID 26399219 Get It

ABSTRACTEpithelial‐mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a process whereby epithelial cells assume mesenchymal characteristics to facilitate cancer metastasis. However, EMT also contributes to the initiation and development of primary tumors. Prior studies that explored the hypothesis that EMT gene variants contribute to epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) risk have been based on small sample sizes and none have sought replication in an independent population. We screened 15,816 single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 296 genes in a discovery phase using data from a genome‐wide association study of EOC among women of European ancestry (1,947 cases and 2,009 controls) and identified 793 variants in 278 EMT‐related genes that were nominally (P < 0.05) associated with invasive EOC. These SNPs were then genotyped in a larger study of 14,525 invasive‐cancer patients and 23,447 controls. A P‐value <0.05 and a false discovery rate (FDR) <0.2 were considered statistically significant. In the larger dataset, GPC6/GPC5 rs17702471 was associated with the endometrioid subtype among Caucasians (odds ratio (OR) = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.07–1.25, P = 0.0003, FDR = 0.19), whereas F8 rs7053448 (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.27–2.24, P = 0.0003, FDR = 0.12), F8 rs7058826 (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.27–2.24, P = 0.0003, FDR = 0.12), and CAPN13 rs1983383 (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.69–0.90, P = 0.0005, FDR = 0.12) were associated with combined invasive EOC among Asians. In silico functional analyses revealed that GPC6/GPC5 rs17702471 coincided with DNA regulatory elements. These results suggest that EMT gene variants do not appear to play a significant role in the susceptibility to EOC.
Network-Based Integration of GWAS and Gene Expression Identifies a HOX -Centric Network Associated with Serous Ovarian Cancer Risk
Kar, Siddhartha , Lawrenson, Kate , Aben, Katja K.H. , Antonenkova, Natalia, Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Study, on behalf of the Australian Cancer, Group, and on behalf of the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Baker, Helen , Bean, Yukie T., Beckmann, Matthias W. , Bisogna, Maria, Bogdanova, Natalia , Brinton, Louise A. , Campbell, Ian , Carty, Karen , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Chen, Y. Ann , Chen, Zhihua , Cunningham, Julie M. , Dansonka‐Mieszkowska, Agnieszka , Dicks, Ed , Dörk, Thilo , Eccles, Diana , Easton, Douglas F. , Edwards, Robert P., Ekici, Arif B. , Fasching, Peter A. , Gao, Yu‐Tang , Giles, Graham G. , Glasspool, Rosalind , Goode, Ellen L. , Goodman, Marc T. , Grownwald, Jacek, Harrington, Patricia, Harter, Philipp , Hein, Alexander , Heitz, Florian , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T., Hillemanns, Peter , Høgdall, Estrid , Høgdall, Claus , Hosono, Satoyo , Iversen, Edwin S., Jakubowska, Anna , Jensen, Allan , Ji, Bu‐Tian , Kjær, Susanne K. , Kelemen, Linda E. , Kellar, Melissa, Kelley, Joseph L., Kiemeney, Lambertus A. , Krakstad, Camilla , Kupryjańczyk, Jolanta , Lambrechts, Diether , Lambrechts, Sandrina, Le, Nhu D. , Lee, Alice W. , Lele, Shashi, Leminen, Arto, Lester, Jenny, Levine, Douglas A. , Liang, Dong , Lissowska, Jolanta , Lu, Karen, Lubiński, Jan , Lundvall, Lene, Massuger, Leon F.A.G. , Matsuo, Keitaro , McGuire, Valerie , McLaughlin, John R., McNeish, Iain A. , Menon, Usha , Moysich, Kirsten B., Narod, Steven A., Nedergaard, Lotte , Ness, Roberta B., Odunsi, Kunle , Olson, Sara H. , Orlow, Irene , Oršulić, Sandra , Weber, Rachel Palmieri , Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Pelttari, Liisa M. , Permuth‐Wey, Jennifer, Phelan, Catherine M., Pike, Malcolm C., Ramus, Susan J. , Rossing, Mary Anne, Rothstein, Joseph H. , Runnebaum, Ingo B. , Rzepecka, Iwona K. , Salvesen, Helga B., Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Schwaab, Ira, Shvetsov, Yurii B. , Sieh, Weiva , Song, Honglin , Southey, Melissa C. , Sucheston‐Campbell, Lara, Tangen, Ingvild L. , Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Terry, Kathryn L. , Thompson, Pamela J., Timorek, Agnieszka, Tworoger, Shelley S. , Altena, Anne M. van , Nieuwenhuysen, Els Van , Vergote, Ignace , Vierkant, Robert A. , Wang‐Gohrke, Shan , Walsh, Christine , Wentzensen, Nicolas, Whittemore, Alice S. , Wicklund, Kristine G. , Woo, Yin Ling , Wu, Xifeng , Wu, Anna H. , Zheng, Wei , Sellers, Thomas A. , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Freedman, Matthew L., Gayther, Simon A. , Lu, Karen H. , Lambrechts, Diether , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , Li, Qiyuan , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Study, on behalf of the Australian Cancer, Group, and on behalf of the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Bandera, Elisa V. , Berchuck, Andrew , Bjørge, Line , Brooks‐Wilson, Angela , Bützow, Ralf C. , Cook, Linda S. , Cramer, Daniel W. , Cybulski, Cezary , Dennis, Joe , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Bois, Andreas du , Dürst, Matthias , Fridley, Brooke L. , Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T. , Paul, James , Karlan, Beth Y. , Lu, Karen, McLaughlin, John R., Modugno, Francesmary , Nevanlinna, Heli , Pejovic, Tanja B. , Poole, Elizabeth M. , Risch, Harvey A. , Rosen, Barry P. , Rudolph, Anja , Shu, Xiao‐Ou , Siddiqui, Nadeem , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Wilkens, Lynne R. , Yang, Hannah , Ziogas, Argyrios , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Pelttari, L M , Dörk, Thilo , Lambrechts, Diether , Giles, Graham G , Kiemeney, Lambertus A , Kjaer, Susanne K , McNeish, Iain A , Ramus, Susan J , Teo, Soo H , Tworoger, Shelley S , Hein, Alexander , Hillemanns, Peter , Jensen, Allan , Vierkant, Robert A , Eccles, Diana , Menon, Usha , Lawrenson, Kate , Monteiro, Alvaro N , Moysich, Kirsten , Orlow, Irene , Lissowska, Jolanta , Campbell, Ian G , Southey, Melissa C , Glasspool, Rosalind , Matsuo, Keitaro , Heitz, Florian , Jakubowska, Anna , Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta , Lambrechts, Diether , Sieh, Weiva , Ekici, Arif B , Bogdanova, Natalia V , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Zheng, Wei , Høgdall, Estrid , Høgdall, Claus K , Kar, Siddhartha , Lubinski, Jan , Goodman, Marc T

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | July 24, 2015 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1574-1584

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-1270 | PMID 26209509 Get It

Abstract Background: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have so far reported 12 loci associated with serous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk. We hypothesized that some of these loci function through nearby transcription factor (TF) genes and that putative target genes of these TFs as identified by coexpression may also be enriched for additional EOC risk associations. Methods: We selected TF genes within 1 Mb of the top signal at the 12 genome-wide significant risk loci. Mutual information, a form of correlation, was used to build networks of genes strongly coexpressed with each selected TF gene in the unified microarray dataset of 489 serous EOC tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Genes represented in this dataset were subsequently ranked using a gene-level test based on results for germline SNPs from a serous EOC GWAS meta-analysis (2,196 cases/4,396 controls). Results: Gene set enrichment analysis identified six networks centered on TF genes (HOXB2, HOXB5, HOXB6, HOXB7 at 17q21.32 and HOXD1, HOXD3 at 2q31) that were significantly enriched for genes from the risk-associated end of the ranked list (P &lt; 0.05 and FDR &lt; 0.05). These results were replicated (P &lt; 0.05) using an independent association study (7,035 cases/21,693 controls). Genes underlying enrichment in the six networks were pooled into a combined network. Conclusion: We identified a HOX-centric network associated with serous EOC risk containing several genes with known or emerging roles in serous EOC development. Impact: Network analysis integrating large, context-specific datasets has the potential to offer mechanistic insights into cancer susceptibility and prioritize genes for experimental characterization. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(10); 1574–84. ©2015 AACR.
Genome-wide Analysis Identifies Novel Loci Associated with Ovarian Cancer Outcomes: Findings from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium
Johnatty, Sharon E. , Kar, Siddhartha , Beesley, Jonathan, Lu, Yi , Gao, Bo , Fasching, Peter A. , Hein, Alexander , Ekici, Arif B. , Beckmann, Matthias W. , Lambrechts, Diether , Nieuwenhuysen, Els Van , Vergote, Ignace , Lambrechts, Sandrina, Rossing, Mary Anne, Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Ness, Roberta B., Moysich, Kirsten B., Levine, Douglas A. , Kiemeney, Lambertus A. , Massuger, Leon F.A.G. , Lubiński, Jan , Jakubowska, Anna , Brinton, Louise A. , Lissowska, Jolanta , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Song, Honglin , Rhenius, Valerie , Campbell, Ian , Eccles, Diana , Sieh, Weiva , Whittemore, Alice S. , McGuire, Valerie , Rothstein, Joseph H. , Sutphen, Rebecca , Gayther, Simon A. , Menon, Usha , Ramus, Susan J. , Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Pike, Malcolm C. , Wu, Anna H. , Kupryjańczyk, Jolanta , Dansonka‐Mieszkowska, Agnieszka , Rzepecka, Iwona K. , Śpiewankiewicz, Beata, Goodman, Marc T. , Carney, Michael E., Thompson, Pamela J., Heitz, Florian , Schwaab, Ira, Harter, Philipp , Pisterer, Jacobus, Hillemanns, Peter , Group, on behalf of the AGO Study, Walsh, Christine M. , Lester, Jenny, Oršulić, Sandra , Winham, Stacey J. , Earp, Madalene A. , Fogarty, Zachary C. , Høgdall, Estrid , Jensen, Allan , Cunningham, Julie M. , Vierkant, Robert A. , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Iversen, Edwin S., Terry, Kathryn L. , Orlow, Irene , Bean, Yukie T., Høgdall, Claus , Lundvall, Lene, McNeish, Iain A. , Paul, James, Carty, Karen , Glasspool, Rosalind , Sellers, Thomas , Kennedy, Catherine J. , Chiew, Yoke-Eng , MacGregor, Stuart , Goode, Ellen L. , DeFazio, Anna , Webb, Penelope M. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Lambrechts, Diether , Earp, Madalene, Fazio, Anna de , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , Beesley, Jonathan, Doherty, Jennifer A. , Modugno, Francesmary , Gronwald, Jacek , Cybulski, Cezary , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Ziogas, Argyrios , Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra , Stram, Daniel O. , Wilkens, Lynne R. , Bois, Andreas du , Group, on behalf of the AGO Study, Karlan, Beth Y. , Lester, Jenny, Larson, Melissa C. , Kjær, Susanne K. , Fridley, Brooke L. , Cramer, Daniel W. , Bandera, Elisa V. , Pejovic, Tanja B. , Siddiqui, Nadeem , Berchuck, Andrew , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Winham, Stacey J , Lambrechts, Diether , Kiemeney, Lambertus A , McNeish, Iain A , Ramus, Susan J , Webb, Penelope M , Hein, Alexander , Hillemanns, Peter , Jensen, Allan , Vierkant, Robert A , Eccles, Diana , Menon, Usha , Moysich, Kirsten , Orlow, Irene , Lissowska, Jolanta , Campbell, Ian G , Glasspool, Rosalind , Kennedy, Catherine J , Fogarty, Zachary C , Heitz, Florian , Jakubowska, Anna , Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta , Lambrechts, Diether , Sieh, Weiva , Ekici, Arif B , Lu, Yi , MacGregor, Stuart , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Høgdall, Estrid , Høgdall, Claus K , Kar, Siddhartha , Lubinski, Jan , Goodman, Marc T

Clinical Cancer Research | July 7, 2015 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 23 | Pages: 5264-5276

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-0632 | PMID 26152742 Get It

Abstract Purpose: Chemotherapy resistance remains a major challenge in the treatment of ovarian cancer. We hypothesize that germline polymorphisms might be associated with clinical outcome. Experimental Design: We analyzed approximately 2.8 million genotyped and imputed SNPs from the iCOGS experiment for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in 2,901 European epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients who underwent first-line treatment of cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy regardless of regimen, and in a subset of 1,098 patients treated with ≥4 cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin at standard doses. We evaluated the top SNPs in 4,434 EOC patients, including patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas. In addition, we conducted pathway analysis of all intragenic SNPs and tested their association with PFS and OS using gene set enrichment analysis. Results: Five SNPs were significantly associated (P ≤ 1.0 × 10−5) with poorer outcomes in at least one of the four analyses, three of which, rs4910232 (11p15.3), rs2549714 (16q23), and rs6674079 (1q22), were located in long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) RP11-179A10.1, RP11-314O13.1, and RP11-284F21.8, respectively (P ≤ 7.1 × 10−6). ENCODE ChIP-seq data at 1q22 for normal ovary show evidence of histone modification around RP11-284F21.8, and rs6674079 is perfectly correlated with another SNP within the super-enhancer MEF2D, expression levels of which were reportedly associated with prognosis in another solid tumor. YAP1- and WWTR1 (TAZ)-stimulated gene expression and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-mediated lipid transport pathways were associated with PFS and OS, respectively, in the cohort who had standard chemotherapy (pGSEA ≤6 × 10−3). Conclusions: We have identified SNPs in three lncRNAs that might be important targets for novel EOC therapies. Clin Cancer Res; 21(23); 5264–76. ©2015 AACR.
Abstract P3-06-29: MammaPrint High1/High2 risk class as a biomarker of response to neratinib plus standard neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer in the I-SPY 2 TRIAL
Sanil, Ashish, Chien, Jo, Nanda, Rita , Chiu, Steven, Albain, Kathy S. , Kaplan, Hank, Moulder, Stacey, Viscusi, Rebecca K., Northfelt, Donald W. , Edmiston, Kirsten K., Styblo, Toncred M., Haley, Barbara , Flynn, Susan, Buxton, Meredith , Hylton, Nola, Paoloni, Melissa, Berry, Don, Liu, Minetta C. , Park, John W., Veer, Laura van ‘t , Yau, Christina , Wolf, Denise M. , Wallace, Anne M. , Boughey, Judy C. , Yee, Douglas , Tripathy, Debu , DeMichele, Angela , Isaacs, Claudine , Elias, Anthony , Swigart, Lamorna Brown , Hirst, Gillian L. , Symmans, W. Fraser , Esserman, Laura J. , Berry, Donald A. , Veer, Laura J. van’t

Cancer Research | May 4, 2015 | Volume: 75 | Issue: 9_Supplement | Pages: P3-06-29-P3-06-29

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs14-p3-06-29 Get It

Abstract Background: Further stratification of the 70-gene MammaPrintTM signature into ‘high’ and ‘ultra-high’ risk groups may help predict chemo-sensitivity. In I-SPY 2, patients were classified as MammaPrint High1 (MP1) or MammaPrint (ultra) High2 (MP2), with MP2 defined as MP_score &lt;-0.154. MP1/MP2 classification was added to HR and HER2 to define the cancer subtypes used in the I-SPY 2 adaptive randomization engine. Neratinib (N), one of the experimental agents evaluated in I-SPY 2, graduated in the HR-HER2+ signature. All patients received at least standard chemotherapy (paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide; T-&gt;AC). HER2- patients were randomized to receive N+T- &gt;AC vs. T-&gt;AC. For HER2+ patients, neratinib was administered in place of trastuzumab (N+T-&gt;AC vs. H+T-&gt;AC). Here, we assess the performance of MP1/MP2 class as a specific biomarker of neratinib response. Methods: 115 patients in the neratinib arm and 76 concurrently randomized controls had Agilent 44K microarrays and pCR data available for analysis. We assess association between MP1/MP2 and response in the neratinib and control arms alone using Fisher’s exact test, and relative performance between arms (biomarker x treatment interaction, likelihood ratio p &lt; 0.05) using a logistic model. This analysis is also performed adjusting for HR status as a covariate, and in receptor subsets. Our study is exploratory with no claims for generalizability of the data. Statistical calculations are descriptive (e.g. p-values are measures of distance with no inferential content). Our analyses do not adjust for multiplicities of other biomarkers in the trial but outside this study. Results: There are 133 MP1 patients (neratinib: 74, Control: 59) and 58 MP2 patients (neratinib: 41, Control: 17), 84% (49) of which are Her2-. The distribution of pCR rates among MP1/MP2 dichotomized groups are summarized in Table 1. Neratinib (n=115)Control (n=76)MP1 (n=74)MP2 (n=41)MP1 (n=59)MP2 (n=17)HER2- (n=105)0 / 1715 / 337 / 395 / 16HER2+ (n=86)22 / 574 / 85 / 200 / 1 MP2, one of the 10 eligible signatures, did not meet the graduation threshold; and MP1/MP2 did not show a significant biomarker x treatment interaction (OR in neratinib relative to control arm = 1.25). The MP1/MP2 x treatment interaction remains non-significant after adjustment for HR and HER2 status (p=0.54). In HER2- patients receiving neratinib, 45% (15/33) of MP2 patients achieved a pCR, compared to 0% (0/17) of MP1 patients. In the HER2- controls, there is a 31% pCR rate in MP2 (5/16) vs. 18% in MP1 (7/39) patients (OR=2.14). This difference in performance between treatment arms appears significant (p=0.041). 90% of HER2+ patients are MP1, thus MP1/MP2 status x treatment interaction within the HER2+ subtype cannot be evaluated. Conclusion: Within the I-SPY 2 population as a whole, MP1/MP2 stratification does not appear to be a specific biomarker of response to neratinib relative to the control arm. The number of HER2- patients is small and precludes any definitive conclusion, but these data motivate further investigation of the biological mechanisms distinguishing MP1 from MP2 to better understand chemotherapy and/or neratanib responsiveness. Citation Format: Christina Yau, Denise M Wolf, Ashish Sanil, Jo Chien, Anne Wallace, Judy Boughey, Doug Yee, Debu Tripathy, Angela DeMichele, Rita Nanda, Steven Chiu, Claudine Isaacs, Kathy Albain, Hank Kaplan, Stacey Moulder, Rebecca Viscusi, Donald Northfelt, Kirsten Edmiston, Anthony Elias, Toncred Styblo, Barbara Haley, Lamorna Brown-Swigart, Susan Flynn, Gillian L Hirst, Meredith Buxton, Nola Hylton, Melissa Paoloni, W Fraser Symmans, Laura Esserman, Don Berry, Minetta C Liu, John W Park, Laura van 't Veer. MammaPrint High1/High2 risk class as a biomarker of response to neratinib plus standard neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer in the I-SPY 2 TRIAL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-06-29.