Yelvington, Kirsten

Objective: To perform a feasibility pilot study comparing the usefulness of EEG electrode cap versus standard scalp EEG for acquiring emergent EEGs in emergency department, inpatient, and intensive care unit patients. Background: Nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is a neurological emergency diagnosed exclusively by EEG. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus becomes more resistant to treatment 1 hour after continued seizure activity. EEG technologists are alerted “stat” when there is immediate need for an EEG during oncall hours, yet delays are inevitable. Alternatively, EEG caps can be quickly placed by in-house residents at bedside for assessment. Design/Methods: EEG caps were compared with standard-of-care “stat” EEGs for 20 patients with suspected NCSE. After the order for a stat EEG was placed, neurology residents were simultaneously alerted and placed an EEG cap prior to the arrival of the on-call out-of-hospital technologist. Both EEG cap recordings and standard EEG recordings were visually reviewed at 10 and 20 minutes in a blinded manner by two electroencephalographers. The timing, accuracy of interpretation, and diagnosis between the two techniques were then compared. Results: Of the 20 adult patients, 70% (14 of 20) of EEG cap recordings were interpretable, whereas 95% (19 of 20) standard EEGs were interpretable; three had findings consistent with NCSE on both the EEG cap and standard EEG recordings. In the time analysis, 16 patients were included. EEG cap placement was significantly more time efficient than an EEG performed by technologist using the usual “stat” EEG protocol, with the median EEG cap electrode placement occurring 86 minutes faster than standard EEG (22.5 minutes vs. 104.5 minutes; P < 0.0001; n = 16). Conclusions: New rapid EEG recording using improved EEG caps may allow for rapid diagnosis and clinical decision making in suspected NCSE.

Introduction:We report a unique EEG phenomenon in patients with paroxysmal neurological events undergoing video EEG monitoring.Methods:Two epilepsy centers analyzed the interictal scalp EEG in patients using personal electronic devices during epilepsy monitoring. The texting rhythm (TR) was defined as a reproducible, stimulus-evoked, generalized frontocentral monomorphic burst of 5–6 Hz theta consistently induced by active text messaging. An independent prospective and retrospective cohort was analyzed and compared from two sites in Florida and Illinois. We assessed age, gender, diagnosis, epilepsy classification, MRI, and EEG to compare patients with a TR. Analysis was performed with statistical significance set atP< 0.05.Results:We identified 24 of 98 evaluable patients with a TR in a prospective arm at one center and 7 of 31 patients in a retrospective arm at another totaling 31/129 (24.0%). The waveform prevalence was similar at both centers independent of location. TR was highly specific to active texting. A similar waveform during independent cognitive, speech or language, motor activation and audio cellular telephone use was absent (P< 0.0001). It appeared to be increased in patients with epilepsy in one cohort (P= 0.03) and generalized seizures in the other (P= 0.025). Age, gender, epilepsy type, MRI results, and EEG lateralization in patients with focal epileptic seizures did not bear a relationship to the presence of a TR in either arm of the study (P= NS).Conclusions:The TR is a novel waveform time-locked to text messaging and associated with active use of smartphones. Electroencephalographers should be aware of the TR to separate it from an abnormality in patients undergoing video EEG monitoring. Larger sample sizes and additional research may help define the significance of this unique cognitive-visual-cognitive-motor network that is technology-related and task-specific with implications in communication research and transportation safety.