Citations

Abstract Antibiotics are critical complements to the immune response in combatting infection. Anaerobic bacteria are increasingly common causes of infection, and antibiotic resistance of anaerobes has been rising. Most laboratories do not perform antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobes, and even fewer have compiled antibiogram data. Here we investigated antimicrobial susceptibility results of anaerobes from January 2012 to December 2021 obtained from inpatients at Mayo Clinic using reference agar dilution testing. Actinomyces (60–70 isolates annually), Bacteroides fragilis (30–80), Finegoldia magna (40–60), and Cutibacterium acnes (70–110) were included. Penicillin, clindamycin, metronidazole, ertapenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, and moxifloxacin were tested. Clinical and Laboratory Standards (CLSI) breakpoints were followed. B. fragilis showed ≥90% and Actinomyces 100% susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam and ertapenem. All F. magna and >95% B. fragilis were susceptible to metronidazole. The most striking fluctuations in percent susceptibility from year to year were observed for clindamycin, with Actinomyces ranging from 66–79%, B. fragilis 34–67%, and F. magna 47–85%. In the absence of local anaerobe antibiograms, providers may refer to such antibiogram data to guide empiric anti-anaerobic therapy at their institutions. In conclusion, anaerobe antibiotic susceptibility patterns must be monitored to ensure appropriate antibiotic empiric therapy and stewardship.

PURPOSE The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected cancer care worldwide, including radiation therapy (RT) for breast cancer (BC), because of risk-based resource allocation. We report the evolution of international breast RT practices during the beginning of the pandemic, focusing on differences in treatment recommendations between countries. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between July and November 2020, a 58-question survey was distributed to radiation oncologists (ROs) through international professional societies. Changes in RT decision making during the first surge of the pandemic were evaluated across six hypothetical scenarios, including the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), early-stage, locally advanced, and metastatic BC. The significance of changes in responses before and during the pandemic was examined using chi-square and McNemar-Bowker tests. RESULTS One thousand one hundred three ROs from 54 countries completed the survey. Incomplete responses (254) were excluded from the analysis. Most respondents were from the United States (285), Japan (117), Italy (63), Canada (58), and Brazil (56). Twenty-one percent (230) of respondents reported treating at least one patient with BC who was COVID-19–positive. Approximately 60% of respondents reported no change in treatment recommendation during the pandemic, except for patients with metastatic disease, for which 57.7% (636/1,103; P < .0005) changed their palliative practice. Among respondents who noted a change in their recommendation during the first surge of the pandemic, omitting, delaying, and adopting short-course RT were the most frequent changes, with most transitioning to moderate hypofractionation for DCIS and early-stage BC. CONCLUSION Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, significant changes in global RT practice patterns for BC were introduced. The impact of published results from the FAST FORWARD trial supporting ultrahypofractionation likely confounded the interpretation of the pandemic's independent influence on RT delivery.

Abstract Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant brain tumor and has a poor prognosis. Imaging findings at diagnosis and in response to treatment are nonspecific. Developing noninvasive assays to augment imaging would be helpful. Plasma extracellular vesicles (EVs) are a promising biomarker source for this. Here, we develop spectral flow cytometry techniques that demonstrate differences in bulk plasma EV phenotype between GBM patients and normal donors that could serve as the basis of a liquid biopsy. Methods Plasma EVs were stained for EV-associated tetraspanins (CD9/CD63/CD81), markers indicating cell of origin (CD11b/CD31/CD41a/CD45), and actin/phalloidin (to exclude cell debris). EVs were analyzed using spectral flow cytometry. Multiparametric analysis using t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) and self-organizing maps on flow cytometry data (FlowSOM) was performed comparing GBM and normal donor (ND) plasma EVs. Results Size exclusion chromatography plus spectral-based flow cytometer threshold settings enriched plasma EVs while minimizing background noise. GBM patients had increased CD9+, CD63+, CD81+, and myeloid-derived (CD11b+) EVs. Multiparametric analysis demonstrated distinct surface marker expression profiles in GBM plasma EVs compared to ND EVs. Fifteen plasma EV sub-populations differing in size and surface marker expression were identified, six enriched in GBM patients and two in normal donors. Conclusions Multiparametric analysis demonstrates that GBM patients have a distinct nonneoplastic plasma EV phenotype compared to ND. This simple rapid analysis can be performed without purifying tumor EVs and may serve as the basis of a liquid biopsy.

Background: Patients with ccTGA have a high incidence of atrial arrhythmias and premature failure of the systemic right ventricle. We sought to better define this risk. Methods: A retrospective review of all clinical data for patients with ccTGA followed at a large tertiary care institution was performed. The primary outcome was a composite of death and cardiac transplantation. Results: A cohort of 165 patients (age 41±16 years, 53% male) were followed for 11±8 years; 41 patients died, 7 underwent cardiac transplantation, and 4 underwent VAD placement. Male sex (HR 2.7, p=0.002), older age (HR 1.04, p<0.001), clinical heart failure symptoms (HR 7, p<0.001), heart failure hospitalization (HR 4.9, p<0.001), syncope (HR 1.8, p=0.04) and pulmonary hypertension (HR 2.77, p<0.001) were significant predictors of the primary outcome. Atrial fibrillation (HR 3.5, p=0.002), atrial flutter (HR 3.05, p=0.04), and prolonged QRS duration (HR 1.01, p=0.004) on the first ECG, as well as right and left atrial enlargement (HR 4, p<0.001 and 3.7, p<0.003) and severe systemic AV valve regurgitation (HR 3.8, p=0.03) on the first echocardiogram were associated with poor outcomes. Atrial arrhythmias occurred in 110(67%) patients: atrial fibrillation in 75(45%), atrial flutter in 50(30%), and supraventricular tachycardia in 16(9.7%) patients. Arrhythmias were largely asymptomatic in 109(66%) patients, while 25(14.5%) experienced palpitations, dizziness or presyncope, and 10(6%) presented with decompensated heart failure. Cardioversion and antiarrhythmic therapy were utilized in 53(32%) patients. Surgical pulmonary vein isolation or atrial MAZE were performed in 15(9%) patients, cryoablation of the CTI in 3 patients, and surgical ablation of an accessory pathway in 2 patients. One or more catheter ablation procedures were also performed in 18(11%) patients. Conclusions: Atrial fibrillation and flutter, heart failure, prolonged QRS duration, systemic AV valve regurgitation and pulmonary hypertension predict worse outcomes in ccTGA. Although asymptomatic in a majority of patients, atrial arrhythmias are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Whether a rhythm control strategy even in asymptomatic patients may improve outcomes remains unknown.