Elsayad, Khaled

Abstract Radiotherapy is an established treatment for low-grade primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma. Recommendations on its use differ internationally, which prompted our group to conduct this analysis. Twenty-two institutions participated in this international study. Patient eligibility required a diagnosis of limited (T1/T2) primary cutaneous marginal zone or follicle center lymphoma treated with radiotherapy between 1995 and 2023. Data were collected retrospectively until February 2024 within the framework of the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group. Overall, 535 patients were analyzed. Predominant locations were the head (40%) and trunk (36%). Radiotherapy had a median dose of 24 Gy in fractions of 2 Gy. Complete responses were observed in 91% at a median time of 3.6 months following radiotherapy. There was no statistically significant difference between treatments ≤4 Gy and >4 Gy for complete or overall response rates (P = .077 and P = .056, respectively). However, there was an inferior duration of local control with ≤4 Gy (5-year local control 73% ± 12% vs 96% ± 2%; P< .001). Radiation dose was the main prognostic factor in the univariate and multivariable Cox analysis; however, higher doses did not translate into an overall survival benefit. Toxicities rarely exceeded grade 2 but were more frequent in the >4 Gy group. Radiotherapy remains an effective treatment option for indolent skin lymphoma with low toxicity. High response rates are observed with low doses of ≤4 Gy. In comparison to conventional doses, these treatments have a shorter duration of local control but a favorable toxicity profile.

PURPOSE The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected cancer care worldwide, including radiation therapy (RT) for breast cancer (BC), because of risk-based resource allocation. We report the evolution of international breast RT practices during the beginning of the pandemic, focusing on differences in treatment recommendations between countries. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between July and November 2020, a 58-question survey was distributed to radiation oncologists (ROs) through international professional societies. Changes in RT decision making during the first surge of the pandemic were evaluated across six hypothetical scenarios, including the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), early-stage, locally advanced, and metastatic BC. The significance of changes in responses before and during the pandemic was examined using chi-square and McNemar-Bowker tests. RESULTS One thousand one hundred three ROs from 54 countries completed the survey. Incomplete responses (254) were excluded from the analysis. Most respondents were from the United States (285), Japan (117), Italy (63), Canada (58), and Brazil (56). Twenty-one percent (230) of respondents reported treating at least one patient with BC who was COVID-19–positive. Approximately 60% of respondents reported no change in treatment recommendation during the pandemic, except for patients with metastatic disease, for which 57.7% (636/1,103; P < .0005) changed their palliative practice. Among respondents who noted a change in their recommendation during the first surge of the pandemic, omitting, delaying, and adopting short-course RT were the most frequent changes, with most transitioning to moderate hypofractionation for DCIS and early-stage BC. CONCLUSION Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, significant changes in global RT practice patterns for BC were introduced. The impact of published results from the FAST FORWARD trial supporting ultrahypofractionation likely confounded the interpretation of the pandemic's independent influence on RT delivery.