Fang, Penny

Abstract Radiotherapy is an established treatment for low-grade primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma. Recommendations on its use differ internationally, which prompted our group to conduct this analysis. Twenty-two institutions participated in this international study. Patient eligibility required a diagnosis of limited (T1/T2) primary cutaneous marginal zone or follicle center lymphoma treated with radiotherapy between 1995 and 2023. Data were collected retrospectively until February 2024 within the framework of the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group. Overall, 535 patients were analyzed. Predominant locations were the head (40%) and trunk (36%). Radiotherapy had a median dose of 24 Gy in fractions of 2 Gy. Complete responses were observed in 91% at a median time of 3.6 months following radiotherapy. There was no statistically significant difference between treatments ≤4 Gy and >4 Gy for complete or overall response rates (P = .077 and P = .056, respectively). However, there was an inferior duration of local control with ≤4 Gy (5-year local control 73% ± 12% vs 96% ± 2%; P< .001). Radiation dose was the main prognostic factor in the univariate and multivariable Cox analysis; however, higher doses did not translate into an overall survival benefit. Toxicities rarely exceeded grade 2 but were more frequent in the >4 Gy group. Radiotherapy remains an effective treatment option for indolent skin lymphoma with low toxicity. High response rates are observed with low doses of ≤4 Gy. In comparison to conventional doses, these treatments have a shorter duration of local control but a favorable toxicity profile.

Abstract In the pivotal study ECHELON-1, brentuximab vedotin (BV), doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A + AVD) demonstrated superior efficacy compared with bleomycin + AVD for the treatment of advanced-stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). However, there are minimal available data regarding the frequency of dose reductions or omission of BV during curative therapy and the potential impact on patient outcomes. In a real-world analysis, we retrospectively reviewed the characteristics and outcomes of 179 patients with stage III or IV cHL treated with frontline A + AVD from January 2010 to April 2022. Treatment consisted of up to 1.2 mg/kg of BV and standard dose AVD IV on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle for up to 6 cycles. At the time of treatment, the median patient age was 37 years, and a high-risk International Prognostic Score was observed in 46% of patients. Overall, 91% of patients received 6 cycles of AVD; 55% of patients did not receive the intended cumulative dose of BV (CDB); 28% of patients received two-thirds or less than the planned CDB. At a median follow-up time of 27.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.8-29), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached, and the 12-month PFS was 90.3% (95% CI, 85.9-95.0). The impact of CDB on PFS was not significant (P = .15), nor was high CDB significantly associated with increased adverse events. In real-world experience, A + AVD is a highly effective treatment for patients with advanced-stage cHL, including for patients with prominent dose reductions of BV.