Lu, Shun

8618 Background: Telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V) is a c-Met–directed antibody-drug conjugate comprising the mAb telisotuzumab and the microtubule polymerization inhibitor monomethyl auristatin E. In the phase 2 LUMINOSITY trial (NCT03539536), Teliso-V monotherapy 1.9 mg/kg showed durable responses and a generally manageable safety profile in patients (pts) with c-Met protein–overexpressing (OE) non-squamous (NSQ) EGFR -wildtype (WT) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Herein we present an analysis of efficacy outcomes according to prior platinum or prior platinum and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies. Methods: Pts (≥18 years) with locally advanced/metastatic c-Met protein–OE NSQ EGFR -WT NSCLC who had ≤2 prior lines of therapy, including ≤1 line of chemotherapy, were treated with 1.9 mg/kg Teliso-V Q2W. c-Met protein overexpression (by immunohistochemistry clinical trial assay for MET [SP44] [Roche]) was defined as ≥25% tumor cells with 3+ staining intensity (high: ≥50% 3+; intermediate [int]: 25 to <50% 3+). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by independent central review per RECIST v1.1. Results: As of 21 Feb 2024, 172 pts received ≥1 dose of Teliso-V and 168 pts were included in efficacy analyses (c-Met high, n=84; c-Met int, n=84). In the c-Met OE total population, 97.6% of pts received prior platinum and 78.6% received prior platinum + ICI. Efficacy data for pts with prior platinum and platinum + ICI therapies are shown in the Table. Among the 172 dosed pts, the most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were peripheral sensory neuropathy (31%), peripheral edema (16%), and fatigue (14%). The most common grade ≥3 TRAE was peripheral sensory neuropathy (7%). Conclusions: This analysis demonstrated that Teliso-V elicited durable responses in pts with c-Met protein–OE NSQ EGFR -WT NSCLC regardless of whether they had received prior platinum or platinum + ICI therapies; the efficacy outcomes in these subgroups were consistent with those in the overall pt population. Clinical trial information: NCT03539536 . Platinum Platinum + ICI Overall ORR, a n/N (%) [95% CI] c-Met OE total c-Met high c-Met int 48/164 (29.3) [22.4, 36.9]28/81 (34.6) [24.3, 46.0]20/83 (24.1) [15.4, 34.7] 38/132 (28.8) [21.2, 37.3]22/67 (32.8) [21.8, 45.4]16/65 (24.6) [14.8, 36.9] 49/168 (29.2) [22.4, 36.7]29/84 (34.5) [24.5, 45.7]20/84 (23.8) [15.2, 34.3] Median DOR, a mo [95% CI] c-Met OE total c-Met high c-Met int 7.2 [5.5, 11.3]9.0 [3.8, 12.0]7.2 [4.7, 11.5] 7.2 [5.5, 11.0]9.0 [3.8, 11.3]7.2 [5.3, 11.5] 7.2 [5.5, 11.0]7.2 [4.2, 12.0]7.2 [4.7, 11.5] a Per independent central review. DOR, duration of response.

PURPOSE Telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V) is a c-Met–directed antibody-drug conjugate with a monomethyl auristatin E cytotoxic payload. The phase II LUMINOSITY trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03539536 ) aimed to identify the optimal c-Met protein–overexpressing non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) population for treatment with Teliso-V (stage I) and expand the selected group for efficacy evaluation (stage II). Stage II enrolled patients with nonsquamous epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR )-wildtype NSCLC. METHODS Eligible patients had locally advanced/metastatic c-Met protein–overexpressing NSCLC and ≤2 previous lines of therapy (including ≤1 line of systemic chemotherapy). c-Met protein overexpression in nonsquamous EGFR -wildtype NSCLC was defined as ≥25% tumor cells with 3+ staining (high [≥50% 3+]; intermediate [≥25%–<50%]). Teliso-V was administered at 1.9 mg/kg once every 2 weeks. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) by independent central review. RESULTS In total, 172 patients with nonsquamous EGFR -wildtype NSCLC received Teliso-V in stages I and II. ORR was 28.6% (95% CI, 21.7 to 36.2; c-Met high, 34.6% [95% CI, 24.2 to 46.2]; c-Met intermediate, 22.9% [95% CI, 14.4 to 33.4]). The median duration of response was 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 11.3; c-Met high, 9.0 [95% CI, 4.2 to 13.0]; c-Met intermediate: 7.2 [95% CI, 5.3 to 11.5]). The median overall survival was 14.5 months (95% CI, 9.9 to 16.6; c-Met high, 14.6 [95% CI, 9.2 to 25.6]; c-Met intermediate, 14.2 [95% CI, 9.6 to 16.6]). The median progression-free survival was 5.7 months (95% CI, 4.6 to 6.9; c-Met high, 5.5 [95% CI, 4.1 to 8.3]; c-Met intermediate: 6.0 [95% CI, 4.5 to 8.1]). Most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were peripheral sensory neuropathy (30%), peripheral edema (16%), and fatigue (14%); the most common grade ≥3 AE was peripheral sensory neuropathy (7%). CONCLUSION Teliso-V was associated with durable responses in c-Met protein–overexpressing nonsquamous EGFR -wildtype NSCLC, especially in those with high c-Met. AEs were generally manageable.

PURPOSE The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected cancer care worldwide, including radiation therapy (RT) for breast cancer (BC), because of risk-based resource allocation. We report the evolution of international breast RT practices during the beginning of the pandemic, focusing on differences in treatment recommendations between countries. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between July and November 2020, a 58-question survey was distributed to radiation oncologists (ROs) through international professional societies. Changes in RT decision making during the first surge of the pandemic were evaluated across six hypothetical scenarios, including the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), early-stage, locally advanced, and metastatic BC. The significance of changes in responses before and during the pandemic was examined using chi-square and McNemar-Bowker tests. RESULTS One thousand one hundred three ROs from 54 countries completed the survey. Incomplete responses (254) were excluded from the analysis. Most respondents were from the United States (285), Japan (117), Italy (63), Canada (58), and Brazil (56). Twenty-one percent (230) of respondents reported treating at least one patient with BC who was COVID-19–positive. Approximately 60% of respondents reported no change in treatment recommendation during the pandemic, except for patients with metastatic disease, for which 57.7% (636/1,103; P < .0005) changed their palliative practice. Among respondents who noted a change in their recommendation during the first surge of the pandemic, omitting, delaying, and adopting short-course RT were the most frequent changes, with most transitioning to moderate hypofractionation for DCIS and early-stage BC. CONCLUSION Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, significant changes in global RT practice patterns for BC were introduced. The impact of published results from the FAST FORWARD trial supporting ultrahypofractionation likely confounded the interpretation of the pandemic's independent influence on RT delivery.