Back to Authors

Daaboul, Nathalie

0009-0009-1464-2235

Mayo Clinic

Hôpital Charles-Le Moyne

Citations 2

Impactof MET amplification (amp) on telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V) efficacy and safety in 2L+ non-squamous (NSQ) EGFR wild-type (WT) NSCLC with c-Met protein ov
Mansfield, Aaron Scott, Daaboul, Nathalie , Horinouchi, Hidehito, Baijal, Shobhit , Lu, Shun, Ratajczak, Christine, Öhrling, Katarina, Patel, Shilpen, Woll, Kellie, Mhaske, Pallavi, Zhang, Jianhai, Verma, Mukesh, Zhao, Weilong , Roberts-Rapp, Lisa, Zhang, Nancy, Ansell, Peter, Navas, Tony , Camidge, David Ross , Bar, Jair , Horinouchi, Hidehito , Ratajczak, Christine K. , Sun, Yan , Roberts-Rapp, Lisa A., Navas, Tony A.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 28, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 8524-8524

10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.8524 Get It

8524 Background: Teliso-V is a c-Met–directed antibody-drug conjugate comprising telisotuzumab and the microtubule polymerization inhibitor monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) payload. In the Ph2 LUMINOSITY study (NCT03539536), Teliso-V showed durable responses and manageable safety (Camidge et al, JCO 2024;42:3000-11) resulting in its accelerated approval in locally advanced/metastatic NSQ NSCLC with high c-Met protein OE (3+, ≥50%), as determined by an FDA-approved test. MET amp is a negative prognostic risk factor in advanced NSCLC, frequently associated with recurrent disease. High levels of MET amp and c-Met OE are hallmarks of MET -addicted tumors. Here, we analyzed the effects of MET amp on clinical responses to Teliso-V in LUMINOSITY. Methods: MET amp was evaluated by FISH and ctDNA in baseline samples from 108 NSQ EGFR WT NSCLC pts with c-Met OE (3+, ≥25%). MET amp by FISH was defined as having focal MET amp (MET/CEP7 ≥2.0) with MET gene copy number (GCN) ≥4. MET amp (focal) by ctDNA was defined as having plasma MET GCN ≥4 with no co-amplification in CDK6 and EGFR. c-Met OE by Immunohistochemistry (IHC; SP44) was defined as 3+ tissue staining intensity in ≥25% tumor cells (high c-Met OE: 3+, ≥50%; intermediate [int] c-Met OE: 3+, 25% to 49%). Exploratory analysis of tumor response was assessed in 76 efficacy evaluable pts with c-Met OE and MET amp assay results. Results: MET amp was detected in 34% (37/108) of pts with c-Met OE (3+, ≥25%) and was enriched by c-Met levels: 22% (11/50) in pts with Int c-Met OE (3+, 25% to 49%) and 45% (26/58) in pts with high c-Met OE (3+, ≥50%). The effects of MET amp on tumor response in LUMINOSITY are shown in Table 1. The majority of c-Met OE pts (79%) with PFS ≥10 mo (n=14) had GCN ≥10 and/or c-Met IHC 3+ ≥50%. No new safety signals were reported in pts with c-Met OE and MET amp. Conclusions: MET amp is more common in pts with high c-Met OE in this retrospective subgroup analysis. Tumor activity with Teliso-V was observed regardless of MET amp status. The impact of MET amp in pts with c-Met OE will be further evaluated in ongoing Phase 3 study (NCT04928846). Teliso-V efficacy in NSQ EGFR -WT NSCLC pts with c-Met OE with or without MET amp in LUMINOSITY. Total c-Met OE(3+, ≥25%) Total c-Met OE(3+, ≥25%) Intermediate c-Met OE(3+, ≥25%-49%) Intermediate c-Met OE(3+, ≥25%-49%) High c-Met OE(3+, ≥50%) High c-Met OE(3+, ≥50%) MET amp(N) No (N=53) Yes (N=23) No (N=30) Yes (N=7) No (N=23) Yes (N=16) ORR %(95% CI) 28 (18.0, 41.6) 39 (22.2, 59.2) 23 (11.8, 40.9) 57 (25, 84.2) 35 (18.8, 55.1) 31 (14.2, 55.6) PFS,median, mo(95% CI) 5.26 (3.71, 8.11) 8.02 (4.47, 14.65) 5.32 (2.69, 8.11) 7.52 (4.47, NA) 4.17 (3.25, 8.87) 8.02 (3.06, 25.92) OS,median, mo(95% CI) 14.5 (8.18, 17.38) 13.86 (6.54, 22.24) 14.03 (3.65, 17.02) 9.79 (6.54, NA) 16.26 (5.59, 36.44) 13.86 (3.06, 30.29)
Telisotuzumab Vedotin Monotherapy in Patients With Previously Treated c-Met Protein–Overexpressing Advanced Nonsquamous EGFR -Wildtype Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Phase II LUMINOSITY Trial
Camidge, D. Ross , Bar, Jair , Goldman, Jonathan W. , Moiseenko, Fedor , Филиппова, Е. А. , Çiçin, İrfan , Daaboul, Nathalie , Liu, Chunling , Bradbury, Penelope A., Moskovitz, Mor, Katgı, Nuran , Cuppens, Kristof , Wu, Shang‐Yin , Baijal, Shobhit , Kuo, Chih‐Hsi S. , Planchard, David , Baik, Christina S. , Li, Martha, Ansell, Peter , Xia, Summer, Bolotin, Ellen, Looman, Jim, Ratajczak, Christine K. , Horinouchi, Hidehito , Goldman, Jonathan W , Moiseenko, Fedor , Cicin, Irfan , Zer Kuch, Alona , Girard, Nicolas , Cuppens, Kristof , Han, Ji-Youn , Wu, Shang-Yin , Mansfield, Aaron S , Kuo, Chih-Hsi , Nishino, Kazumi , Lee, Se-Hoon , Planchard, David , Lu, Shun , Filippova, Elena, Ciuleanu, Tudor–Eliade , Tomasini, Pascale , Girard, Nicolas , Mansfield, Aaron S.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 6, 2024 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 25 | Pages: 3000-3011

10.1200/jco.24.00720 Get It

PURPOSE Telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V) is a c-Met–directed antibody-drug conjugate with a monomethyl auristatin E cytotoxic payload. The phase II LUMINOSITY trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03539536 ) aimed to identify the optimal c-Met protein–overexpressing non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) population for treatment with Teliso-V (stage I) and expand the selected group for efficacy evaluation (stage II). Stage II enrolled patients with nonsquamous epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR )-wildtype NSCLC. METHODS Eligible patients had locally advanced/metastatic c-Met protein–overexpressing NSCLC and ≤2 previous lines of therapy (including ≤1 line of systemic chemotherapy). c-Met protein overexpression in nonsquamous EGFR -wildtype NSCLC was defined as ≥25% tumor cells with 3+ staining (high [≥50% 3+]; intermediate [≥25%–<50%]). Teliso-V was administered at 1.9 mg/kg once every 2 weeks. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) by independent central review. RESULTS In total, 172 patients with nonsquamous EGFR -wildtype NSCLC received Teliso-V in stages I and II. ORR was 28.6% (95% CI, 21.7 to 36.2; c-Met high, 34.6% [95% CI, 24.2 to 46.2]; c-Met intermediate, 22.9% [95% CI, 14.4 to 33.4]). The median duration of response was 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 11.3; c-Met high, 9.0 [95% CI, 4.2 to 13.0]; c-Met intermediate: 7.2 [95% CI, 5.3 to 11.5]). The median overall survival was 14.5 months (95% CI, 9.9 to 16.6; c-Met high, 14.6 [95% CI, 9.2 to 25.6]; c-Met intermediate, 14.2 [95% CI, 9.6 to 16.6]). The median progression-free survival was 5.7 months (95% CI, 4.6 to 6.9; c-Met high, 5.5 [95% CI, 4.1 to 8.3]; c-Met intermediate: 6.0 [95% CI, 4.5 to 8.1]). Most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were peripheral sensory neuropathy (30%), peripheral edema (16%), and fatigue (14%); the most common grade ≥3 AE was peripheral sensory neuropathy (7%). CONCLUSION Teliso-V was associated with durable responses in c-Met protein–overexpressing nonsquamous EGFR -wildtype NSCLC, especially in those with high c-Met. AEs were generally manageable.