Estes, Lynn L.

Background: Ceftriaxone and cefepime resistance among Enterobacterales continues to increase globally, partly due to the rising prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing organisms. Surveillance of both resistance patterns and antimicrobial utilization is essential to inform empiric prescribing practices and stewardship strategies. Since carbapenems are frequently used to treat cephalosporin-nonsusceptible Enterobacterales infections, we evaluated trends in ceftriaxone and cefepime susceptibility among Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae from 2012–2024 and institutional carbapenem utilization during overlapping years (2019–2025), following outcomes from the MERINO trial for management of ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales infections. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of annual cumulative inpatient antibiogram data for E. coli and K. pneumonia isolates for 2012-2024. Percent susceptibility to ceftriaxone and cefepime was assessed using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints among a median of 1,532 E. coli isolates/year and 561 K. pneumoniae isolates/year. (Table 1). Institutional carbapenem utilization (combined meropenem and ertapenem use) was measured as days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient-days during 2019–2025 (not specifically representing treatment of E. coli or K. pneumoniae), following implementation of electronic medical record (EMR)–based antimicrobial utilization dashboards. Temporal trends were visualized using line plots. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were calculated to assess percent susceptibility trends and carbapenem utilization during 2019–2024. Analyses are descriptive; no causal inference was made. Result: During 2012–2024, ceftriaxone susceptibility declined from 89% to 83% among E. coli and from 93% to 82% for K. pneumoniae, while cefepime susceptibility declined from 95% to 88% and 97% to 85% respectively (Figure 1). During the overlapping years 2019–2024, Pearson correlation showed modest downward susceptibility trends for ceftriaxone (E. coli r = −0.900, p = 0.014; K. pneumoniae r = −0.840, p = 0.036) and cefepime (E. coli r = −0.780, p = 0.067; K. pneumoniae r = −0.850, p = 0.033). Institutional carbapenem use increased from 15.2 to 19.3 DOT per 1,000 patient days between 2019 and 2025 (r = 0.79, p = 0.035) (Figure 2). Upon review, carbapenem use was substantially higher in hematology-oncology services (23.7–25.9 DOT/1000 patient-days, during 2022–2025) compared with overall institutional use (15.2–19.3 DOT/1000 patient-days). Conclusion: Ceftriaxone and cefepime susceptibility among Enterobacterales declined over the past decade, coinciding with a modest increase in institutional carbapenem use without a corresponding increase in carbapenem resistance during 2019-2024. Local susceptibility patterns and antimicrobial utilization data provide critical context for stewardship prioritization, especially in high-risk hematology-oncology populations.

Abstract Background Antibiograms are an important stewardship tool that can inform optimal empiric therapy; most antibiograms are hospital-wide. Unit-specific antibiogram data for unique patient populations including intensive care unit and pediatrics is robust; however, published experience with unit-specific antibiograms in the hematology-oncology (heme-onc) population is limited. These patients are unique because of the common use of antimicrobial prophylaxis, prolonged broad-spectrum antibiotics, and an immunocompromised state. We sought to examine the trends in antibiogram antimicrobial susceptibility over time. Methods This retrospective quality initiative included microbiology results (first isolates per patient per timeframe) from Mayo Clinic Rochester from 2012 to 2022. Eligible cultures were those identified as being obtained from one of 8 hematology, oncology, or bone marrow transplant inpatient units. Agar dilution susceptibility testing and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints were used. Screening PCRs (eg, VRE PCR) were excluded. Culture and susceptibilities were identified by an EMR based report, compiled annually, and reported for two-year periods. Susceptibility rates were compared using the Chi-square test and Chi-square analysis for trends. Results There were 4 gram-negative and 5 gram-positive organism groups that met CLSI antibiogram criteria of ≥ 30 isolates and were included (tables 1-4). There were several significant differences in comparison to the hospital-wide antibiogram, with lower antibiotic susceptibility rates in the heme-onc units for multiple organisms, notably fluoroquinolones to E.coli and P. aeruginosa and several cephalosporins to Enterobacterales as well as penicillin and levofloxacin to Viridans group Streptococcus and vancomycin to E. faecium (tables 1&2). Over the period of 2012-2013 to 2021-2022, susceptibility rates remained stable among the heme-onc antibiogram, with few significant changes (tables 3&4). Conclusion Heme-onc antibiograms illustrated susceptibility rate differences compared to our hospital-wide antibiograms, particularly for antimicrobials used as prophylaxis. Through population-specific antibiograms, providers may be able to improve empiric antibiotic selection. Disclosures Christina G. Rivera (O'Connor), Pharm.D, Gilead Sciences: Board Member

Abstract Antibiotics are critical complements to the immune response in combatting infection. Anaerobic bacteria are increasingly common causes of infection, and antibiotic resistance of anaerobes has been rising. Most laboratories do not perform antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobes, and even fewer have compiled antibiogram data. Here we investigated antimicrobial susceptibility results of anaerobes from January 2012 to December 2021 obtained from inpatients at Mayo Clinic using reference agar dilution testing. Actinomyces (60–70 isolates annually), Bacteroides fragilis (30–80), Finegoldia magna (40–60), and Cutibacterium acnes (70–110) were included. Penicillin, clindamycin, metronidazole, ertapenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, and moxifloxacin were tested. Clinical and Laboratory Standards (CLSI) breakpoints were followed. B. fragilis showed ≥90% and Actinomyces 100% susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam and ertapenem. All F. magna and >95% B. fragilis were susceptible to metronidazole. The most striking fluctuations in percent susceptibility from year to year were observed for clindamycin, with Actinomyces ranging from 66–79%, B. fragilis 34–67%, and F. magna 47–85%. In the absence of local anaerobe antibiograms, providers may refer to such antibiogram data to guide empiric anti-anaerobic therapy at their institutions. In conclusion, anaerobe antibiotic susceptibility patterns must be monitored to ensure appropriate antibiotic empiric therapy and stewardship.

Abstract Background: Antiretroviral therapy for HIV-1 infection has become increasingly complex. The availability of new and potent drugs and progress in understanding the pathogenesis of HIV-1 infection have led to the establishment of new treatment paradigms. The varying dosing regimens, associated toxicities, and the potential for drug-drug and food-drug interactions further complicate treatment. This complexity contributes to patient nonadherence. Because clinicians have no tools to monitor adherence or drug-drug interactions and because response requires that therapy exceed the known inhibiting concentration, serum monitoring of antiretroviral therapy may play a role in improving treatment of HIV-1 infection. We report methods to quantify serum concentrations of antiretroviral drugs used to treat HIV-1 infection, precision and interference studies of these methods, and results observed in a pilot evaluation of blood serum concentrations from 12 human subjects. Methods: HPLC offers adequate sensitivity to measure peak or trough serum concentrations of delavirdine, lamivudine, nevirapine, indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir and peak serum concentrations of stavudine, zidovudine, and didanosine with reasonable precision. Results: Peak indinavir serum concentrations in most patients were in the range of 1–10 mg/L, and trough concentrations were in the range of 0.1–0.5 mg/L. Peak stavudine concentrations were in the range of 0.3–1.3 mg/L, and trough concentrations were in the range of 0.1–0.5 mg/L. Peak zidovudine concentrations were in the range of 0.1–1.1 mg/L. Conclusions: Because this was a blood serum concentration-seeking pilot study to evaluate analytic performance, we do not report on the correlation of drug response to blood concentration. However, the concentrations observed in patients are generally consistent with blood concentrations reported from studies of monotherapy.

Abstract Background: Neutropenia is the most common predisposing factor that increases the susceptibility of cancer patients (pts) to infection. The use of fluoroquinolones (FQs) as prophylaxis during chemotherapy-induced neutropenia has been shown to decrease the frequency of gram-negative (GN) infections (Cullen et al. NEJM 2005) with the benefit of reduced infection-related mortality in neutropenic pts with cancer (Bucaneve et al. NEJM 2005) and was instituted as part of our institution-wide standard clinical practice in January 2006. The widespread use of FQs for prophylaxis of pts with neutropenia and hematologic malignancies raises concerns about the evolving resistance of organisms. Methods: This retrospective observational study compared acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) pts, ages 18 and older who were admitted to the hematology service and received levofloxacin prophylaxis (LEVP) within 60 days of admission with those who were admitted but did not receive LEVP during the period of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Pts had to have a positive sterile site culture up to 96 hours prior to admission excluding Staphylococcus coagulase negative, Propionibacterium, Corynebacterium, and other common colonizing organisms. Analysis also compared the rates of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, positive Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) swabs, and positive Clostridium difficile cultures and evaluated them for a correlation LEVP. Results: A total of 213 pts were evaluated between September 2004 and May 2007. Ninety-four pts received LEVP and 119 did not. Patient characteristics were similar between groups. There was a shift from almost equal incidence of gram-positive (GP) and GN cultures in the group without prophylaxis (51% vs 49%, respectively) to a predominance of GP cultures with LEVP (68% vs 32%, respectively). There was a significant decrease in the number of sterile site cultures of GN organisms (n = 94 vs 37, respectively), while cultures of GP organisms remained similar (n = 98 vs. 77, respectively). GN organisms in sterile site cultures occurred less often in the LEVP group, however; the incidence of resistance to levofloxacin in GN was higher (32% vs 15%), particularly the susceptibility profiles of Pseudomonas sp., Escherichia coli, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Both groups had equal cultures of Staphylococcus aureus, but the group receiving LEVP had a greater incidence of MRSA (55% vs 30%). Rates of positive VRE swabs declined and had no apparent correlation with the use of levofloxacin as prophylaxis. There were more documented positive Clostridium difficile cultures in the pts receiving LEVP (29% vs 22%, respectively), but rates of Clostridium difficile have shown a constant increase throughout the institution; therefore, LEVP should not be considered the sole contributing factor to an increased rate of positive cultures. Conclusions: The epidemiology and microbial susceptibility profile of positive sterile site cultures of acute leukemia pts receiving LEVP during chemotherapy-induced neutropenia differed from those that did not. The LEVP group had a decrease in the absolute number of sterile site cultures, number and percent of GN sterile site cultures. There was an increase in GN organism resistance to levofloxacin and the incidence of several GP organisms increased with the number of GP organisms remaining constant.

Abstract Background Limited data exist to evaluate safety-related outcomes in Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) patients treated with antimicrobial agents for Gram-positive infections. Methods This retrospective, single-center study enrolled Mayo Clinic OPAT patients between 2013 and 2017. The primary objective of the study compared rates of therapy modification due to drug-related toxicity for staphylococcal infections treated with ceftriaxone, cefazolin, nafcillin, oxacillin, vancomycin, daptomycin, ceftaroline, linezolid, or ertapenem. Secondary objectives included determination of the frequency and type of adverse drug events (ADEs) attributed to OPAT and rate of readmission due to ADEs attributed to OPAT. Results One hundred seventy-two patients were identified (cefazolin n = 54, ceftriaxone n = 49, vancomycin n = 30, daptomycin n = 16, nafcillin n = 9, ertapenem n = 6, ceftaroline n = 4, oxacillin n = 3, linezolid n = 1). The overall treatment completion rates were high (153/172, 89.0%). Patients completed an average of 35.3 days (7 to 95) of therapy with their original antibiotic. Fourteen patients required change to a different antibiotic due to antimicrobial toxicity (ceftriaxone=5; vancomycin=2; cefazolin = 2; daptomycin = 2; ceftaroline = 1; nafcillin = 1; oxacillin = 1) and five patients experienced treatment failure required an additional agent (ceftriaxone = 2; nafcillin = 2; linezolid = 1). Adverse drug events (ADEs) were the most common reason for antimicrobial adjustment (14/19, 73.7%). The most common ADEs were hypokalemia (28/172, 16.3%) and diarrhea (25/172, 14.5%). There were only two cases of Clostridium difficile. Thirty-day readmissions due to antimicrobial therapy were low with 11 patients. Conclusion OPAT with Gram-positive agents used for staphylococcal infections is effective, but antimicrobial modifications still occur. Clinicians should be aware of the risk of ADEs and readmissions in OPAT patients. A multidisciplinary approach may enhance management of ADEs and possibly preventing readmissions Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

ABSTRACT The CLSI cefepime breakpoints were revised to include a susceptible-dose-dependent (SDD) category for Enterobacteriaceae , with the intention that higher cefepime doses be used for these isolates. In this study, 1.6% of Enterobacteriaceae isolates were reported as SDD, with Escherichia coli the most common SDD organism. Cefepime was prescribed in three cases (4.8%); the majority of SDD isolates were treated with a carbapenem. Enterobacteriaceae with cefepime SDD MICs were not commonly treated with cefepime at our institution.

ABSTRACT While posaconazole prophylaxis decreases the risk of invasive fungal infection compared to fluconazole, low bioavailability of the oral-suspension formulation limits its efficacy. A new delayed-release tablet formulation demonstrated an improved pharmacokinetic profile in healthy volunteers. However, serum levels for the two formulations have not been compared in clinical practice. This study compared achievement of therapeutic posaconazole levels in patients taking the delayed-release tablet to those taking the oral suspension. This retrospective cohort study included 93 patients initiated on posaconazole between 2012 and 2014 and had at least one serum posaconazole level measured. The primary measure was the proportion of patients achieving an initial therapeutic level (>700 ng/ml). An initial therapeutic posaconazole level was seen in 29 of 32 (91%) patients receiving tablets and 37 of 61 (61%) patients receiving suspension ( P = 0.003). Among patients with a steady-state level measured 5 to 14 days after initiation, a therapeutic level was observed in 18 of 20 (90%) patients receiving tablets and 25 of 43 (58%) patients receiving suspension ( P = 0.01). In these patients, the median posaconazole level of the tablet cohort (1655 ng/ml) was twice that of the suspension cohort (798 ng/ml) ( P = 0.004). In this cohort study, the improved bioavailability of delayed-release posaconazole tablets translates into a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving therapeutic serum levels than in the cohort receiving the oral suspension. The results of this study strongly support the use of delayed-release tablets over suspension in patients at risk for invasive fungal infection.

ABSTRACT Piperacillin-tazobactam (PTZ) is known to cause false-positive results in the Platelia Aspergillus enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA), due to contamination with galactomannan (GM). We tested 32 lots of PTZ and 27 serum specimens from patients receiving PTZ. GM was not detected in the lots of PTZ; one serum specimen (3.7%) was positive. PTZ formulations commonly used in the United States today appear to be a rare cause for false-positive GM results.