Citations

Background: There is growing recognition of the importance of patient-reported tolerability in complementing traditional clinician-reported safety evaluation of cancer therapies. Recent regulatory guidance listed the evaluation of overall side effect impact as a core patient-reported outcome in oncology clinical trials. A single item (‘GP5’) that asks about side effect bother is included in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy and has been used to capture overall side effect impact. This paper sought to expand the evidence base for GP5 by examining its association with clinician-reported treatment-emergent adverse events and patient-reported global health. Methods: We examined six commercial cancer clinical trials that collected GP5. The patient population was drawn from the safety population and the analysis focused on the first on-treatment assessment. Clinician-reported adverse events were classified as symptomatic if such adverse events were considered amenable to patient self-reporting (e.g. nausea). Chi-square tests and Pearson’s correlation were used to examine associations. We considered adverse event grade and frequency, both for symptomatic adverse events and any type of adverse events. Global health was measured using the visual analogue scale of the EuroQol-5 Dimensions-3 Levels measure. ‘Moderate-severe’ bother was characterised as scores of 2–4 on a 0–4 point scale for GP5, and ‘severe’ bother was characterised as scores of 3–4. Analyses were conducted separately for each trial. Results: Data from 3,557 patients were included. Across the trials, most (71.7%–94.2%) patients had an adverse event of some kind, but fewer (17.1%–44.4%) had an adverse event of grade 3 or higher. In general, fewer than 50% of patients (20.6%–44.2%) reported moderate-severe bother and 5.8%–17.% reported severe bother. There were consistent, albeit not always statistically significant, associations between GP5 and adverse events, and GP5/global health correlations ranged from −0.17 to −0.41. Discussion: GP5 is associated with both clinician- and patient-reported symptoms, suggesting its validity and usefulness as part of comprehensive tolerability assessment of cancer trials.

The success of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has bridged the growing gap between organ demand and availability in patients with liver failure or liver cancer. Safety of the living liver donor (LLD) is paramount, and astute intraoperative management plays a critical role in ensuring optimal outcomes for them. Given that intraoperative surgical and anesthesia practices vary widely across centers, the International Liver Transplantation Society (ILTS) and the International Living Donor Liver Transplantation Group (iLDLT Group) convened a global consensus conference in Toronto in March 2025 to develop guidelines for intraoperative management of the LLD. This manuscript details the recommendations on intraoperative considerations for the safety of LLD developed by Working Group II of the Consensus Scientific Committee, using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system for assessment of recommendations, and the Danish model of consensus. Working Group II focused on intraoperative monitoring, fluid and ventilation strategies, surgical techniques for vascular and biliary division, surgeon and center-specific experience, and intraoperative crises planning. These guidelines aim to support both established and emerging LDLT teams to ensure high-quality and safe intraoperative care for the LLD.

Abstract Secondary central nervous system (CNS) large B-cell lymphoma (SCNSL) occurs in the de novo setting, as a CNS-isolated relapse, or synchronous (concomitant CNS and systemic) relapse. SCNSL is a devastating event without therapeutic consensus. Thus, we aimed to evaluate treatment outcomes in an international cohort. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR, estimated using competing-risk models) were reported. Prognostic factors were identified in a 6-month landmark multivariate analysis. Outcomes after thiotepa autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (CAR-T) delivered at relapse were compared after propensity score matching (PSM). A total of 1139 patients were included in the analysis (de novo: 537; relapsed SCNSL: 602). Two-year PFS estimates were 40.4%, 43.9%, and 16.2% for de novo SCNSL, CNS-isolated relapse, and synchronous relapse, respectively. Patients with CNS-isolated relapse demonstrated low rates of systemic recurrence (24-month CIR, 6%). Thiotepa-ASCT correlated with longer survival in de novo SCNSL (PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; P = .005; and OS: HR, 0.62; P = .023) and CNS-isolated relapses (PFS: HR, 0.55; P = .002; and OS: HR, 0.39; P< .0001). ASCT (thiotepa or no thiotepa) also associated with improved survival in synchronous relapses (PFS: HR, 0.57; P = .023; and OS: HR, 0.48; P = .019). Higher survival with thiotepa-ASCT than CAR-T was observed after PSM (PFS: HR, 0.45; P = .005 and OS: HR, 0.41; P = .014). These data support thiotepa-ASCT in eligible patients, particularly de novo disease and CNS-isolated relapses. CNS-isolated relapse was infrequently associated with systemic recurrence, supporting treatment regimens adopted from primary CNS lymphoma.

Abstract Objective Perimenopause is an under-recognized life stage that may be accompanied by complex and fluctuating symptoms. We aimed to quantify the prevalence of perimenopause uncertainty and explore the underlying drivers. Methods We conducted a mixed-methods study based on a cross-sectional survey of U.S. women aged 35 years and above (N=7,640). Closed-ended responses were analyzed to estimate the prevalence of perimenopause uncertainty with subgroup differences investigated by age and symptom severity. Content analysis of free-text responses (n=409) was conducted to identify the main uncertainty drivers. Results Overall, 34% of participants reported being unsure of their reproductive stage. Uncertainty peaked among those aged 40-44 (42%) and was highest among those with severe symptom burden (37%). The content analysis revealed three main uncertainty drivers. Symptom confusion and attribution was the most common (56%), reflecting difficulties interpreting bodily changes and distinguishing perimenopause from other causes. Knowledge gaps and information seeking accounted for 28% of responses, highlighting limited health literacy, assumptions about age, and active searches for evidence. Barriers to confirmation and care (16%) described dismissive healthcare encounters and reluctance to acknowledge perimenopause. Younger women (35-39 years) were more likely to cite knowledge gaps, while healthcare barriers peaked in the 40-44 age group. Conclusion Perimenopause uncertainty is a prevalent and clinically meaningful challenge. This uncertainty is conceptually distinct from illness-focused models: it is a universal transition with ambiguity and often lack of validation. Better symptom recognition and targeted communication is a crucial first step toward improving women’s awareness and support during perimenopause.

The Concise Guide to Pharmacology 2025/26 marks the seventh edition in this series of biennial publications in the British Journal of Pharmacology. Presented in landscape format, the guide provides a comparative overview of the pharmacology of drug target families. The concise nature of the Concise Guide refers to the style of presentation, being clear, accessible, and well‐structured, rather than the scope of the content, which spans approximately 500 pages. The Concise Guide summarises the key pharmacological properties of around 1900 human drug targets, and nearly 7000 interactions, involving around 4400 ligands. While the content is a substantially condensed version of the more detailed information and links available at the www.guidetopharmacology.org website, the printed guide serves as a permanent, citable, point‐in‐time record, that remains stable despite ongoing updates to the online database. The full contents of this publication can be found at https://bpspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.70233 . The Concise Guides provide expert‐curated recommendations of ‘Gold Standard’ selective pharmacological tools, available either commercially or as donations, which enable the identification of individual drug targets or families of drug targets. While the Concise Guide offers a more streamlined overview, more comprehensive information, including detailed pharmacological profiles and links to multiple online databases, is available through the Guide to Pharmacology website. The 2025/26 edition of the Concise Guide is based on material current as of mid‐2025, and supersedes all previous editions, including the 2023/24 Guide, and earlier Guides to Receptors and Channels. It is produced in close conjunction with the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology (NC‐IUPHAR), and as such provides official IUPHAR classification and nomenclature for human drug targets, where applicable. Catalytic receptors are one of the six major pharmacological targets into which the Guide is divided, with the others being: G protein‐coupled receptors, ion channels, nuclear hormone receptors, enzymes and transporters. Each section includes nomenclature guidance, concise summaries, information of the best available pharmacological tools, key references, and suggestions for further reading.

Abstract Background Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) can detect iron deposition or myelin loss in the brain by estimating magnetic susceptibility properties. Iron is an important component in neurofibrillary tangles and is known to co‐localize in regions with tangle burden in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Abnormal magnetic susceptibility measured on QSM has been observed in atypical AD, although it is unclear if susceptibility is regionally related to AV‐1451‐PET uptake in atypical AD. Method Forty atypical AD patients (visual variant=24, language variant=7, others=9) were recruited by the Neurodegenerative Research group from the Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. They underwent a 3T MRI scan with a five‐echo gradient echo sequence for calculation of QSM ( n = 80), Aβ (Pittsburgh Compound‐B) and a 18 F‐ AV‐1451 PET scan ( n = 73). All patients showed evidence of Aβ positivity on PET. To assess the relationship between QSM and AV‐1451‐PET, two approaches were used i) Voxel‐based regression analysis using VoxelStats for the whole brain, and ii) region‐of‐interest (ROI)‐based Spearman's correlation analyses using cortical and subcortical ROIs. All models were adjusted for age and sex as covariates and were corrected for multiple comparisons, specifically the VoxelStats regression maps were corrected using random field theory and the ROI‐based correlation plots were corrected using false discovery rate. Result At the voxel‐level, positive correlations between AV‐1451‐PET and QSM were only observed in the left caudate (Figure 1). At the ROI‐level, no significant associations were found, although uncorrected data showed a positive association in the occipital lobe (red circle) and a negative association between substantia nigra susceptibility and occipital AV‐1451 uptake (blue circle) (Figure 2). Since these findings did not survive corrections, they should be interpreted cautiously. Conclusion Our data provides little evidence that regional AV‐1451 PET uptake is related to susceptibility changes in patients with atypical AD, suggesting that iron deposition may not be associated with regional tau accumulation in AD.

Abstract Background Self‐administered and remote digital cognitive assessments provide a scalable method for screening and longitudinal cognitive monitoring. Mayo Test Drive (MTD) is one such assessment with previously demonstrated usability, reliability, validity and multi‐device compatibility. MTD includes a computer‐adaptive word list memory test (Stricker Learning Span) and a measure of processing speed/executive functioning (Symbols Test) that combine to provide an MTD Composite. This study aimed to develop a conditional normative model predicting longitudinal cognitive change for MTD, and to validate the model in two independent samples of cognitively unimpaired (CU) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI)/dementia (DEM) participants. Method 1355 CU participants at initial MTD assessment with 2‐4 consecutive MTD assessments every 7.5 months comprised the development dataset. Linear mixed effects models were used to construct a conditional normative model for MTD assessments 2‐4. The baseline model was chosen a priori , consisting of age, sex, education, baseline score, number of assessments, and time. Device type, race, and baseline score by time interactions were also considered. Variables were only added if a >1% increment in r‐squared was observed. The models were externally validated in 113 CU and 51 MCI/DEM patients. Following model development, the data were updated and additional follow‐up MTD assessments were added for many participants, including the addition of additional CU validation data at test 3 ( N = 126) and 4 ( N = 279). T‐tests compared observed and predicted differences and residual z‐scores between development and validation at each follow‐up assessment. Result Table 1 presents demographic variables. No additional variables increased the r‐squared by >1%. The final models are presented in Table 2. Age, baseline score, sex, and education were significant. Residual z‐scores were not significantly different between CU development and CU validation cohorts, indicating observed scores were in line with model predicted scores. Residual z‐scores were significantly worse among MCI/DEM compared to CU development in 11/12 comparisons (Figure 1), indicating observed scores were below model predicted expectations and implying sensitivity to longitudinal cognitive decline. Conclusion These longitudinal normative models can be used to identify individuals with follow‐up scores outside of expected predicted ranges, signifying abnormal longitudinal cognitive decline.

Abstract Background In addition to visuospatial and visuoperceptual deficits, most PCA patients also report deficits in visual attention, episodic memory, and working memory. The dorsal attention network is known to play a critical role in modulating these clinical functions. However, little is known about the relationship of the dorsal attention network with other core networks and relationships to volume loss and memory functions in PCA. Method Fifty‐seven PCA patients were recruited by the Neurodegenerative Research group, Mayo Clinic, and compared to 60 cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. The CONN functional connectivity toolbox was used to calculate within‐ and between‐network connectivity. Functional connectivity within the key regions (i.e., inter‐hemisphere connectivity) of the dorsal attention network, namely frontal eye field (FEF) and intraparietal sulcus (IPS), and the entire network was generated. Functional connectivity between the dorsal attention network and the frontoparietal, visual, and default mode networks (DMN) were also generated using CONN's network parcellation atlas. Multivariate linear regression models were fit i) to compare within‐ and between‐network connectivity between both groups and ii) to assess relationships between within‐network connectivity and both gray matter volumes and clinical test scores. Result PCA showed reduced within‐network connectivity in the dorsal attention network, specifically within the IPS and the entire network compared to CU. An increase in between‐network connectivity between the frontoparietal network and both FEF and the entire dorsal attention network was noted in PCA compared to CU (Figure 1). Lower dorsal attention within‐network connectivity was associated with a trend for lower volumes in the entire network (Figure 2) and significantly lower scores on the auditory verbal learning test‐recognition percent correct (AVLT‐RCP) and Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS) III‐digit span backward in PCA (Figure 3). Conclusion These findings suggest that within‐ and between‐network connectivity of the dorsal attention network, both within key regions and the entire network, was disrupted in PCA patients. However, this network did not show disrupted connectivity with the core PCA networks. Within‐network connectivity disruptions in the dorsal attention network are associated with aspects of memory function, and to some extent, with volume loss.

Abstract Background Aging and dementia are generally associated with lower metabolism in gray matter on FDG‐PET and have been widely studied. However, white matter (WM) metabolic changes remain understudied. We investigated the metabolic changes in WM associated with aging and dementia and their relationships with established Alzheimer's Disease (AD) biomarkers and cognitive outcomes. Method We analyzed data from 3,169 participants (72 ± 9 years; 53% male; 65% cognitively unimpaired) enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). All participants underwent baseline MRI, amyloid‐PET, and FDG‐PET scans, as well as neuropsychological evaluations, with at least one clinical follow‐up. Voxel‐wise multiple regression analysis identified WM metabolic changes associated with global cognition in cognitively unimpaired MCSA participants ( n = 1,754). Univariate analyses and structural equation models were applied to elucidate the driving factors underlying the WM metabolic changes in MCSA data. Multiple regression and linear mixed‐effects models evaluated the explanatory utility of WM metabolism for baseline global cognition and cognitive decline in both cohorts. In a subset of MCSA participants, we evaluated neurite density index from diffusion MRI as a surrogate of WM health and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) as a surrogate of neuroinflammation to understand underlying mechanisms. Result We identified an atypical WM signature (AWM‐Signature) in the anterior and superior corona radiata, where glucose metabolism increased as cognitive performance worsened (Figure 1). Hypermetabolism in AWM‐Signature was related to increased age, amyloidosis, vascular disease, and neuroinflammation, as well as decreasing WM neurite density in the same regions (Figure 2). Hypermetabolism in AWM‐Signature regions predicted faster future cognitive decline, even after accounting for demographics, amyloid, and vascular disease metrics. The results observed in the AWM‐Signature regions were consistently in the opposite direction of the associations seen with gray matter and typical WM regions. Conclusion We found unexpected metabolism increases in corona radiata, a hub that carries significant portion of the brain's neural traffic, with aging and disease which likely indicates a compensatory response. These changes may be useful cognitive resilience measures and require further investigation to understand their role in maintaining cognitive function.