Citations

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs more frequently in men, but women suffer more AF recurrence; mechanisms are not completely understood. Purpose To explore whether sex related differences in LA stiffness (LAstiffn) in patients with AF ablation could potentially explain differences in AF recurrence. Methods We screened patients with catheter ablation for AF, in sinus rhythm at 3 months post-ablation, with no significant mitral valve disease (< moderate), and with prospectively measured LA volumes [maximum (LAVI) and minimum volume index] by echocardiography. LAStiffn index was estimated as (E/e’)/LA emptying fraction. Outcome endpoint was AF recurrence up to 14 years post ablation. Results A total of 591 patients with AF ablation were studied (mean age 60±10 years; 25% women; Table1). At 3 months post-ablation, LAVI was 36±10 mL/m2 and LAstiffn was 0.31±0.21 1/%. Compared to males, female patients were slightly older, had more frequently hypertension, congestive heart failure, prior stroke/TIA, higher CHA2DS2-VASc score; they less often had persistent AF, coronary artery disease, or dilated cardiomyopathy. Women also had higher LAstiffn (0.37±0.24 vs. 0.29±0.19, P <.0001, Figure 1), despite similar indexed LA volumes (Table1). Rates of AF recurrence at follow-up (median 7.5 years; 347 patients with events) were higher in women vs. men (Figure 2, left; log-rank P<.001) and persisted after adjustment for age, type and duration of AF, body mass index, cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities, CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2, LV ejection fraction, and LAVI (adjusted HR 1.58 [1.20-2.08], P=.001). Overall, LA volumes and LAstiffn were higher in patients with older age and more comorbidities (hypertension, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, persistent AF, CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2, etc; P<.01 for all). At multivariable regression analysis, LAVI and LAstiffn correlated with E/e’, LV size and mass, degree of mitral/tricuspid regurgitation, and LV stroke volume index (only LAVI). In addition, LAstiffn was higher in patients with elevated right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) >35 mmHg and increase in RVSP more than 10 mmHg from pre-ablation (P<.0001) (correlation R=0.44, P<.0001). At follow-up, after adjusting for age and LAVI, higher LAstiffn remained associated with AF recurrence in women (P=.02, HR 2.82 per unit change, 95% CI, 1.08-6.72; Figure 2, right), but not in men (P=.30). Conclusions LAStiffn is higher in women vs. men and correlates with burden of comorbidities, aging, diastolic dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension, possibly reflecting more extensive LA myopathy, and potentially contributing to sex differences in AF recurrence.Figure 1Table 1

ABSTRACT How cell metabolism regulates DNA repair is incompletely understood. Here, we define a GTP-mediated signaling cascade that links metabolism to DNA repair and has significant therapeutic implications. GTP, but not other nucleotides, regulates the activity of Rac1, a guanine nucleotide-binding protein, which promotes the dephosphorylation of serine 323 on Abl-interactor 1 (Abi-1) by protein phosphatase 5 (PP5). Dephosphorylated Abi-1, a protein previously not known to activate DNA repair, promotes nonhomologous end joining. In patients and mouse models of glioblastoma, Rac1 and dephosphorylated Abi-1 mediate DNA repair and resistance to standard-of-care genotoxic treatments. The GTP–Rac1–PP5–Abi-1 signaling axis is not limited to brain cancer, as GTP supplementation promotes DNA repair and Abi-1-S323 dephosphorylation in nonmalignant cells and protects mouse tissues from genotoxic insult. This unexpected ability of GTP to regulate DNA repair independently of deoxynucleotide pools has important implications for normal physiology and cancer treatment. SIGNIFICANCE: A newly described GTP-dependent signaling axis is an unexpected link between nucleotide metabolism and DNA repair. Disrupting this pathway can overcome cancer resistance to genotoxic therapy while augmenting it can mitigate genotoxic injury of normal tissues. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 5

Background: Early diagnosis of significant valvular heart disease (VHD) enables appropriate implementation of the best therapeutic strategy and follow-up. Cardiac auscultation remains suboptimal in early detection of VHD. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for early detection of VHD and its severity. Methods: All consecutive patients with VHD who did not have a standard echocardiogram prior to first outpatient cardiology consultation underwent history and physical examination followed by POCUS study by an experienced physician in a general cardiology clinic from June 2017 to August 2022 at our institution. Subsequent standard transthoracic echocardiography (sTTE) was performed as the gold standard. Comparison was performed between POCUS and sTTE for the presence and severity of VHD. sTTE was performed by registered cardiac sonographers and interpreted by another cardiologist blinded to the POCUS results. Results: A total of 77 patients were studied (ge 72 ± 11 years, 58.4% males). A total of 89 significant valvular abnormalities were diagnosed. There were 39 (43.8%) cases of regurgitant VHD, 16 (18.0%) of stenotic VHD and 34 (38.2%) had evaluation for prosthetic valve function. The sensitivity (90.9%; 82.4%; 83.3%; 100%) and specificity (100%; 96.7%; 100%; 100%) were high for detecting ≥ moderate aortic regurgitation (AR), mitral regurgitation (MR), aortic stenosis (AS) and prosthetic valvular abnormality, respectively. The weighted κ coefficient between POCUS and sTTE for the assessment of ≥ moderate MR, AR and AS was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.65–0.97), 0.94 (95% CI, 0.84–1.00) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.76–1.0), respectively, indicating excellent agreement. Conclusions: POCUS can identify patients with significant VHD and may serve as a powerful screening tool for early detection of significant VHD in the outpatient clinical practice with downstream impact on clinical management of significant VHD.

PURPOSE The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria for high-grade gliomas (RANO-HGG) and low-grade gliomas (RANO-LGG) were developed to improve reliability of response assessment in glioma trials. Over time, some limitations of these criteria were identified, and challenges emerged regarding integrating features of the modified RANO (mRANO) or the immunotherapy RANO (iRANO) criteria. METHODS Informed by data from studies evaluating the different criteria, updates to the RANO criteria are proposed (RANO 2.0). RESULTS We recommend a standard set of criteria for both high- and low-grade gliomas, to be used for all trials regardless of the treatment modalities being evaluated. In the newly diagnosed setting, the postradiotherapy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), rather than the postsurgical MRI, will be used as the baseline for comparison with subsequent scans. Since the incidence of pseudoprogression is high in the 12 weeks after radiotherapy, continuation of treatment and confirmation of progression during this period with a repeat MRI, or histopathologic evidence of unequivocal recurrent tumor, are required to define tumor progression. However, confirmation scans are not mandatory after this period nor for the evaluation of treatment for recurrent tumors. For treatments with a high likelihood of pseudoprogression, mandatory confirmation of progression with a repeat MRI is highly recommended. The primary measurement remains the maximum cross-sectional area of tumor (two-dimensional) but volumetric measurements are an option. For IDH wild-type glioblastoma, the nonenhancing disease will no longer be evaluated except when assessing response to antiangiogenic agents. In IDH-mutated tumors with a significant nonenhancing component, clinical trials may require evaluating both the enhancing and nonenhancing tumor components for response assessment. CONCLUSION The revised RANO 2.0 criteria refine response assessment in gliomas.

Purpose of review Early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ERAT) during blanking period (BP) is not uncommon after catheter ablation of AF. Current guidelines and consensus statements recommend conservative treatment of ERAT. This review summarized recent studies, underlying mechanism and clinical managements of ERAT, and proposed a reconsideration of the definition and clinical significance of BP. Recent findings Recent studies have shown that the entity of ERAT in the very early phase of BP (i.e., first 4 weeks of the 3-month period) is different from those ERATs occurring late which is strongly associated with the late recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia. The optimal BP duration suggested by clinical observation ranges from 21 to 58 days. Using antiarrhythmic drugs and early electrical cardioversion are the effective management for ERAT, whereas re-ablation is a reasonable strategy although remains controversial. Summary The definition of BP with a shorter duration, that is, 1 month instead of 3 months post AF ablation, is supported by the observations of latest clinical studies. Recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia beyond the 1-month time frame is associated with higher risk of late recurrence and may warrant repeat ablation. A revisit to the guideline recommendation on management of ERAT is needed to change clinical practice.

PURPOSE The Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT) is a phase II platform trial that uses response adaptive randomization and genomic profiling to efficiently identify novel therapies for phase III testing. Three initial experimental arms (abemaciclib [a cyclin-dependent kinase [CDK]4/6 inhibitor], neratinib [an epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR]/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 inhibitor], and CC-115 [a deoxyribonucleic acid–dependent protein kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor]) were simultaneously evaluated against a common control arm. We report the results for each arm and examine the feasibility and conduct of the adaptive platform design. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed O 6 -methylguanine–DNA methyltransferase-unmethylated glioblastoma were eligible if they had tumor genotyping to identify prespecified biomarker subpopulations of dominant glioblastoma signaling pathways (EGFR, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and CDK). Initial random assignment was 1:1:1:1 between control (radiation therapy and temozolomide) and the experimental arms. Subsequent Bayesian adaptive randomization was incorporated on the basis of biomarker-specific progression-free survival (PFS) data. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and one-sided P values are reported. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02977780 ). RESULTS Two hundred thirty-seven patients were treated (71 control; 73 abemaciclib; 81 neratinib; 12 CC-115) in years 2017-2021. Abemaciclib and neratinib were well tolerated, but CC-115 was associated with ≥ grade 3 treatment-related toxicity in 58% of patients. PFS was significantly longer with abemaciclib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.06; one-sided P = .046) and neratinib (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.02; one-sided P = .033) relative to the control arm but there was no PFS benefit with CC-115 (one-sided P = .523). None of the experimental therapies demonstrated a significant OS benefit ( P > .05). CONCLUSION The INSIGhT design enabled efficient simultaneous testing of three experimental agents using a shared control arm and adaptive randomization. Two investigational arms had superior PFS compared with the control arm, but none demonstrated an OS benefit. The INSIGhT design may promote improved and more efficient therapeutic discovery in glioblastoma. New arms have been added to the trial.

Abstract Tumor-related epilepsy (TRE) is a frequent and major consequence of brain tumors. Management of TRE is required throughout the course of disease and a deep understanding of diagnosis and treatment is key to improving quality of life. Gross total resection is favored from both an oncologic and epilepsy perspective. Shared mechanisms of tumor growth and epilepsy exist, and emerging data will provide better targeted therapy options. Initial treatment with antiseizure medications (ASM) in conjunction with surgery and/or chemoradiotherapy is typical. The first choice of ASM is critical to optimize seizure control and tolerability considering the effects of the tumor itself. These agents carry a potential for drug–drug interactions and therefore knowledge of mechanisms of action and interactions is needed. A review of adverse effects is necessary to guide ASM adjustments and decision-making. This review highlights the essential aspects of diagnosis and treatment of TRE with ASMs, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy while indicating areas of uncertainty. Future studies should consider the use of a standardized method of seizure tracking and incorporating seizure outcomes as a primary endpoint of tumor treatment trials.