Citations

Abstract The overall goal of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) is to optimize and validate biomarkers for clinical trials while sharing all data and biofluid samples with the global scientific community. ADNI has been instrumental in standardizing and validating amyloid beta (Aβ) and tau positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. ADNI data were used for the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the Fujirebio and Roche Elecsys cerebrospinal fluid diagnostic tests. Additionally, ADNI provided data for the trials of the FDA‐approved treatments aducanumab, lecanemab, and donanemab. More than 6000 scientific papers have been published using ADNI data, reflecting ADNI's promotion of open science and data sharing. Despite its enormous success, ADNI has some limitations, particularly in generalizing its data and findings to the entire US/Canadian population. This introduction provides a historical overview of ADNI and highlights its significant accomplishments and future vision to pioneer “the clinical trial of the future” focusing on demographic inclusivity. Highlights The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) introduced a novel model for public‐private partnerships and data sharing. It successfully validated amyloid and Tau PET imaging, as well as CSF and plasma biomarkers, for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease. ADNI generated and disseminated vital data for designing AD clinical trials.

Introduction Age correlates with survival in patients (pts) with DLBCL, which has a median age at diagnosis of 67 y. Recent therapeutic advances, including bispecifics and cell therapy, have promising efficacy, but safety and accessibility continue to be limited for older pts. The randomized, global, phase 3 ECHELON-3 study (NCT04404283) demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate (ORR) with brentuximab vedotin (BV) + lenalidomide (Len) + rituximab (R; BV+Len+R) vs placebo+Len+R in pts with R/R DLBCL after ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies who were ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplant and/or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Here, we present safety and efficacy in pts aged ≥65 y. Methods In ECHELON-3, pts were randomized 1:1 to receive BV (1.2 mg/kg) or placebo every 3 weeks (q3w), in combination with R (375 mg/m2) q3w and Len (20 mg) once daily. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was required in all cycles. Efficacy was assessed by investigators per Lugano 2014 classification. The primary endpoint was OS, with key secondary endpoints of PFS and ORR. Other secondary endpoints included detailed safety and tolerability. This subgroup analysis comprises pts aged ≥65 y. P values are descriptive. Results A total of 155 pts aged ≥65 y were enrolled from April 2021 to November 2023 and randomized to BV+Len+R (n=79) or placebo+Len+R (n=76). The median age was 75 y (range, 65-89 y); 54% of pts were male, 59% were White, and 19% were Asian. Twenty-three percent and 54% had Ann Arbor stage III and IV disease, respectively, and 64% had high-intermediate or high International Prognostic Index scores (3-5) at enrollment. The most common DLBCL subtype was DLBCL not otherwise specified (58%). Twenty-nine percent of pts had transformed DLBCL. Approximately half (49%) of pts had primary refractory disease, and 81% had disease refractory to their most recent prior line of therapy. Seventy percent of pts had <1% CD30 expression via IHC; 48% of cases had germinal center B-cell origin. Prior CAR-T was reported in 21.9% of pts. At a median follow-up of 16.8 mo (95% CI, 14.3-19.5 mo), median OS was 15.9 mo (95% CI, 11.7 mo-not estimable [NE]) with BV+Len+R vs 8.5 mo (95% CI, 5.5-11.5 mo) with placebo+Len+R (hazard ratio [HR], 0.540; 95% CI, 0.351-0.830; P=.0043). Median PFS was 5.7 mo (95% CI, 4.1-12.7 mo) with BV+Len+R vs 2.8 mo (95% CI, 1.9-4.1 mo) with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.478; 95% CI, 0.318-0.718; P=.0003). ORR was 70.9% (95% CI, 59.6%-80.6%) with BV+Len+R vs 46.1% (95% CI, 34.5%-57.9%) with placebo+Len+R (P=.0020); complete response (CR) rate was 45.6% vs 19.7%, respectively. Median time to CR was 1.61 mo with both BV+Len+R and placebo+Len+R (range, 1.2-7.3 vs 0.7-4.6 mo, respectively). Median duration of CR was 18.9 mo (95% CI, 12.4 mo-NE) with BV+Len+R vs 5.4 mo (95% CI, 2.8 mo-NE) with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.416; 95% CI, 0.139-1.250). In total, 154 pts were evaluable for safety analysis (75 pts in placebo+Len+R group). The median number of cycles was 5 (range, 1-34) vs 3 (range, 1-31) in the BV+Len+R and placebo+Len+R groups, respectively. The percentage of pts with any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was similar between groups (97% with BV+Len+R and 99% with placebo+Len+R); grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 89% of pts in the BV+Len+R group and 76% in the placebo+Len+R group. Serious TEAEs and TEAEs leading to death were reported more frequently in the BV+Len+R group (62% and 13%, respectively) than the placebo+Len+R group (47% and 8%, respectively). More pts discontinued study treatment due to TEAEs in the BV+Len+R group than the placebo+Len+R group (20% vs 8%). In total, 39% of pts on BV+Len+R had a peripheral neuropathy event vs 27% of pts on placebo+Len+R; however, the majority of cases were grade 1 (22% and 17%, respectively). Additional information on older pts will be presented. Conclusions BV+Len+R demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement in all key efficacy outcomes in pts aged ≥65 y, which is consistent with the overall ECHELON-3 population (median age 74 y; 70.5% of pts aged ≥65 y in BV+Len+R group). Differences in some safety endpoints are likely attributable to longer duration of treatment in the BV+Len+R group. No clinically meaningful safety trends in pts aged ≥65 y were identified. These results suggest that BV+Len+R may be an effective treatment option in older pts with R/R DLBCL.

Introduction Patients (pts) with progressive disease after ≥2 prior lines of systemic therapy are unlikely to derive additional benefit from current salvage immunochemotherapies, and survival declines significantly with each subsequent treatment. Pts with refractory disease following second-line therapy have worse outcomes, with reported overall response rates (ORRs) of 1% to 14% and overall survival (OS) of 5 months (Blood. 2017;130[16]:1800-1808). While chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has become a preferred strategy in the second- and third-line settings, pts with R/R disease following CAR-T experience dismal survival, with progression-free survival (PFS) and OS as low as 3 and 5 months, respectively, and no agreed standard of care post CAR-T (Blood. 2022;140[24]:2527-2529). The randomized, global, phase 3 ECHELON-3 study (NCT04404283) was conducted in pts with R/R DLBCL after ≥2 prior therapies who were ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplant and/or CAR-T. Here, we present subgroup analyses in pts with 2 prior lines of therapy, refractory disease, or prior CAR-T. Methods In these subgroup analyses of ECHELON-3, eligible pts had 2 prior lines of systemic therapy, disease refractory to the last prior therapy, or prior exposure to CAR-T. Pts could qualify for ≥1 subgroup and were analyzed separately. Refractory disease was defined as stable or progressive disease as best overall response to last line of treatment or relapse ≤6 months from the end of treatment. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive brentuximab vedotin (BV; 1.2 mg/kg) or placebo every 3 weeks (q3w), in combination with rituximab (R; 375 mg/m2) q3w and lenalidomide (Len; 20 mg) once daily. Efficacy was assessed by investigators per Lugano 2014 classification. The primary endpoint was OS, with key secondary endpoints of PFS and ORR. P values are descriptive. Results In total, 230 pts were enrolled in ECHELON-3 from April 2021 to November 2023, with a median follow-up of 16.4 months (range, 0.1-31.5 months). Overall, 94 pts with 2 prior lines of systemic therapy were enrolled and randomized to BV+Len+R (n=48) or placebo+Len+R (n=46). Median OS was 16.3 months (95% CI, 12.6 months-not estimable) with BV+Len+R vs 8.5 months (95% CI, 4.1-15.8 months) with placebo+Len+R (hazard ratio [HR], 0.557; 95% CI, 0.317-0.977; P=.0388). Median PFS was 7.1 months (95% CI, 3.6-12.6 months) with BV+Len+R vs 2.7 months (95% CI, 1.4-4.0 months) with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.462; 95% CI, 0.279-0.764; P=.0020). ORR was 68.8% (95% CI, 53.7%-81.3%) with BV+Len+R vs 43.5% with placebo+Len+R (95% CI, 28.9%-58.9%; P=.0216); complete response (CR) rate was 52.1% vs 13.0%, respectively. Additional data for pts by lines of therapy received will be presented. In total, 194 pts with disease refractory to the most recent systemic therapy were enrolled and randomized to BV+Len+R (n=98) and placebo+Len+R (n=96). Median OS was 11.7 months (95% CI, 8.8-16.3 months) with BV+Len+R vs 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.7-8.5 months) with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.566; 95% CI, 0.396-0.808; P=.0015). Median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.8-5.4 months) with BV+Len+R vs 1.5 months (95% CI, 1.4-2.6 months) with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.508; 95% CI, 0.363-0.712; P<.0001). ORR was 59.2% (95% CI, 48.8%-69.0%) with BV+Len+R vs 29.2% (95% CI, 20.3%-39.3%) with placebo+Len+R (P<.0001); CR rate was 34.7% vs 11.5%, respectively. Overall, 67 pts who received prior CAR-T were enrolled and randomized to BV+Len+R (n=32) and placebo+Len+R (n=35). Median OS was 15.6 months with BV+Len+R vs 4.4 months with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.2-0.75). Median PFS was 3.0 months with BV+Len+R vs 1.4 months with placebo+Len+R (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.76). ORR was 65.6% (95% CI, 46.8%-81.4%) with BV+Len+R vs 25.7% (95% CI, 12.5%-43.3%) with placebo+Len+R (P=.0014); CR rate was 37.5% vs 11.4%, respectively. Conclusions BV+Len+R demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement in all key efficacy outcomes, including CR and OS, in pts with 2 prior lines of therapy, disease refractory to prior treatment, or prior CAR-T. This treatment benefit was generally consistent with that observed in the overall ECHELON-3 study population. Therefore, BV+Len+R has the potential to address an unmet need for effective and tolerable therapy in heavily pretreated pts, as described above.

Introduction: Brexu-cel is an autologous anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy approved in the US and EU for treatment of adults with R/R MCL (after ≥2 prior therapies in EU) based on a high objective response rate (ORR; 93%; 67% complete response [CR] rate) in pts who received the pivotal dose (2×106 anti-CD19 CAR T cells/kg; Cohort 1; N=60) in ZUMA-2 (NCT02601313; Wang et al, N Engl J Med 2020). After ~4 years (y) of median follow-up, Brexu-cel demonstrated a median overall survival (OS) of 46.4 months (mo) in 68 pts with R/R MCL in Cohort 1 (Goy et al. ASH 2023). Cohort 2 was established to assess a lower dose (0.5 x 106 anti-CD19 CAR T cells/kg); however, the risk/benefit ratio of the Cohort 1 dose was deemed the optimal dose before Cohort 2 reached full enrollment. Here we report primary outcomes of Cohort 2 and 5-y outcomes of Cohorts 1 and 2. Methods: Pts with R/R MCL and ≤5 prior therapies including a BTKi received optional bridging therapy (protocol-defined), lymphodepleting chemotherapy, and 1 infusion of brexu-cel. The primary endpoint was ORR (CR + partial response [PR]) per Lugano classification (Cheson et al. J Clin Oncol. 2014) by independent radiology review committee (IRRC) assessment. Key secondary endpoints were duration of response (DOR), best objective response (BOR), progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and safety. After ≥24 mo of assessment, pts could transition to long-term follow-up (LTFU), NCT05041309, where they were monitored for late-onset targeted/serious adverse events (AEs) possibly related to brexu-cel, presence of replication-competent retrovirus (RCR), and/or insertional mutagenesis. Descriptive statistics are reported herein. Results: As of the primary analysis data cutoff date, July 24, 2019, 17 pts enrolled in Cohort 2, 14 (82%) of whom were treated with brexu-cel with median follow-up of 16.0 mo (range, 13.9-18.0). Pt characteristics for Cohort 2 (N=14) were similar to Cohort 1; median (range) age and number or prior therapies was 61.5 y (52-73) and 3 (2-5); 100% US-treated, 79% male, 71% extranodal disease, 50% intermediate or high s-MIPI scores, 50% refractory to last therapy, and 43% had prior autologous stem cell transplantation. ORR was 93% (95% CI, 66.1-99.8) per IRRC; 64% had a CR (95% CI, 35.1-87.2), 29% had a PR (95% CI, 8.4-58.1) and 1 pt was not assessed. All 14 pts had ≥1 AE of any grade (Gr), with Gr ≥3 AEs occurring in 93% of pts; the most common being hypotension (50%), white blood cell count decrease (50%), anemia (43%), and neutrophil count decrease (43%). Rates of Gr ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurological events were 7% and 43%, respectively. As of April 1, 2024, median follow-up (range) for Cohort 1 and 2 was 67.8 mo (58.2-88.6; N=68) and 72.3 mo (70.1-74.3; N=14), respectively. In Cohort 1, 24 pts were still alive (35%; 2 withdrew consent and 1 lost to follow up) and 44 pts died (65%). In Cohort 2, 8 pts were still alive (57%; 2 withdrew consent and 1 lost to follow up) and 6 pts died (43%). A total of 27 pts (Cohort 1, n=23; Cohort 2, n=4) enrolled in the LTFU study by data cutoff with a median follow-up time of 70.2 mo (range, 58.2-88.6). Median (95% CI) investigator-assessed DOR and PFS were 36.5 mo (17.7-48.9; n=60; 17 patients in ongoing response, all CR) and 25.3 mo (12.7-46.6; N=68) in Cohort 1; and 57.5 mo (4.7-not estimable [NE]; n=12; 3 pts in ongoing response, all CR) and 29.5 mo (3.3-NE; N=14) in Cohort 2. Median OS (95% CI) and 60-mo OS rates (95% CI) were 46.5 mo (24.9- 60.2) and 38.5% (26.7-50.1) in Cohort 1; and not reached (9.4-NE) and 53.6% (23.8-76.2) in Cohort 2. One pt had 3 ongoing AEs on LTFU, hypogammaglobulinemia and 2 viral infections that arose prior to LTFU. Two pts died on LTFU, both due to progressive disease; no new secondary malignancies or RCR cases were reported. Conclusions: Consistent with Cohort 1, brexu-cel demonstrated a high ORR, durable responses, and an expected safety profile in pts with R/R MCL in Cohort 2 despite the lower dose. However, small sample size limits interpretation of these results. With >5 y of median follow-up, pts in Cohort 1 and 2 continued to experience durable responses with high 60-mo OS rates. No new safety signals were detected and no secondary malignancies or RCR cases were reported in LTFU. Additionally, ZUMA-2 results are consistent with real-world outcomes of brexu-cel in the post BTKi R/R MCL setting (89% ORR and 81% CR rate; Wang Y, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2023). These results support the continued use of brexu-cel in R/R MCL.

Introduction Relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is very aggressive, with a historically low complete response (CR) rate (Blood. 2017; 130[16]:1800-1808). Recent research has focused on achieving complete and durable responses in this population, which translate to improvements in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results from the randomized, global, phase 3 ECHELON-3 study (NCT04404283) demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in OS, PFS, and objective response rate with brentuximab vedotin (BV) combined with lenalidomide (Len) and rituximab (R; BV+Len+R) vs placebo+Len+R in patients (pts) with R/R DLBCL after ≥2 prior systemic therapies. Here, we present subgroup analyses in pts with a best overall response (BOR) of CR (n=67). Methods Pts in the study were randomized (1:1) to receive BV (1.2 mg/kg) or placebo every 3 weeks, in combination with R (375 mg/m2) and Len (20 mg) once daily. In these subgroup analyses, eligible pts had a BOR of CR and some ended study treatment and received any subsequent anticancer therapy. BOR was assessed by investigators according to the Lugano 2014 classification. Duration of response was defined as the time from the start of the first documented CR to the first documented tumor progression per Lugano 2014 or death. Pts who initiated a subsequent nonpalliative anticancer therapy were censored at the most recent prior response assessment. Subsequent nonpalliative anticancer therapies were defined as any systemic therapy received after the end of study treatment. P values are descriptive. Results Of the 112 pts in the BV+Len+R group, 45 (40.2%) had a BOR of CR. Of the 118 pts in the placebo+Len+R group, 22 (18.6%) had a BOR of CR. The median duration of CR was 18.9 months (95% CI, 11.1 months-not estimable [NE]) with BV+Len+R vs not reached (NR) with placebo+Len+R (hazard ratio [HR], 0.527; 95% CI, 0.200-1.389; P=.1891). The median time to CR was 1.58 months (range, 1.2-7.3 months) with BV+Len+R and 1.61 months (range, 0.7-4.6 months) with placebo+Len+R. With a median follow-up of 14.3 months, the median OS in pts with a BOR of CR was 31.5 months (95% CI, 20.3 months-NE) in the BV+Len+R group vs NR in the placebo+Len+R group (HR, 1.044; 95% CI, 0.331-3.298; P=.9407). Median PFS in pts with a BOR of CR was 21.5 months (95% CI, 12.6 months-NE) in the BV+Len+R group vs NR (95% CI, 5.4 months-NE) in the placebo+Len+R group (HR, 0.6333; 95% CI, 0.256-1.567; P=.3198). Results of NR in the placebo+Len+R group are likely attributable to limited follow-up and small sample size. Additional data on baseline characteristics of pts who had CR will be presented. Of the 45 pts with CR in the BV+Len+R group, 42 (93.3%) received no subsequent anticancer therapy. Of the 22 pts with CR in the placebo+Len+R group, 17 (77.3%) received no subsequent anticancer therapy. Conclusions BV doubled the CR rate in pts with R/R DLBCL compared with placebo, and outcomes in pts with CR were durable, with only 6.7% of pts treated with BV+Len+R receiving subsequent systemic anticancer therapy, compared with 22.7% of pts treated with placebo+Len+R receiving subsequent therapy. Overall, BV+Len+R demonstrated a survival benefit in the ECHELON-3 study and is a promising option to achieve complete and durable responses in third- or later-line therapy for pts with R/R DLBCL.

Background: Management of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) with chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) has evolved in the last decade. First line treatment tocilizumab (toci) was initially given for grade 2 or higher CRS in clinical trials (Toci/CRS≥2). Earlier use of toci in grade 1 CRS was found to be safe without negative impact on clinical response in cohort 4 of ZUMA-1 study for axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL; Toci/CRS1). This practice was also adopted for other CAR-T therapies for other disease indications. Subsequently, FDA also updated the package insert for axi-cel in 2021 to include the use of prophylactic dexamethasone (ppx dex) to be given on days 0, 1, 2 of CAR-T infusion based on the results from cohort 6 of ZUMA-1. We examined CRS and ICANS (immune effector cell associated neurologic syndrome) outcome of patients who received FDA approved axi-cel in standard-of-care (SOC) practice with these evolving practices. Of note, adoption of ppx dex has been variable across CAR-T treatment centers in the US (Khurana et al, Blood 2022). At Mayo Clinic Rochester, patients considered high-risk for severe CRS/ICANS (those who received bridging therapy and had LDH above upper limit of normal and/or with secondary CNS involvement or other CNS pathologies) would be considered for ppx dex. Methods: Medical records of patients who received axi-cel in SOC between 2018 and 2023 at Mayo Clinic Rochester were reviewed. ASTCT guideline was used for CRS and ICANS grading. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-squared test and continuous variables were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: Among 187 pts receiving SOC axi-cel, the median age was 60 years and 121 (65%) were males, 152 (81%) had CRS, of which 73 (39%) were grade ≥2; 97 (52%) had ICANS, of which 65 (35%) were grade ≥2. Of the 152 CRS pts, 54/152 (36%) pts never received toci or ppx/dex. Of the pts who received Toci, 35/152 (23%) received Toci when CRS is at least grade 2 (Toci/CRS≥2), 49/152 (32%) received Toci/CRS1 without ppx dex (Toci/CRS1), and 14 (9%) received ppx dex with Toci given in CRS1 when pts developed CRS (PPX DEX). Baseline demographics were comparable except age (Toci/CRS≥2: 58y; Toci/ CRS1: 63y; ppx dex: 50y; p=0.001) and pre-LD CRP (Toci/CRS≥2: 34mg/L; Toci/ CRS1: 6mg/L; ppx dex: 16mg/L; p=0.002). Pre-LD LDH and ferritin were also comparable. PPX DEX or Toci/CRS1 had significantly lower rate of maximum grade CRS≥2 (PPX DEX: 4 (29%); Toci/ CRS1: 20 (41%); 35 (100%); p<0.001) and duration of CRS (PPX DEX: 2.5d; Toci/ CRS1: 3d; Toci/CRS≥2: 5d; p<0.001). Time to onset of CRS was not statistically different between the 3 groups. Not surprisingly, Toci/CRS1 group had higher overall rate of toci use, compared to . Interestingly, use rate of ≥2 doses of Toci or siltuximab was significantly higher in Toci/CRS1 or PPX DEX (PPX DEX: 8 (57%); Toci/ CRS1: 26 (53%); 9 (26%); p=0.02). Pt who received PPX DEX or Toci/CRS1 had a significantly lower rate of ICANS (PPX DEX: 6 (43%); Toci/ CRS1: 33 (67%); 32 (91%); p=0.001) and rate of max grade ICANS ≥2 (PPX DEX: 3 (21%); Toci/ CRS1: 23 (47%); 27 (77%); p<0.001). The time to onset and duration of ICANS was not different among the 3 groups. Conclusion: Our real-world study shows that earlier use of Toci in grade 1, compared to its first use in grade 2, can result in lower overall incidence of more severe CRS, duration of CRS, incidence of ICANS and more severe ICANS. While we selected patients at higher risk for having more severe CRS in our PPX DEX cohort, experience to date suggests that these patients, compared to toci/CRS>=2 cohort, could also have reduced severity of CRS and ICANS with this updated management.

Brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel), a CD28-costimulated CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART19) product, was FDA-approved in 2020 after demonstrating remarkable efficacy in the pivotal ZUMA-2 trial of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). However, despite the impressive initial activity of CART19 cell therapy in MCL, most patients relapse within the first 3 years following treatment. Myeloid cells, such as monocytes and macrophages, have been demonstrated to be major inhibitors of other immune cells, including T cells. Growing evidence shows that monocytes and macrophages contribute to CART cell failure, although the exact mechanisms are not fully understood. To better understand the mechanisms contributing to CART treatment resistance in MCL, we first utilized brexu-cel products from patients with MCL on the ZUMA-2 trial to uncover their transcriptomic features by single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) analysis. To understand if myeloid cells had negative impacts on clinical outcomes, we then analyzed autologous baseline peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples by scRNAseq. Our analyses of the brexu-cel samples revealed reduced response to IL-1β and its downstream signaling pathway as well as impaired T cell functions in non-responders. Transcriptomic analyses of the autologous baseline monocyte populations showed downregulation of IL-1β production and its associated pathways as well as upregulation of M2 phenotype-associated genes and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) in non-responder monocytes, implying a potential role of myeloid cells in CART resistance through impairment of IL-1 signaling in brexu-cel products. To validate our findings from the ZUMA-2 samples, we further studied the interactions between macrophages, MCL cells, and CART19 cells in preclinical models. First, CD28-costimulated CART19 cells generated from healthy donors were cocultured with JeKo-1, a CD19+ MCL cell line, and freshly isolated monocytes or ex vivo differentiated M2-like macrophages. M2-like macrophages were generated by incubating fresh monocytes with rhGM-CSF followed by coculturing with JeKo-1. CART19 antigen-specific proliferation was significantly inhibited by M2-like macrophages but not fresh monocytes (JeKo-1+CART19 vs JeKo-1+M2+CART19, p=0.00503). Transwell assays indicated that suppression by M2-like macrophages was contact-independent. Cytokine profile analysis of coculture supernatants showed significant elevation of IL-1ra in M2-like macrophage cocultures (JeKo-1+Mono+CART19 vs JeKo-1+M2+CART19, p=0.0292). This led us to hypothesize that M2-like macrophages inhibit CART19 by secreting IL-1ra to block IL-1 signaling in CART19. To test this hypothesis, we interrogated the role of IL-1ra in CART19. CART19 + JeKo-1 cocultures were supplemented with IL-1β + IL-1ra or IL-1β + IL-1ra + IL-1ra neutralizing antibody (neuAb). CART19 proliferation was improved by IL-1β (vehicle control vs IL-1β, p<0.0001). IL-1ra inhibited IL-1β-dependent CART19 proliferation (IL-1β vs IL-1β+IL1ra, p=0.0006), which was restored by IL-1ra neutralization (IL-1β+IL-1ra vs IL-1β+IL-1ra+IL-1ra neuAb, p=0.0215). Next, we assessed the impact of IL-1ra on CART functions in mouse MCL xenografts in the presence of M2-like macrophages. NOD-SCID-γ-/- (NSG) mice were subcutaneously injected with 0.5 million of human macrophages and 1 million of luciferase+ JeKo-1. Mice were then randomized once tumor engraftment was confirmed by bioluminescence imaging (BLI), followed by treatment with 2 million CART19 with 10 mg/kg IL-1ra neuAb or control IgG for 3 weeks. Combination of CART19 cells and IL-1ra neuAb led to improved antitumor activity based on BLI measurements compared to control IgG (IL-1ra neuAb vs control IgG, p=0.0058). Additionally, expression of IL-1RI, receptor of IL-1β and IL-1ra, was measured on T cells after coculturing CART19, JeKo-1, and M2-like macrophages. M2-like macrophages downregulated IL-1RI expression on CART cells, which might potentially desensitize CART response to IL-1β, resulting in further suppression in CART proliferation (JeKo-1+M2+CART19 vs JeKo-1+CART19, p=0.001). Overall, our study elucidates a potential mechanism of IL-1 pathway modulation mediated by myeloid cells in contributing to CART19 failure in MCL.

Background: Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are known safety concerns following chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Axi-cel, a CAR T-cell therapy approved in the US for adults with R/R LBCL after ≥ 1 line of prior therapy (2L+), has been administered in the outpatient setting, where a common cause for post-infusion hospital admissions were CAR T-cell-related toxicities (Furqan et al., 2024). Due to reimbursement policies in the US, patients at higher risk for safety events requiring inpatient care within 3 days of infusion may not be ideal candidates for outpatient care. We sought to identify what pre-infusion characteristics may put patients more at risk for developing early CRS and ICANS after axi-cel. Methods : Patients receiving axi-cel for R/R LBCL 2L+ between 01/2021−10/2023 registered in the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) observational database were potentially eligible for analysis. Patients with prior non-transplant cellular therapy or missing data for analysis were excluded. Primary endpoints were onset of early CRS and early ICANS, defined as an any grade event within 3 calendar days of axi-cel infusion (date of infusion is defined as Day 0 and onset of CRS/ICANS before the end of Day 3 is an early event). Early Grade ≥ 2 and early Grade ≥ 3 CRS and ICANS (onset of CRS/ICANS before the end of Day 3 and maximum Grade ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 per ASTCT Criteria) were also evaluated. Patient demographics, ECOG PS, comorbidities, disease characteristics at diagnosis and prior to infusion, line of therapy (LoT), lab assessments prior to infusion, and infusion-related attributes were evaluated by univariate screening and multivariable regression for development of early CRS or early ICANS. Results: A total of888 patients from 105 centers were included in the analysis. Median age was 63 years (45% ≥ 65 years) and 66% were male. At LBCL diagnosis, 22% of patients had a histological transformation. Prior to infusion, 5% of patients had ECOG PS ≥ 2 and 70% had at least 1 clinically significant comorbidity. Half (50%) of patients received axi-cel with 1 prior LoT (2L) and 10% of patients underwent a prior autologous hematopoietic cell transplant. Median time from leukapheresis to infusion was 30 days (interquartile range [IQR] 27−34). Bridging therapy of any type was administered in 59%, and systemic bridging therapy in 48%, of patients and 14% of patients were intended to be treated in the outpatient setting. Thirty percent of patients had chemo-sensitive disease prior to infusion. Median follow-up post-infusion was 12.3 months (range 3−38). Median time to onset of CRS was 4 days (IQR 2−6) and 84% of patients experienced CRS at any time. Early any grade (Grade ≥ 3) CRS was observed in 47% (3%) of patients. In the multivariate analysis of early any grade CRS, only prior LoT (≥ 2 vs 1) was associated with lower risk (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.55−0.94), but this association was not seen in the analyses of early Grade ≥ 2 nor early Grade ≥ 3 CRS. Notably, 47% and 52% of patients with ≥ 2 vs 1 prior LoT, respectively, only experienced early Grade 1 CRS (defined as fever only). In the analysis of early Grade ≥ 3 CRS, only ECOG PS 0−1 was associated with lower risk vs patients with ECOG PS ≥ 2 (OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.06−0.48). Median time to onset of ICANS was 7 days (IQR 5−9) and 47% of patients experienced ICANS at any time. Early any grade (Grade ≥ 3) ICANS occurred in 9% (5%) of patients. After multivariate adjustment, age < 65 vs ≥ 65 (OR 0.38 [95% CI 0.23−0.62]) and 1 vs ≥ 2 prior LoT (OR 0.58 [95% CI 0.36−0.95]) were associated with lower risk of early any grade ICANS. Age < 65 vs ≥ 65 was also associated with lower risk of early Grade ≥ 3 ICANS (OR 0.31 [95% CI 0.15−0.61]), as was ECOG PS 0−1 vs ECOG PS ≥ 2 (OR 0.30 [95% CI 0.11−0.83]). Comorbidities were evaluated and no significant associations with early CRS nor early ICANS were found. Conclusions: This analysis of readily available clinical variables in a real-world contemporary cohort of patients treated with axi-cel demonstrates that younger patients and patients with better ECOG PS have lower risk of early CRS and early ICANS. Axi-cel in 2L setting, vs 3L+, is associated with lower risk of early any grade ICANS and comparable early Grade ≥ 2 CRS, but a higher risk of early fever. These results further enable a more informed decision of patient selection for physicians, which is critical for the success of outpatient administration.

Context.— Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) is a promising new technology with the potential to transform communication and workflows in health care and pathology. Although new technologies offer advantages, they also come with risks that users, particularly early adopters, must recognize. Given the fast pace of GAI developments, pathologists may find it challenging to stay current with the terminology, technical underpinnings, and latest advancements. Building this knowledge base will enable pathologists to grasp the potential risks and impacts that GAI may have on the future practice of pathology. Objective.— To present key elements of GAI development, evaluation, and implementation in a way that is accessible to pathologists and relevant to laboratory applications. Data Sources.— Information was gathered from recent studies and reviews from PubMed and arXiv. Conclusions.— GAI offers many potential benefits for practicing pathologists. However, the use of GAI in clinical practice requires rigorous oversight and continuous refinement to fully realize its potential and mitigate inherent risks. The performance of GAI is highly dependent on the quality and diversity of the training and fine-tuning data, which can also propagate biases if not carefully managed. Ethical concerns, particularly regarding patient privacy and autonomy, must be addressed to ensure responsible use. By harnessing these emergent technologies, pathologists will be well placed to continue forward as leaders in diagnostic medicine.