Citations

ABSTRACT Solid tissue‐derived extracellular vesicles (ST‐EVs) are extracellular vesicles (EVs) separated directly from solid tissues of both vertebrates and invertebrates. ST‐EVs provide a physiologically relevant snapshot of tissue‐specific molecular dynamics and can be enriched directly in situ, from tissues in their natural state, preserving the native characteristics of ST‐EVs. However, their enrichment presents unique technical challenges compared to EVs derived from biofluids or cell culture media. The need for transparent reporting in ST‐EV research is crucial to enhance the reproducibility, comparability, and reliability of research findings. The Solid Tissue Task Force, part of the Scientific Reproducibility Subcommittee of International Society for Extracellular Vesicles, aims to recommend reporting parameters and identify outstanding questions related to the pre‐analytical and analytical handling of solid tissues, as well as ST‐EV separation and characterization. These steps are essential for advancing the understanding of the biological roles of ST‐EVs and their potential clinical applications.

Abstract BACKGROUND Despite multimodal treatment, brain tumors frequently recur and are often life-threatening. Patients commonly experience progressive neurologic decline, significantly impacting quality of life. We aimed to characterize the symptom burden of central nervous system tumors and to explore patient and caregiver experiences. METHODS In this observational study (NCT06676306), we conducted semi-structured interviews with 22 patients receiving care through the Mayo Clinic Neuro-oncology division. Caregivers were invited to participate. Demographic data were obtained from electronic medical records. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically. RESULTS Twenty-two patients (9/22, 41% female; median age 41.5 years, range 24–71) and 13 caregivers (13/22, 59%) participated. Diagnoses included astrocytoma, IDH mutant (8/22, 36%), glioblastoma (4/22, 18%), oligodendroglioma (3/22, 14%), astrocytoma, IDH wildtype (2/22, 9%), and other (5/22, 23%). The most frequently reported symptoms were headaches (13/22, 59%), cognitive changes (8/22, 36%), and fatigue (7/22, 32%). Among twenty patients who discussed treatment impacts, the most common were fatigue (45%), cognitive changes (40%), and mood changes (40%). Caregivers reported emotional toll (13/13, 100%), career changes (7/13, 54%), and difficulty balancing responsibilities (6/13, 46%). Twenty-one patients shared coping strategies, including faith (29%), hobbies (24%), and exercise (19%). All 20 respondents who discussed overall experience with neuro-oncology care reported a positive overall experience (100%), with the patient–neuro-oncologist relationship (40%) and communication (39%) cited as key contributors. For 19 patients who discussed treatment outcomes, quality of life (26%), maintaining function (21%), and tumor stability (21%) were paramount. For 9 caregivers who discussed treatment outcomes, 44% prioritized quality of life and 44% reported desire for a cure. CONCLUSIONS Brain tumors and their treatments affect patients and caregivers across physical, emotional, and social domains. Strong relationships and communication with the care team are central to patient satisfaction. Quality of life should be prioritized in neuro-oncology research and trials.

Abstract WSD0922-Fu is an oral, CNS-penetrant, small molecule EGFR inhibitor which potently inhibits EGFR aberrations specific to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and glioblastoma (GBM). MC1914 (NCT04197934) is a first-in-human phase 1 trial in patients with EGFR aberrant recurrent GBM and NSCLC. After determining the maximum tolerated dose, adults with recurrent GBM were treated in two expansion cohorts: (a) non-surgical cohort (6/12 patients thus far): EGFRvIII mutation, first recurrence; food-effect study included (b) surgical cohort (6/6 patients), any EGFR mutation, any recurrence; window-of-opportunity study (WOO) included. Among these 12 patients, median age = 60 years; 50% female; 58% ECOG 0). All patients received prior radiation and temozolomide. After the WOO or food-effect study, patients were dosed at 120 mg BID (5 days on, 2 days off), and escalated to 160 mg BID (5 days on, 2 days off) based on tolerability. Common adverse events (>40%) are comparable to other EGFR inhibitors (acneiform rash, diarrhea, fatigue, xerosis, pruritis). Treatment-related grade 3+ adverse events were limited to lymphopenia (n = 1). WSD0922-Fu exposure in the fed state exceeded the fasted state (median plasma Cmax and AUC0-24h are 1.6x and 1.3x, respectively) with a delayed Tmax (6.0 vs 1.8 hours). For the WOO, time between last dose administered to tumor collection ranged between 4 - 13.5 hours. Median tumor WSD0922-Fu concentration was 0.76 µg/g; estimated median unbound tumor concentration was 24.9 ng/g and within expectations for pharmacodynamic effect. Median brain/plasma ratio = 0.59; median unbound brain/unbound plasma = 0.88. Enrollment to the non-surgical cohort is ongoing, so formal efficacy data remain immature. However, examples of clinical efficacy will be shown along with data on recurrence patterns. Phase 2 clinical trial development is in progress.

Abstract BACKGROUND Mixed histiocytic neoplasms with overlapping features of Erdheim-Chester Disease (ECD) and Rosai-Dorfman Disease (RDD) are extremely rare and diagnosis may be delayed due to lack of awareness and complex histology features. METHODS We report a case of mixed ECD/RDD misdiagnosed as IgG4-related disease and review the literature. RESULTS A 50-year-old man presented for evaluation of spastic paraparesis in the context of a thoracic dural lesion. Two years prior he developed an inflammatory monoarthritis concerning for rheumatoid arthritis unresponsive to methotrexate. Six months prior he developed leg spasms, gait spasticity, and urinary incontinence. MRI demonstrated a T2 hypointense enhancing epidural mass with spinal cord compression. Epidural biopsy showed fibrosis and non-specific inflammation. Given elevated serum IgG4 (170 mg/dL) and clinical findings, he was diagnosed with IgG4-related disease. He received high dose prednisone and etanercept without radiographic or clinical improvement. He then presented to our institution. Given high concern for RDD, he underwent FDG-PET CT which demonstrated an infiltrative process and FDG avid regions in the upper thoracic spinal cord, paranasal sinus, renal hilum, perivascular abdominal vessels, testicle, and multiple joint effusions. Biopsy of left testicle demonstrated CD163-positive histiocytes which coexpressed S100, cyclin D1, and OCT2, consistent with RDD. Biopsy of the left shoulder synovium demonstrated an atypical CD163-positive histiocytic infiltrate expressing Factor XIIIa, cyclin D1 and S100 (partial), and appeared negative for OCT2, consistent with ECD. The atypical histiocytes in both biopsies were negative for CD1a and BRAF V600E by immunohistochemistry. Genomic sequencing of the testicular tissue demonstrated a MAP2K1 (Q56P) alteration. He was treated with radiation therapy targeting the dural lesion with temporarily worsening symptoms improved with steroids and started on cobimetinib. DISCUSSION This case expands on the phenotypic description of mixed ECD/RDD. Histiocytic neoplasms should be considered in the differential diagnosis of dural based lesions.

Abstract Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors and exhibit clinical heterogeneity. Radiotherapy (RT) remains the only adjuvant therapy, but response is variable and biomarkers are limited. RTOG-0539 is the first prospective phase 2 trial to stratify meningioma patients for adjuvant RT based on clinical risk. Here, we apply modern molecular tools to this cohort and uncover correlates of RT response. To do so, tumor tissue from 100 RTOG-0539 patients was profiled using DNA methylation arrays, RNA sequencing, and whole-exome sequencing. Recurrence scores, Molecular Groups, gene expression, and copy number alterations were compared across clinical groups and between RT responders and non-responders. Using this approach, modern grading criteria, including brain invasion, TERT mutation, CDKN2A/B deletion and 1p/1q status, would reclassify 10% of tumors and alter treatment group assignment in 7%. Notably, non-responders to RT had more frequent 1p and 14q loss, and greater copy number burden. In addition, transcriptomic and epigenetic profiling revealed immune-related signatures in RT responders and upregulation of cell cycle–related pathways in RT non-responders, several of which overlapped with targets of vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor validated in aggressive meningioma models. Of particular importance, the Proliferative Molecular Group was an independent predictor of post-RT recurrence in multivariable analysis, outperforming WHO grade. In conclusion, multi-omic analysis of the RTOG-0539 cohort shows that updated WHO grading criteria, incorporating molecular and cytogenetic features, improve risk stratification. However, molecular classification, particularly the Proliferative group, remains an independent and stronger predictor of RT response. These findings support integrating molecular biomarkers alongside modern grading frameworks to guide treatment and trial design in meningioma.

Abstract Purpose: CD4 T-cell immunity is associated with improved survival in patients with breast cancer. We previously reported a phase I trial evaluating a folate receptor alpha (FRα) vaccine administered with cyclophosphamide (CP), demonstrating excellent safety and immunogenicity. To simplify the vaccine strategy for ease of use, we report here the results of a randomized phase II trial evaluating a lower vaccine dose alongside the original dose, administered with or without CP pretreatment. Patients and Methods: Patients with triple-negative breast cancer who completed all systemic and local therapies were assigned to receive either low-dose (825 μg) or high-dose (2.5 mg) vaccine peptides plus GM-CSF in six 4-week cycles, with or without CP prior to vaccination. Safety was monitored, and immunogenicity was evaluated before and after vaccination. Results: A total of 80 patients were dosed with vaccine, and 58 patients were evaluable for immunogenicity. Vaccination was well tolerated and elicited immunity in 83% of patients. Levels of FRα-specific T cells were high, persistent, and comparable with T-cell levels against tetanus toxoid. No differences in immunity were observed between the two doses. CP pretreatment also did not affect the immune responses. Recurrences occurred in eight evaluable patients and were unrelated to the treatment arm. No patients died during the study because of their disease. Conclusions: The reduced-dose FRα vaccine is as effective as the original dose and does not require CP to generate maximal immunity. These findings may inform the design of trials testing efficacy in triple-negative breast cancer or other cancers.

Importance Treatment for cognitive dysfunction due to postacute sequelae of long COVID (ie, symptoms of fatigue, malaise, weakness, confusion that persist beyond 12 weeks after an initial COVID infection) remains a significant unmet need. Objective To test evidence-based rehabilitation strategies for improving cognitive symptoms in persons with long COVID. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a 5-arm, multicenter, randomized clinical trial of 3 remotely delivered interventions conducted between August 17, 2023, and June 10, 2024. The study took place at 22 trial sites and included the screening of individuals with cognitive long COVID. Interventions Participants were randomized to 1 of 5 arms: adaptive computerized cognitive training (BrainHQ [Posit Science]), cognitive-behavioral rehabilitation involving both group and individual counseling sessions (PASC-Cognitive Recovery [PASC-CoRE]) paired with BrainHQ, and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) paired with BrainHQ. Two comparator arms were included as follows: unstructured computer puzzles and games (active comparator) and sham tDCS paired with BrainHQ. The interventions occurred 5 times per week over 10 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures Cognitive and behavioral in-person assessments were performed at baseline, midintervention, at the end of intervention, and 3 months after the end of the intervention. The primary outcome measure was the modified Everyday Cognition Scale 2 (ECog2) completed at the end of the intervention compared to the baseline visit based on participant self-report looking back over the prior 7 days. Results A total of 378 individuals were screened, from which there were 328 participants (median [IQR] age, 48.0 [37.0-58.0] years; 241 female [73.5%]; race: 15 Asian [4.6%], 47 Black [14.3%], and 235 White [71.6%]; ethnicity: 52 Hispanic [15.9%]). None of the 3 active interventions demonstrated benefits on the modified ECog2 in the intention-to-treat population by the end of the intervention period. The adjusted differences in mean change were 0.0 (95% CI, −0.2 to 0.2) for BrainHQ vs active comparator, 0.1 (95% CI, −0.1 to 0.3) for PASC-CoRE + BrainHQ vs active comparator, 0.0 (95% CI, −0.2 to 0.2) for tDCS-active + BrainHQ vs tDCS-sham + BrainHQ, and 0.1 (95% CI, −0.1 to 0.3) for PASC-CoRE + BrainHQ vs BrainHQ alone. Secondary participant-reported outcomes and neuropsychological tests showed no differential benefits for any treatment arm. All 5 arms demonstrated some improvements over time on the modified ECog2 and on secondary outcomes. There were no serious adverse events attributable to the interventions. Conclusions and Relevance This phase 2 randomized clinical trial failed to demonstrate differential benefits for online cognitive training, a structured cognitive rehabilitation program, and tDCS for cognitive long COVID. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05965739 .

Abstract Background and Objectives To assess the efficacy of a local volunteer program, delirium optimization with volunteer engagement (DOVE), in preventing in-hospital delirium. Research Design and Methods Between February 2023 and June 2024, volunteers provided structured interventions to patients at risk for delirium, as identified by the Delirium Risk Assessment (DRA) score. Interventions are humanities-based and included sensory aide assistance, completion of “get to know me” forms, and conversation. Data were retrospectively acquired from electronic health records and compared to a control cohort from another medical unit. Delirium occurrence was captured when the nursing confusion assessment method (CAM) documentation was positive, or a clinician documented delirium diagnoses. Cohorts were matched 1:2 (DOVE vs Control) by age, gender, DRA score, month/year of admission, and length of hospital stay. Results A total of 168 patients received interventions by DOVE volunteers, of which 139 were matched with 261 controls. In-hospital delirium occurrence was lower in the DOVE cohort compared to the control cohort (46.8% vs 56.7%; p = .015). Conditional logistic regressions demonstrated a lower odds ratio (OR) for delirium occurrence, 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.34–0.89; p = .015) associated with DOVE intervention. Subgroup analyses of delirium occurrence among patients with DRA score of 3–4 demonstrated an OR of 0.56 (95% CI; 0.31–1.01; p = .053) between the DOVE and control cohorts. Discussion and Implications In-hospital delirium occurrence was ∼10% lower among DOVE cohort patients. This humanities-based intervention offers a feasible strategy, particularly during times of staffing shortages, and should be considered for broader implementation across healthcare institutions.

Purpose: There are reported barriers to implementation of esophageal screening during the videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) completed by the speech-language pathologist (SLP). Often, patients referred to the SLP for a VFSS have an esophageal component that may explain their complaint. In this article, authors explore roadblocks to esophageal screening and potential roadmaps to improve patient care through standardization of esophageal screening procedures. Conclusions: A strong body of literature supports physiologic, anatomic, and disease state relationships of the oropharynx and esophagus. Despite this, the assessment of the oropharynx and esophagus is dichotomized. There remain billing limitations for same-day esophagram and VFSS, and the well-documented esophageal screen provides a view of bolus flow in an upright, typical eating position with consideration of oropharyngeal function to provide a comprehensive view of the continuous process of swallowing from mouth to stomach. The continued practice of evaluating the oropharynx without consideration of the esophagus poses a threat to patient safety and may delay care. A collaborative, multidisciplinary effort among healthcare professionals to create streamlined practice parameters, update position statements, and enhance education parameters will allow for cohesive practices among professionals. Assessment of the swallow mechanism is incomplete without consideration of the entire continuum.