Citations

Background: Pediatric patients (pts) with low-risk cHL achieve high cure rates with standard chemo. However, those with a SER to front-line chemo are at higher risk of relapse than pts with a rapid early response (RER). Current treatment options are also associated with long-term toxicities such as secondary malignancies, cardiovascular disease, and pulmonary and gonadal toxicity. Novel treatment approaches are needed to optimize outcomes while minimizing long-term toxicity. KEYNOTE-667 (NCT03407144) is an open-label, phase 2 study that included an analysis of safety and efficacy of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) induction in pediatric pts with low-risk cHL followed by consolidation with pembro plus AVD and involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT) and pembro maintenance in those with SER to front-line ABVD. We present an interim analysis of pts with low-risk cHL enrolled in this trial. Methods: Eligible pts were 3-25 y old and had newly diagnosed stage IA, IB, or IIA cHL without bulky disease, measurable disease per investigator assessment, and a Lansky Play-Performance Scale ≥50 (aged <16 y) or a Karnofsky score of ≥50 (aged ≥16 y). Pts initially received 2 cycles of induction with ABVD. Response was then assessed by PET/MRI/CT (early response assessment). Pts with RER received nonstudy therapy per treating physician. Pts with SER (Deauville score [DS], 4 or 5) received consolidation with pembro 2 mg/kg up to 200 mg IV Q3W (3-17 y) or 200 mg IV Q3W (18-25 y) in combination with 2 cycles of AVD followed by a late response assessment (LRA) with PET/MRI/CT. All pts with a SER then received ISRT (21.6 Gy for pts with a complete PET response [DS, 1-3]; 30.6-36 Gy for pts with a partial PET response [DS, 4 or 5]) plus maintenance pembro Q3W for up to 17 cycles. Primary end point was ORR by blinded independent central review (BICR) per Cheson 2007 IWG criteria in pts with SER determined at any time after starting pembro and before start of new anticancer therapy. Secondary end points included rate of PET negativity after consolidation, EFS, OS, and safety. Results: 73 pts with low-risk cHL were enrolled, 9 of whom had SER to ABVD induction. 64 pts had a RER and received nonstudy treatment. At data cutoff (March 1, 2023), 2 of 9 pts (22%) with SER had completed consolidation and maintenance therapy, 5 (56%) were ongoing, and 2 (22%) had discontinued, both because of complete response. Median time from enrollment to data cutoff was 8.7 mo (range, 2.2-32.9). Median age was 16 y (range, 7-20), 5 pts (56%) were male, 2 (22%) had Ann Arbor stage I disease, and 7 (78%) had Ann Arbor stage II disease. Pts with SER had received a median of 8 doses of pembro (range, 1-17); median time on pembro was 4.8 mo (range, <0.1-11.3). Of 9 pts who received consolidation therapy with pembro plus AVD, 6 (67%) had a LRA (3 are still in consolidation and have not reached the LRA timepoint), of whom 3 (50%) were PET negative by BICR (2 [33%] were PET negative by investigator review). Of 73 pts who received ABVD induction, 66 (90%) had an AE regardless of causality. 33 pts (45%) experienced grade 3/4 AEs, most commonly (≥10%) neutrophil count decreased (n = 19; 26%) and neutropenia (n = 9; 12.3%). One pt experienced grade 4 febrile neutropenia. Twelve pts (16%) had serious AEs. No pts discontinued treatment or died because of AEs. Treatment-related AEs due to ABVD induction occurred in 59 pts (81%), with grade 3/4 events in 31 (42%). Of the 9 pts with SER to ABVD induction who received consolidation and maintenance therapy, 7 (78%) experienced an AE regardless of causality. Two pts (22%) had grade 3/4 AEs. No serious AEs were reported during consolidation and maintenance therapy, and no pts discontinued treatment or died because of AEs. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 6 pts (67%) who received consolidation and maintenance therapy; with grade 3/4 events in 2 pts (22%). Six pts (67%) experienced AEs related to pembro; most commonly (≥3 pts) anemia, nausea, vomiting (n = 3 each [33%]). Two pts experienced grade 3/4 AEs related to pembro (vomiting, white blood cell count decreased). One pt (11%) experienced an immune-mediated AE (grade 2 hyperthyroidism). Conclusion: Early results from the low-risk cHL cohort of KEYNOTE-667 suggest that induction therapy with ABVD and consolidation with pembro plus AVD had a manageable safety profile. Among the relatively small number of pts with a SER to ABVD, 50% with a LRA had a PET-negative response by BICR and received a reduced dose of RT.

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to evaluate the 24-month durability of pain relief, function, quality of life, and safety outcomes for patients with nonsurgical refractory back pain (NSRBP) treated with high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (SCS) within a large, national, multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT). METHODS Following the completion of an RCT comparing high-frequency SCS plus CMM with CMM alone for the treatment of NSRBP, patients gave additional consent for a follow-up extension to 24 months. Presented is the cohort analysis of all patients treated with high-frequency SCS following the optional crossover at 6 months. The outcomes assessed to 24 months included responder rate of ≥ 50% pain relief measured according to the visual analog scale [VAS]), disability (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), quality of life (EQ-5D 5-level [EQ-5D-5L]), opioid reduction. RESULTS Of the 125 patients who received a permanent implant, 121 completed the 12-month follow-up, 101 gave additional consent for extended follow-up, and 98 completed the 24-month follow-up. At 24 months after implantation, the mean back pain VAS score was reduced by 73% and the responder rate was 82%. ODI and EQ-5D-5L both improved by at least double the minimal clinically important difference for each measure. No unexpected adverse events were observed, and the rates of serious adverse events (3.4%) and device explantations (4.8%) were low. CONCLUSIONS The addition of high-frequency SCS to CMM in patients with NSRBP offers profound improvements at 24 months in pain, function, quality of life, and reduced opioid use. This study provides much-needed evidence to inform current clinical practice for managing patients with NSRBP.

Abstract Background Pulmonary abnormalities are common in patients with prevalent heart failure (HF). Arterial hypoxemia is considered rare in HF, but this has not been rigorously evaluated in patients with HF and preserved EF (HFpEF). Methods Results Patients with HFpEF (n=539) and no clinically-relevant lung disease underwent invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing with simultaneous blood and expired gas analysis. Exertional hypoxemia was defined by oxyhaeemoglobin saturation <94%. As compared to those without hypoxemia (n=403), patients with hypoxemia (n=136, 25%) were slightly older, heavier, and had higher NT-proBNP levels. They had higher cardiac filling pressures, higher pulmonary vascular pressures, greater alveolar-arterial O2 difference compared to those without hypoxemia. These differences were replicated in a sensitivity analysis where patients with any spirometric abnormalities were excluded. Regression analyses revealed that increases in pulmonary arterial and capillary pressures were related to lower PaO2. The presence of exertional hypoxemia was associated with two-fold increased risk for death over 2.8 (IQR 0.7-5.5) years of follow up, (Adjusted:HR 2.00 (95%CI: 1.01−3.96), p=0.046). Conclusion One quarter of HFpEF patients displayed arterial desaturation during exercise. Patients with hypoxemia display more severely abnormal hemodynamics and increased mortality. Further study is required to better understand the mechanisms in patients with HFpEF.Hemodynamic changes at rest/exerciseRisk of death in HFpEF with hypoxemia

Abstract Rationale Follow-up of patients with emphysema treated with endobronchial valves is limited to 3–12 months after treatment in prior reports. To date, no comparative data exist between treatment and control subjects with a longer follow-up. Objectives To assess the durability of the Spiration Valve System (SVS) in patients with severe heterogeneous emphysema over a 24-month period. Methods EMPROVE, a multicenter randomized controlled trial, presents a rigorous comparison between treatment and control groups for up to 24 months. Lung function, respiratory symptoms, and quality-of-life (QOL) measures were assessed. Results A significant improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second was maintained at 24 months in the SVS treatment group versus the control group. Similarly, significant improvements were maintained in several QOL measures, including the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire and the COPD Assessment Test. Patients in the SVS treatment group experienced significantly less dyspnea than those in the control group, as indicated by the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale score. Adverse events at 24 months did not significantly differ between the SVS treatment and control groups. Acute chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation rates in the SVS treatment and control groups were 13.7% (14 of 102) and 15.6% (7 of 45), respectively. Pneumothorax rates in the SVS treatment and control groups were 1.0% (1 of 102) and 0.0% (0 of 45), respectively. Conclusions SVS treatment resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful durable improvements in lung function, respiratory symptoms, and QOL, as well as a statistically significant reduction in dyspnea, for at least 24 months while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01812447).

Background: Limited information is available for patients with breast cancer (BC) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially among underrepresented racial/ethnic populations. Methods: This is a COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry-based retrospective cohort study of females with active or history of BC and laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection diagnosed between March 2020 and June 2021 in the US. Primary outcome was COVID-19 severity measured on a five-level ordinal scale, including none of the following complications, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, and all-cause mortality. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression model identified characteristics associated with COVID-19 severity. Results: 1383 female patient records with BC and COVID-19 were included in the analysis, the median age was 61 years, and median follow-up was 90 days. Multivariable analysis revealed higher odds of COVID-19 severity for older age (aOR per decade, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.32–1.67]); Black patients (aOR 1.74; 95 CI 1.24–2.45), Asian Americans and Pacific Islander patients (aOR 3.40; 95 CI 1.70–6.79) and Other (aOR 2.97; 95 CI 1.71–5.17) racial/ethnic groups; worse ECOG performance status (ECOG PS ≥2: aOR, 7.78 [95% CI, 4.83–12.5]); pre-existing cardiovascular (aOR, 2.26 [95% CI, 1.63–3.15])/pulmonary comorbidities (aOR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.20–2.29]); diabetes mellitus (aOR, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.66–3.04]); and active and progressing cancer (aOR, 12.5 [95% CI, 6.89–22.6]). Hispanic ethnicity, timing, and type of anti-cancer therapy modalities were not significantly associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. The total all-cause mortality and hospitalization rate for the entire cohort was 9% and 37%, respectively however, it varied according to the BC disease status. Conclusions: Using one of the largest registries on cancer and COVID-19, we identified patient and BC-related factors associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, underrepresented racial/ethnic patients experienced worse outcomes compared to non-Hispanic White patients. Funding: This study was partly supported by National Cancer Institute grant number P30 CA068485 to Tianyi Sun, Sanjay Mishra, Benjamin French, Jeremy L Warner; P30-CA046592 to Christopher R Friese; P30 CA023100 for Rana R McKay; P30-CA054174 for Pankil K Shah and Dimpy P Shah; KL2 TR002646 for Pankil Shah and the American Cancer Society and Hope Foundation for Cancer Research (MRSG-16-152-01-CCE) and P30-CA054174 for Dimpy P Shah. REDCap is developed and supported by Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research grant support (UL1 TR000445 from NCATS/NIH). The funding sources had no role in the writing of the manuscript or the decision to submit it for publication. Clinical trial number: CCC19 registry is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04354701 .

Key Points Combined endoscopic sinus surgery and nasal septal perforation repair is technically feasible. NOSE‐Perf is a recently developed patient‐reported outcome measure for nasal septal perforation. The decision to perform combined ESS and NSP repair should be made on a case‐by‐case basis.

Background: Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) has been shown to provide clinical benefits in patients with symptomatic meniscal deficiency in the short term and midterm. There is, however, a paucity of data regarding long-term outcomes after MAT using fresh-frozen allografts and the bridge-in-slot technique. Purpose: To report clinical outcomes and revision rates after primary MAT with fresh-frozen allografts and the bridge-in-slot technique in a large case series of patients at a 10-year minimum follow-up. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed on patients undergoing primary MAT between 2001 and 2012. Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective form, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales were collected preoperatively and at 1-, 2-, 5-, and minimum 10-year follow-ups. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to identify variables associated with reoperation and failure, defined as revision MAT or conversion to arthroplasty. Reoperation was defined as a subsequent surgical intervention on the transplanted meniscus, including partial or total meniscectomy, meniscal repair, or failure as defined in the previous sentence. Results: A total of 174 patients undergoing MAT met the inclusion criteria and were followed for a mean of 12.7 ± 2.7 years (range, 10.0-21.0 years). The mean age at surgery was 28.3 ± 10.1 years. The patients were predominantly female (n = 92; 53%), and medial MAT was the most commonly performed procedure (n = 91; 52%). Concomitant procedures were performed in 115 patients (66%), with the most common procedure being osteochondral allograft transplantation (n = 59; 34%). Patients demonstrated statistically significant postoperative improvements at all time points for all patient-reported outcome measures ( P ≤ .0001). A total of 65 patients (37%) underwent a meniscal reoperation at a mean time of 6.6 ± 5.5 years (range, 0.3-16.7 years) postoperatively. A total of 40 patients (23%) met the criteria for failure at a mean time of 7.3 ± 5.0 years (range, 1.0-17.4 years) after MAT, with 22 of these patients having undergone a previous meniscal reoperation. At the final follow-up, 13 patients (7%) had undergone revision MAT and 27 (15%) had converted to arthroplasty. The MAT survival rates free of meniscal reoperation and failure were 73% and 85% at 10 years and 60% and 72% at 15 years, respectively. At the time of the final follow-up, 86% of patients reported that they were satisfied with their overall postoperative condition. Conclusion: Primary MAT demonstrates efficacy and durability with high rates of patient satisfaction at a minimum 10-year follow-up. Patients should be counseled that although reoperation rates may approach 40% at 15 years, rates of overall revision MAT and conversion to arthroplasty remain low at long-term follow-up.