Kalhan, Ravi

Abstract Background:Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major global health burden, with genome-wide association studies explaining only a fraction of its heritability. Recent advancements, including large-scale, multi-ancestry whole-genome sequencing and a focus on severe, early-onset cases, offer promising avenues to identify additional COPD-related variants. Furthermore, recent studies show that adjusting for polygenic risk scores (PRS) enhances statistical power to detect rare variants, advancing efforts to understand COPD's genetic basis. Methods:We performed a whole genome sequencing association study of severe, early-onset COPD (FEV1 < 50%, age ≤ 55), FEV1 and FEV1/FVC in eight population-based studies (ARIC, CARDIA, CFS, CHS, FHS, HCHS/SOL, JHS, MESA) and seven COPD-enriched studies (COPDGene, ECLIPSE, Boston Early-Onset COPD Study, LTRC, TCGS (Poland), ICGN, SPIROMICS). We performed single-variant analyses using regenie software, applying a genome-wide significance threshold of P < 5.0 x 10-8. For rare variant set (MAF <1%) analysis, we annotated variants with loss of function or deleterious missense using WGS Annotator and prediction tools LOFTEE, SIFT, and PolyPhen2, then analyzed these variants with SKATO-ACAT method in regenie, adjusting for covariates including sex, sequencing center, and principal components of ancestry. We additionally evaluated adjusting the analyses for PRSs for lung function traits. Results: We analyzed 53,028 participants including 34,751 European, 12,508 African, 1,088 Latino American, and 674 East Asian ancestry. Across cohorts, we analyzed 5,063 severe (FEV1 < 50%) COPD cases, among whom 1,103 were early-onset (age ≤ 55). Excluding variants within 1 Mbp of known variants, single-variant analysis identified 68 novel associations (MAC ≥ 30), with 8 common associations (MAF ≥ 1%) in 6 genomic regions. Our most significant novel association for severe early-onset COPD was rs74297390 (intergenic to POM121L12, MAF = 9.6%, Beta = 0.41, P = 3.5 x 10-8). For FEV1 and FEV1/FVC ratio, variants near DKK2 and AKR1E2 were significantly associated and were replicated in an independent dataset (Shrine et al., 2019). DKK2 is an antagonist in the Wnt pathway. In a preliminary variant set analysis, CHRM3-AS1 was associated with severe early-onset COPD, GPAT with FEV1, and COL8A1I and HMCN1 with FEV1/FVC. With PRS adjustment, ST6GALNAC5 was associated with FEV1/FVC. Conclusions: In a whole genome sequencing study of lung function and severe early-onset COPD, we identified new loci for COPD-related phenotypes, including two novel loci that replicated in an independent dataset. Ongoing work involves variant set-based analyses with additional covariate adjustments, as well as PRS adjustments for binary traits.

Abstract Rationale Follow-up of patients with emphysema treated with endobronchial valves is limited to 3–12 months after treatment in prior reports. To date, no comparative data exist between treatment and control subjects with a longer follow-up. Objectives To assess the durability of the Spiration Valve System (SVS) in patients with severe heterogeneous emphysema over a 24-month period. Methods EMPROVE, a multicenter randomized controlled trial, presents a rigorous comparison between treatment and control groups for up to 24 months. Lung function, respiratory symptoms, and quality-of-life (QOL) measures were assessed. Results A significant improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second was maintained at 24 months in the SVS treatment group versus the control group. Similarly, significant improvements were maintained in several QOL measures, including the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire and the COPD Assessment Test. Patients in the SVS treatment group experienced significantly less dyspnea than those in the control group, as indicated by the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale score. Adverse events at 24 months did not significantly differ between the SVS treatment and control groups. Acute chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation rates in the SVS treatment and control groups were 13.7% (14 of 102) and 15.6% (7 of 45), respectively. Pneumothorax rates in the SVS treatment and control groups were 1.0% (1 of 102) and 0.0% (0 of 45), respectively. Conclusions SVS treatment resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful durable improvements in lung function, respiratory symptoms, and QOL, as well as a statistically significant reduction in dyspnea, for at least 24 months while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01812447).

Abstract Rationale Less invasive, nonsurgical approaches are needed to treat severe emphysema. Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the Spiration Valve System (SVS) versus optimal medical management. Methods In this multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial, subjects aged 40 years or older with severe, heterogeneous emphysema were randomized 2:1 to SVS with medical management (treatment) or medical management alone (control). Measurements and Main Results The primary efficacy outcome was the difference in mean FEV1 from baseline to 6 months. Secondary effectiveness outcomes included: difference in FEV1 responder rates, target lobe volume reduction, hyperinflation, health status, dyspnea, and exercise capacity. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of composite thoracic serious adverse events. All analyses were conducted by determining the 95% Bayesian credible intervals (BCIs) for the difference between treatment and control arms. Between October 2013 and May 2017, 172 participants (53.5% male; mean age, 67.4 yr) were randomized to treatment (n = 113) or control (n = 59). Mean FEV1 showed statistically significant improvements between the treatment and control groups—between-group difference at 6 and 12 months, respectively, of 0.101 L (95% BCI, 0.060–0.141) and 0.099 L (95% BCI, 0.048–0.151). At 6 months, the treatment group had statistically significant improvements in all secondary endpoints except 6-minute-walk distance. Composite thoracic serious adverse event incidence through 6 months was greater in the treatment group (31.0% vs. 11.9%), primarily due to a 12.4% incidence of serious pneumothorax. Conclusions In patients with severe heterogeneous emphysema, the SVS shows significant improvement in multiple efficacy outcomes, with an acceptable safety profile. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01812447).