Slebos, Dirk‐Jan

Abstract Rationale: The D'Nerva Targeted Lung Denervation (TLD) System uses radiofrequency energy delivered bronchoscopically to the main bronchi to disrupt parasympathetic nerve innervation to the lung. AIRFLOW-3 clinical trial was a randomized, double blind, sham controlled study to determine the impact of TLD on COPD exacerbations. Methods: AIRFLOW-3 patients had symptomatic COPD (CAT ≥10) with moderate to very severe airflow obstruction (GOLD stage II-IV: 25% ≤ FEV1 ≤ 80% predicted, FEV1/FVC<0.70) and GOLD E status (≥2 moderate or ≥1 severe exacerbation in the prior 12 months) despite optimal medical therapy. The primary endpoint was a time-to-first event comparison of the probability of subjects having a moderate or severe exacerbation, between the Treatment arm (TLD + optimal medical therapy) and the Sham Control arm (optimal medical therapy). Results: 388 patients were randomized 1:1 at 32 clinical sites across the US, EU, and UK. Patients were 67.8 (SD 7.1) years of age, ex-smokers with a 46.7 (22.0) pack-year smoking history, and 41.0 (11.8) post bronchodilator FEV1% pred. SGRQ-C and CAT scores were 62.5 (17.0) and 23.6 (6.3), respectively. Over 90% of patients were on triple therapy (LAMA+LABA+ICS) at baseline and through 1 year of follow up. 42% of patients had prior-year COPD hospitalization(s). There was no difference between groups in the analysis of the primary endpoint. At 1 year, the sham arm exhibited a statistical decline in lung function (decrease in FEV1 and FVC) and worsening of gas trapping (increase in RV). Lung function and gas trapping were stable in the treatment arm. The treatment arm exhibited a statistically significant improvement in dyspnea at one year compared to sham (mMRC, and TDI). These observations led to the identification of a subgroup of TLD treatment responders corresponding to an airway predominant phenotype (lung hyperinflation in the absence of significant emphysema) that demonstrated clinically and statistically significant improvements in lung function and exacerbation frequency and severity (Table). Conclusions: The AIRFLOW-3 clinical trial failed to meet its prespecified primary endpoint. Post-hoc analysis of this robust dataset led to the identification of a responder profile that achieved significant and sustained improvements in lung function, and exacerbation reduction. A future clinical study is being designed to confirm these findings.

Abstract For over 150 years, bronchoscopy, especially flexible bronchoscopy, has been a mainstay for airway inspection, the diagnosis of airway lesions, therapeutic aspiration of airway secretions, and transbronchial biopsy to diagnose parenchymal lung disorders. Its utility for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary nodules and therapeutic treatments besides aspiration of airway secretions, however, has been limited. Challenges to the wider use of flexible bronchoscopy have included difficulty in navigating to the lung periphery, the avoidance of vasculature structures when performing diagnostic biopsies, and the ability to biopsy a lesion under direct visualization. The last 10–15 years have seen major advances in thoracic imaging, navigational platforms to direct the bronchoscopist to lung lesions, and the ability to visualize lesions during biopsy. Moreover, multiple new techniques have either become recently available or are currently being investigated to treat a broad range of airway and lung parenchymal diseases, such as asthma, emphysema, and chronic bronchitis, or to alleviate recurrent exacerbations. New bronchoscopic therapies are also being investigated to not only diagnose, but possibly treat, malignant peripheral lung nodules. As a result, flexible bronchoscopy is now able to provide a new and expanding armamentarium of diagnostic and therapeutic tools to treat patients with a variety of lung diseases. This State-of-the-Art review succinctly reviews these techniques and provides clinicians an organized approach to their role in the diagnosis and treatment of a range of lung diseases.