Valipour, A.

Abstract Rationale: The D'Nerva Targeted Lung Denervation (TLD) System uses radiofrequency energy delivered bronchoscopically to the main bronchi to disrupt parasympathetic nerve innervation to the lung. AIRFLOW-3 clinical trial was a randomized, double blind, sham controlled study to determine the impact of TLD on COPD exacerbations. Methods: AIRFLOW-3 patients had symptomatic COPD (CAT ≥10) with moderate to very severe airflow obstruction (GOLD stage II-IV: 25% ≤ FEV1 ≤ 80% predicted, FEV1/FVC<0.70) and GOLD E status (≥2 moderate or ≥1 severe exacerbation in the prior 12 months) despite optimal medical therapy. The primary endpoint was a time-to-first event comparison of the probability of subjects having a moderate or severe exacerbation, between the Treatment arm (TLD + optimal medical therapy) and the Sham Control arm (optimal medical therapy). Results: 388 patients were randomized 1:1 at 32 clinical sites across the US, EU, and UK. Patients were 67.8 (SD 7.1) years of age, ex-smokers with a 46.7 (22.0) pack-year smoking history, and 41.0 (11.8) post bronchodilator FEV1% pred. SGRQ-C and CAT scores were 62.5 (17.0) and 23.6 (6.3), respectively. Over 90% of patients were on triple therapy (LAMA+LABA+ICS) at baseline and through 1 year of follow up. 42% of patients had prior-year COPD hospitalization(s). There was no difference between groups in the analysis of the primary endpoint. At 1 year, the sham arm exhibited a statistical decline in lung function (decrease in FEV1 and FVC) and worsening of gas trapping (increase in RV). Lung function and gas trapping were stable in the treatment arm. The treatment arm exhibited a statistically significant improvement in dyspnea at one year compared to sham (mMRC, and TDI). These observations led to the identification of a subgroup of TLD treatment responders corresponding to an airway predominant phenotype (lung hyperinflation in the absence of significant emphysema) that demonstrated clinically and statistically significant improvements in lung function and exacerbation frequency and severity (Table). Conclusions: The AIRFLOW-3 clinical trial failed to meet its prespecified primary endpoint. Post-hoc analysis of this robust dataset led to the identification of a responder profile that achieved significant and sustained improvements in lung function, and exacerbation reduction. A future clinical study is being designed to confirm these findings.