Back to Authors

Yu, Cong

0000-0002-1957-574X

Mayo Clinic

Swedish Health Services, Seattle, Washington;

Citations 2

Durable responses at 24 months with high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for nonsurgical refractory back pain
Johnson, Curtis A. , Kloster, Daniel, Calodney, Aaron , Kosek, Peter, Pilitsis, Julie G. , Bendel, Markus A. , Wu, Chengyuan, Cherry, Taissa, Lad, Shivanand P. , Goree, Johnathan , Lyons, Mark , Sack, Andrew , Bruce, Diana, Bharara, Manish , Province‐Azalde, Rose , Caraway, David , Bendel, Markus, Patel, Naresh P. , Jameson, Jessica, Johnson, Curtis, Petersen, Erika , Yu, Cong , Sayed, Dawood , Kapural, Leonardo

Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine | November 18, 2023 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 229-239

10.3171/2023.9.spine23504 Get It

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to evaluate the 24-month durability of pain relief, function, quality of life, and safety outcomes for patients with nonsurgical refractory back pain (NSRBP) treated with high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (SCS) within a large, national, multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT). METHODS Following the completion of an RCT comparing high-frequency SCS plus CMM with CMM alone for the treatment of NSRBP, patients gave additional consent for a follow-up extension to 24 months. Presented is the cohort analysis of all patients treated with high-frequency SCS following the optional crossover at 6 months. The outcomes assessed to 24 months included responder rate of ≥ 50% pain relief measured according to the visual analog scale [VAS]), disability (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), quality of life (EQ-5D 5-level [EQ-5D-5L]), opioid reduction. RESULTS Of the 125 patients who received a permanent implant, 121 completed the 12-month follow-up, 101 gave additional consent for extended follow-up, and 98 completed the 24-month follow-up. At 24 months after implantation, the mean back pain VAS score was reduced by 73% and the responder rate was 82%. ODI and EQ-5D-5L both improved by at least double the minimal clinically important difference for each measure. No unexpected adverse events were observed, and the rates of serious adverse events (3.4%) and device explantations (4.8%) were low. CONCLUSIONS The addition of high-frequency SCS to CMM in patients with NSRBP offers profound improvements at 24 months in pain, function, quality of life, and reduced opioid use. This study provides much-needed evidence to inform current clinical practice for managing patients with NSRBP.
Treatment of nonsurgical refractory back pain with high-frequency spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz: 12-month results of a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized controlled trial
Jameson, Jessica , Johnson, Curtis D., Kloster, Daniel, Calodney, Aaron , Kosek, Peter, Pilitsis, Julie G. , Bendel, Markus A. , Petersen, Erika , Cherry, Taissa, Lad, Shivanand P. , Goree, Johnathan , Lyons, Mark , Sack, Andrew , Bruce, Diana, Rubenstein, Frances, Province‐Azalde, Rose , Caraway, David , Bendel, Markus, Patel, Naresh P. , Kapural, Leonardo , Johnson, Curtis, Wu, Chengyuan , Yu, Cong , Sayed, Dawood

Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine | February 11, 2022 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 188-199

10.3171/2021.12.spine211301 Get It

OBJECTIVE Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) at 10 kHz (10-kHz SCS) is a safe and effective therapy for treatment of chronic low-back pain. However, it is unclear from existing evidence whether these findings can be generalized to patients with chronic back pain that is refractory to conventional medical management (CMM) and who have no history of spine surgery and are not acceptable candidates for spine surgery. The authors have termed this condition "nonsurgical refractory back pain" (NSRBP) and conducted a multicenter, randomized controlled trial to compare CMM with and without 10-kHz SCS in this population. METHODS Patients with NSRBP, as defined above and with a spine surgeon consultation required for confirmation, were randomized 1:1 to patients undergoing CMM with and without 10-kHz SCS. CMM included nonsurgical treatment for back pain, according to physicians’ best practices and clinical guidelines. Primary and secondary endpoints included the responder rate (≥ 50% pain relief), disability (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), global impression of change, quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), and change in daily opioid use and were analyzed 3 and 6 months after randomization. The protocol allowed for an optional crossover at 6 months for both arms, with observational follow-up over 12 months. RESULTS In total, 159 patients were randomized; 76 received CMM, and 69 (83.1%) of the 83 patients who were assigned to the 10-kHz SCS group received a permanent implant. At the 3-month follow-up, 80.9% of patients who received stimulation and 1.3% of those who received CMM were found to be study responders (primary outcome, ≥ 50% pain relief; p < 0.001). There was also a significant difference between the treatment groups in all secondary outcomes at 6 months (p < 0.001). In the 10-kHz SCS arm, outcomes were sustained, including a mean 10-cm visual analog scale score of 2.1 ± 2.3 and 2.1 ± 2.2 and mean ODI score of 24.1 ± 16.1 and 24.0 ± 17.0 at 6 and 12 months, respectively (p = 0.9). In the CMM arm, 74.7% (56/75) of patients met the criteria for crossover and received an implant. The crossover arm obtained a 78.2% responder rate 6 months postimplantation. Five serious adverse events occurred (procedure-related, of 125 total permanent implants), all of which resolved without sequelae. CONCLUSIONS The study results, which included follow-up over 12 months, provide important insights into the durability of 10-kHz SCS therapy with respect to chronic refractory back pain, physical function, quality of life, and opioid use, informing the current clinical practice for pain management in patients with NSRBP.