Citations

29 Background: International Medical Graduates (IMGs) comprise over one-third of internal medicine (IM) trainees and practicing oncologists in the United States. We aimed to examine challenges faced by IM IMG residents in pursuing hematology-oncology (HO) fellowship positions. Methods: We conducted a pilot survey using SurveyPluto to assess demographics and evaluate visa related challenges amongst ACGME residents interested in HO. The survey was disseminated through the ASCO IMG Community of Practice (CoP), the Heme-Onc Fellows Mentorship Empowerment (H.O.M.E) group and the IMG Oncologists social media homepage (@IMG_Oncologists). Results: A total of 59 IMG residents completed the survey (20% PGY-1, 36% PGY-2 and 44% PGY-3). The majority of trainees (88%) were from community or university-affiliated community programs. J-1 visa was the most common visa type (67.8%). The visa process was rated as difficult or very difficult by 36% of trainees. Annual visa renewal was required by 51% trainees and 55.9% reported visa related impact on plans for research grant applications (Table). The greatest challenges associated with visa status were disruption of travel plans and inability to unite with family (35.6%); obtaining documentation from home country (33.9%); visa renewal (28.8%) and lack of clarity in visa instructions (27.1%). Among resources that respondents wanted better access to, IMG networking groups (81.4%), legal/financial aids (47.5%), institutional visa seminars (45.8%) and flexibility from their program to visit family overseas (45.8%) were identified as priorities. Conclusions: Visa related barriers pose significant challenges to IMGs interested in HO. Policy changes, advocacy work and additional resources could be beneficial for future IMG oncologists. Challenges associated with visa status for hematology/oncology aspirants. Greatest visa related barriers during training % of respondents (n=59) Documentation from home country 33.9% Disruption in travel plans/ inability to unite with family 35.6% Lack of clarity in renewal instructions/ renewal process post document procurement 55.9% Ability to secure grant affected by visa 22% Non-monetary grant aspects affected by visa 13.6% Did not pursue grants due to visa 20.3% Desired resources during residency Institutional visa seminars 45.8% IMG network groups 81.4% Program flexibility to visit family overseas/ legal and financial aids 45.8%/47.5%

283 Background: Infertility can be a devastating consequence for adolescent or young adult (AYA) patients, posing distinct challenges for healthcare providers striving to deliver high-quality, equitable cancer care. The rising incidence of cancer and growing population of AYA cancer survivors necessitates innovative, streamlined, and efficient processes to promote fertility preservation. While guidelines from organizations like American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) provide valuable recommendations, ensuring consistent adherence to these standards remains an ongoing challenge. Methods: The aim of this quality improvement project was to increase fertility preservation counseling and documentation, by 20% within 6 months without delaying chemotherapy start for newly diagnoses AYA patients (age 18-39) within a large academic medical center. Utilizing a Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control (DMAIC) methodology, interventions were conducted through a series of Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles that included provider and staff education, referral process standardization, implementation of a best practice advisory (BPA) within the electronic health record (EHR), revision of organizational policy, and establishment of nurse touchpoints to facilitate communication. Results: The percentage of counseling and documentation in AYA cancer patients (n=83) increased by 52%, exceeding the project aim. Statistical significance was calculated using a chi-square test. Contrary to initial concerns of potential delays in beginning chemotherapy while awaiting preservation, the average time to starting chemotherapy decreased by 43%. Conclusions: Fertility preservation counseling is a critical aspect of quality outcomes for AYA cancer patients. Strategic planning of automated methods to facilitate documentation and referral was an ideal method of building quality into a large healthcare system. Establishing methods of process improvement engrained best practices, allowing for enrichment of data collection, while driving continuous quality improvement. Increased utilization of the BPA facilitated tracking of quality metrics, while promoting a patient-centered approach to fertility preservation. Interdisciplinary collaboration between physicians, nurses, and reproductive specialists fosters holistic care to enhance long-term survivorship. Fertility preservation counseling and documentation Results. Month Month Count (%) QuarterlyCount (%) 95% CI Change 95% CI P Mean days to begin chemotherapy Baseline 17 of 41 (41%) 17 of 41 (41%) 0.27 to 0.58 42 October 19 of 20 (95%) November 10 of 12 (83%) December 9 of 14 (64%) 38 of 46 (83%) 0.68 to 0.92 0.41 0.20 to 0.62 <0.001 January 10 of 12 (83%) February 7 of 7 (100%) March 12 of 12 (100%) 29 of 31 (94%) 0.77 to 0.99 0.52 0.32 to 0.72 <0.001 24 April 6 of 6 (100%)

271 Background: Many studies have shown that fatigue is associated with poor outcomes such as quality of life and physical function in breast cancer survivors.Early treatment of symptoms that result in persistent fatigue may be a strategy to mitigate long-term fatigue.As a result, we studied symptoms and developed risk estimates for patients that are most likely to develop fatigue by pre-surgery and follow up among patients treated on the I-SPY 2 neoadjuvant trial. I-SPY 2 is a phase-II adaptive trial for high-risk early-stage breast cancer patients. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study of 306 women undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy +/- targeted therapy, patients complete electronic surveys of symptoms via 34 PRO-CTCAE items and QOL via 9 PROMIS instruments. Fatigue is collected as part of the PROMIS survey and scored using Health Measures. Study timepoints are screening (SC), weekly study treatment (ST), 12 weeks (12w), pre-surgery (PS) and at 1, 6, 12 and 24 months (FU1-FU4) following surgery. Correlation between symptoms and fatigue at equal timepoints was quantified using spearman correlations and BH-adjusted p-values. For symptom odds analysis, symptoms were binarized such that those that had an average grade of mild or above (severity), rarely or above (frequency) or a little bit or above (interference) between ST weeks 1-6 were considered present. Clinically significant (CS) increase in fatigue was defined as an increase >=0.5 standard deviation (SD) in mean from baseline. Logistic regression was used to determine odds ratios of factors associated with fatigue. Results: Baseline PROMIS fatigue mean score was 47.14 (SD 9.31) with a median of 47.45. A CS increase in fatigue from baseline was seen in 55% of patients at 12w, and 61% of patients pre-surgery. Of the patients that had a CS increase in fatigue at any point prior to surgery, 45.7% had persistent fatigue through FU1-4. Symptoms associated with Fatigue at 12w were shortness of breath, headache, and nausea (P< 0.03). At PS, fatigue was significantly correlated with GI symptoms, neuropathy, and shortness of breath (P< 0.03). Risk estimates for patients that filled out symptom surveys at early timepoints (weeks 1-6) and also had fatigue were evaluated. Patients with early GU (genitourinary) symptoms had higher risk of fatigue at IR (OR=9.33, p=0.02, 88.9% in cases vs 33.3% in controls). Patients with early GI symptoms at PS (OR=8.56, p=0.03, 90.1% vs 50%), or FU2-4 (OR= 5.88 and 7.36, p= 0.04 and 0.02, 80% vs 39.1% and 81.8% vs 36.3%) also had a higher risk of developing fatigue. Conclusions: A CS increase in fatigue during treatment and follow up is seen in the majority of patients and is associated with a large number of persistent symptoms.

160 Background: In the United States, racial/ethnic disparities in adoption of breast cancer evidence-based practices (EBPs) persist along the cancer care continuum. This scoping review applied an implementation science lens to describe the current evidence base for interventions to reduce disparities, synthesizing evidence on effective interventions while highlighting gaps in the literature. Methods: A formalized search strategy identified USA-based interventional studies aiming to improve adoption of an EBP along the breast cancer care continuum among racially/ethnically minoritized patients. Relevant articles from 1/2010 - 8/2022 (Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus) were included. For each article, two reviewers screened and extracted data, with a third resolving discrepancies. The PRISMA-ScR checklist and JBO Manual for Evidence Synthesis framework were followed. Results: Our search strategy yielded 45,215 articles. After applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, 59 articles were retained, targeting screening (85%, 50 of 59), treatment (12%, 7 of 59), and survivorship (5%, 3 of 59) (2 targeted multiple areas). No articles targeted end-of-life care. Of these, 49% (29 of 59) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Among 24 screening RCTs, the most common interventions—and fraction with statistically significant improved screening uptake—were patient navigation (100%, 11 of 11) and patient education (80%, 4 of 5). Among 4 treatment RCTs, 3 targeted adjuvant chemotherapy uptake. Of these, 1 had significant improvements and used patient navigation. The 2 studies without significant improvements used a patient tracking tool/alert system or patient education. Among 2 survivorship RCTs, one used email interventions, resulting in significantly improved physical activity and dietary health. A second used a nurse-facilitated internet support group, resulting in significantly improved physical/psychological symptoms. Early to mid-stage implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, or fidelity) were commonly measured (81%, 48 of 59). No study measured later stage implementation outcomes (sustainability or costs). Conclusions: In multiple studies, patient navigation and education improved breast cancer screening among racially/ethnically minoritized populations. In one study, patient navigation improved completion of adjuvant treatment. Despite these studies, patient navigation is not reimbursed for cancer screening, and adoption has not been widespread. Future studies should focus on evaluating and improving later stage implementation outcomes (sustainability and costs). Based on these results, insurance reimbursement mechanisms for screening-related navigation may be warranted. Future breast cancer care delivery disparities research should also be expanded to include treatment, survivorship, and end-of-life care.

152 Background: The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) started the Diversity in Oncology initiative in 2017. Minority representation in the US oncology physician workforce was the subject of a recent series of ASCO State of the Oncology Workforce in America snapshots (1). However, Asian minority representation was not mentioned in any of these reports. Our objective was to determine the proportion of Asian workforce in various oncology specialties inclusive of physician and non-physician practitioners as well as physician trainees. Methods: We searched the web for publicly available data on Asian representation among US oncology adult (A) and pediatric (P) practitioners and trainees. Major data sources included the 2020 US Census, Association of American Medical Colleges, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, and professional societies. Practitioners included hematologists/oncologists (H/O), gynecologic oncologists (GYNO), radiation oncologists (RADO), surgical oncologists (SURGO), hematopathologists (HP), oncology nurse practitioners (ONP), oncology physician assistants (OPA), and oncology nurses (ON). Trainees included fellows (F) and residents (R). For reference, we obtained similar data on US population, medical students (MS), adult internal medicine residents (AIMR), gynecology residents (GYNR), pediatric residents (PR), pathology residents (PATHR), surgery residents (SURGR), nurses (RN), nurse practitioners (NP), and physician assistants (PA). For a snapshot of the oncology workforce, data from 2020-2022 were used. Whenever available, we obtained serial data for trainees over the years. Results: A snapshot of the proportions of Asians based on their professions is shown (Table). While Asians comprise only 6.2% of the US population, between 14.7% to 32.1% of physician practitioners in various oncology subspecialties are Asian. Moreover, between 17.9% to 35.3% of oncology physician trainees and 26.7% of medical students are Asian and these proportions have remained stable from 2005 to 2022. Data are unavailable for HP, SURGO, and non-physician practitioners except for OPA (7.0%) and RN (7.2%). Conclusions: Asians comprise a large segment of the US oncology workforce. While only 1 in 20 people in the US are Asians, between 1 in 3 and 1 in 5 oncology physician practitioners and trainees are Asians. Data are limited for non-physician practitioners. Asian minority representation should be highlighted and considered as an example of success in diversity. 1. JCO Oncol Pract 2020-2022. Snapshot of Asian representation among oncology trainees and practitioners in the US. Trainees 2022 A-H/O-F 35.3% AIMR 35.9% 2022 P-H/O-F 20.0% PR 22.0% 2022 RADO-R 26.4% MS 26.7% 2022 GYNO-F 17.9% GYNR 14.9% 2022 HP-F 20.0% PATHR 26.6% 2022 SURGO-F 21.2% SURGR 19.2% Practitioners 2021 A-H/O 32.1% OPA 7.0% 2021 P-H/O 20.4% RN 7.2% 2021 RADO 25.9% HP/SURGO/ONP/ON NA 2020 GYNO 14.7% US Census 6.2%

132 Background: Cervical cancer continues to affect the Appalachian population to a higher degree than the rest of the American population. Researchers believe the increased prevalence of cervical cancer in the Appalachian area is due to health disparities across the area. Methods: We queried the Kentucky Cancer Registries online public Cancer Incidence and Mortality Inquiry System to determine changes in age adjusted invasive cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates in Appalachian (AK) and Non-Appalachian Kentucky (NAK) counties over time. Incidence rate ratios were used to analyze the difference in cervical cancer incidence and mortality between Appalachian KY and non-Appalachian KY populations across several time periods. Results: In 1995-1999, there was a statistically significant difference in cervical cancer incidence between AK and NAK 14.8 vs. 12.7/100,000 people (p= 0.0035) and mortality 4.6 vs. 4.0/100,000 (p=0.0471). The cervical cancer incidence was 16.9% higher in AK versus NAK and mortality was 18.4% higher in AK versus NAK. In 2016-2020, there was a statistically significant difference in cervical cancer incidence between AK and NAK 12.1 vs. 8.9/100,000 people (p≤ 0.0001) and mortality between AK and NAK 3.6 vs. 2.3/100,000 people (p= 0.0001). The cervical cancer incidence was 36% higher in AK versus NAK and mortality was 55.7% higher in AK versus NAK. Conclusions: Disparities between in Appalachian Kentucky and Non-Appalachian Kentucky in cervical cancer incidence and mortality not only have persisted since the 1990’s, but they have widened proportionally over time as survival gains have lagged in Appalachia. The observed cervical cancer outcome disparities are likely contributed to by not only the lack of general health education in the region, but more importantly barriers to care access contributing to a lower use of Pap testing in the area. Higher rates of poverty, increased rates of smoking and HPV infection also likely play a role. Research has been conducted to observe identified opportunities for intervention and begin collaborative efforts in the region engineered towards a cervical cancer risk reduction program, but the need for improvement clearly remains. Cervical cancer mortality rates in Appalachian Kentucky vs. non-Appalachian Kentucky, 1995-2020. Appalachia Non-Appalachia Population at Risk Deaths Crude Rate/100,000 Age-Adjusted Rate 95% Confidence Interval Population at risk Deaths Crude Rate/100,000 Age-Adjusted Rate 95% Confidence Interval 1995-1999 2928468 145 5 4.6 [3.9-5.4] 7209127 301 4.2 4 [3.6-4.5] 2000-2004 2962204 102 3.4 3.2 [2.6-3.9] 7485965 214 2.9 2.7 [2.3-3.1] 2005-2009 2986284 117 3.9 3.5 [2.9-4.2] 7833348 225 2.9 2.6 [2.3-3.0] 2010-2015 3577269 141 3.9 3.4 [2.8-4.0] 9803897 277 2.8 2.5 [2.2-2.9] 2016-2020 2941022 121 4.1 3.6 [3.0-4.4] 8378683 221 2.6 2.3 [2.0-2.7]

Cytolytic immunosuppression with OKT3 antibody has been shown to be highly effective in reducing the frequency of early allograft rejection in cardiac transplantation. Failure of OKT3 immunosuppression in the absence of anti‐OKT3 antibodies is a rare event, having been reported in only 3 patients who manifested predominantly vascular (humoral) rejection during OKT3 therapy. We report the first case of hemodynamically serious cellular rejection, without a demonstrable vascular rejection component, in a cardiac allograft recipient during OKT3 treatment. This case underscores the need to remain vigilant for signs of rejection in cardiac recipients during OKT3 immunosuppression.

Three multicenter studies have shown that the addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to an immunosuppressive regime consisting of cyclosporin A (CSA) and prednisone (PRED) decreases the incidence of acute rejection episodes when compared with azathioprine (AZA) or placebo (1–3). In those patients receiving 3 g/d of MMF, the highest dose used in the studies, there was a trend towards an increased incidence of cytomegaloviral sepsis (CMV). We postulated therefore that MMF may represent an independent risk factor for the development of CMV infection in patients receiving renal allografts and MMF at our institution. Having altered the triple drug regime from CSA, AZA (2‐2.5 mg/kg/d) and PRED to CSA. MMF (2 g/d) and PRED in July 1995, we elected to study all patients undergoing kidney transplantation for the 33‐month period January 1994‐September 1996, by undertaking a case control analysis to determine independent risk factors for the development of CMV infection, as defined by CMV viremia or tissue‐invasive CMV. Three CMV disease‐free control patients were matched to each case, these patients having been randomly selected from the entire pool of patients in the observation period. There were 31 CMV case patients and 102 control patients. Univariate analysis indicated that gender, a concomitant pancreas transplant, acute rejection and CMV seropositivity in the donor were risk factors. However, multivariate analysis indicated that only acute rejection and donor CMV seropositivity were independently linked (p<0.05) to CMV disease in this sample. Specifically, the odds ratio (OR) for CMV disease between MMF and AZA was 1.0 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46‐2.18). Therefore, in this case control study we find no evidence that MMF at a dose of 2 g/d is an independent risk factor for primary CMV viremia or tissue invasion in renal allograft recipients.

A 59‐year‐old female developed symptoms of graft‐versus‐host disease 3½ weeks after liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis. Symptoms of graft‐versus‐host disease included fever, erythroderma with bullae formation, and mucosal surface ulceration. Donor lymphocytes were present in the peripheral blood. Despite treatment with equine antilymphoblast globulin, steroids and, eventually, cyclosporine withdrawal, she developed neutropenia and succumbed to sepsis. At autopsy, she had marked lymphocyte depletion involving the bone marrow and both native and donor origin lymph nodes. As expected, the liver was normal. The clinical and pathological features were remarkably similar to those of the few other reported cases of graft‐versus‐host disease after liver transplantation and transfusion‐associated graft‐versus‐host disease; therapy is usually ineffective, and progression of disease leads to pancytopenia and death from sepsis.