Wiesner, Russell H.

A 59‐year‐old female developed symptoms of graft‐versus‐host disease 3½ weeks after liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis. Symptoms of graft‐versus‐host disease included fever, erythroderma with bullae formation, and mucosal surface ulceration. Donor lymphocytes were present in the peripheral blood. Despite treatment with equine antilymphoblast globulin, steroids and, eventually, cyclosporine withdrawal, she developed neutropenia and succumbed to sepsis. At autopsy, she had marked lymphocyte depletion involving the bone marrow and both native and donor origin lymph nodes. As expected, the liver was normal. The clinical and pathological features were remarkably similar to those of the few other reported cases of graft‐versus‐host disease after liver transplantation and transfusion‐associated graft‐versus‐host disease; therapy is usually ineffective, and progression of disease leads to pancytopenia and death from sepsis.

Background. The role of MZ phenotype of α 1 antitrypsin (α1AT) deficiency as a potential cofactor in advanced liver disease arising from other primary causes is not widely understood. In the general population, MZ phenotype accounts for 2%–4% in Europe and 2%–7.1% in North America. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of the MZ phenotype among various causes of cirrhosis in the United States in the modern era and its impact on pulmonary function before and after liver transplantation. Methods. This retrospective study included adult patients with cirrhosis who underwent liver transplantation at Mayo Clinic. Participants’ data including pathogenesis of cirrhosis, model for end-stage liver disease-Na score, α1AT phenotype, liver decompensation events, and pulmonary outcomes was determined by retrospective review of the liver transplantation database. Results. One hundred thirty of 1341 adult patients with cirrhosis (9.7%) were α1AT MZ carriers. When comparing the distribution of protease inhibitor (PI) MZ among different pathogenesis, the prevalence of MZ was significantly increased in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), alcoholic liver disease (ALD), and cryptogenic cirrhosis compared with other causes. Thirty-seven of 171 with NASH (22%), 37 of 187 with ALD (20%), and 9 of 39 with cryptogenic cirrhosis (23.1%) were identified as PI MZ, while in other subgroups; we detected 18 of 320 with viral hepatitis, and 11 of 339 with primary biliary cholangitis/primary sclerosing cholangitis. Also, MZ patients were more likely to develop preoperative chronic obstructive lung disease, and postoperative pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary embolism than MM patients. Conclusions. The rates of preoperative and postoperative pulmonary complications were found to be higher in PI MZ patients than in PI MM patients. The MZ phenotype was significantly enriched in NASH, ALD, and cryptogenic cirrhosis.

Abstract Despite recent improvements in immunosuppressive therapy, hepatic allograft rejection remains a major cause of morbidity and late graft loss in patients undergoing liver transplantation. Although some biochemical tests suggest hepatic allograft damage, the gold standard for defining rejection remains based on morphologic findings. Acute cellular rejection usually occurs within the first 3 weeks posttransplantation and the incidence varies between 40% and 70%. Ductopenic rejection occurs in 5-10% of patients undergoing initial liver transplantation and usually occurs between 6 weeks and 6 months after the procedure. Induction and maintenance of immunosuppression with triple-drug therapy (cyclosporine, prednisone, and azathioprine) and other combinations that include anti-lymphocyte preparations have led to an overall decrease in the incidence of both cellular and ductopenic rejection. In addition, the availability of FK506 as a rescue therapy has saved grafts in some patients experiencing chronic (ductopenic) rejection. Overall, the correlation between the degree of biochemical liver dysfunction and the presence and severity of histologic rejection remains poor. Histologic severity of rejection, however, suggests which patients will require more immunosuppressive therapy and which patients may need antilymphocyte therapy to control the rejection episode. Some rejection episodes remain resistant to all known therapy and eventually lead to graft loss. New immunosuppressive agents and regimens are needed to improve graft and patient survival, decrease the incidence of cellular and ductopenic rejection, minimize drug-related side effects and complications, and reduce the high cost of immunosuppressive therapy.

We prospectively studied the utility of the amplification of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in the sera of liver transplant recipients in order to predict symptomatic CMV infection, thus enabling preemptive therapy with antiviral agents. Serum samples obtained at biweekly intervals from 20 sequential liver transplant recipients for at least 8 weeks following transplantation were tested by the PCR amplification procedure. Results were correlated with blood and urine cultures, histopathological findings from infected organs, and clinical manifestations. Six patients (30%) developed symptomatic CMV infection; in five (83%) of these patients, CMV DNA was detected prior to symptomatic CMV infection, and in one (17%) of these patients, CMV DNA was detected at the time of symptomatic CMV infection. CMV DNA was detected a mean of 13 days (range, 0 to 23 days) prior to the onset of symptomatic CMV infection. In addition, CMV DNA was detected in the sera of four of five patients with asymptomatic viremia and two patients with asymptomatic viruria. Lastly, the PCR was negative for sera from seven patients with no evidence of CMV infection. We found that PCR was able to detect the presence of CMV DNA in the sera of liver transplant recipients at a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 100% for CMV infection, while the sensitivity and specificity for symptomatic infection were 100 and 57%, respectively.

Abstract Abstract 2859 Background: PTLD is the most common malignancy, other than melanomatous skin cancer complicating solid organ transplantation and has been one of the most commonly observed fatal consequences. The histologies are diverse and include B-cell, T-cell and Hodgkin lymphomas. Rituximab has affected the outcome in CD20+ patients with PTLD. This single institution study sought to identity the outcomes in patients of all histologies and presentations managed in the post-rituximab era. Methods: Patients with solid organ transplantation who were diagnosed with PTLD at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) between December 1970 and October 2009 were identified through the Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Data Base. The rituximab era was defined as patients diagnosed after December 26, 2000, the date of diagnosis for the first patient treated with rituximab in our series. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association of clinical factors and overall survival (OS). Results: 143 patients diagnosed with PTLD between December 1970 and October 2009 were identified. The median age at the time of diagnosis of PTLD was 50 years (range 15–84) with 41 patients (29%) over the age of 60. 93 were male (65%). At a median follow-up of 84 months (range 1–295), 95 patients (65%) have died. The types of organ transplant included renal (39%), liver (31%), cardiac (11%), lung (6%), renal/pancreas (6%), pancreas (4%), and multiorgan (4%). 83% of patients presented with extranodal disease. 28% had involvement of the engrafted organ. 76% of the patients developed PTLD that was EBV+ by in situ hybridization. 62% were stage 3–4. The IPI was intermediate-high in 39% of patients. Initial approaches to management included reduction in immunosuppression (45%), chemotherapy (12%), reduction in immunosuppression with rituximab (12%), rituximab (8%), and radiation therapy (6%). The overall response to therapeutic approaches was 46% in the pre-rituximab era and 56% in the post-rituximab era (chi-squared p=0.25). Patients treated with rituximab had an improved overall survival (HR = 1.66, 95% CI: 0.99–2.79). Patients treated in the rituximab era had improved 1 year survival (76%) compared to patients in the pre-rituximab era (59%) (chi-squared p=0.03). However, the survival advantage in the rituximab era was not maintained in longer follow-up. The median overall survival in the pre-rituximab era was 31 months compared to 56 months in the post-rituximab era (logrank p=0.63). Conclusion: The overall response rates and overall survival are improved with rituximab treatment in CD20+ PTLD, however, the natural history of all PTLD has not improved significantly in the post-rituximab era. New approaches are needed for the prevention and management of all the histologies of PTLD. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

T cell–mediated rejection (TCMR) is common after liver transplantation (LT), and it is often thought to have a minimum impact on outcomes. Because alloimmune response changes over time, we investigated the role of the timing of TCMR on patient and allograft survival and examined the risk factors for early and late TCMR. We reviewed protocol liver biopsies for 787 consecutive LT recipients with an 8.6‐year follow‐up. The incidence of early TCMR (≤6 weeks after LT) was 33.5% with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis patients having the lowest incidence. Younger recipient age (P < 0.01), number of human leukocyte antigen mismatches (P < 0.01), and use of deceased donor allografts (P = 0.01) were associated with increased risk of early TCMR, which had no impact on allograft (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; 95% CI, 0.79‐1.32; P = 0.89) or overall survival (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.78‐1.34; P = 0.86). Late TCMR (>6 weeks after LT) was less common (17.7%) and was associated with different risk factors. The majority of late TCMR (56.2%) episodes had no antecedent early TCMR, although moderate‐to‐severe early TCMR (HR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.55‐5.23; P < 0.01) and steroid resistance (HR, 3.62; 95% CI, 1.87‐6.99; P < 0.01) were associated with late TCMR. Late TCMR increased risk of mortality (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.35‐2.65; P = 0.001) and graft loss (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.23‐2.37; P = 0.001). Thus, these data suggest that the timing and histologic grade of TCMR determine its impact on patient and allograft survival. Early mild TCMR episodes after LT do not adversely impact patient or allograft survival provided that they are adequately treated. The occurrence of late TCMR carries deleterious effects with increased longterm risk of graft loss and decreased survival. Patients with moderate‐to‐severe early TCMR are at an increased risk for late TCMR and warrant closer clinical follow‐up.

BackgroundData on liver transplant (LT) outcomes using deceased donors with heavy drinking (HD) (>2 drinks per day) are scanty.MethodsUsing the United Network for Organ Sharing database (2002-2014), we examined outcomes after LT in adults comparing deceased HD donors with non-HD (ND) donors.ResultsOf 56 182 first LTs performed in the United States for 10 common indications using deceased donors, 47 882 with available information on alcohol use were analyzed. Of these 47 882 LT recipients, 7298 (15%) were from HD donors, with similar proportion over time (2002-2014, Armitage trend testP= 0.75) and for recipient liver disease etiology (χ2P= 0.42). Proportion of liver organ used for LT was lower for HD donors compared with ND donors (63% vs 78%;P< 0.001). Five-year outcomes on first LT comparing 7166 HD donors and 21 498 ND donors matched based on propensity score were similar for liver graft (73.7% vs 73.7%, log rankP= 0.98) and patient survival (77.6% vs 77.0%,P= 0.36). On Cox regression analysis, history of HD in deceased donors did not affect liver graft 1.02 (0.97-1.08) or patient survival 1.03 (0.97-1.09).ConclusionsAmong LT recipients using select liver grafts, history of HD in deceased donors does not impact outcomes after LT.