Munn, Stephen

Three multicenter studies have shown that the addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to an immunosuppressive regime consisting of cyclosporin A (CSA) and prednisone (PRED) decreases the incidence of acute rejection episodes when compared with azathioprine (AZA) or placebo (1–3). In those patients receiving 3 g/d of MMF, the highest dose used in the studies, there was a trend towards an increased incidence of cytomegaloviral sepsis (CMV). We postulated therefore that MMF may represent an independent risk factor for the development of CMV infection in patients receiving renal allografts and MMF at our institution. Having altered the triple drug regime from CSA, AZA (2‐2.5 mg/kg/d) and PRED to CSA. MMF (2 g/d) and PRED in July 1995, we elected to study all patients undergoing kidney transplantation for the 33‐month period January 1994‐September 1996, by undertaking a case control analysis to determine independent risk factors for the development of CMV infection, as defined by CMV viremia or tissue‐invasive CMV. Three CMV disease‐free control patients were matched to each case, these patients having been randomly selected from the entire pool of patients in the observation period. There were 31 CMV case patients and 102 control patients. Univariate analysis indicated that gender, a concomitant pancreas transplant, acute rejection and CMV seropositivity in the donor were risk factors. However, multivariate analysis indicated that only acute rejection and donor CMV seropositivity were independently linked (p<0.05) to CMV disease in this sample. Specifically, the odds ratio (OR) for CMV disease between MMF and AZA was 1.0 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46‐2.18). Therefore, in this case control study we find no evidence that MMF at a dose of 2 g/d is an independent risk factor for primary CMV viremia or tissue invasion in renal allograft recipients.

AbstractMultiple risk factors are important predictors in the development of diabetic nephropathy (DN). Once DN has developed, it progresses steadily to renal failure. To determine the rate of renal function decline and the parameters that influence the rate of decline, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients with DN who had undergone dialysis or kidney transplantation at the Mayo Clinic from 1983 to 1993. Forty patients were found to have two or more iothalamate clearance (IothmCl) measurements where a slope of renal function decline over time, expressed as mL/ min/month/1.73 m2, can be calculated. The parameters examined included age of onset and duration of diabetes (DM), age at initial presentation, insulin dosage, glycosylated hemoglobin level, proteinuria, blood pressure (BP), number of antihypertensive medications (HTM), use of ACE inhibitors, creatinine, and initial IothmCl. The mean overall decline of clearance was 1.36±1.1 mL/min/month, corrected. Univariate regression analysis showed that only systolic and mean BP (p<0.05), use of HTM (p=0.02), and the number of HTM used (p=0.0001) correlated with the rate of clearance decline. No other parameter was significant. The decline of IothmCl was 0.72±0.41, 1.20±0.9, and 2.34±1.38 mL/min/month, for patients taking no HTM, <3 HTM, and ≥ 3HTM, respectively. Of the eight patients on HTM who presented with initial IothmCl of <30 mL/min/1.73 m2, seven (88%) had clearance of <10 mL/min/1.73 m2 within 1 yr. We conclude that hypertension is an important marker of DN progression, and that the more HTM required for control of BP, the faster the decline of renal function. We recommend that a suitable transplant candidate with DN who presents with hypertension requiring HTM and a clearance of <30 mL/min should be placed on the transplant waiting list.

Although sulfonylureas enhance insulin secretion, it is unknown whether these hypoglycemic chemicals stimulate insulin secretion through the augmentation of the pulsatile or basal modes of insulin release. Enhanced pulsatile insulin could occur in turn through amplification of the burst mass or an increase in burst frequency. To address the mechanism of sulfonylurea action, we employed a recently validated canine model with a portal vein sampling catheter and flow probe to measure pulsatile insulin secretion in vivo directly in response to tolbutamide infusion or ingestion. After a 16-h fast, seven dogs were studied in the postabsorptive basal state and during a tolbutamide (0.2 mg/min) infusion when their plasma glucose concentrations were clamped at euglycemia. Insulin concentrations in the carotid artery (basal vs. tolbutamide, 85 ± 12 vs. 325 ± 66 pmol/l; P &lt; 0.01) and portal vein (basal vs. tolbutamide, 345 ± 55 vs. 1,288 ± 230 pmol/l; P &lt; 0.01) increased during tolbutamide infusion, but the portal vein plasma flow did not change. Increased plasma insulin concentrations were achieved by a fourfold increase in the total insulin secretion rate (2.3 ± 0.2 to 9.4 ± 1.9 pmol · kg−1 · min−1; basal vs. tolbutamide, P &lt; 0.01). The augmented total insulin secretion was achieved mechanistically via a marked and selective increase in the insulin secretory burst mass (basal vs. tolbutamide, 266 ± 64 vs. 817 ± 144 pmol/pulse; P &lt; 0.01), with no change in portal-vein insulin pulse frequency (basal vs. tolbutamide, 10.1 ± 0.6 vs. 11.1 ± 0.8 pulses/h; P = 0.3). Oral (250 mg) tolbutamide also magnified the endogenous insulin secretion rate by the preferential amplification of the secretory pulse mass (basal vs. tolbutamide, 167 ± 37 vs. 362 ± 50 pmol/pulse; P &lt; 0.01). Neither the infusion nor the ingestion of tolbutamide changed the calculated clearance rates of endogenously secreted insulin. We conclude that sulfonylurea (tolbutamide) induced insulin secretion in vivo is achieved by the highly selective amplification of insulin secretory burst mass with no change in basal insulin release or the frequency of the β-cell-network pacemaker.

In the present studies, we used a recently validated canine model to determine 1) if glucose ingestion stimulates insulin secretion by amplifying the pulsatile component of insulin release, and if so, 2) whether this effect is achieved preferentially through burst mass or frequency modulation, and 3) if the mechanism of incretin effect of insulin secretion is mediated via the pulsatile mode of secretion. We report that 30 g of glucose ingestion stimulates an ∼ 550% increase in the overall rate of insulin secretion (1.8 ± 0.2 to 11.6 ± 1.5 pmol.kg−1 · min−1), which is achieved via an ∼ 400% increase in the mass of insulin secreted per burst (202 ± 38 to 1,003 ± 147 pmol/pulse, P &lt; 0.001) and a ∼ 40% increase in burst frequency (8.7 ± 0.5 to 12.3 ± 0.6 pulse/h, P &lt; 0.001). Of the insulin secreted after glucose ingestion, 68% (±4) was released in discrete secretory bursts. Further analyses showed that the incretin effect of ingested (GPO) versus infused glucose (GIV) is achieved through regulation of pulsatile insulin secretion. Glucose ingestion led to an ∼ 70% greater rate of insulin secretion than intravenous glucose delivery (10.0 ± 1.6 vs. 5.9 ± 0.9 pmol.kg−1 · min−1, P &lt; 0.005, GPO vs. GIV). This incretin effect was achieved by the specific mechanism of an ∼ 70% greater pulse mass (930 ± 196 vs. 558 ± 97 pmol/pulse, P &lt; 0.02, GPO vs. GIV) but with a comparable pulse frequency (13.1 ± 0.9 vs. 12.0 ± 0.5 pulses/h, P = 0.14, n = 9 dogs, GPO vs. GIV). We conclude that in vivo glucose regulates overall insulin secretion almost exclusively by amplification of the pulsatile mode of insulin secretion, and that the incretin effect is achieved by preferential enhancement of insulin secretory burst mass.