Schmitz, Ole

Although sulfonylureas enhance insulin secretion, it is unknown whether these hypoglycemic chemicals stimulate insulin secretion through the augmentation of the pulsatile or basal modes of insulin release. Enhanced pulsatile insulin could occur in turn through amplification of the burst mass or an increase in burst frequency. To address the mechanism of sulfonylurea action, we employed a recently validated canine model with a portal vein sampling catheter and flow probe to measure pulsatile insulin secretion in vivo directly in response to tolbutamide infusion or ingestion. After a 16-h fast, seven dogs were studied in the postabsorptive basal state and during a tolbutamide (0.2 mg/min) infusion when their plasma glucose concentrations were clamped at euglycemia. Insulin concentrations in the carotid artery (basal vs. tolbutamide, 85 ± 12 vs. 325 ± 66 pmol/l; P < 0.01) and portal vein (basal vs. tolbutamide, 345 ± 55 vs. 1,288 ± 230 pmol/l; P < 0.01) increased during tolbutamide infusion, but the portal vein plasma flow did not change. Increased plasma insulin concentrations were achieved by a fourfold increase in the total insulin secretion rate (2.3 ± 0.2 to 9.4 ± 1.9 pmol · kg−1 · min−1; basal vs. tolbutamide, P < 0.01). The augmented total insulin secretion was achieved mechanistically via a marked and selective increase in the insulin secretory burst mass (basal vs. tolbutamide, 266 ± 64 vs. 817 ± 144 pmol/pulse; P < 0.01), with no change in portal-vein insulin pulse frequency (basal vs. tolbutamide, 10.1 ± 0.6 vs. 11.1 ± 0.8 pulses/h; P = 0.3). Oral (250 mg) tolbutamide also magnified the endogenous insulin secretion rate by the preferential amplification of the secretory pulse mass (basal vs. tolbutamide, 167 ± 37 vs. 362 ± 50 pmol/pulse; P < 0.01). Neither the infusion nor the ingestion of tolbutamide changed the calculated clearance rates of endogenously secreted insulin. We conclude that sulfonylurea (tolbutamide) induced insulin secretion in vivo is achieved by the highly selective amplification of insulin secretory burst mass with no change in basal insulin release or the frequency of the β-cell-network pacemaker.

In vitro data have recently suggested that sulfonylureas (SUs) enhance GH secretion by modulating the effects of GHRH and somatostatin in pituitary cells. The present study was undertaken to explore in more detail a possible influence of a single dose of SU (glibenclamide) and a non-SU (repaglinide) insulin secretagogue on circulating GH dynamics. Ten C-peptide-negative type 1 diabetic individuals were examined on three occasions in random order. Either glibenclamide (10.5 mg), repaglinide (8 mg), or placebo was administered after overnight normalization of plasma glucose by iv insulin infusion. Subsequently, GH concentrations were measured regularly after stimulation with GHRH (bolus 0.1 μg/kg) alone and during concomitant infusion with somatostatin (7 ng·kg–1·min–1). Insulin was replaced at baseline levels (0.25 mU·kg–1·min–1) and plasma glucose clamped at 5–6 mmol/liter. Overall, there were no significant statistical differences in GH responses determined as either GH peak concentrations, integrated levels of GH, or secretory burst mass of GH during the experimental protocol. In contrast, plasma glucagon concentrations were significantly increased during glibenclamide and repaglinide exposure. The present experimental design does not support the hypothesis that acute administration of pharmacological doses of the oral antihyperglycemic agents glibenclamide and repaglinide per se enhance GH release in humans. Additionally, this study shows that these potassium channel inhibitors seem to stimulate glucagon secretion in people who have severe intraislet insulin deficiency (e.g. type 1 diabetes). However, extrapolation of our findings to type 2 diabetic individuals should be done with some caution.