Citations

Importance Patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass often require platelet transfusions for bleeding. Platelets are routinely stored at room temperature (20-24 °C) for up to 5 to 7 days; however, cold storage (1-6 °C) may allow for increased storage duration without loss of hemostatic function. Objective To determine the maximum cold-storage duration, up to 21 days, for which cold-stored platelets (CSPs) are noninferior or superior in hemostatic efficacy to room-temperature platelets (RTPs) when transfused in actively bleeding patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Design, Setting, and Participants A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, partially blinded, adaptive, noninferiority, storage duration–ranging trial conducted in pediatric and adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with planned cardiopulmonary bypass at 27 sites in the US and Australia from December 2021 to March 2025. Statistical analysis was conducted from September 9 to October 3, 2025. Intervention Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive CSPs with a maximum of 21 days of storage vs RTPs with a maximum of 7 days of storage. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was a hemostatic efficacy score with values ranging from 1 to 5 and higher values indicating greater bleeding. The noninferiority margin was 1 point. The success criterion was met if at least 1 cold-storage duration of 7 days or more had a posterior probability of noninferiority of at least 97.5%. The secondary outcome was 24-hour chest tube output. Results Of the 1000 patients who underwent platelet transfusion, 989 were included in the primary analysis (650 CSPs and 339 RTPs). The cohort had a mean (SD) age of 42.1 (30.1) years and 67.8% were male. CSPs were noninferior to RTPs for the primary outcome, with a probability of greater than 99.9% for all cold-storage durations. Pooled across storage durations, CSPs had a mean difference from RTPs of 0.09 (95% credible interval, −0.06 to 0.23). Median (IQR) chest tube output at 24 hours (8.9 mL/kg [5.2-15.4] for CSPs vs 8.4 mL/kg [5.5-15.9] for RTPs; difference in medians, 0.4 [95% CI, −1.0 to 1.5]) was not statistically different between study groups. In a post hoc analysis, as all storage durations were noninferior, considering the CSPs as a single group, the hemostatic efficacy score was similar between both groups: mean (SD) of 3.08 (1.15) CSPs vs 2.99 (1.10) RTPs. There were no differences in venous or arterial thrombotic events, transfusion-associated adverse events, acute respiratory distress syndrome, kidney failure, septic shock, and mortality between the study groups, except for increased reexploration rates in the CSP group. Conclusions and Relevance For patients undergoing cardiac surgery, CSPs stored up to 21 days are noninferior to RTPs for the control of active surgical bleeding. Use of CSPs may allow for increased availability of platelets by reducing wastage and shortages and may allow for incorporation of platelets into inventory at locations where platelets cannot be maintained due to the 5- to 7-day shelf life of RTPs. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04834414

Despite advances in pharmacogenomics that have led to innovative therapeutic strategies, substantial interindividual variability in drug efficacy and toxicity persists. Both endogenous and exogenous factors contribute to this unexplained variation, resulting in suboptimal treatment effectiveness, unnecessary healthcare costs, preventable mortality, and significant human suffering. The emerging field of exposomics is aimed at addressing the complex exposures that impact human health and offers an opportunity to interrogate how these exposures influence drug actions and outcomes. Here, we introduce pharmacoexposomics as a complementary framework that systematically quantifies the body's metabolic response to drug and environmental exposures using high-resolution mass spectrometry. We then present IndiPHARM (Individualized Pharmacology), a multi-institution, Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health–supported platform designed to integrate population-scale pharmacoexposomics with pharmacogenomics and clinical data to elucidate interindividual variability in drug response, identify adverse reactions, and inform tailored, effective treatment strategies that advance precision medicine.

Financial toxicity is a significant but often overlooked consequence of cancer for adolescents and young adults (AYAs, 15–39 years old), who face limited savings, unstable employment, and insurance gaps that heighten financial stress. As part of a larger initiative to determine whether our cancer center can use an existing social drivers of health (SDOH) screening process to identify patients who may benefit from targeted supportive interventions, we sought to characterize financial strain, toxicity, and SDOH needs in AYAs treated in our cancer center and compare them to both younger and older cancer patients. This is a cross-sectional observational study at Mayo Clinic of patients with an oncology-related department visit between 8 September 2023–4 June 2024 (N = 81,731) who completed routine institutional electronic screenings for financial strain and SDOH. Survey items assessed financial strain, transportation barriers, and food insecurity; institutional billing data captured financial toxicity (unresolved balances, collection referrals, write-offs). AYAs (n = 5655) were more likely than non-AYAs to report medium/high financial strain, have unpaid debt, or have an unresolved balance, referral to a collection agency, or bad debt write-off, with nearly double the odds of medium/high financial strain compared to patients over 40 (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.84–2.23, p < 0.001). Within AYAs, ages 26–32 bore the greatest burden: 24.2% in the medium/high-risk category, 9.4% with unresolved billing issues or collections, and 11.6% reporting food insecurity. These findings identify AYAs—particularly those 26–32—as a distinct high-risk group for financial toxicity and health-related social needs, underscoring the need for targeted interventions, tailored financial navigation, and policy efforts to reduce economic barriers to care. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions in mitigating financial toxicity, addressing health-related social needs, and improving patient outcomes in this population.

ABSTRACT Objectives To investigate pharmacological treatment patterns in individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) with and without comorbid substance use disorder (SUD) and anxiety disorder (AX), we leveraged the Global Bipolar Cohort to analyze cross‐regional practices across North America, Europe, and the Pacific. Methods Fourteen cohorts contributed aggregate data on pharmacotherapy, demographics, diagnostic subtypes, and comorbidities. Proportional meta‐analyses using generalized linear mixed models were conducted to examine prescription trends and identify clinical differences. Results The sample ( N = 11,521) was 60% female and 84% Caucasian. Participants were categorized into four mutually exclusive groups based on comorbidity status: those with comorbid AX only, comorbid SUD only, both AX and SUD, or neither. The AX+SUD subgroup showed higher rates of attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), rapid cycling, obesity, and unemployment, reflecting a more severe clinical profile. Regional variations were notable: North American cohorts reported higher prevalence of AX and SUD than European and Pacific cohorts. Antidepressants use for AX were more common in Europe and the Pacific, while North American prescribing patterns were more variable. Benzodiazepine use was high among individuals with SUD across all regions. Lithium and first‐generation antipsychotic prescriptions varied, with higher rates observed in Europe. Conclusions Findings underscore the heterogeneity of BD and the influence of comorbid AX and SUD on illness burden and treatment. Regional prescribing variations underscore the need for context‐specific guidelines. Gaps in data on medication‐assisted treatment for SUD point to areas for future research. These insights can support more individualized and effective care for complex BD presentations.

Deregulated inflammatory signaling via STAT family transcription factors, particularly STAT1, underlies a variety of immune-related diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease. Whereas activation of STATs by JAKs via canonical receptor-driven JAK–STAT signaling is well understood, little is known about JAK-independent mechanisms of STAT activation. Here, we identify the understudied nonreceptor tyrosine kinase TNK1 as a therapeutically targetable, JAK-independent activator of STAT signaling. Using a multiomics approach, we mapped a network of TNK1 substrates associated with protein condensates and proinflammatory signaling, including STAT1. We found that TNK1, but not its sister kinase ACK1, directly phosphorylates STATs at well described STAT-activating JAK sites. In cells, TNK1-mediated STAT1 phosphorylation and activation occurs independently of JAKs. Imaging and interactomics data suggest that TNK1 interacts with STAT1 in cytosolic condensates, which likely compartmentalize TNK1-substrate interactions. We show that an intrinsically disordered proline-rich region in TNK1, which includes a 14-3-3 docking phosphorylation site, is required for the formation of kinase-active TNK1 condensates and STAT1 phosphorylation. Mutations within the proline-rich region that eliminate 14-3-3 binding increase formation of TNK1 condensates, suggesting a model in which 14-3-3 acts as a clamp that constrains the flexible PRR to inhibit condensate formation and STAT1 activation. Finally, we show that TNK1 is a targetable driver of STAT1-mediated inflammation in the gut as inhibition of TNK1 reduces active STAT1 in the colon and ameliorates colitis symptoms in mice.

Long-established prostate cancer cell lines provide limited insight into how contemporary early prostate cancer evolves into drug-resistant and neuroendocrine-like refractory disease. Patient-derived three-dimensional (3D) ex vivo models may better preserve this transition. Here, we found that 8 of 10 magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy specimens from patients with early-stage prostate cancer generated sustained 3D tumor spheroid cultures. After 12 weeks of enzalutamide selection, only one patient-derived culture acquired a resistant phenotype with treatment-emergent neuroendocrine prostate cancer (t-NEPC)-like features, including increased chromogranin A (CgA) and synaptophysin (SYP); reduced androgen receptor (AR), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA); and conversion from compact spheroids into irregular resistant aggregates. During this transition, WD repeat and SOCS box-containing protein 1 (WSB1) increased, whereas PSMA progressively decreased. WSB1 silencing restored PSMA, AR, and PSA expression and reduced neuroendocrine-associated features. A similar WSB1 dependency was observed in enzalutamide-resistant LNCaP cells, the castration-resistant prostate cancer model 22Rv1, and the neuroendocrine/small-cell prostate cancer model NCI-H660. Mechanistically, WSB1 functioned as a SOCS box-dependent E3 ubiquitin ligase adaptor that promoted PSMA ubiquitination and degradation. SOCS box deletion or T380A mutation impaired this process, while Aurora kinase A (AURKA) inhibition reduced WSB1-dependent PSMA ubiquitination. WSB1 depletion, AURKA inhibition with alisertib, and combined AURKA inhibition with EZH2 suppression reduced resistant aggregate growth and increased apoptosis-associated markers in patient-derived enzalutamide-resistant neuroendocrine-like spheroids and related models. These findings nominate the AURKA–WSB1–PSMA axis as a therapeutic vulnerability in refractory prostate cancer.

ABSTRACT Pediatric radiation therapy presents unique challenges compared to adult treatments, including those of immobilization, potential need for sedation, and the critical importance of accurate, reproducible positioning. Additionally, heightened attention to imaging doses is necessary to minimize long‐term toxicity in survivors. Many of these challenges must be addressed during the process of simulation. This report provides guidelines for pediatric radiotherapy simulation from the Children's Oncology Group. These guidelines cover all anatomic sites and include recommendations for photon and proton therapies, as well as specialized procedures such as stereotactic body radiation therapy, brachytherapy, and total body irradiation. These guidelines are presented as recommendations rather than prescriptive standards as the practice will vary depending on patient age, diagnosis, clinical judgment, and institutional resources.