Citations

Abstract Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is an antibody-calicheamicin conjugate with high efficacy in lymphoid malignancies. It targets the B-cell surface protein CD22, which is expressed in most B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) cases, albeit with variable intensity. However, factors governing CD22 expression and thus leukemia sensitivity to InO remain incompletely understood. Using multiomic characterization of 196 human B-ALL samples, coupled with ex vivo InO sensitivity profiling, we showed that early leukemia differentiation arrest at the pre–pro-B stage is associated with resistance to InO. Screening of 1639 transcription factor genes identified early B-cell factor 1 (EBF1) as a key regulator of CD22 expression (false discovery rate of 7.1 × 10−4). When comparing the assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing profiling results of the most InO-sensitive and -resistant cases (50% lethal concentration <10th vs >90th percentile, n = 18), the binding motif for EBF1 was strikingly enriched in regions with differential open chromatin status (P = 8 × 10−174). CRISPR interference targeting EBF1 binding sites at the CD22 locus led to an ∼50-fold reduction in cell surface CD22 expression and, consequently, an ∼22-fold increase in InO resistance in ALL cell lines. Interestingly, within BCR::ABL1 ALL, we observed intrasubtype heterogeneity linked to EBF1 transcriptional downregulation (P = 1.1 × 10−15) and/or somatic alteration (P = .004), which led to reduced CD22 expression (P = 8.3 × 10−11) and ex vivo and in vivo resistance to InO. Collectively, these findings point to the direct impact of EBF1 on CD22 expression during B-cell development, which, in turn, contributes to interpatient variability in InO response, even within the same subtype of B-ALL.

Abstract Background Primary aldosteronism (PA), a primary adrenal disorder leading to excessive aldosterone production by one or both adrenal glands, is a common cause of hypertension. It is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular complications compared with primary hypertension. Despite effective methods for diagnosing and treating PA, it remains markedly underdiagnosed and undertreated. Objective To develop an updated guideline that provides a practical, clinical approach to identifying and managing PA to improve diagnosis rates and encourage targeted treatment. Methods The Guideline Development Panel (GDP), composed of a multidisciplinary panel of clinical experts and experts in systemic review methodology, used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to define 10 questions related to the diagnosis and treatment of PA. Systematic reviews were conducted for each question. The GDP used the GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework to consider contextual factors, such as stakeholder values and preferences, costs and required resources, cost-effectiveness, acceptability, feasibility, and the potential impact on health equity. Results We suggest that all individuals with hypertension be screened for PA by measuring aldosterone and renin and determining the aldosterone to renin ratio, and that subsequent clinical care be guided by the results. We suggest that individuals with PA receive PA-specific therapy, either medical or surgical. In individuals who screen positive for PA, we suggest (1) commencement of PA-specific medical therapy in individuals who do not desire or are not candidates for surgery and in situations where the probability of lateralizing PA (excess aldosterone produced by one adrenal) is low based on screening results; and (2) aldosterone suppression testing in situations when screening results indicate an intermediate probability for lateralizing PA and individualized decision making confirms a desire to pursue eligibility for surgical therapy. In those who test positive by aldosterone suppression testing, and in those in whom screening results show a high probability of lateralizing PA (obviating the need for aldosterone suppression testing), we suggest adrenal lateralization with computed tomography scanning and adrenal venous sampling prior to deciding the treatment approach (medical vs surgical). In all individuals with PA and an adrenal adenoma, we suggest performing a 1-mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test. We suggest the use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) over epithelial sodium-channel (ENaC) inhibitors in the medical treatment of PA. We suggest the use of spironolactone over other MRAs, given its lower cost and greater availability; however, all MRAs, when titrated to equivalent potencies, are anticipated to have similar efficacy in treating PA. Thus, MRAs with greater mineralocorticoid receptor specificity and fewer androgen/progesterone receptor-mediated side effects may be preferred in some situations. In individuals receiving MRA therapy, we suggest monitoring renin and, in those whose hypertension remains uncontrolled and renin is suppressed, titrating the MRA to increase renin. Conclusion These recommendations provide a practical framework for the diagnosis and treatment of PA. They are based on currently available literature and take into consideration outcomes that are important to key stakeholders. The goal is to increase identification of individuals with PA and, by initiating PA-specific medical or surgical therapy, improve blood pressure control and reduce PA-associated adverse cardiovascular events. The guidelines also highlight important knowledge gaps in PA diagnosis and management.

Abstract Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is an antibody-calicheamicin conjugate with striking efficacy in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, there is wide interpatient variability in treatment response, and the genetic basis of this variation remains largely unknown. Using a genome-wide CRISPR screen, we discovered that the loss of DNA nucleotidylexotransferase (DNTT) is a primary driver of InO resistance. Mechanistically, the downregulation of DNTT attenuated InO–induced DNA damage response, cell cycle arrest, and mitochondrial apoptotic priming, thereby ultimately leading to leukemia resistance to InO. Ex vivo leukemia InO sensitivity was highly associated with DNTT expression in ALL blasts with substantial intraleukemia heterogeneity as revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Among patients with B-ALL enrolled in the Children's Oncology Group trial AALL1621, we observed consistent DNTT downregulation in residual blasts following InO treatment. The selection of DNTT-low blasts by InO therapy was also recapitulated in vivo using patient-derived xenograft models. Collectively, our data indicate that DNTT is a key regulator of calicheamicin response in leukemia and thus a potential biomarker for individualizing InO therapy in B-ALL.

Background: Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (InO) is an antibody-cytotoxin conjugate with high activity in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). InO targets the B-cell surface protein CD22, which is expressed in most B-ALL cases, albeit with great variability in expression levels. Emerging evidence suggest that this variation is associated with the stage of leukemia differentiation arrest [PMID: 21348573]. However, the exact relationship between CD22 expression and leukemia sensitivity to InO, particularly in the context of leukemia developmental state, remains unclear. Furthermore, our understanding of the molecular mechanisms regulating CD22 transcription in B-ALL is still incomplete. Methods: To comprehensively investigate the genomic basis of variability in leukemia CD22 expression and thus B-ALL sensitivity to InO, we performed a multi-omic characterization of 196 primary human B-ALL samples, using whole transcriptome sequencing (RNAseq), assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing (ATAC-seq), coupled with ex vivo profiling of InO sensitivity. Additionally, genomic editing studies were performed in Nalm6 and REH B-ALL cell lines, and patient derived xenograft (PDX) models were used for in vitro and in vivo validations. Results: Applying digital cytometry to leukemia bulk RNAseq data to infer the B-ALL developmental state, we found that blast cells with early Pre-pro-B-like signature had low levels of CD22 expression and were resistant to InO. As B-cell differentiation is controlled by stage-specific transcription factors (TFs), we performed a targeted CRISPR library screen of 1,639 TF genes and identified EBF1 as a key activator of CD22 expression (FDR=7.1x10-4). In primary B-ALL samples, EBF1 expression was significantly correlated with CD22 expression (R=0.69, P<0.0001) and leukemia response to InO (measured as LC50, R=-0.42, P<0.0001). In addition, TF footprint analysis of leukemia ATAC-seq data identified EBF1 as the most differentially activated TF comparing InO-sensitive and -resistant B-ALL cases (P=8x10-174). Blocking the EBF1 binding sites within the CD22 promoter by CRISPR interference resulted in a 50-fold and 49-fold decrease in cell surface CD22 expression, and a 22-fold and 25.7-fold increase in InO LC50 for Nalm6 and REH, respectively, confirming the direct impact of EBF1 on CD22 transcription and InO sensitivity. Because BCR::ABL1-positive ALL showed the greatest variability in InO sensitivity among all B-ALL subtypes, we further investigate the role of the EBF1/CD22 axis on InO sensitivity within this subtype. Unsupervised clustering of gene expression profiles revealed two distinct groups, namely BCR::ABL1 ALL with multilineage (BCR::ABL1-M) or lymphoid only (BCR::ABL1-L) involvement [PMID: 38153913]. Compared to BCR::ABL1-L, BCR::ABL1-M displayed markedly reduced CD22 expression (P=8.3×10-11) and resistance to InO (P=1.9×10-4), likely due to the lower expression and frequent somatic alteration of EBF1. Finally, we established PDX models for representative cases of BCR::ABL1-M and BCR::ABL1-L. Strikingly, InO treatment did not affect leukemia progression in the BCR::ABL1-M PDX model, whereas the BCR::ABL1-L PDX model achieved complete remission and has remained leukemia free to date. Conclusion: Collectively, these data demonstrate the direct impact of EBF1 on CD22 expression during B-cell development, and explain the heterogeneity of InO sensitivity, even within the same molecular B-ALL subtype.

Abstract Disclosure: J. Yang: None. J. Burrello: None. J. Goi: None. T.A. Williams: None. W.F. Young: Consulting Fee; Self; Arena Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Other; Self; Crinetics Pharmaceuticals. P.J. Fuller: None. P. Investigators: None. Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common endocrine cause of hypertension. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, at adequate doses, lower blood pressure and cardiovascular risk in patients with PA. However, there is a lack of a standardized approach to medical therapy and subsequent outcomes assessment. We aimed to: 1) establish criteria for assessing outcomes of targeted medical treatment of PA, and 2) evaluate outcomes using these criteria across an international cohort. A panel of 31 PA experts from 31 centres across four continents used the Delphi method, including three rounds of online questionnaires, to reach consensus. Clinical data were then collected from consecutive patients with PA who started targeted medical treatment between 2016 and 2021 at the participating centres. Consensus was reached for six outcomes, including complete, partial, or absent biochemical response, and complete, partial, or absent clinical response. “Complete biochemical response” was defined as “correction of hypokalemia without potassium supplementation, and normalization of plasma renin activity or concentration”; while “absent biochemical response” was defined as “persistent hypokalemia and/or persistently suppressed or low plasma renin activity or concentration without change from baseline”. “Complete clinical response” was defined as “normal blood pressure without additional antihypertensive medications”; while “absent clinical response” was defined as “the same or increased blood pressure compared to before targeted treatment with same or more antihypertensive medications, not counting targeted therapy”. Of 1483 patients (mean age 52y, 48% female) from 28 centers, 232 (16%) had a complete clinical response, and 719 (49%) had a complete biochemical response at the most recent follow-up (median 29 months after treatment initiation). Compared to those with partial or absent clinical response, patients with complete clinical response had a significantly higher proportion of women and lower proportion with diabetes, stroke or left ventricular hypertrophy. They also had a significantly shorter duration of hypertension, lower BMI, higher eGFR and lower defined daily dose of antihypertensives at baseline. In contrast, these differences were not observed in those with a complete, partial or absent biochemical response. The defined daily dose of targeted therapy did not differ across the various response categories. In conclusion, we have established an international expert consensus for standardized criteria to evaluate the response to targeted medical treatment of PA, facilitate comparisons of outcome data and guide clinicians who manage PA. In a retrospective international cohort, less than half of medically-treated patients reached the established biochemical treatment targets. Further work is needed to increase the rate of complete response. Presentation: 6/3/2024

PURPOSE Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) can occur across all age groups, with a strikingly higher cure rate in children compared with adults. However, the pharmacological basis of age-related differences in ALL treatment response remains unclear. METHODS Studying 767 children and 309 adults with newly diagnosed B-cell ALL enrolled on frontline trials at St Jude Children's Research Hospital, MD Anderson Cancer Center, the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, and the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group, we determined the ex vivo sensitivity of leukemia cells to 21 drugs. Twenty-three ALL molecular subtypes were identified using RNA sequencing. We systematically characterized the associations between drug response and ALL genomics in children, adolescents and young adults, and elderly adults. We evaluated the effect of age-related gene expression signature on ALL treatment outcomes. RESULTS Seven ALL drugs (asparaginase, prednisolone, mercaptopurine, dasatinib, nelarabine, daunorubicin, and inotuzumab ozogamicin) showed differential activity between children and adults, of which six were explained by age-related differences in leukemia molecular subtypes. Adolescents and young adults showed similar patterns of drug resistance as older adults, relative to young children. Mercaptopurine exhibited subtype-independent greater sensitivity in children. Transcriptomic profiling uncovered subclusters within CRLF2 -, DUX4 -, and KMT2A -rearranged ALL that were linked to age and cytotoxic drug resistance. In particular, a subset of children had adult-like ALL on the basis of leukemia gene expression patterns across subtypes, despite their chronological age. Resistant to cytotoxic drugs, children with adult-like ALL exhibited poor prognosis in pediatric ALL trials, even after adjusting for age and minimal residual diseases. CONCLUSION Our results provide pharmacogenomic insights into age-related disparities in ALL cure rates and identify leukemia prognostic features for treatment individualization across age groups.

While the cure rate of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) now exceeds ~90% with contemporary combination chemotherapy, the prognosis for adults with ALL remains significantly inferior with long-term overall survival ranging from 50% to 70%. Recent studies have uncovered marked differences in ALL genomics between children and adults, with some high-risk subtypes becoming more prevalent with age. However, the underlying biology of age-related disparities in ALL is not fully understood, especially with regard to differences in leukemia sensitivity to chemotherapy. To address this knowledge gap, we performed ex vivo drug sensitivity profiling (i.e., pharmacotyping) of 21 anti-leukemia agents on primary B-ALL diagnostic samples from 767 pediatric (age, 0-18 years) and 309 adult (19-84 years) patients. Drug sensitivity was measured as LC 50: the concentration of drug required to kill 50% of the leukemia cells (PMID: 36604538). A total of 7,975 unique LC 50 values were experimentally determined. RNA-seq was used for subtype classification and gene expression analysis. Among 21 drugs, seven showed significant differences in overall LC 50 between children and adults ( P<0.05 after Bonferroni correction): children displayed higher sensitivity to asparaginase, prednisolone, mercaptopurine, daunorubicin, and inotuzumab, while adults showed higher sensitivity to dasatinib and nelarabine. In multivariate models adjusting for 23 ALL molecular subtypes, only mercaptopurine remained significantly associated with age ( P=1.5×10 -5), suggesting that age-related differences in drug sensitivity can be primarily attributed to the variation in ALL subtypes between children and adults. For mercaptopurine, within KMT2A, CRLF2, and DUX4 subtypes, pediatric samples consistently showed a lower LC 50 than adults carrying the same genomic abnormality ( P=0.032, 0.0045, and 0.02, respectively). To explore intra-subtype heterogeneity, we performed unsupervised clustering using gene expression data for each of these three subtypes. Remarkably, within each of these subtypes, we identified two clusters with distinct transcriptomic profiles that were also largely segregated by age group, i.e., an adult-dominated cluster (C-a) and a pediatric-dominated cluster (C-p). In the KMT2A subtype, cases in C-a exhibited an over-representation of the KMT2A:: AFF1 fusion, and resistance to mercaptopurine ( P=0.029), prednisolone ( P=0.0039), vincristine ( P=0.046) and cytarabine ( P=0.0037). Within CRLF2 ALL, cases in C-a were associated with the presence of BCR:: ABL1-like signature and IGH:: CRLF2 rearrangements, and were more resistant to mercaptopurine ( P=0.0073) and prednisolone ( P=0.00036) compared to those in C-p. For DUX4 ALL, C-a was characterized by an under-representation of ERG deletions and resistance to mercaptopurine ( P=0.0056) and prednisolone ( P=0.0031), compared to C-p within DUX4. To explore the clinical relevance of this heterogeneity, we analyzed the in vivo treatment response of KMT2A (N=35), CRLF2 (N=59) and DUX4 (N=118) B-ALL enrolled in six frontline ALL trials. Compared to cases in C-p (usually drug-sensitive), those in C-a (usually drug-resistant) consistently had significantly poorer initial treatment responses as measured by persistent end-of-induction minimal residual disease (≥0.01%) in KMT2A (58% vs 9%; P=0.0063), CRLF2 (74% vs 41%; P=0.030), and DUX4 (66% vs 40%; P=0.0058) ALL. In conclusion, these studies have revealed important new insights into the pharmacogenomic basis of age-related differences in B-ALL treatment response. These results indicate that both inter- and intra-subtype heterogeneity contribute to inferior prognosis in adults with ALL, but also point to therapeutic opportunities to improve their outcomes.

PURPOSE Patients with Down syndrome (DS) and B-ALL experience increased rates of relapse, toxicity, and death. We report results for patients with DS B-ALL enrolled on Children's Oncology Group trials between 2003 and 2019. METHODS We analyzed data for DS (n = 743) and non-DS (n = 20,067) patients age 1-30 years on four B-ALL standard-risk (SR) and high-risk trials. RESULTS Patients with DS exhibited more frequent minimal residual disease (MRD) ≥0.01% at end induction (30.8% v 21.5%; P < .001). This difference persisted at end consolidation only in National Cancer Institute (NCI) high-risk patients (34.0% v 11.7%; P < .0001). Five-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly poorer for DS versus non-DS patients overall (EFS, 79.2% ± 1.6% v 87.5% ± 0.3%; P < .0001; OS, 86.8% ± 1.4% v 93.6% ± 0.2%; P < .0001), and within NCI SR and high-risk subgroups. Multivariable Cox regression analysis of the DS cohort for risk factors associated with inferior EFS identified age >10 years, white blood count >50 × 103/μL, and end-induction MRD ≥0.01%, but not cytogenetics or CRLF2 overexpression. Patients with DS demonstrated higher 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (11.5% ± 1.2% v 9.1% ± 0.2%; P = .0008), death in remission (4.9% ± 0.8% v 1.7% ± 0.1%; P < .0001), and induction death (3.4% v 0.8%; P < .0001). Mucositis, infections, and hyperglycemia were significantly more frequent in all patients with DS, while seizures were more frequent in patients with DS on high-risk trials (4.1% v 1.8%; P = .005). CONCLUSION Patients with DS-ALL exhibit an increased rate of relapse and particularly of treatment-related mortality. Novel, less-toxic therapeutic strategies are needed to improve outcomes.

Blinatumomab is an efficacious immunotherapeutic agent in B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, the pharmacogenomic basis of leukemia response to blinatumomab is unclear. Using genome-wide CRISPR, we comprehensively identified leukemia intrinsic factors of blinatumomab sensitivity, i.e., the loss of CD58 as a top driver for resistance, in addition to CD19 . Screening 1639 transcription factor genes, we then identified PAX5 as the key activator of CD58. ALL with the PAX5 P80R mutation also expressed the lowest level of CD58 among 20 ALL molecular subtypes in 1988 patients. Genome editing confirmed the effects of this mutation on CD58 expression and blinatumomab sensitivity in B-ALL, with validation in patient leukemic blasts. We described a PAX5-driven enhancer at the CD58 locus, which was disrupted by PAX5 P80R, and the loss of CD58 abolished blinatumomab-induced T cell activation with global changes in transcriptomic/epigenomic program. In conclusion, we identified previously unidentified genetic mechanisms of blinatumomab resistance in B-ALL, suggesting strategies for genomics-guided treatment individualization.

ImportanceCytokine storm due to COVID-19 can cause high morbidity and mortality and may be more common in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy (IO) due to immune system activation.ObjectiveTo determine the association of baseline immunosuppression and/or IO-based therapies with COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm in patients with cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis registry-based retrospective cohort study included 12 046 patients reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry from March 2020 to May 2022. The CCC19 registry is a centralized international multi-institutional registry of patients with COVID-19 with a current or past diagnosis of cancer. Records analyzed included patients with active or previous cancer who had a laboratory-confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction and/or serologic findings.ExposuresImmunosuppression due to therapy; systemic anticancer therapy (IO or non-IO).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was a 5-level ordinal scale of COVID-19 severity: no complications; hospitalized without requiring oxygen; hospitalized and required oxygen; intensive care unit admission and/or mechanical ventilation; death. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of cytokine storm.ResultsThe median age of the entire cohort was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 54-74) years and 6359 patients were female (52.8%) and 6598 (54.8%) were non-Hispanic White. A total of 599 (5.0%) patients received IO, whereas 4327 (35.9%) received non-IO systemic anticancer therapies, and 7120 (59.1%) did not receive any antineoplastic regimen within 3 months prior to COVID-19 diagnosis. Although no difference in COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm was found in the IO group compared with the untreated group in the total cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56-1.13, and aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.41-1.93, respectively), patients with baseline immunosuppression treated with IO (vs untreated) had worse COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm (aOR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.38-8.01, and aOR, 4.41; 95% CI, 1.71-11.38, respectively). Patients with immunosuppression receiving non-IO therapies (vs untreated) also had worse COVID-19 severity (aOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.36-2.35) and cytokine storm (aOR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.42-3.79).Conclusions and RelevanceThis cohort study found that in patients with cancer and COVID-19, administration of systemic anticancer therapies, especially IO, in the context of baseline immunosuppression was associated with severe clinical outcomes and the development of cytokine storm.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04354701