Citations

Abstract Aims SCN5A-E1784K (c.5350G>A) is the most common variant associated with the long QT (LQTS) and Brugada syndromes (BrS). It can manifest variably as LQTS, BrS, and/or conduction disorders. This presents a challenge for risk stratification. We aimed to describe clinical and ECG characteristics and identify risk markers that associate with arrhythmic events. Methods and results We undertook a retrospective observational multicentre study of a large cohort of 231 subjects with SCN5A-E1784K from Europe, USA, and Japan. Comprehensive demographic and clinical data, including initial presentation ECG and follow-up, were collected. ‘Lethal events’ were defined as sudden death, non-fatal cardiac arrest, and documented sustained VT or VF. ‘Cardiac events’ were defined as arrhythmic syncope plus any lethal events. Clinical characteristics and ECG parameters corrected for age were investigated for association with lethal and/or cardiac events. Fourteen (6%) subjects experienced a lethal event and 45 (19%) a cardiac event. PR interval and QRS duration were associated with lethal and cardiac events. In multivariable models, both PR interval and QRS duration were associated with lethal events, but only QRS duration was associated with cardiac events. Only age-corrected QRS (rQRS) was associated with lethal and cardiac event-free survival from birth after correction for multiple testing. Conclusion Ventricular myocardial conduction appears likely to play a role in the risk of arrhythmic events in patients with SCN5A-E1784K. This provides an important opportunity for the personalization of management and has the potential to guide preventative therapies.

ABSTRACT Background Clinical T 2 ‐weighted (T2W) MRI of prostate cancer (PCa) usually implements a 2D fast‐spin‐echo (FSE) sequence, but understanding the echo‐time‐dependent contrast behavior is not straightforward due to the complicated FSE signal evolution. Consequently, consensus‐based recommendations on the optimal effective echo time (TE eff ) to maximize contrast are lacking. Purpose To investigate the effect of TE eff on PCa lesion contrast in prostate T2W MRI. Study Type Phantom and in vivo prospective study. Subjects A standard MRI phantom and 53 prostate cancer patients (29 for image evaluation and 24 for quantitative lesion analysis). Field Strength and Sequence Multi‐slice T2W FSE sequence at 3 T acquired at multiple TE eff values. Assessment Three readers (13, 25, and 27 years' experience) evaluated TE eff = 100 ms versus 150 ms on diagnostic quality and reader preference. The effective T 2 relaxation rates ( T 2,eff ) were measured using FSE sequences in the phantom and used to predict the optimal TE eff maximizing T2W contrasts. From multi‐TE eff scans of subjects with suspected PCa, T 2,eff values of PCa lesions and healthy tissue were measured and used to calculate the optimal TE eff maximizing the lesion contrast. In vivo contrast metrics were measured as a function of TE eff . Statistical Tests Wilcoxon test of reader scores, with p < 0.05 defining statistical significance. Results No statistically significant difference was found in diagnostic quality between TE eff = 150 ms and 100 ms images, but all three readers significantly favored TE eff = 150 ms. Phantom experiments demonstrated that TE eff ‐dependent FSE signal progression can be characterized by T 2,eff values typically 40% longer than actual T 2 values, allowing accurate prediction of optimal TE eff within 2%–5%. Applied to PCa imaging, in vivo measurements indicated that effective T 2 relaxation times of the prostate are on average 1.5× longer than published T 2 values. Data Conclusion The benefits of TE eff = 150 ms versus 100 ms in prostate T2W FSE were supported by reader preference, phantom experiments, in vivo measurements, and analytic optimizations. Evidence Level 2. Technical Efficacy 2.

Introduction/Objectives: House call programs provide care for homebound patients. We conducted a case-control study to compare hospitalization and/or emergency department (ED) use by patients enrolled in a primary care house call program versus ambulatory (community-dwelling) patients. Methods: Program enrollees (cases) were matched by age and self-reported gender to community-dwelling patients (controls). The primary exposure was the combination of hospitalization and/or ED visits for 1 year before the index date (October 1, 2024). We used unadjusted and adjusted conditional logistic regression to determine differences in health care use. Results: We identified 26 cases (median [range] age, 84 [66-98] years; 16 [62%] female) and 130 controls. All cases had 4 or more chronic diseases, as compared with 87 (67%) of controls ( P = .003). A higher proportion of cases than controls had previous hospitalization and/or ED visits (84.6% vs 27.7%; P < .001). After adjusting for the number of chronic illnesses, no differences in previous hospitalization and/or ED use were identified between groups. Conclusions: Cases had more chronic illnesses and more hospitalizations and/or ED visits than community-dwelling controls. The comorbid health burden of participants in the house call program drove greater health care use and justifies a higher level of care for this medically complex patient population.

A comprehensive, machine-interpretable taxonomy of artificial intelligence (AI) performance metrics provides a shared vocabulary and structured foundation to facilitate rigorous, transparent, and responsible evaluation of medical AI systems.

Background: Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC) is an extremely rare, high-grade, and aggressive tumor of the sinonasal tract. Due to the rarity of this malignancy, current treatment guidelines are based on small and often/mainly single-center retrospective datasets. In the absence of a universally accepted standard of care for SNUC, treatment approaches vary across countries and institutions, reflecting real-world clinical practice. The primary aim of this study was to describe real-world treatment and outcomes for patients with confirmed SNUC. Methods: This was an international, multi-center, retrospective, observational cohort study that pooled patients into the largest SNUC dataset to date. Fifteen centers were enrolled to contribute data, including seven from Europe, four from the United States, three from the United Kingdom, and one from Canada. In the absence of a universally accepted standard of care for SNUC, treatment approaches varied across countries and institutions, reflecting real-world clinical practice. Patients included were those with histologically confirmed SNUC who were treated between 1997 and 2021. Results: This study yielded 485 patients treated for SNUC. The median age at diagnosis was 55.6 years (IQR: 44.5–67.6), and 63.7% were male. Most cases presented at advanced stages, with 70.8% as T4a or T4b. Overall survival (OS) outcomes were available for 412 patients, with a median follow-up of 26.0 months. The 5- and 10-year OS were 47.2% (95% CI: 40.8–53.3%) and 39.6% (95% CI: 32.5–46.6%), respectively. Advanced age, dichotomized T-stage (T4a/b vs. T1–3), M-stage, and orbital involvement were significant poor prognostic factors on univariable analysis (p’s < 0.01). On multivariable analysis, orbital involvement (HR: 2.73, 95% CI: 1.42–5.27, p = 0.003) and distance metastasis stage (HR: 3.00, 95% CI: 1.25–7.21, p = 0.014) were both independently associated with worse OS. Conclusions: This observational study presents the largest multi-center cohort analysis of SNUC to date, providing new insights into prognostic factors for a rare cancer treated at global centers of excellence. Orbital involvement and the presence of metastases are candidate independent risk factors associated with poorer OS.

Abstract Context Adult growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) is characterized by metabolic abnormalities caused by insufficient GH production. Lonapegsomatropin, a prodrug administered once weekly, was designed to provide sustained release of unmodified somatropin to reduce the burden of daily somatropin injections. Objective This work aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lonapegsomatropin vs placebo as treatment for adults with GHD. Methods The foresiGHt trial was a multicenter, randomized, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled (double-blind) and active-controlled (open-label) trial (NCT04615273) conducted at 116 centers in North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific. The trial randomly assigned and dosed 259 adults with GHD. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive once-weekly lonapegsomatropin, once-weekly placebo, or daily somatropin for 38 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline in trunk percent fat at week 38. Secondary efficacy end points included change from baseline in trunk fat mass and total body lean mass. Results At week 38, lonapegsomatropin significantly reduced trunk percent fat (−1.68% vs +0.37%; least squares [LS] mean difference −2.04%; P &lt; .001), increased total body lean mass (+1.60 kg vs −0.11 kg; LS mean difference 1.70 kg; P &lt; .0001), and reduced trunk fat mass (−0.48 kg vs +0.22 kg; LS mean difference −0.70 kg; P = .0053) vs placebo. The safety and tolerability profile of lonapegsomatropin was comparable to somatropin. Conclusion The foresiGHt trial met its primary efficacy end point by demonstrating superiority of lonapegsomatropin vs placebo with similar safety and tolerability, supporting its potential as a once-weekly treatment option for adults with GHD.

Renovascular hypertension is the most common cause of secondary hypertension, and radiologist awareness of the various imaging appearances and various causes is crucial for accurate diagnosis and guiding treatment.

Importance Metabolic dysfunction–associated steatohepatitis (MASH) represents a high, underprioritized burden among noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) and people living with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Objective To identify cost-effective management approaches to prevent, detect, and treat MASH and liver fibrosis in people living with T2D. Design, Setting, and Participants This economic evaluation consisted of a generalized cost-effectiveness analysis (GCEA) that was conducted for 12 countries (Brazil, Chile, Germany, Italy, Japan, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Tanzania, Thailand, and the United States), across all 6 World Health Organization (WHO) regions. A cohort state-transition model simulated liver disease development and its impact on a synthetic cohort, aged 19 years and older and living with T2D, over their lifespan across 10 liver health states. Exposures Using an 80% coverage level, 14 management approaches were compared, including screening via the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) test and Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) test or vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) as well as treatment with pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcomes were the average cost-effectiveness ratios (ACERs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), which were used to construct care expansion paths by ranking the management approaches in order of cost-effectiveness. The main measures were the total incremental costs and the total incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of each intervention. Results In this GCEA, the outcomes were evaluated with respect to country-specific willingness-to-pay thresholds. The standard of care had the lowest ACERs in 8 countries (not in Chile, Germany, Saudi Arabia, or the United States). Treatment with intensive lifestyle interventions (ILIs), after screening via ELF or VCTE, was cost-effective in all countries. ILIs and treatment with semaglutide was cost-effective in 11 countries (not in Tanzania); ILIs and treatment with resmetirom was cost-effective in 8 countries (not in Brazil, South Africa, Tanzania, or Thailand). Conclusion and Relevance In this economic evaluation, screening followed by ILIs was found to be a cost-effective management approach for MASH and liver fibrosis among people living with T2D in all countries. Screening followed by pharmacological treatment was cost-effective in most countries. These results can inform health policy decision-making and further the development of WHO recommended interventions to address NCDs.

Background: Older adults with severe aortic stenosis (AS) are at high risk of mortality unless treated by aortic valve replacement (AVR). The Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) score is primarily used clinically to determine mortality risk from surgical AVR. Due to geriatric comorbidities unique to older adults, traditional methods of risk stratification with STS may have significant shortcomings. Administratively derived risk scores that have prognostic significance in the geriatric population may prove valuable. Methods: We reviewed patients at our hospital system with AS undergoing AVR (surgical and transcatheter) and administratively derived an Elder Risk Assessment (ERA) score from the health record. The ERA score is a composite of age, marital status, number of hospitalized days in previous 2 years, and comorbidities (diabetes, coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure, stroke, pulmonary disease, cancer, and dementia). Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival by ERA score tertile. Cox regression was used to determine association between ERA and survival after accounting for STS predicted risk. Results: There were a total of 228 patients that underwent AVR (TAVR: 59 (26.1 %); SAVR 167 (73.9%) and had ERA scores derived. The average age was 79.6 (SD 7.6) years) and there were 93 (40.8%) women. Patients were stratified by ERA score tertiles: low (≤6), mid (6-13), or high (≥14). Over a mean follow up of 5.8 (SD 3.1) years, lower ERA scores were associated with better long-term survival (p<0.001). After accounting for age, sex, and STS score, mid ERA (HR 1.61; 95% CI 1.00-2.59; p<0.001) and high (HR 2.90; 95% CI 1.79-4.69; p<0.001) were associated with mortality (reference: low ERA). For every 10-point increase in the ERA, there was a 2-fold increase in adjusted mortality risk (HR 2.14; 95% CI 1.58-2.90; p<0.001). Conclusions: Older adults undergoing AVR for severe AS have specific geriatric comorbidities that may be better characterized using the ERA score. This administratively derived score was independently associated with survival after accounting for the widely used STS risk score.