Citations

ImportanceUptake of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination varies by characteristics, exposing some children to higher HPV cancer risks than others.ObjectiveTo examine whether the effectiveness of a multilevel intervention on HPV vaccination differed by race and ethnicity, rurality, and Area Deprivation Index (ADI) in children ages 11 to 12 years.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial was conducted from April 2018 to August 2022 among children at 6 Mayo Clinic primary care practices in Minnesota to improve HPV vaccination. This secondary analysis was performed from March to June 2024.InterventionA multilevel intervention that included parent reminder/recall letters, which alerted parents of children due or past due for vaccination, and health care professional audit/feedback reports, which alerted health care professionals of their own vaccination rates.Main Outcome and MeasureVaccine initiation (first dose of the 2-dose HPV vaccine) and vaccine completion (second dose) were the primary study outcomes. In this secondary analysis, the effect of the intervention on HPV vaccine initiation and completion by race and ethnicity, rurality, and ADI quartiles (Qs) was assessed.ResultsA total of 6232 children aged 11 to 12 years (3285 [52.7%] male; 3481 [55.9%] aged 11 years and 2751 [44.1%] aged 12 years) were included in the analysis. Of the study participants, 304 (4.9%) were Asian, 561 (9.0%) Black, 146 (2.3%) Hispanic, 4501 (72.2%) White, and 720 (11.6%) other, including American Indian or Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, Other Pacific Islander, Samoan, unable to provide, unknown, chose not to disclose, or other unspecified. A total of 5434 participants (87.2%) were urban residents, and 2794 (44.8%) resided in ADI Q2 areas. With usual care, HPV vaccine initiation and completion rates were significantly lower with each increasing ADI quartile (initiation: Cochran-Armitage test for trend [SE], −0.02 [0.01]; P < .001; completion: Cochran-Armitage test for trend [SE], −0.05 [0.01]; P < .001) but did not differ by children’s race and ethnicity or rurality. With the intervention, vaccine initiation increased significantly for most children (range of rates, 9.2% [95% CI, 5.2%-13.3%] to 24.0% [95% CI, 7.5%-40.6%]) except those with Black race, in rural settings, and in ADI Q4 (highest area deprivation); vaccine completion increased significantly for most children (range of rates, 19.4% [95% CI, 5.5%-33.3%] to 31.2% [95% CI, 12.1%-50.3%]) except for those in ADI Q4.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial, a multilevel intervention was associated with increased HPV vaccination for most children but had limited effect for those residing in areas of highest deprivation. Future research should explore other intervention strategies that would effectively promote HPV vaccination among families in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas to reduce HPV vaccination disparities.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03501992

Abstract Background: Epidemiologic studies commonly obtain important exposure and outcome information from patient self-report although these may be influenced by imperfect understanding and/or faulty recall. The Voyage Study is a large-scale, prospective cohort study of long-term health outcomes among participants with a valid multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test order (N=150, 047). The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the validity of participant reported mt-sDNA tests, colorectal cancer (CRC), and/or aerodigestive cancers (ADC, including cancers of the head, neck, oral, esophageal, lung, liver, stomach, pancreas, anus) among respondents. Methods: Participants from across the Unites States enrolled in the study completing questionnaires at enrollment and 1 year. The year 1 questionnaire collected data on completion and outcome of their mt-sDNA test, follow up colonoscopies and other procedures as well as a diagnosis of CRC or ADC. The study team contacts those who reported either CRC or ADC for permission to obtain copies of medical records. Records are then reviewed by a trained nurse abstractor and evaluated for validity. Mt-sDNA test results were available from Exact Sciences. Results: At the time of this analysis, year 1 questionnaire data were available on 135, 035 participants. Abnormal mt-sDNA results (n=12, 928) were self-reported by 13, 420 participants with 96.3% accuracy. Of the 111, 556 self-reported normal results, 93.4% (n=104, 150) were reported correctly. The validation process for the Voyage Study is ongoing with 860 self-reported CRC and 318 self-reported aerodigestive cancer diagnoses to date. Complete data are available on 155 individuals with a self-report of a new CRC diagnosis and 63 individuals with a self-report of aerodigestive cancer. Abstraction confirmed 47% (n=73) of those reported as true CRC diagnoses. Participants were better at correctly reporting at least one aerodigestive cancer (73%, n=46). Discussion and Conclusions: Patient reported medical record validation poses a unique challenge in today’s world. The process of requesting participant authorization followed by institutional requests to release the medical records to the research team is slow and painstaking. We found that patients are able to correctly report their mt-sDNA tests but found a relatively low proportion of reported cancer diagnoses reported correctly. This underscores the need to continue to validate key outcomes rather than relying solely on participant responses. As the number of outcomes validated increases, the study team will look at a variety of social and economic factors to better understand what contributes to or hinders an accurate self-report. Citation Format: Emily J. Kirsch, Jessica A. Grimm, Shawn M. Stoddard, Winnie Z. Fan, Kandace A. Bohn, Kathleen J. Yost, Lila J. Finney Rutten, Janet E. Olson. Patient reported outcome validation within the Voyage Study cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 7354.

The Alaska Tribal Health System is increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among Alaska Native (AN) peoples, who experience the highest CRC rate in the world. Through a clinical trial (NCT04336397), AN people living in rural/remote Alaska were offered either the previously unavailable multi-target stool DNA test (mt-sDNA; Cologuard®) or colonoscopy. From April 2022 to August 2024, 113 (59%) people who completed mt-sDNA testing and 51 (39%) who completed a colonoscopy procedure participated in a survey on factors influencing their screening test choice. The majority of mt-sDNA participants (79%) were aware of the colonoscopy option, while most colonoscopy participants (72%) reported being unaware of the mt-sDNA option. Key mt-sDNA preference themes included not having to travel, less time commitment, childcare and work responsibilities, physical limitations, greater convenience, and the test being less invasive and dangerous than a colonoscopy. In contrast, colonoscopy preference themes included wanting to adhere to screening recommendations, be proactive about preventative health, family history of cancer, awareness of the higher CRC risk among AN peoples, as well as the belief that colonoscopy is more reliable and accurate since it is performed by medical providers. These findings underscore the complex factors influencing CRC screening preferences among rural and remote AN people. Limited access to medical facilities, financial burdens, and personal commitments, along with personal factors, have a substantial bearing on the screening decision-making process. Recognizing and addressing these multifaceted influences can help CRC screening programs better meet community member needs and preferences, ultimately improving screening rates and colorectal health outcomes.

Importance Typical cysteine-altering NOTCH3 ( NOTCH3 cys ) variants are highly prevalent (approximately 1 in 300 individuals) and are associated with a broad spectrum of small vessel disease (SVD), ranging from early-onset stroke and dementia (cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy [CADASIL]) to nonpenetrance. A staging system that captures the full NOTCH3 -SVD severity spectrum is needed and currently lacking. Objective To design a simple disease severity staging system that captures the broad clinicoradiological NOTCH3 -SVD severity spectrum. Design, Setting, and Participants A cohort study was performed in which the NOTCH3 -SVD severity staging system was developed using a discovery cohort (2019-2020) and validated in independent international CADASIL cohorts (1999-2023) and the UK Biobank. Clinical and imaging data were collected from participants originating from 23 international CADASIL cohorts and from the UK Biobank. Eligibility criteria were presence of a NOTCH3 cys variant, availability of brain magnetic resonance imaging, and modified Rankin Scale score. The discovery cohort consisted of 195 NOTCH3 cys -positive cases from families with CADASIL; the validation set included 1713 NOTCH3 cys -positive cases from 15 countries. The UK Biobank cohort consisted of 101 NOTCH3 cys -positive individuals. Data from 2-year (2019-2023) and 18-year (1999-2017) follow-up studies were also analyzed. Data analysis was performed from July 2023 to August 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures Percentage of cases following the sequence of events of the NOTCH3 -SVD stages, and the association between the stages and ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, global cognition, processing speed, brain volume, brain microstructural damage, and serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) level. Results The NOTCH3 -SVD staging system encompasses 9 disease stages or substages, ranging from stage 0 (premanifest stage) to stage 4B (end stage). Of all 1908 cases, which included 195 in the discovery cohort (mean [SD] age, 52.4 [12.2] years) and 1713 in the validation cohorts (mean [SD] age, 53.1 [13.0] years), 1789 (94%) followed the sequence of events defined by the NOTCH3 -SVD staging system. The NOTCH3 -SVD stages were associated with neuroimaging outcomes in the NOTCH3 cys -positive cases in the CADASIL cohorts and in the UK Biobank and with cognitive outcomes and serum NfL level in cases from the CADASIL cohorts. The NOTCH3 -SVD staging system captured disease progression and was associated with 18-year survival. Conclusions and Relevance The NOTCH3 -SVD staging system captures the full disease spectrum, from asymptomatic individuals with a NOTCH3 cys variant to patients with end-stage disease. The NOTCH3 -SVD staging system is a simple but effective tool for uniform disease staging in the clinic and in research.

AbstractObjectivesTo report lessons from integrating the methods and perspectives of clinical informatics (CI) and implementation science (IS) in the context of Improving the Management of symPtoms during and following Cancer Treatment (IMPACT) Consortium pragmatic trials.Materials and MethodsIMPACT informaticists, trialists, and implementation scientists met to identify challenges and solutions by examining robust case examples from 3 Research Centers that are deploying systematic symptom assessment and management interventions via electronic health records (EHRs). Investigators discussed data collection and CI challenges, implementation strategies, and lessons learned.ResultsCI implementation strategies and EHRs systems were utilized to collect and act upon symptoms and impairments in functioning via electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) captured in ambulatory oncology settings. Limited EHR functionality and data collection capabilities constrained the ability to address IS questions. Collecting ePRO data required significant planning and organizational champions adept at navigating ambiguity.DiscussionBringing together CI and IS perspectives offers critical opportunities for monitoring and managing cancer symptoms via ePROs. Discussions between CI and IS researchers identified and addressed gaps between applied informatics implementation and theory-based IS trial and evaluation methods. The use of common terminology may foster shared mental models between CI and IS communities to enhance EHR design to more effectively facilitate ePRO implementation and clinical responses.ConclusionImplementation of ePROs in ambulatory oncology clinics benefits from common understanding of the concepts, lexicon, and incentives between CI implementers and IS researchers to facilitate and measure the results of implementation efforts.

PURPOSE The enhanced, electronic health record (EHR)–facilitated cancer symptom control (E2C2) trial is a cohort cluster-randomized, stepped-wedge, hybrid type II trial that leverages EHR systems to facilitate a collaborative care model (CCM) approach with the goal of improving cancer symptom management. Understanding factors that influence care team adoption of EHR systems remains a critical understudied area of research. This study examines how oncology care teams' perceptions regarding the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of E2C2 EHR systems preimplementation were associated with adoption 3 months after implementation and characterizes differences in adoption by individual- and system-level factors. METHODS Care team members completed an electronic survey before and 3 months after implementation of E2C2 for their respective sequence. Adoption was defined as frequency of use to statements aligned with care team–directed EHR systems designed to facilitate CCM approaches. Chi-square tests assessed differences in adoption while logistic regression models estimated associations between baseline mean scores of acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness on care team adoption at 3 months. RESULTS Results from 94 care team members (37.2% oncologists, 72.6% female, 55.3% in their role for 6+ years) found that adoption rates ranged from 48.9% to 71.7%, with significant differences observed by location (community-based health care systems v tertiary medical center) and professional role. Adjusting for professional role, care team members reporting higher levels of perceived acceptability and appropriateness at baseline had greater odds of adopting EHR systems at 3 months. CONCLUSION EHR systems perceived as acceptable and appropriate are more likely to be adopted by oncology care teams in our sample. Future implementation efforts should consider tailored strategies to facilitate adoption of EHR systems designed to promote CCM-based approaches to improve cancer symptom management.

Objective To identify the optimal incentive protocol for maximising participation while managing study costs during the Voyage trial. Design Prospective cohort (Voyage trial) of colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality outcomes in individuals screened with multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) served as the population. A subset was randomised to receive postage stamps as a pre-consent incentive, or as a post-consent incentive after completion of the consent and questionnaire. Descriptive statistics from year 1 are reported. Results During year 1 of the Voyage trial, a total of 600 258 individuals with mt-sDNA orders received at Exact Sciences Laboratories were randomly selected and invited to participate. Of those, 26 429 (4.4%) opted in, 14 365 of whom (54.3%) consented. The opt-in and consent samples were similar to the target population with respect to sex but differed by geographic residence and age (p<0.001). For the embedded incentive experiment, 2333 were randomised to the pre-incentive arm, while 2342 were randomised to the post-incentive arm. Overall consent rate in the incentive trial was 56.4% (60.9% for the pre-consent incentive arm (1421/2333) vs 52.0% for the post-consent incentive arm (1217/2342), p<0.001). Cost reduction was observed for the pre-consent incentive group, and higher response rates were seen among older versus younger individuals. Conclusions Pre-consent incentive option was associated with a higher participation rate and lower costs and was used for the remainder of study recruitment. CRC incidence and mortality vary with age; thus, adjusting for differential participation by age and region will be important in analyses of Voyage data. Trial registration number NCT04124406.

Objectives Primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing by clinician-collection is endorsed by U.S. guideline organizations for cervical cancer screening, but uptake remains low and insights into patients’ understanding are limited. This study aims to primarily address patient awareness of primary HPV screening by clinician-collection and acceptance of primary HPV screening by clinician- and self-collection, and secondarily assess factors associated with awareness and acceptance. Setting Primary care practices affiliated with an academic medical center. Methods A cross-sectional survey study of screening-eligible women aged 30–65 years was conducted to assess awareness and acceptability of primary HPV screening. We analyzed bivariate associations of respondent characteristics with awareness of primary HPV screening by clinician-collection, willingness to have clinician- or self-collected primary HPV testing, and reasons for self-collection preference. Results Respondents (n = 351; response rate = 23.4%) reported cervical cancer screening adherence of 82.8% but awareness of clinician-collected primary HPV as an option was low (18.9%) and only associated with HPV testing with recent screening ( p = 0.003). After reviewing a description of primary HPV screening, willingness for clinician-collected (81.8%) or home self-collected (76.1%) HPV testing was high, if recommended by a provider. Acceptability of clinician-collected HPV testing was associated with higher income ( p = 0.009) and for self-collection was associated with higher income ( p = 0.002) and higher education ( p = 0.02). Higher education was associated with reporting self-collection as easier than clinic-collection ( p = 0.02). Women expected self-collection to be more convenient (94%), less embarrassing (85%), easier (85%), and less painful (81%) than clinician-collection. Conclusions Educational interventions are needed to address low awareness about the current clinician-collected primary HPV screening option and to prepare for anticipated federal licensure of self-collection kits. Informing women about self-collection allows them to recognize benefits which could address screening barriers.

AimsThe majority of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) harbour PDGFB or PDGFD rearrangements. We encountered ALK expression/rearrangement in a PDGFB/D‐negative CD34‐positive spindle cell neoplasm with features similar to DFSP, prompting evaluation of ALK‐rearrangements in DFSP and plaque‐like CD34‐positive dermal fibroma (P‐LDF).Methods and ResultsWe searched the archives of academic institutions for cases previously coded as DFSP and P‐LDF. NGS‐naïve or PDGFB‐negative DFSP were screened for ALK (clone D5F3) expression by immunohistochemistry. NGS or ALK FISH was performed on ALK‐positive cases. Methylome profiling studies were performed and compared with conventional DFSP. One case of “DFSP” and two “P‐LDF” with ALK expression were identified from the archives, while four cases were detected prospectively. These seven cases (6F:1M; 8 months to 76 years) arose in the dermis of the arm (two), scalp, eyelid, thigh, abdomen, and shoulder and ranged from 0.4 to 4.2 cm. Tumours were composed of spindled cells and displayed a storiform growth pattern. Cytologic atypia was absent, and mitotic figures were scarce (0–2/10 HPFs, high power fields). The lesional cells were diffusely positive for CD34 and ALK and negative for S100 protein. By NGS (n = 5), ALK fusion partners included DCTN1 (2), PLEKHH2, and CLIP2 in DFSP‐like cases and FLNA in P‐LDF‐like lesions. ALK FISH was positive in one (of two) cases previously labelled P‐LDF. Methylome profiling of two (of three) ALK‐rearranged DFSP‐like tumours showed clustering with conventional DFSP in the UMAP dimension reduction plot. To date, no tumour has recurred (n = 2; 26, 27 months).ConclusionWe describe a cohort of novel ALK‐rearranged tumours with morphologic features similar to DFSP.

Abstract Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in adults in the United States. Despite compelling evidence of improved outcomes in colorectal cancer, screening rates are not optimal. This study aimed to characterize colorectal cancer screening trends over the last two decades and assess the impact of various screening modalities on overall colorectal cancer screening rates. Using National Health Interview Survey data from 2005 to 2021, we examined colorectal cancer screening [colonoscopy, multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA), fecal occult blood test (FOBT)/fecal immunochemical test, sigmoidoscopy, CT colonography] rates among adults ages 50–75 years (n = 85,571). A pseudo-time-series cross-sectional (pseudo-TSCS) analysis was conducted including a random effects generalized least squares regression model to estimate the relative impact of each modality on changes in colorectal cancer screening rates. Among 50 to 75 year olds, the estimated colorectal cancer screening rate increased from 47.7% in 2005 to 69.9% in 2021, with the largest increase between 2005 and 2010 (47.7%–60.7%). Rates subsequently plateaued until 2015 but increased from 63.5% in 2015 to 69.9% in 2018. This was primarily driven by the increased use of mt-sDNA (2.5% in 2018 to 6.6% in 2021). Pseudo-TSCS analysis results showed that mt-sDNA contributed substantially to the increase in overall screening rates (77.3%; P &lt; 0.0001) between 2018 and 2021. While colorectal cancer screening rates increased from 2005 to 2021, they remain below the 80% goal. The introduction of mt-sDNA, a noninvasive screening test may have improved overall rates. Sustained efforts are required to further increase screening rates to improve patient outcomes and offering a range of screening options is likely to contribute to achieving this goal. Prevention Relevance: This retrospective study highlights the importance of convenient stool-based colorectal cancer screening options to achieve the national goal of 80% for overall colorectal cancer screening rates. Empowering screening-eligible individuals with a choice for their colorectal cancer screening tests is imperative.