Citations

Objective: To evaluate treatment trends and compare outcomes following fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) versus open surgical repair (OSR) of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA). Background: FB-EVAR has been increasingly utilized as a less invasive alternative to OSR for treatment of TAAAs. Methods: We studied patients who underwent elective FB-EVAR or OSR of TAAAs (2008-2020), since the initiation of an Advanced Endovascular Aortic Program. Primary endpoints were early major adverse events (MAE) and early and late all-cause mortality. Propensity score overlap weighting analysis was performed to adjust for measured confounders between groups. Results: There were 357 (70.8%) patients treated by FB-EVAR and 147 (29.2%) with OSR. The use of FB-EVAR increased from 16.7% in 2008 to >80% since 2017 ( P <0.001). Incidences of early MAEs were 25.8% and 49.0%, respectively; early mortality rates for FB-EVAR and OSR were 2.5% and 6.8%, respectively. In the weighted cohort, FB-EVAR patients had decreased early MAEs (weight-adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.41; P <0.001) and mortality (aOR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17-0.73; P =0.005) versus OSR patients. Five-year survival estimates were 52.2% (95% CI, 45.2-60.4%) and 78.0% (95% CI, 70.6-86.2%), respectively. In the weighted cohort, there was no significant difference in late survival between groups (weight-adjusted hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.74-2.39; P =0.34). Conclusions: This study confirmed the change in practice from OSR to FB-EVAR for treatment of TAAAs over the past decade. Incidences of early MAEs and mortality were lower with FB-EVAR, with no significant difference in late survival in the weighted cohort.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic cardiomyopathy variant carriers in a multiancestry US population and examine the risk of adverse clinical outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included multiancestry US adults aged ≥18 years with sequencing data from the All of Us Research Program. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in cardiomyopathy genes were identified using the ClinVar database. The primary outcome was heart failure. Secondary outcomes included cardiomyopathy and arrhythmia. Outcomes were identified from electronic health records. Interval-censored Cox models, taking age on the timescale, were used to assess the risk of outcomes in pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant carriers with noncarriers as the reference group. RESULTS: Among 167 435 individuals (median age, 55.2 [39.5–66.3] years; 61.7% female; 40.7% non-European ancestry) included, the prevalence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic cardiomyopathy variant carriers was 0.7% in the overall population and 0.8%, 0.8%, 0.5%, and 1.2% among European, African, East Asian, and South Asian ancestry individuals, respectively. Over their lifetime, there were 12 867 heart failure events (205 in carriers and 12 662 in noncarriers), with an incidence rate of 3.05 (95% CI, 2.66–3.49) per 1000 person-years in carriers and 1.37 (95% CI, 1.35–1.40) in noncarriers (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.30 [95% CI, 2.04–2.60]). Cardiomyopathy occurred in 5164 (161 in carriers and 5003 in noncarriers), with an incidence rate of 2.38 (95% CI, 2.04–2.78) per 1000 person-years among carriers and 0.54 (95% CI, 0.53–0.56) in noncarriers (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.31 [95% CI, 3.73–4.97]). There were 19 405 arrhythmia events (263 in carriers and 19 142 in noncarriers), with an incidence rate of 3.93 (95% CI, 3.48–4.44) per 1000 person-years among carriers and 2.09 (95% CI, 2.06–2.12) in noncarriers (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.12 [95% CI, 1.78–2.53]). CONCLUSIONS: Pathogenic/likely pathogenic cardiomyopathy variant carriers have an increased risk of heart failure, cardiomyopathy, and arrhythmias. Despite the modest overall prevalence, the associated risks suggest potential benefits of targeted genetic screening for early detection and management.

Abstract RATIONALE: Research since 2017 has highlighted artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies to assist in detecting and/or classifying lung nodules on Computed Tomography (CT) scans. However, few have combined detection and classification tasks, and most have required extensive hands-on image manipulation to process the cases, which is both costly and time-consuming. Here, we present a closed loop, fully automated software package, Bronchosolve, which handles cases from scan to result without manual intervention. METHODS: The software package combined pre-processing, analysis, and result generation system including a deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) for assessment of suspicious pulmonary nodules. Model inputs were full CT cases formatted in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM), without demographics or clinical variables. Automated steps included 1) automatic selection of the optimal CT series for analysis; 2) normalization and pre-processing of the series; 3) AI-based analysis of the images to both detect and classify suspicious lung lesions; and 4) generation of analysis report. The system was trained using a multi-center dataset of over 2,358 cases of suspicious lung nodules, including cancers and non-cancers. A United States-based, multi-site cohort (n=184) was used for initial algorithm validation where positive cases were defined as biopsy-proven cancer within 1 year, and negatives as negative biopsy or 2+ year negative follow-up. RESULTS: In the validation set, the system achieved a technical completion rate of 100%, automatically for all cases. Median patient age was 62.5 years (interquartile range 58.5 to 66.5 years), 45% were former smokers, 55% were current smokers, and 40% were female. The AI cancer risk (CA-risk) model achieved an area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.828 [CI: 0.773 – 0.883] in differentiating cancer from non-cancer in cases with known suspicious pulmonary nodules, as confirmed by biopsy, surgery, and/or follow-up. These results were statistically superior to Lung-RADS pAUC of 0.669 [CI: 0.601 – 0.737] and trended better than Brock model AUC of 0.783 [CI: 0.723 – 0.842], Figure 1. At the Youden operating point, model sensitivity was 73.1% [CI: 66.7 – 79.5%], and specificity was 82.5% [CI: 77.0 – 88.0%]. The model's performance was consistent across various CT scanner manufacturers and tested slice thickness. CONCLUSIONS: The closed loop, automated software system, Bronchosolve, consistently processed and analyzed a wide range of CT scans, providing accurate assessment in risk-classifying suspicious lung nodules. This approach has the potential to improve non-invasive assessment of lung nodules eliminating the need for additional user training and time.

INTRODUCTION: Barrett esophagus (BE) is the strongest known risk factor for developing esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), the second-most lethal cancer in the United States. Esopredict is a novel validated methylation-based biomarker assay that provides precise quantification of neoplastic progression risk in BE patients. Inherit challenges, including tissue heterogeneity, sampling error, interobserver variability, and inconsistent adherence to surveillance biopsy guidelines, may affect the predictive value results of Esopredict obtained at different anatomic locations or different sampling time points. METHODS: To investigate the spatiotemporal performance of Esopredict across multiple spatiotemporal sampling points, we profiled 220 biopsies obtained from 58 BE patients, including 11 patients with overlapping spatial and temporal biopsies. We focused on spatial profiling (i.e., multiple biopsies obtained at several anatomic locations during a single endoscopy) and temporal profiling (i.e., biopsies obtained from multiple endoscopies performed at different time points). Each patient had an initial histologic diagnosis of nondysplastic Barrett esophagus, indefinite for dysplasia, or low-grade dysplasia. Final follow-up (endpoint) biopsies showed either high-grade dysplasia or EAC (progressors), or nondysplastic Barrett esophagus, indefinite for dysplasia, or low-grade dysplasia (nonprogressors). Biopsies were analyzed with Esopredict to compute a progression risk score, which quantified the likelihood of future progression to high-grade dysplasia or EAC within 5 years. RESULTS: In 52 spatially profiled patients, Esopredict demonstrated a sensitivity of 81% (17/21 progressor patients), based on the highest-scoring biopsy from each patient; sensitivity increased to 100% (12/12) when end point biopsies occurred within 5 years of the index (initial) biopsy. In 28 temporally profiled patients, sensitivity was 100% (8/8 patients), based on the biopsy performed at the time point closest to the end point biopsy. DISCUSSION: Esopredict showed high predictive performance in multiple spatiotemporal samples in BE patients. These data further support the use of Esopredict as a robust test to distinguish high-risk BE patients, who may benefit from endoscopic eradication therapy or increased surveillance frequency, from low-risk patients, who may be candidates for less frequent surveillance and noninterventional observation.

Objective: To compare target artery (TA) outcomes after fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) versus open surgical repair (OSR) of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). Background: Few studies have compared TA outcomes after endovascular incorporation and open reconstruction. Methods: Among consecutive patients who underwent elective OSR or FB-EVAR of TAAAs (2008–2020), we reviewed those who had postoperative imaging studies evaluating TA. Data of FB-EVAR patients were obtained from a prospectively maintained institutional database. TAs included celiac, superior mesenteric, right, and left renal arteries treated during TAAA repairs. The primary endpoint was TA patency (primary and secondary). Results: There were 131 patients (487 TAs) treated by OSR and 350 (1300 TAs) by FB-EVAR. In the OSR group, 440 TAs (90.3%) were reconstructed by bypasses, and 47 (9.7%) by reimplantation. In the FB-EVAR group, 841 TAs (64.7%) were incorporated by fenestrations and 459 (35.3%) by directional branches. Thirty-day TA primary patency rates were not significantly different between FB-EVAR and OSR (99.4%% vs 99.0%, P = 0.36), but the secondary patency rate was higher after FB-EVAR (99.8% vs 99.0%, P = 0.02). Three-year primary patency rates were 95.9% (95% CI: 94.7%–97.2%) and 94.7% (95% CI: 92.2%–97.2%), respectively; secondary patency rates were 98.5% (95% CI: 97.7%–99.2%) and 94.7% (95% CI: 95.7%–99.2%), respectively. There were no significant differences in late primary patency and secondary patency between groups (each P < 0.05). Conclusions: TA primary and secondary patency rates following elective OSR or FB-EVAR were high. Endovascular repair was not associated with loss of primary patency and late secondary patency.

Background Older adults with non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome are less likely to undergo an invasive strategy compared with younger patients. Randomized controlled trials traditionally exclude older adults because of their high burden of geriatric conditions. Methods and Results We searched for randomized controlled trials comparing invasive versus medical management or a selective invasive (conservative) strategy for older patients (age≥75 years) with non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome. Fixed effects meta‐analysis was conducted to estimate the odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI for the composite of death or myocardial infarction (MI) and individual secondary end points of all‐cause death, cardiovascular death, MI, revascularization, stroke, and major bleeding. Nine studies with 2429 patients (invasive: 1228 versus control: 1201) with a mean follow‐up of 21 months were included. An invasive strategy was associated with a significantly decreased risk of a composite of death and MI (OR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.54–0.83], P <0.001), MI (OR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.45–0.70], P <0.001) and subsequent revascularization (OR, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.16–0.48], P <0.001). There was no difference in all‐cause death (OR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.65–1.10], P =0.21), cardiovascular death (OR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.63–1.15], P =0.30), stroke (OR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.38–1.47], P =0.39), or major bleeding (OR, 1.24 [95% CI, 0.42–3.66], P =0.70). Conclusions In older patients ≥75 years old with non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome, an invasive strategy reduced the risk of a composite of death and MI, MI, and subsequent revascularization compared with a conservative strategy alone. Older adults with higher burden of geriatric conditions should be included in future trials to improve generalizability to this growing population.

INTRODUCTION: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is the second-most lethal cancer in the United States, with Barrett esophagus (BE) being the strongest risk factor. Assessing the future risk of neoplastic progression in patients with BE is difficult; however, high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and early EAC are treatable by endoscopic eradication therapy (EET), with survival rates of 90%. Thus, it would be beneficial to develop a molecular assay to identify high-risk patients, who merit more frequent endoscopic surveillance or EET, as well as low-risk patients, who can avoid EET and undergo less frequent surveillance. METHODS: Deidentified endoscopic biopsies were acquired from 240 patients with BE at 6 centers and confirmed as future progressors or nonprogressors. Tissues were analyzed by a set of methylation-specific biomarker assays. Test performance was assessed in an independent validation set using 4 stratification levels: low risks, low-moderate risks, high-moderate risks, and high risks. RESULTS: Relative to patients in the low-risk group, high-risk patients were 15.2 times more likely to progress within 5 years to HGD or EAC. For patients in the high-risk category, the average risk of progressing to HGD or EAC within 5 years was 21.5%, 4-fold the BE population prevalence within 5 years, whereas low-risk patients had a progression risk of only 1.85%. DISCUSSION: This clinical assay, Esopredict, stratifies future neoplastic progression risk to identify higher-risk patients with BE who can benefit from EET or more frequent surveillance and lower-risk patients who can benefit from reduced surveillance.

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine perioperative outcomes and the patency of interposition conduits for visceral arterial reconstruction in this setting. Background: Visceral arterial encasement in locally advanced pancreatic cancer was historically a contraindication for surgery. With modern, effective neoadjuvant strategies, our recent experience has made advanced vascular resection and reconstruction feasible in selected patients. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing pancreatic tumor resection with en bloc arterial resection and interposition revascularization between June 2002 and October 2022. Endpoints included graft patency, vascular-related complications, reinterventions, morbidity, and mortality. Results: Visceral arterial reconstruction with interposition grafting was performed in 111 patients undergoing en bloc arterial resections for pancreatic cancer. Graft types included autologous arterial conduits (n=66, 58 superficial femoral arteries (SFA) and 8 splenic arteries), cryopreserved arterial allografts (n=24), autologous saphenous veins (n=12), synthetic conduits (n=8), and composite autologous artery and synthetic (n=1). Perioperative 90-day mortality decreased significantly over time to 5% in the last 6 years. Vascular complications related to arterial reconstruction occurred in 11% (n=12) and included pseudoaneurysm (n=6), graft thrombus (n=2), stenosis requiring reintervention (n=2), hepatic failure (n=1), and hepatic and intestinal ischemia (n=1). Nine (8%) patients underwent vascular-related reinterventions. After a median follow-up of 17 months, primary patency was 81% for the entire cohort and was highest in the SFA group (95%). The donor limb/harvest site complication rate was 8% with 100% primary patency. Conclusion: Visceral arterial resection with interposition reconstruction for locally advanced pancreatic cancer can be performed with acceptable vascular morbidity and durable patency. Autologous SFA was the most suitable conduit for reconstructions in our experience, with the highest primary patency.