Background: Pericarotid adipose tissue (PCAT) characteristics and systemic inflammation may play an important role in carotid endarterectomy (CEA) outcomes. This study explores the association between PCAT Hounsfield Unit (HU) ranges, radiomic features, and systemic inflammatory markers in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Methods: Twenty patients undergoing CEA were included in this cross-sectional study. PCAT was analyzed using preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) images, with regions of interest defined around the carotid arteries. PCAT was categorized into three HU ranges: −190 to −120, −119 to −70, and −69 to −30. Radiomics features were extracted using PyRadiomics. The primary outcome was the correlation of PCAT imaging with preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLRs). The secondary outcome was the association of PCAT imaging with the red cell distribution width (RDW-CV). Linear regression was used to evaluate associations between PCAT characteristics and inflammatory markers. Results: Distinct HU ranges in PCAT imaging showed strong correlations with the preoperative NLR. The −190 to −120 HU range demonstrated a negative association (β = −3.809, p < 0.001), whereas the −119 to −70 HU range showed a positive correlation (β = 3.814, p < 0.001). PCAT uniformity was positively associated with RDW-CV (β = 0.494, p = 0.027). Other radiomics features, such as contrast, showed trends but did not reach statistical significance. A larger outer area of PCAT was inversely associated with the NLR (β = −0.677, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Specific PCAT HU ranges and radiomics features are significantly associated with systemic inflammatory markers in CEA patients. These findings suggest that HU-based segmentation and radiomics analysis of PCAT may offer valuable insights into the relationship between local adipose tissue characteristics and systemic inflammation.
Treatment Trends and Outcomes of Endovascular versus Open Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair – A Single-center Comparative Cohort Study
Objective: To evaluate treatment trends and compare outcomes following fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) versus open surgical repair (OSR) of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA). Background: FB-EVAR has been increasingly utilized as a less invasive alternative to OSR for treatment of TAAAs. Methods: We studied patients who underwent elective FB-EVAR or OSR of TAAAs (2008-2020), since the initiation of an Advanced Endovascular Aortic Program. Primary endpoints were early major adverse events (MAE) and early and late all-cause mortality. Propensity score overlap weighting analysis was performed to adjust for measured confounders between groups. Results: There were 357 (70.8%) patients treated by FB-EVAR and 147 (29.2%) with OSR. The use of FB-EVAR increased from 16.7% in 2008 to >80% since 2017 ( P <0.001). Incidences of early MAEs were 25.8% and 49.0%, respectively; early mortality rates for FB-EVAR and OSR were 2.5% and 6.8%, respectively. In the weighted cohort, FB-EVAR patients had decreased early MAEs (weight-adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.41; P <0.001) and mortality (aOR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17-0.73; P =0.005) versus OSR patients. Five-year survival estimates were 52.2% (95% CI, 45.2-60.4%) and 78.0% (95% CI, 70.6-86.2%), respectively. In the weighted cohort, there was no significant difference in late survival between groups (weight-adjusted hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.74-2.39; P =0.34). Conclusions: This study confirmed the change in practice from OSR to FB-EVAR for treatment of TAAAs over the past decade. Incidences of early MAEs and mortality were lower with FB-EVAR, with no significant difference in late survival in the weighted cohort.
The 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, and American Vein and Lymphatic Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Varicose Veins of the Lower Extremities. Part II: Endorsed by the Society of Interventional Radiology a
Experimental Evaluation of Bleeding Complications, Thrombogenicity and Neointimal Characteristics of Prosthetic Patch Materials Used for Carotid Angioplasty
Experiments were designed to compare perioperative blood loss, early thrombogenicity and morphologic and functional characteristics of the neointima of three types of prosthetic materials used for carotid artery patch angioplasty. Bilateral carotid patch angioplasties were performed in 20 dogs, using 20 gelatin-impregnated fluoropassivated Dacron (GIF), 10 untreated knitted Dacron and 10 expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patches (5 cm2). Intraoperative blood loss, platelet deposition at 24 h and neointimal morphology at 6 weeks after the operation were assessed. Bioassay of the neointima was performed at 6 weeks in 16 patches. Mean (s.e.m.) blood loss was significantly less in GIF patches (14.7 (2.7) ml) compared with either PTFE (75.6 (24) ml) or untreated Dacron (64. 3 (9.5)) ( P < 0.005). Mean (s.e.m.) platelet deposition in GIF patches (1380 (328) platelets/cm2) was approximately 50% less at 24 h than in untreated Dacron (2562 (1035) platelets/cm2) or PTFE (2140 (998) platelets/cm2) patches ( P < 0.05). Neointimal coverage was greater in PTFE (94 (1.3%)) compared with GIF (79 (2.7%)) or untreated Dacron (86(2.4%)) patches ( P < 0.05). The thickness of the neointimal layer of PTFE (0.5 (0.01) mm) patches was greater than other patch types; GIF (0.2 (0.01) mm) or untreated Dacron (0.3 (0.01) mm) ( P < 0.05). Under bioassay conditions, acetylcholine caused release of vasoactive relaxing factor(s) from all patches. However, relaxations from baseline were less with GIF patches (−37.9 (11.7)% versus −54.5 (9.6) for untreated Dacron; −50.2 (15.2)% for PTFE) ( P = n.s.). Endothelin-1 release occurred from all patches and was increased with the extent of neointimal coverage. These data demonstrate that GIF patches caused the least perioperative bleeding, were the least thrombogenic at 24 h and developed the thinnest neointima at 6 weeks. All patch materials developed a functioning neointima.
An Arginine Analog Inhibits Responses of Both the Endothelium and Smooth Muscle of Canine in situ Vein Grafts
Increased shear, pressure, and oxygen tension in vein grafts may alter production of endothelium-derived vasoactive and anti-mitogenic factors such as nitric oxide which subsequently affect development of neointimal hyperplasia. This study was designed to determine whether or not nitric oxide mediates endothelium-dependent responses in femoral in situ vein grafts. Non-reversed, canine femoral vein grafts were placed bilaterally to bypass a ligated segment of the femoral artery in dogs. After 6 weeks, the grafts were removed, cut into rings, and suspended in organ chambers for measurement of isometric force. In some rings the endothelium was removed deliberately. In the presence of indomethacin, the synthetic analog of L-arginine, L-NG-monomethyl-arginine (10−4 M: L-NMMA) did not cause a significant change in baseline tension of rings with endothelium. L-NMMA reduced only contractions of rings with endothelium to the alpha-adrenergic agonist UK 14,304. The analog also reduced maximal relaxations to the calcium-ionophore, A23187 in rings with endothelium. In addition, L-NMMA reduced relaxations of rings without endothelium to adenosine diphosphate by 35%. Positive immunostaining for nitric oxide synthase was present in both the myointima and media of histological sections of grafts. In conclusion, these results suggest that in situ vein grafts exhibit two unique properties which are unlike unoperated arteries or veins: (i) alpha2-adrenergic receptors may be coupled to the release of contractile endothelium-derived factors associated with production of nitric oxide; and (ii) nitric oxide may be released by the smooth muscle in response to purinergic stimulation. The presence of nitric oxide synthase throughout the wall of the graft may result in production of nitric oxide in response to adenosine diphosphate released by platelets and to circulating catecholamines.
Renal Artery Anomalies in Patients with Horseshoe or Ectopic Kidneys: The Challenge of Aortic Reconstruction
Renal fusion or ectopia can present formidable challenges during aortic surgery. To evaluate morbidity and define optimal management, the clinical histories of 120 patients with renal fusion or ectopia who underwent 21 aortic procedures at the authors' institution over a 37-year period were reviewed. Indications for surgery included aortic aneurysm in 16 patients (infrarenal in 15 and thoracoabdominal in one) and aortoiliac occlusive disease in five (with renovascular hypertension in two). The abnormal kidney was detected before surgery in 13 patients (65%) by excretory urography, arteriography, computed tomography, or ultrasonography. Arteriography revealed multiple and/or anomalous renal arteries in nine of 12 patients studied. At surgery, 15 patients (75%) were found to have multiple or anomalous renal arteries. Six required renal revascularization (reimplantation four, endarterectomy one, aortorenal bypass one). The renal symphysis was divided in two patients. There were no operative deaths. Six major complications included bleeding requiring reoperation, renal failure requiring short-term dialysis, pancreatitis, gastrointestinal bleeding, pneumonia and thrombophlebitis. Preoperative aortography is recommended in patients with renal fusion or ectopia because of the high incidence of associated renal artery anomalies. The surgeon must be prepared to preserve or revascularize these anomalous renal arteries. Division of the renal symphysis is rarely required. Although perioperative morbidity is raised, aortic reconstruction in patients with renal fusion or ectopia can be safely performed without increased mortality.
Guidelines for management of actual or suspected inadvertent intra-arterial injection of sclerosants
Background Inadvertent intra-arterial injection of sclerosants is an uncommon adverse event of both ultrasound-guided and direct vision sclerotherapy. This complication can result in significant tissue or limb loss and significant long-term morbidity. Objectives To provide recommendations for diagnosis and immediate management of an unintentional intra-arterial injection of sclerosing agents. Methods An international and multidisciplinary expert panel representing the endorsing societies and relevant specialities reviewed the published biomedical, scientific and legal literature and developed the consensus-based recommendations. Results Actual and suspected cases of an intra-arterial sclerosant injection should be immediately transferred to a facility with a vascular/interventional unit. Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) is the key investigation to confirm the diagnosis and help select the appropriate intra-arterial therapy for tissue ischaemia. Emergency endovascular intervention will be required to manage the risk of major limb ischaemia. This includes intra-arterial administration of vasodilators to reduce vasospasm, and anticoagulants and thrombolytic agents to mitigate thrombosis. Mechanical thrombectomy, other endovascular interventions and even open surgery may be required. Lumbar sympathetic block may be considered but has a high risk of bleeding. Systemic anti-inflammatory agents, anticoagulants, and platelet inhibitors and modifiers would complement the intra-arterial endovascular procedures. For risk of minor ischaemia, systemic oral anti-inflammatory agents, anticoagulants, vasodilators and antiplatelet treatments are recommended. Conclusion Inadvertent intra-arterial injection is an adverse event of both ultrasound-guided and direct vision sclerotherapy. Medical practitioners performing sclerotherapy must ensure completion of a course of formal training (specialty or subspecialty training, or equivalent recognition) in the management of venous and lymphatic disorders (phlebology), and be personally proficient in the use of duplex ultrasound in vascular (both arterial and venous) applications, to diagnose and provide image guidance to venous procedure. Expertise in diagnosis and immediate management of an intra-arterial injection is essential for all practitioners performing sclerotherapy.
Diagnosis of post-thrombotic syndrome: International union of phlebology (UIP) survey of medical specialists
Objective To review the current approaches to the diagnosis of Post-Thrombotic Syndrome (PTS) and to evaluate the potential need for a diagnostic tool. Method Medical specialists were invited to participate in an online survey of their current approaches to the diagnosis and management of PTS, including the use of scoring systems, diagnostic imaging techniques and the extent the practitioner reviews the patient’s venous history. Results 502 participants completed the survey. Over 80% obtained imaging reports to confirm a history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). 72% of participants always obtained an up-to-date duplex ultrasound for PTS diagnosis. Over 50% did not use a scoring system for either PTS diagnosis or management. 65% of the participants agreed that a new system for PTS diagnosis should be devised. Conclusion Heterogeneity was observed in methods of diagnosing PTS by medical practitioners with frequent use of medical imaging studies and moderate use of scoring systems. Development of a new diagnostic tool for PTS should be considered for future studies.
Why selective screening for asymptomatic carotid stenosis is currently appropriate: a special report
Delphi Consensus on Reporting Standards in Clinical Studies for Endovascular Treatment of Acute Iliofemoral Venous Thrombosis and Chronic Iliofemoral Venous Obstruction
Acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis and chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction cause substantial patient harm and are increasingly managed with endovascular venous interventions, including percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy and stent placement. However, studies of these treatment elements have not been designed and reported with sufficient rigor to support confident conclusions about their clinical utility. In this project, the Trustworthy consensus-based statement approach was utilized to develop, via a structured process, consensus-based statements to guide future investigators of venous interventions. Thirty statements were drafted to encompass major topics relevant to venous study description and design, safety outcome assessment, efficacy outcome assessment, and topics specific to evaluating percutaneous venous thrombectomy and stent placement. Using modified Delphi techniques for consensus achievement, a panel of physician experts in vascular disease voted on the statements and succeeded in reaching the predefined threshold of >80% consensus (agreement or strong agreement) on all 30 statements. It is hoped that the guidance from these statements will improve standardization, objectivity, and patient-centered relevance in the reporting of clinical outcomes of endovascular interventions for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis and chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction in clinical studies and thereby enhance venous patient care.