Cheng, Yulan

INTRODUCTION: Barrett esophagus (BE) is the strongest known risk factor for developing esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), the second-most lethal cancer in the United States. Esopredict is a novel validated methylation-based biomarker assay that provides precise quantification of neoplastic progression risk in BE patients. Inherit challenges, including tissue heterogeneity, sampling error, interobserver variability, and inconsistent adherence to surveillance biopsy guidelines, may affect the predictive value results of Esopredict obtained at different anatomic locations or different sampling time points. METHODS: To investigate the spatiotemporal performance of Esopredict across multiple spatiotemporal sampling points, we profiled 220 biopsies obtained from 58 BE patients, including 11 patients with overlapping spatial and temporal biopsies. We focused on spatial profiling (i.e., multiple biopsies obtained at several anatomic locations during a single endoscopy) and temporal profiling (i.e., biopsies obtained from multiple endoscopies performed at different time points). Each patient had an initial histologic diagnosis of nondysplastic Barrett esophagus, indefinite for dysplasia, or low-grade dysplasia. Final follow-up (endpoint) biopsies showed either high-grade dysplasia or EAC (progressors), or nondysplastic Barrett esophagus, indefinite for dysplasia, or low-grade dysplasia (nonprogressors). Biopsies were analyzed with Esopredict to compute a progression risk score, which quantified the likelihood of future progression to high-grade dysplasia or EAC within 5 years. RESULTS: In 52 spatially profiled patients, Esopredict demonstrated a sensitivity of 81% (17/21 progressor patients), based on the highest-scoring biopsy from each patient; sensitivity increased to 100% (12/12) when end point biopsies occurred within 5 years of the index (initial) biopsy. In 28 temporally profiled patients, sensitivity was 100% (8/8 patients), based on the biopsy performed at the time point closest to the end point biopsy. DISCUSSION: Esopredict showed high predictive performance in multiple spatiotemporal samples in BE patients. These data further support the use of Esopredict as a robust test to distinguish high-risk BE patients, who may benefit from endoscopic eradication therapy or increased surveillance frequency, from low-risk patients, who may be candidates for less frequent surveillance and noninterventional observation.

INTRODUCTION: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is the second-most lethal cancer in the United States, with Barrett esophagus (BE) being the strongest risk factor. Assessing the future risk of neoplastic progression in patients with BE is difficult; however, high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and early EAC are treatable by endoscopic eradication therapy (EET), with survival rates of 90%. Thus, it would be beneficial to develop a molecular assay to identify high-risk patients, who merit more frequent endoscopic surveillance or EET, as well as low-risk patients, who can avoid EET and undergo less frequent surveillance. METHODS: Deidentified endoscopic biopsies were acquired from 240 patients with BE at 6 centers and confirmed as future progressors or nonprogressors. Tissues were analyzed by a set of methylation-specific biomarker assays. Test performance was assessed in an independent validation set using 4 stratification levels: low risks, low-moderate risks, high-moderate risks, and high risks. RESULTS: Relative to patients in the low-risk group, high-risk patients were 15.2 times more likely to progress within 5 years to HGD or EAC. For patients in the high-risk category, the average risk of progressing to HGD or EAC within 5 years was 21.5%, 4-fold the BE population prevalence within 5 years, whereas low-risk patients had a progression risk of only 1.85%. DISCUSSION: This clinical assay, Esopredict, stratifies future neoplastic progression risk to identify higher-risk patients with BE who can benefit from EET or more frequent surveillance and lower-risk patients who can benefit from reduced surveillance.

Abstract Phospholipase C epsilon (PLCε or PLC∈ 1) is a phosphoinositide-specific enzyme phospholipase C that converts phosphatidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate to two intracellular second messengers, diacylglycerol and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, which regulate protein kinase C activity and calcium mobilization, respectively. These responses are involved in the regulation of cell growth, differentiation and oncogenesis. However, the involvement of PLCε in human carcinogenesis, particularly in esophageal cancer, was not been recognized until a susceptible SNP (rs2274223: A5780G:His1927Arg) was recently identified in a large genome-wide association study (GWAS). This SNP, located within exon 26 and C2 domain of the PLCε gene at chromosome 10q23, leads to a nonsynonymous alteration from CAC (A allele, encoding histidine) to CGC (G allele, encoding arginine), which was associated with an increased risk of both squamous cell carcinoma and esophagus-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma. In the current report, we demonstrate that the presence of the G allele (AG or GG) at this locus leads to increased PLCε mRNA and protein expression in human esophageal cancer tissues and in human esophageal cancer cell lines. The present of G allele also leads o a higher enzyme activity in esophageal cancer cells in vitro. Quantitative analysis of the C2 domain sequences revealed that A:G allelic imbalance is strongly associated with esophageal malignancy. Moreover, the analysis of 10,614 non-cancer subjects from high- and low-risk areas of China demonstrated that the presence of the G allele is strongly associated with moderate to severe esophagitis in the subjects from the high-risk areas of China: 77% of the severe esophagitis individuals in high-risk areas had AG/GG genotypes vs. only 37% of these subjects in low-risk areas (OR 6.03 with 95% CI 1.59-22.9 vs. OR 0.74 with 95% CI 0.33-1.64; p=0.008). These data suggest that the interaction of potential environmental factors with PLCε, particularly in individuals with AG or GG allele, not only exists in high-risk areas for esophageal cancer development in China, but also correlates with the severity of esophagitis. In conclusion, PLCε is likely to play a pivotal role in esophageal carcinogenesis: the presence of the 5780G allele may not only predict a high risk of future esophageal cancer development, but may also participate in esophageal cancer growth and progression by upregulating levels of PLCε mRNA, protein, and enzyme activity, ultimately leading to augmentation of the inflammatory process in esophageal epithelium. Thus, the 5780G allele in PLCε may constitute a promising biomarker for esophageal squamous carcinoma risk stratification, early detection, and progression prediction. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4704. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-4704

Abstract Esophageal adenocarcinoma risk in Barrett's esophagus (BE) is increased 30- to 125-fold versus the general population. Among all BE patients, however, neoplastic progression occurs only once per 200 patient-years. Molecular biomarkers are therefore needed to risk-stratify patients for more efficient surveillance endoscopy and to improve the early detection of progression. We therefore performed a retrospective, multicenter, double-blinded validation study of eight BE progression prediction methylation biomarkers. Progression or nonprogression were determined at 2 years (tier 1) and 4 years (tier 2). Methylation was assayed in 145 nonprogressors and 50 progressors using real-time quantitative methylation-specific PCR. Progressors were significantly older than nonprogressors (70.6 versus 62.5 years; P < 0.001). We evaluated a linear combination of the eight markers, using coefficients from a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Areas under the ROC curve (AUC) were high in the 2-year, 4-year, and combined data models (0.843, 0.829, and 0.840; P < 0.001, <0.001, and <0.001, respectively). In addition, even after rigorous overfitting correction, the incremental AUCs contributed by panels based on the 8 markers plus age versus age alone were substantial (Δ-AUC = 0.152, 0.114, and 0.118, respectively) in all 3 models. A methylation biomarker–based panel to predict neoplastic progression in BE has potential clinical value in improving both the efficiency of surveillance endoscopy and the early detection of neoplasia. [Cancer Res 2009;69(10):4112–5]