Zaidi, Ali Hussainy

2558 Background: Clinical validation studies have shown that early dynamic changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) tumor fraction (TF) can predict clinical outcomes. Yet few studies have evaluated the clinical value of longitudinal monitoring throughout the course of treatment. Here we evaluate longitudinal changes in ctDNA TF and clinical outcomes in an advanced real-world pan-cancer cohort of patients (pts) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: The cohort included deidentified pts from the Tempus clinicogenomic database with stage IIIB or IV solid tumors who underwent ctDNA NGS and were treated with an FDA-approved ICI +/- chemotherapy (CT). Pts had a pre-treatment baseline liquid biopsy (T0) and ≥1 on-treatment sample Ti within 21-180 days of ICI. xM for treatment response monitoring estimates TF via an ensemble algorithm that incorporates variant and copy number information. Response status was determined at each on-treatment timepoint Ti relative to T0. Pts were classified as a Molecular Responder (MR) if TF < 1% at T0 and Ti or if TF decreased by ≥ 50% from T0 to Ti; otherwise, they were classified as a Molecular Non-Responder (nMR). Pts with TF < 0.09% at T0 and Ti were classified as ctDNA not detected. The longitudinal cohort included pts with ≥2 on-treatment timepoints, further classified based on the most frequent classification across each Ti as longitudinal MR, longitudinal nMR and longitudinal ctDNA not detected. If no classification was dominant, the most recent classification was used. Real-world overall survival (rwOS) was defined from T1 to death and assessed by log-rank test. Results: The full cohort of 84 pts with > 10 solid tumors included 34.5% (n = 29) NSCLC and 16.7% (n = 14) SCLC. The majority of pts (59.5%, n = 50) received ICI+CT, (64.0% first-line [1L]), and 40.5% (n = 34) ICI-only (35.3% 1L). rwOS was longer for 53 MRs vs. 18 nMRs (median not reached vs. 7.0 months, P < 0.005); 13 pts had no ctDNA detected. The longitudinal subcohort of 35 pts was 31.4% (n = 11) NSCLC, 20.0% (n = 7) prostate cancer, and 14.3% (n = 5) SCLC; 45.7% (n = 16) ICI+CT (56.3% 1L), 54.3% (n = 19) ICI-only (31.6% 1L). On average, pts had 3 on-treatment liquid biopsies, with a median time between on-treatment samples of 91 days. Twelve pts were longitudinal nMRs (10 MR or ctDNA not detected at T1), 18 longitudinal MRs, and 5 longitudinal no ctDNA detected. There were 6 death events in the longitudinal nMRs, 3 in the longitudinal MRs (all > 18 months after T1), and no death events in the longitudinal no ctDNA detected group. Longitudinal MRs had longer rwOS than longitudinal nMRs (median 37.4 months vs 8.7 months, P < 0.005). Conclusions: Longitudinal nMR was associated with worse survival compared to longitudinal MR. Longitudinal, molecular biomarker dynamics may be a useful clinical treatment decision tool for monitoring treatment response to ICI therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Barrett esophagus (BE) is the strongest known risk factor for developing esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), the second-most lethal cancer in the United States. Esopredict is a novel validated methylation-based biomarker assay that provides precise quantification of neoplastic progression risk in BE patients. Inherit challenges, including tissue heterogeneity, sampling error, interobserver variability, and inconsistent adherence to surveillance biopsy guidelines, may affect the predictive value results of Esopredict obtained at different anatomic locations or different sampling time points. METHODS: To investigate the spatiotemporal performance of Esopredict across multiple spatiotemporal sampling points, we profiled 220 biopsies obtained from 58 BE patients, including 11 patients with overlapping spatial and temporal biopsies. We focused on spatial profiling (i.e., multiple biopsies obtained at several anatomic locations during a single endoscopy) and temporal profiling (i.e., biopsies obtained from multiple endoscopies performed at different time points). Each patient had an initial histologic diagnosis of nondysplastic Barrett esophagus, indefinite for dysplasia, or low-grade dysplasia. Final follow-up (endpoint) biopsies showed either high-grade dysplasia or EAC (progressors), or nondysplastic Barrett esophagus, indefinite for dysplasia, or low-grade dysplasia (nonprogressors). Biopsies were analyzed with Esopredict to compute a progression risk score, which quantified the likelihood of future progression to high-grade dysplasia or EAC within 5 years. RESULTS: In 52 spatially profiled patients, Esopredict demonstrated a sensitivity of 81% (17/21 progressor patients), based on the highest-scoring biopsy from each patient; sensitivity increased to 100% (12/12) when end point biopsies occurred within 5 years of the index (initial) biopsy. In 28 temporally profiled patients, sensitivity was 100% (8/8 patients), based on the biopsy performed at the time point closest to the end point biopsy. DISCUSSION: Esopredict showed high predictive performance in multiple spatiotemporal samples in BE patients. These data further support the use of Esopredict as a robust test to distinguish high-risk BE patients, who may benefit from endoscopic eradication therapy or increased surveillance frequency, from low-risk patients, who may be candidates for less frequent surveillance and noninterventional observation.

INTRODUCTION: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is the second-most lethal cancer in the United States, with Barrett esophagus (BE) being the strongest risk factor. Assessing the future risk of neoplastic progression in patients with BE is difficult; however, high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and early EAC are treatable by endoscopic eradication therapy (EET), with survival rates of 90%. Thus, it would be beneficial to develop a molecular assay to identify high-risk patients, who merit more frequent endoscopic surveillance or EET, as well as low-risk patients, who can avoid EET and undergo less frequent surveillance. METHODS: Deidentified endoscopic biopsies were acquired from 240 patients with BE at 6 centers and confirmed as future progressors or nonprogressors. Tissues were analyzed by a set of methylation-specific biomarker assays. Test performance was assessed in an independent validation set using 4 stratification levels: low risks, low-moderate risks, high-moderate risks, and high risks. RESULTS: Relative to patients in the low-risk group, high-risk patients were 15.2 times more likely to progress within 5 years to HGD or EAC. For patients in the high-risk category, the average risk of progressing to HGD or EAC within 5 years was 21.5%, 4-fold the BE population prevalence within 5 years, whereas low-risk patients had a progression risk of only 1.85%. DISCUSSION: This clinical assay, Esopredict, stratifies future neoplastic progression risk to identify higher-risk patients with BE who can benefit from EET or more frequent surveillance and lower-risk patients who can benefit from reduced surveillance.

Abstract Lesson Learned Panitumumab plus irinotecan is not active for the treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Background Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is a lethal cancer with increasing incidence. Panitumumab (Pa) is a fully humanized IgG2 monoclonal antibody against human EGFR. Cetuximab (Cx) combined with irinotecan (Ir) is active for second-line treatment of colorectal cancer. This phase II study was designed to evaluate Pa plus Ir as second-line therapy for advanced EAC. Methods The primary endpoint was response rate (RR). Patients with one prior treatment were given Pa 9 mg/m2 on day 1 and Ir 125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle. Inclusion criteria were confirmed EAC, measurable disease, no prior Ir or Pa, performance status &lt;2, and normal organ function. Results Twenty-four patients were enrolled; 18 were eligible and evaluable. These patients were all white, with a median age of 62.5 years (range, 33–79 years), and included 15 men and 3 women. The median number of cycles was 3.5. The most common grade 1–2 adverse events were fatigue, diarrhea, anemia, leukopenia, and hypoalbuminemia. Grade 3–4 adverse events included hematologic, gastrointestinal, electrolyte, rash, fatigue, and weight loss. The median follow-up was 7.2 months (range, 2.3–14 months). There were no complete remissions. The partial response rate was 6% (1/18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01–0.26). The clinical benefit (partial response [PR] plus stable disease [SD]) rate was 50%. The median overall survival was 7.2 months (95% CI, 4.1–8.9) with an 11.1% 1-year survival rate. The median progression-free survival was 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.6–5.3). Conclusion Irinotecan and panitumumab as second-line treatment for advanced EAC are not active.

Abstract Background: Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (EAC) continues to rise in incidence, with prognosis remaining poor despite advances in multimodality therapy. Several novel target agents are now being explored as an option for treating EAC. One potential target is heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90), a chaperone protein that is involved in many diverse biological processes including cell signaling, proliferation, and survival. Many of the client proteins are known oncoproteins that allow Hsp90 to stabilize cancer cell growth by supporting proliferation and preventing apoptosis. The isoform, Hsp90β, is constituently expressed, while Hsp90α is inducible during times of stress, with expression increased 2-10 fold in cancers. Our hypothesis is that Hsp90 inhibition, in combination with standard chemotherapeutic drugs, will cause EAC cancer cells to be more susceptible to apoptosis and reduce the rate of proliferation. Methods: EAC cell lines, OE19 and OE33, were used to evaluate the effects of Hsp90 inhibitor, AUY-922, in cancer cell growth and apoptosis. ELISA of WST-1 and BrdU were used to determine the effective dosage and assess proliferation. Pathway inhibition was evaluated by Western Blot of Hsp90α and Hsp70. OE19, OE33, and patient samples of EAC tumor and gastroesophageal reflux tissue were used to assess the gene expression of Hsp90 and several client protein pathways by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results: The ED50 of AUY-922 was determined to be 30ηM. A combination of chemotherapeutic drugs, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu), along with AUY-922 showed significantly decreased proliferation compared to untreated and single agent treated cell lines. Western blot demonstrated that Hsp90 was inhibited by AUY-922 treatment, by a decrease in expression of Hsp90α, and an increase in the expression of Hsp70. RT-PCR in the cell line treatment groups showed an impact on many client oncoproteins involved in cancer cell survival and Hsp90 was shown to be upregulated in tumor samples when compared to normal GERD samples. Conclusion: The use of Hsp90 inhibitor, AUY-922, leads to reduced Hsp90 pathway expression, resulting in a degradation of many Hsp90 client proteins involved in cancer genesis. Cell proliferation was decreased with AUY-922 treatment, with the greatest demonstrated effect when used in combination with cisplatin and 5-Fu. Therefore, Hsp90 inhibition may have an application in multimodal EAC chemotherapy. Citation Format: Christina L. Rotoloni, Jaclyn M. LaRosa, Michael J. Porter, Lori A. Kelly, Katherine Nega, Emily Wolfson, Yoshihiro Komastu, Juliann E. Kosovec, Pashtoon M. Kasi, Toshitaka Hoppo, Ali H. Zaidi, Blair A. Jobe. Enhanced efficacy of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil combination with AUY-922 in esophageal adenocarcinoma cells. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Third AACR International Conference on Frontiers in Basic Cancer Research; Sep 18-22, 2013; National Harbor, MD. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(19 Suppl):Abstract nr A48.

Abstract Background: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is a lethal cancer, and the incidence is increasing. Our group demonstrated that over-expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) correlated with reduced survival in EAC. Panitumumab (P) is a fully human IgG2 monoclonal antibody against human EGFR. Cetuximab combined with irinotecan (I) has shown activity for second-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). P alone is active in EGFR expressing CRC as well. Our group has empiric evidence for the activity of cetuximab + I as third-line treatment for advanced EAC. As such, a phase II study was designed to evaluate P + I as second-line therapy for advanced EAC. Trial Design: The primary endpoint is overall response (OR) as measured by RECIST (cross-sectional imaging every 2 cycles). Secondary endpoints include overall survival, safety/toxicity and correlative studies. Patients with confirmed EAC with history of one prior treatment are treated with P 9 mg/m2 on day 1 and I 125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of each 21 day cycle to a maximum of 6 cycles. Inclusion criteria include confirmed EAC, measurable disease, no prior I or P, PS &lt;2 and normal organ function. A Simon two-stage design is used with power of 80% and a type I error of 0.05. 18 patients will be tested in the first stage and will terminate the trial if 2 or fewer respond. A total of 43 patients will be studied. Blood and tissue are obtained to analyse the role of FCα-R receptors as well EGFR pathway components and kras mutations. Enrollment: The 1st patient was enrolled in May 2009. Through August 2011, 7 patients received treatment. Preliminary results: Of the 7 patients treated, all are white males, median age 62. 2 patients completed 6 cycles. 1 patient received 3 cycles, 3 received 2 cycles and 1 patient completed 1 cycle. 3 patients are still alive. However, only 1 patient is still in the trial. 4 patients received dose reductions due to grade 3 or 4 side effects, including GI disturbances (5), fatigue(1), skin rash(1), electrolyte imbalances(2) and hematologic abnormalities (5). Reasons for discontinuation included progressive disease (PD, 5 patients) and patient refusal (2). The longest survival was 338 days–1 of the 2 patients who completed 6 cycles. The second patient who completed 6 cycles is alive at 307 days. 1 patient completed 3 cycles and survived 213 days after PD. 1 patient survived 174 days followed PD after 2 cycles. 2 patients completed 2 cycles and are still alive, surviving 151 (pt refusal) and 103 days respectively. The shortest survival was 85 days who completed only 1 cycle. Conclusion: Preliminary data from this Phase II trial suggests that patients with advanced EAC might benefit from P+I regimen as 2nd line therapy. 3 additional centers will open the trial. Accrual is ongoing, and correlative studies will follow. This project used the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and was supported in part by award P30CA047904 Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3708. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-3708