Back to Authors

Cornish, Drew

0009-0005-7397-9576

Mayo Clinic

Capital Digestive Care, Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA.

Citations 1

Validation of an Epigenetic Prognostic Assay to Accurately Risk-Stratify Patients With Barrett Esophagus
Laun, Sarah , Kann, Lisa , Braun, Jerome J., Gilbert, Stacey, Lunz, Daniel, Pierre, Francia , Kalra, Andrew , Tsai, Hua‐Ling , Wang, Hao , Cheng, Yulan , Ahmed, Yousra , Wang, Kenneth K, Leggett, Cadman L. , Cellini, Ashley, Ioffe, Olga B. , Omstead, Ashten N., Jobe, Blair A. , Korman, Louis Y. , Cornish, Drew, Zellenrath, Pauline A. , Perpetua, Lorrie A., Greenwald, Bruce D. , Maddala, Tara, Meltzer, Stephen J. , Tsai, Hua-Ling , Wang, Hao , Ahmed, Yousra , Leggett, Cadman L , Ioffe, Olga B , Zaidi, Ali Hussainy , Cornish, Drew , Zellenrath, Pauline , Spaander, Manon , Kuipers, Ernst , Greenwald, Bruce D , Meltzer, Stephen J , Braun, Jerome, Ma, Ke , Jit, Simran, Kuipers, Ernst J.

American Journal of Gastroenterology | August 14, 2024 | Volume: 120 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1296-1306

10.14309/ajg.0000000000003030 Get It

INTRODUCTION: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is the second-most lethal cancer in the United States, with Barrett esophagus (BE) being the strongest risk factor. Assessing the future risk of neoplastic progression in patients with BE is difficult; however, high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and early EAC are treatable by endoscopic eradication therapy (EET), with survival rates of 90%. Thus, it would be beneficial to develop a molecular assay to identify high-risk patients, who merit more frequent endoscopic surveillance or EET, as well as low-risk patients, who can avoid EET and undergo less frequent surveillance. METHODS: Deidentified endoscopic biopsies were acquired from 240 patients with BE at 6 centers and confirmed as future progressors or nonprogressors. Tissues were analyzed by a set of methylation-specific biomarker assays. Test performance was assessed in an independent validation set using 4 stratification levels: low risks, low-moderate risks, high-moderate risks, and high risks. RESULTS: Relative to patients in the low-risk group, high-risk patients were 15.2 times more likely to progress within 5 years to HGD or EAC. For patients in the high-risk category, the average risk of progressing to HGD or EAC within 5 years was 21.5%, 4-fold the BE population prevalence within 5 years, whereas low-risk patients had a progression risk of only 1.85%. DISCUSSION: This clinical assay, Esopredict, stratifies future neoplastic progression risk to identify higher-risk patients with BE who can benefit from EET or more frequent surveillance and lower-risk patients who can benefit from reduced surveillance.