Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

134 citation(s) found for "Isaacs, C".

Treatment effect of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in melanoma correlates with tumor burden: meta-analysis of reported clinical trials
Duarte-Bateman, Daniela, Shen, A., Ko, Jennifer, Melenhorst, Jan Joseph, Tufaro, Anthony P. , Kennedy, Lucy Boyce , Isaacs, James, Gastman, Brian , Escandón, Joseph M. , Chen, Yanwen , Isaacs, James

Melanoma Research | January 29, 2026 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 98-106

10.1097/cmr.0000000000001079 | PMID 41607207 Get It

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition (Neo-ICI) in melanoma is an emerging therapeutic strategy that induces pathologic responses with significant prognostic implications for survival. Tumor burden in nonresectable melanoma has a major impact on immunotherapy efficacy, yet little is known on its impact in the Neo-ICI setting. We evaluated the association between tumor burden, measured by the sum of diameters (SoD), and pathological response in melanoma patients treated with Neo-ICI. A meta-analysis of published trials in resectable stage III/IV melanoma was conducted, extracting data on patient characteristics, treatment regimens, pathological response, and survival outcomes. A total of 451 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 47% (95% confidence interval: 35–58%; P < 0.001). Meta-regression demonstrated a significant association between SoD and pCR (moderator = −0.36; P = 0.032), with greater tumor burden associated with lower pCR rates. No significant association was observed between SoD and recurrence-free survival (RFS). This study identifies higher tumor burden as a potential risk factor for lower pathologic response rates to neoadjuvant therapy, underscoring the need to incorporate tumor burden into future clinical research and potentially clinical decision-making.
603 SUPRAME: a phase 3 trial evaluating IMA203 PRAME-directed TCR T-cell therapy vs investigator’s choice in previously treated advanced cutaneous melanoma
Moser, Justin, Amaria, Rodabe N, Warner, Allison Betof, Chmielowski, Bartosz, Fecher, Leslie A, Chandrasekaran, Sanjay, Chen, Ruqin, Cowey, Charles L, Daniels, Gregory A, Daud, Adil, Dimitrova, Maya, Dudek, Arkadiusz Z, Haugh, Alexandra, Hernandez-Aya, Leonel, Hu-Lieskovan, Siwen, Hurwitz, Michael E, Isaacs, James M, Karapetyan, Lilit, Lee, Sylvia, Mammen, Joshua MV, Mckean, Meredith, Mitchell, Tara C, Moschos, Stergios J, Naqash, Abdul Rafeh, Olson, Daniel J, Olszanski, Anthony J, Patel, Sapna P, Poklepovic, Andrew S, Robert, Caroline, Schadendorf, Dirk, Seedor, Rino S, Seetharam, Mahesh, Smithy, James W, Solomon, Benjamin M, Taylor, Matthew H, Terhune, Julia H, Viray, Hollis A, Whitman, Eric D, Wu, Richard, Xing, Yan, Krishna, Delfi, Mayer-Mokler, Andrea, Pankov, Dmitry, Britten, Cedrik M, Luke, Jason J, Moser, Justin, Amaria, Rodabe N, Warner, Allison Betof, Chmielowski, Bartosz, Fecher, Leslie A, Chandrasekaran, Sanjay, Chen, Ruqin, Cowey, Charles L, Daniels, Gregory A, Daud, Adil, Dimitrova, Maya, Dudek, Arkadiusz Z, Haugh, Alexandra, Hernandez-Aya, Leonel, Hu-Lieskovan, Siwen, Hurwitz, Michael E, Isaacs, James M, Karapetyan, Lilit, Lee, Sylvia, Mammen, Joshua MV, Mckean, Meredith, Mitchell, Tara C, Moschos, Stergios J, Naqash, Abdul Rafeh, Olson, Daniel J, Olszanski, Anthony J, Patel, Sapna P, Poklepovic, Andrew S, Robert, Caroline , Schadendorf, Dirk, Seedor, Rino S, Seetharam, Mahesh, Smithy, James W, Solomon, Benjamin M, Taylor, Matthew H, Terhune, Julia H, Viray, Hollis A, Whitman, Eric D, Wu, Richard, Xing, Yan, Krishna, Delfi, Mayer-Mokler, Andrea, Pankov, Dmitry, Britten, Cedrik M, Luke, Jason J

Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts | November 5, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: A687-A687

10.1136/jitc-2025-sitc2025.0603 Get It

Emergency department-initiated palliative care screening among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
Lin, Dimitri E , Mowbray, Fabrice , Isaacs, E. D., Markwalter, Daniel , Hay, Alison , Manfredi, Rita A. , Westlake, Erica , Bowman, Jason , Rebollo-Lee, Naomi, Gacioch, Brian, Brooten, Justin K. , Pajka, Sarah E. , Selman, Katie, Bain, Paul , Liu, Shan W. , Ouchi, Kei , Markwalter, Daniel , Ginsburg, Alexander D, Bain, Paul , Mowbray, Fabrice , Lin, Dimitri E , Gunaga, Satheesh , Isaacs, Eric D, George, Naomi R. , Akhter, Murtaza , Ginsburg, Alexander , Selman, Katherine , Davis, Joshua J.

BMJ Open | October 22, 2025 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 10 | Pages: e095894

10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095894 | PMID 41125269 Get It

Introduction The rapidly growing population of older adults (individuals aged 65 years and older) presents a new set of challenges for healthcare providers in the emergency department (ED), given the prevalence of severe and life-threatening conditions among this group, such as chronic cancer, Alzheimer’s disease/dementia and congestive heart failure. ED encounters often represent a critical point in an older patient’s trajectory of care and can thus be an important opportunity for various interventions such as palliative care consultation. Therefore, identifying those who will benefit most from palliative care is of high importance, especially in determining the course of future treatment. Thus, we aim to conduct a systematic review assessing the efficacy of palliative care screening in the ED by assessing inpatient length of stay as the primary outcome and quality of life, percentage of hospitalisation and cost of care as secondary outcomes. Methods This study will use Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, Web of Science and Cochrane as databases. The study population comprises adults aged 60 years and older, with no focus on any specific clinical specialty or disease. Patients who have not received palliative care screening will serve as the comparator. Only studies with an applicable comparator will be considered. Studies published from 1 January 2000 to 1 July 2025 will be included. All articles will be reviewed independently and in duplicate, and every author will participate in the review, data abstraction and conflict resolution process. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required as it is a protocol for a systematic review. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. PROSPERO registration number CRD42024562389.
Immune Subtyping Identifies Patients With Hormone Receptor–Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer Who Respond to Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy (IO): Results From Five IO Arms of the I-SPY2 Trial
Wolf, Denise M. , Yau, Christina , Glas, Annuska M. , Barcaru, Andrei, Kuilman, Midas M. , Swigart, Lamorna Brown , Hirst, Gillian L. , Basu, A. , Magbanua, Mark Jesus M. , Sayaman, Rosalyn W. , Huppert, Laura A. , Investigators, I-SPY2, Borowsky, Alexander D. , Pohlmann, Paula R. , Clark, Amy S. , Yee, Douglas , Perlmutter, Jane , Petricoin, Emanuel F. , Chien, A. Jo , Stringer-Reasor, Erica , Liu, Minetta C. , Nanda, Rita , Veer, Laura van ‘t , Melisko, Michelle , Albain, Kathy S. , Robinson, Patricia A. , Lo, Simon S. , Potter, David J. , Beckwith, Heather , Haddad, Tufia C. , Kemmer, Kathleen, Lu, Janice , Williams, Nicole , Ellis, Erin D. , Sanford, Amy, Sanft, Tara, Viscusi, Rebecca K., Arora, Mili, Northfelt, Donald W. , Haley, Barbara , Yung, Rachel L. , Mayer, Ingrid, Khan, Qamar J. , Edmiston, Kirsten K., Glas, Annuska , Mittempergher, Lorenza , Brown-Swigart, Lamorna , Hirst, Gillian L , Basu, Amrita , Magbanua, Mark J M , Sayaman, Rosalyn , Huppert, Laura , Delson, Amy , Symmans, W Fraser , Pohlmann, Paula , Rugo, Hope S , Clark, Amy S , Yee, Douglas , DeMichele, Angela , Petricoin, Emmanuel F , Chien, Jo , Stringer-Reasor, Erica , Shatsky, Rebecca , Liu, Minetta , Soliman, Hatem Hussein , Isaacs, Claudine , Nanda, Rita , Hylton, Nola M. , Pusztai, Lajos , Esserman, Laura J , Veer, Laura J. van’t , Campbell, Michael, Investigators, I-SPY2, Symmans, W. Fraser , Rugo, Hope S. , DeMichele, Angela , Shatsky, Rebecca , Han, Hyo S , Isaacs, Claudine , Pusztai, Lajos , Esserman, Laura J. , Mukhtar, Rita A. , Wallace, Anne M. , Yeung, Kay T. , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. , Potter, David, Blaes, Anne , Boughey, Judy C. , Elias, Anthony , Mitri, Zahi Ibrahim , Lang, Julie E. , Thomas, Alexandra , Trivedi, Meghna S. , Hershman, Dawn L. , Meisel, Jane Lowe , Kalinsky, Kevin M. , Vaklavas, Christos , Sanft, Tara , Arora, Mili, Falkson, Carla I. , Murthy, Rashmi Krishna

JCO Precision Oncology | June 17, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: 9 | Pages: No page available

10.1200/po-24-00776 | PMID 40526879 Get It

PURPOSE Neoadjuvant immunotherapy (IO) has become the standard of care for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), but not yet for other subtypes. We previously developed a clinical-grade mRNA-based immune classifier (ImPrint) predicting response to IO that is now being used in I-SPY2.2 as part of the response predictive subtypes. We report the performance of ImPrint in hormone receptor–positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HR+HER2–) patients from five IO arms. METHODS A total of 204 HR+HER2– (MammaPrint high-risk) patients from five IO arms (anti–PD-1, anti–PD-L1/poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase inhibitor combination, anti–PD-1/toll-like receptor 9 dual-IO combination, and anti–PD-1 ± lymphocyte activation gene 3 dual-IO combination) and 191 patients from the chemotherapy-only control arm were included in this analysis. Patients were classified as ImPrint+ (likely sensitive) versus ImPrint– (likely resistant), using pretreatment mRNA. Performance of ImPrint for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) to IO-containing arms was characterized and compared with tumor grade (III), MammaPrint (ultra) High2 risk (MP2), and estrogen receptor (ER)-low (ER ≤ 10%). RESULTS Overall, the pCR rate across the five IO arms was 33%. 26% of HR+HER2– patients were ImPrint+, and pCR rates with IO were 75% in ImPrint+ versus 17% in ImPrint–, with the highest pCR rate >90% in a dual-IO arm. In the control arm, pCR rates were 33% in ImPrint+ and 8% in ImPrint–. Tumor grade (III), MP2, and ER-low showed pCR rates in IO of 45%, 56%, and 63%, respectively, with lower pCR odds ratios (OR < 7.5) compared with ImPrint (OR = 14.5). CONCLUSION Using an accurate selection strategy, HR+HER2– patients could achieve pCR rates similar to what is seen with best neoadjuvant therapies in TNBC and HER2+ (ie, pCR rate >65%-70%). ImPrint, an Food and Drug Administration IDE-enabled assay, may represent a way to identify HR+HER2– patients for IO that best balances likely benefit versus risk of serious immune-related adverse events.
ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Crohn's Disease in Adults
Lichtenstein, Gary R. , Afzali, Anita , Long, Millie D. , Ha, Christina , Ha, Christina Y, Loftus, Edward V. , Barnes, Edward L. , Isaacs, Kim L.

American Journal of Gastroenterology | June 3, 2025 | Volume: 120 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1225-1264

10.14309/ajg.0000000000003465 | PMID 40701562 Get It

Crohn's disease (CD) is an idiopathic inflammatory disorder of unknown etiology with genetic, immunologic, and environmental influences. The incidence of CD has steadily increased over the past several decades. The diagnosis and treatment of patients with CD has evolved since the last practice guideline was published. These guidelines represent the official practice recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology and were developed under the auspices of the Practice Parameters Committee for the management of adult patients with CD. These guidelines are established for clinical practice with the intent of suggesting preferable approaches to medical problems as established by interpretation and collation of scientifically valid research, derived from extensive review of published literature. When exercising clinical judgment, health care providers should incorporate this guideline along with patient's needs, desires, and their values to care for patients fully and appropriately with CD. Shared decision-making with the patient is advocated. This guideline is intended to be flexible, not necessarily indicating the only acceptable approach, and should be distinguished from standards of care that are inflexible and rarely violated. To evaluate the level of evidence and strength of recommendations, we used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. The Committee reviews guidelines in depth, with participation from experienced clinicians and others in related fields. The final recommendations are based on the data available at the time of the production of the document and may be updated with pertinent scientific developments later.
Early adverse symptoms to predict response to treatment among patients in the I-SPY trial.
Umashankar, Saumya , Roy, Ritu , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Olshen, Adam B. , Michele, Angela De, Perlmutter, Jane , Hylton, Nola, Veer, Laura van ‘t , Melisko, Michelle , Advocates, I-SPY Trial Investigators and Patient, Basu, Amrita B , Wolf, Denise M. , Yau, Christina , Blaes, Anne , Yee, Douglas , Veer, Laura J. van’t , Shatsky, Rebecca , Isaacs, Claudine , Rugo, Hope S. , Esserman, Laura J. , Hershman, Dawn L. , Advocates, I-SPY Trial Investigators and Patient

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 28, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 610-610

10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.610 Get It

610 Background: The adverse event (AE) landscape in oncology is changing due to the introduction of immunotherapy and antibody drug conjugates. These AEs come with both short and long-term symptoms that significantly impact patient quality of life. Monitoring for early onset of symptoms could optimize therapy for a particular patient, maximizing potential efficacy while mitigating toxicity. It is also possible that some toxicities are directly associated with drug sensitivity. We sought to identify symptoms associated with pathologic complete response (pCR) using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in early-stage high-risk breast cancer patients. Methods: Our study population included 288 stage II/III high-risk breast cancer patients enrolled on the I-SPY2 trial from 2021-2024, who received novel neoadjuvant therapies ± standard paclitaxel. pCR was assigned if tumor was absent in breast and nodes at surgery following neoadjuvant treatment. Patients (n = 288, pCR rate = 29%, 89% administered immunotherapy) were sent electronic PROs. 33 patient-reported AEs were measured using NCI's Patient Reported Outcomes - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Each symptom was evaluated using severity, frequency, and interference on a Likert Scale. Presence of early PRO symptoms (cycles 1-3 of treatment) were binarized (at least one of moderate or greater), and odds ratios were computed with pCR as outcome. To assess whether higher grade AEs were enriched in patients that achieved a pCR, we also performed the Wilcoxan rank sum test using maximum (worst) symptom severity. Results: Of 288 patients included in our analysis (median age = 48 years, range = 20-78), 203 (70.5%) were White, 17 (5.9%) were Asian, 33 (11.5%) were Black or African American, and 35 (12.2%) were Hispanic. PRO analysis revealed that patients that had moderate to severe muscle pain (27% vs 10% OR = 3.15, p < 0.05), joint pain (22% vs 8% OR = 3.23, p < 0.05), headache (27% vs 12.5% OR = 2.59, p < 0.05), or mouth/throat sores (16% vs 5% OR = 3.56, p < 0.05) within weeks 1-3 had higher odds of achieving a pCR. When we looked at maximum severity between weeks 1-3, patients that achieved a PCR had higher grade muscle pain (p = 0.04), heart palpitations (p = 0.035), and significantly lower grade numbness and tingling (p = 0.002). Beyond 6 weeks, associations were weaker or insignificant. Conclusions: Our study utilizes an analysis framework that was able to determine sentinel symptoms such as muscle and joint pain, mouth/throat sores and palpitations as early as weeks 1-3 associated with increased efficacy. This may suggest an early immune reaction in patients that eventually respond favorably to treatment. Our work can help provide earlier proactive monitoring to mitigate toxicities, treatment redirection if needed, and a potential symptom-based early understanding to personalize treatment efficacy. A similar analysis is underway to predict immune related AEs. Clinical trial information: NCT01042379 .
Predicting nodal burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with circulating tumor (ct)DNA for surgical planning: Results from the I-SPY2 trial.
Mukhtar, Rita, Dimitroff, Katrina, Veer, Laura van ‘t , Chien, Jo, Hirst, Gillian L. , Tchou, Julia , Kuerer, Henry M. , Reyna, Chantal , Sauder, Candice A. M. , Magbanua, Mark Jesus M. , Hirst, Gillian L , Yau, Christina , Veer, Laura J. van’t , Swigart, Lamorna Brown , DeMichele, Angela , Yee, Douglas , Rugo, Hope S. , Shatsky, Rebecca , Isaacs, Claudine , Ahmed, Kamran A. , Esserman, Laura J. , Boughey, Judy C.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 28, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 504-504

10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.504 Get It

504 Background: Axillary surgery in breast cancer is used for staging and therapeutic purposes, but axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) confers high risk of complications including lymphedema. Accordingly, trials have focused on right-sizing axillary surgery, with options ranging from complete omission of surgery, sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery, targeted axillary dissection (TAD), or ALND. Identifying a biomarker to reliably predict nodal burden would facilitate accurate selection of surgical management. We evaluated whether the presence or absence of ctDNA in the blood pre and post NAC is associated with residual nodal burden. Methods: I-SPY2 is a prospective, multicenter NAC trial for patients with clinical stage II-III high-risk breast cancer. Patients are randomized to novel NAC agents, with pathologic complete response being the primary endpoint. As part of the trial, serial ctDNA is assessed with a highly sensitive tumor-informed assay using up to 16 patient-specific tumor mutations (Signatera) at baseline, 3 weeks, 12 weeks, and post-NAC. We determined whether ctDNA positivity or negativity post-NAC, and the change in ctDNA status baseline/post-NAC (-/-, -/+, +/+, +/-) are associated with ypN category (N0, N1, N2). Results: ctDNA status was available post-NAC in 495 patients and change in ctDNA status from baseline was available in 493. At baseline, ctDNA was detected in 160/220 (72.3%) cN0 patients and 227/273 (83.2%) cN+ patients (p=0.006). Post-NAC, ctDNA was detected in 11/220 (5%) cN0 patients and 34/273 (12.5%) cN+ patients (p=0.004). While baseline ctDNA status was not associated with ypN category, there was a significant association between post-NAC ctDNA status and ypN category. For ctDNA + patients post-NAC, 33.3% were ypN0, 31.1% were ypN1, and 35.6% were ypN2 at surgery; in contrast, for ctDNA - patients post-NAC, 67.1% were ypN0, 23.1% were ypN1, and 9.8% were ypN2 (p<0.0001). Dynamic ctDNA changes were also associated with ypN category, with significantly more ypN0 patients among ctDNA -/- or ctDNA +/- cases, and more ypN2 patients in those who did not clear ctDNA (+/+) (p=0.0001, Table). Conclusions: To our knowledge this is the first study to demonstrate a significant relationship between ctDNA and ypN category, which has important surgical implications. CtDNA negativity was associated with low likelihood of ypN2 disease, making these patients excellent candidates for SLN surgery or TAD. Ongoing analyses will incorporate receptor subtype and timing of clearance of ctDNA. CtDNA in breast cancer may help tailor surgical management of the axilla, potentially reducing patient morbidity without compromising prognostic information. ctDNA baseline/post-NAC ypN0 (n=317) ypN1 (n=116) ypN2 (n=60) ctDNA -/- (n=105) 72.4% 19.1% 8.6% ctDNA -/+ (n=1) 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% ctDNA +/+ (n=44) 34.1% 29.6% 36.4% ctDNA +/- (n=343) 65.9% 23.9% 10.2%
Metabolic Dysfunction–Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) in People With Diabetes: The Need for Screening and Early Intervention. A Consensus Report of the American Diabetes Association
Cusi, Kenneth , Bardsley, Joan K. , Isaacs, Scott , Kanwal, Fasiha , Richardson, Caroline R., Roden, Michael, Younossi, Zobair M. , Bajaj, Mandeep , Bajaj, Mandeep , Abdelmalek, Manal F. , Bannuru, Raveendhara R , Apovian, Caroline M , Balapattabi, Kirthikaa , Bannuru, Raveendhara R. , Barb, Diana , Beverly, Elizabeth Ann , Corbin, Karen D. , ElSayed, Nuha A. , Pekas, Elizabeth J. , Richardson, Caroline R., Roden, Michael , Sanyal, Arun J. , Shubrook, Jay H

Diabetes Care | May 28, 2025 | Volume: 48 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1057-1082

10.2337/dci24-0094 | PMID 40434108 Get It

Metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), formerly referred to as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), is a growing but often unrecognized medical problem for people with diabetes (particularly type 2 diabetes, especially when associated with obesity). Liver health has not been at the forefront of complications tracked for disease prevention, as traditionally done for diabetic retinopathy, nephropathy, or neuropathy. However, liver steatosis affects approximately two out of three people with type 2 diabetes and places them at an increased risk for metabolic dysfunction–associated steatohepatitis (MASH), cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and overall liver-related mortality. MASLD is also associated with extrahepatic cancers, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and progression from prediabetes to type 2 diabetes and negatively impacts health-related quality of life. However, most individuals and their health care professionals remain unaware of the severe hepatic or extrahepatic health risks associated with MASLD and the need for early identification. In recognition of this knowledge gap and the rising prevalence of MASLD, this consensus report is a call to action to screen for liver fibrosis and risk stratify people with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes, in particular if obesity is also present. This consensus report explains the rationale for the recent MASLD nomenclature change, how to best risk stratify, current treatment and long-term monitoring options, the value of an interprofessional approach to disease management, and the impact of alcohol intake on liver health. More awareness about the health risks associated with MASLD and broad adoption of screening for liver fibrosis as a new standard of care hold promise for a future without cirrhosis for people with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes.
Awareness of metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in 4 major cities in the United States
Lazarus, Jeffrey V. , White, Trenton M. , Allen, Alina M. , Pannain, Silvana , Alkhouri, Naim , Bansal, Meena B. , Fortune, Brett E. , Handelsman, Yehuda , Isaacs, Scott , Jacobson, Ira M. , Kumar, Sonal , Manolas, Melina I. , Noureddin, Mazen , Rinella, Mary E. , El-Mohandes, Ayman , Manolas, Melina I , Noureddin, Mazen , Rinella, Mary , Terrault, Norah , Lazarus, Jeffrey V , Allen, Alina M , Charlton, Michael , Terrault, Norah A.

Hepatology Communications | May 7, 2025 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1097/hc9.0000000000000704 | PMID 40331869 Get It

Germline–Somatic Interactions in BRCA-Associated Cancers: Unique Molecular Profiles and Clinical Outcomes Linking ATM to TP53 Synthetic Essentiality
Arafa, Ali T., Yadav, Siddhartha , Marshall, Catherine H. , Mauer, Elizabeth , Huang, Minxuan , Yilma, Binyam , Pol, Ymke van der , Fragkogianni, Stamatina , Teslow, Emily A. , Kellen, Samuel , Boytim, Ella , Luo, Christine , Ludwig, Megan , Jayaraj, Arockia, Armstrong, Deborah K. , Isaacs, William B. , Nguyen, Hai Dang , Huang, R. Stephanie , Dehm, Scott M. , Hwang, Justin H. , Arafa, Ali T. , Arafa, Ali , van der Pol, Ymke , Zhang, Weijie , Jayaraj, Arockia , Armstrong, Deborah K , Isaacs, William B , Drake, Justin M , Nguyen, Hai Dang , Huang, R Stephanie , Chao, Calvin Y. , Lou, Emil , Dehm, Scott M , Couch, Fergus J. , Hwang, Justin H , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S , Mauer, Elizabeth , Yadav, Siddhartha , Marshall, Catherine H , Teslow, Emily A , Fragkogianni, Stamatina , Lou, Emil , Couch, Fergus J. , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S.

Clinical Cancer Research | February 28, 2025 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1730-1745

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-2058 | PMID 40019487 Get It

Abstract Purpose: Germline alterations in homologous recombination repair (gHRR) genes affect the pathogenesis, treatment options, and survival of patients with cancer. However, distinct gHRR gene alterations may differentially affect treatment response and oncogenic signaling. In this study, we interrogated genomic and transcriptomic data and assessed clinical outcomes of patients with gHRR mutations across four BRCA-associated cancers (breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancers) to identify therapeutic vulnerabilities. Experimental Design: We assessed 24,309 patients undergoing matched tumor/normal next-generation DNA and RNA sequencing. Annotated gHRR gene variants [germline BRCA1, germline BRCA2, germline PALB2, germline ATM (gATM), and germline CHEK2] were analyzed. HRs were used to assess survival outcomes comparing germline versus sporadic groups. Somatic alterations and their frequencies were compared across gHRR-altered groups. Differential gene expression and gene set enrichment analysis were used to compare transcriptomic profiles. Results: Somatic TP53 mutations were depleted in gATM carriers (P &lt; 0.05) across all four BRCA-associated cancers by up to 2.5-fold. Tumors with germline BRCA1/2 mutations were associated with improved survival in patients with ovarian cancer and had consistent enrichment of TP53 mutations in all four cancers. gATM mutations displayed elevated p53 transcriptional activity in all four cancers, with significance reached in breast and prostate cancers (P &lt; 0.01). In breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers, gATM tumors demonstrated significantly increased inflammatory pathways (P &lt; 0.001). Finally, using gene dependency data, we found that cell lines that were highly dependent on ATM were co-dependent on canonical p53 function. Conclusions: gATM-associated cancers seem to require intact p53 activity and this synthetic essentiality may be used to guide targeted therapies that perturb canonical TP53 function.